Comparing the Information Content of Two Large Olfactory Databases

The expert's subjectivity in establishing an olfactory description can produce wide discrepancies in different databases listing the odor profile of identical compounds. A representative example is obtained by comparing the odorous compounds included in the “Perfumery Materials and Performance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of chemical information and modeling 2006-01, Vol.46 (1), p.32-38
Main Authors: Pintore, Marco, Wechman, Christophe, Sicard, Gilles, Chastrette, Maurice, Amaury, Nicolas, Chretien, Jacques R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Classification
Comparative analysis
Mathematical models
Odors
Smell
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title Journal of chemical information and modeling
container_volume 46
creator Pintore, Marco
Wechman, Christophe
Sicard, Gilles
Chastrette, Maurice
Amaury, Nicolas
Chretien, Jacques R
description The expert's subjectivity in establishing an olfactory description can produce wide discrepancies in different databases listing the odor profile of identical compounds. A representative example is obtained by comparing the odorous compounds included in the “Perfumery Materials and Performance 2001” (PMP2001) database and in Arctander's books (1960 and 1969). To better assess this problem, classification models obtained by using the adaptive fuzzy partition method were established on subsets of these databases distributed into the same olfactory classes. The robustness and the prediction power of these models give a powerful criterion for evaluating the “quality” of their information content and for deciding which is the most trustable database.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ci0502505
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70696354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1004941871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0F1LwzAUBuAgitPphX9AiqDgRTWfp-uldn4MJxs4wbuQdensXJuZpOj-vR2dG-hVQs7DyTkvQicEXxFMyXWaY4GpwGIHHRDB4zAG_Lb7excxtNChczOMGYuB7qMWAU4Bs-gA3SamWCibl9PAv-ugV2bGFsrnpgwSU3pd-sBkwejLBH1lpzoYzDOVemOXQVd5NVZOuyO0l6m508frs41e7-9GyWPYHzz0kpt-qDjnPtSTCI8xZUToKNIRZYwAZDQeTzIOHUUJEcBFCnU1ZXoSpxnUT1h0MOckZsDa6KLpu7Dms9LOyyJ3qZ7PValN5WSEIQYmeA3P_sCZqWxZzyYpAQqUCFajywal1jhndSYXNi-UXUqC5SpVuUm1tqfrhtW40JOtXMdYg7ABufP6e1NX9kNCxCIhR8MXybudETwPn-RqlfPGq9Rth_v_8Q-0aYmL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216262153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the Information Content of Two Large Olfactory Databases</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Pintore, Marco ; Wechman, Christophe ; Sicard, Gilles ; Chastrette, Maurice ; Amaury, Nicolas ; Chretien, Jacques R</creator><creatorcontrib>Pintore, Marco ; Wechman, Christophe ; Sicard, Gilles ; Chastrette, Maurice ; Amaury, Nicolas ; Chretien, Jacques R</creatorcontrib><description>The expert's subjectivity in establishing an olfactory description can produce wide discrepancies in different databases listing the odor profile of identical compounds. A representative example is obtained by comparing the odorous compounds included in the “Perfumery Materials and Performance 2001” (PMP2001) database and in Arctander's books (1960 and 1969). To better assess this problem, classification models obtained by using the adaptive fuzzy partition method were established on subsets of these databases distributed into the same olfactory classes. The robustness and the prediction power of these models give a powerful criterion for evaluating the “quality” of their information content and for deciding which is the most trustable database.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-9596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-960X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ci0502505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16426037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Classification ; Comparative analysis ; Mathematical models ; Odors ; Smell</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2006-01, Vol.46 (1), p.32-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jan 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16426037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pintore, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wechman, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicard, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chastrette, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaury, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chretien, Jacques R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the Information Content of Two Large Olfactory Databases</title><title>Journal of chemical information and modeling</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><description>The expert's subjectivity in establishing an olfactory description can produce wide discrepancies in different databases listing the odor profile of identical compounds. A representative example is obtained by comparing the odorous compounds included in the “Perfumery Materials and Performance 2001” (PMP2001) database and in Arctander's books (1960 and 1969). To better assess this problem, classification models obtained by using the adaptive fuzzy partition method were established on subsets of these databases distributed into the same olfactory classes. The robustness and the prediction power of these models give a powerful criterion for evaluating the “quality” of their information content and for deciding which is the most trustable database.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Smell</subject><issn>1549-9596</issn><issn>1549-960X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpl0F1LwzAUBuAgitPphX9AiqDgRTWfp-uldn4MJxs4wbuQdensXJuZpOj-vR2dG-hVQs7DyTkvQicEXxFMyXWaY4GpwGIHHRDB4zAG_Lb7excxtNChczOMGYuB7qMWAU4Bs-gA3SamWCibl9PAv-ugV2bGFsrnpgwSU3pd-sBkwejLBH1lpzoYzDOVemOXQVd5NVZOuyO0l6m508frs41e7-9GyWPYHzz0kpt-qDjnPtSTCI8xZUToKNIRZYwAZDQeTzIOHUUJEcBFCnU1ZXoSpxnUT1h0MOckZsDa6KLpu7Dms9LOyyJ3qZ7PValN5WSEIQYmeA3P_sCZqWxZzyYpAQqUCFajywal1jhndSYXNi-UXUqC5SpVuUm1tqfrhtW40JOtXMdYg7ABufP6e1NX9kNCxCIhR8MXybudETwPn-RqlfPGq9Rth_v_8Q-0aYmL</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Pintore, Marco</creator><creator>Wechman, Christophe</creator><creator>Sicard, Gilles</creator><creator>Chastrette, Maurice</creator><creator>Amaury, Nicolas</creator><creator>Chretien, Jacques R</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Comparing the Information Content of Two Large Olfactory Databases</title><author>Pintore, Marco ; Wechman, Christophe ; Sicard, Gilles ; Chastrette, Maurice ; Amaury, Nicolas ; Chretien, Jacques R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Smell</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pintore, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wechman, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicard, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chastrette, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaury, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chretien, Jacques R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pintore, Marco</au><au>Wechman, Christophe</au><au>Sicard, Gilles</au><au>Chastrette, Maurice</au><au>Amaury, Nicolas</au><au>Chretien, Jacques R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the Information Content of Two Large Olfactory Databases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>32-38</pages><issn>1549-9596</issn><eissn>1549-960X</eissn><notes>istex:9F59E921A9FD471B16BB9EE11E0969FA69632B98</notes><notes>ark:/67375/TPS-4D8T6MPK-6</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>The expert's subjectivity in establishing an olfactory description can produce wide discrepancies in different databases listing the odor profile of identical compounds. A representative example is obtained by comparing the odorous compounds included in the “Perfumery Materials and Performance 2001” (PMP2001) database and in Arctander's books (1960 and 1969). To better assess this problem, classification models obtained by using the adaptive fuzzy partition method were established on subsets of these databases distributed into the same olfactory classes. The robustness and the prediction power of these models give a powerful criterion for evaluating the “quality” of their information content and for deciding which is the most trustable database.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>16426037</pmid><doi>10.1021/ci0502505</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-9596
ispartof Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2006-01, Vol.46 (1), p.32-38
issn 1549-9596
1549-960X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70696354
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Classification
Comparative analysis
Mathematical models
Odors
Smell
title Comparing the Information Content of Two Large Olfactory Databases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T01%3A37%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20Information%20Content%20of%20Two%20Large%20Olfactory%20Databases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20information%20and%20modeling&rft.au=Pintore,%20Marco&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=32-38&rft.issn=1549-9596&rft.eissn=1549-960X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ci0502505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1004941871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a444t-ed70b02315e77e7233166f29bdf468a2115645c6e77c3ed9cf611505804419363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216262153&rft_id=info:pmid/16426037&rfr_iscdi=true