Loading…
Within- and between-person variability of exhaled breath condensate pH and NH4+ in never and current smokers
Summary Recent studies have suggested that the collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may be a viable method in occupational field studies to sample secretions of the lower airway because it is simple to perform and non-invasive. However, there are unresolved questions about whether certain l...
Saved in:
Published in: | Respiratory medicine 2008-03, Vol.102 (3), p.457-463 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary Recent studies have suggested that the collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may be a viable method in occupational field studies to sample secretions of the lower airway because it is simple to perform and non-invasive. However, there are unresolved questions about whether certain laboratory conditions may influence the analysis of EBC biomarker measurements. A total of 12 subjects performed 116 EBC tests. The effect of short and long-term sample storage and sample volume on two biomarkers of acid stress, pH and NH4+ , in EBC were investigated and did not significantly influence either marker measurement after argon deaeration. We also investigated the variability and the effect of smoking on the biomarkers by collecting six samples each from five adult never smokers and five adult current smokers over a period of 1 month ( n =60 total). For pH, the within-person and between-person variability was larger in current smokers compared to never smokers. Similar results were found for NH4+ . Cigarette packs smoked per day now was also associated with both pH ( p =0.01) and NH4+ ( p =0.04) using mixed effects regression analysis. The variability and smoking results suggest that repeated measurements of EBC pH and NH4+ from the same individual may accurately predict the biological state of the airways of current smokers when compared to never smokers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.10.002 |