Loading…

Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction

A new condyle can be reconstructed by osteodistraction, but the biomechanical properties of the neocondyle remain unknown. This study examined the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of neocondylar cancellous bone could reach control levels 24 weeks after its creation by osteodistraction. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dental research 2008-05, Vol.87 (5), p.490-494
Main Authors: Zhu, S., Hu, J., Zou, S., Kakudo, K., Tsunokuma, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693
container_end_page 494
container_issue 5
container_start_page 490
container_title Journal of dental research
container_volume 87
creator Zhu, S.
Hu, J.
Zou, S.
Kakudo, K.
Tsunokuma, M.
description A new condyle can be reconstructed by osteodistraction, but the biomechanical properties of the neocondyle remain unknown. This study examined the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of neocondylar cancellous bone could reach control levels 24 weeks after its creation by osteodistraction. The right mandibular condyles were removed and reconstructed by osteo-distraction in 16 adult goats. Their contralateral condyles served as controls. Microstructural and mechanical properties were examined by microcomputed tomography and mechanical testing. At 24 weeks after distraction, the neocondyle grew larger in size, but the shape and histological features were similar to those of the controls. The cancellous bone of the neocondyle even appeared to be more dense and stiffer in comparison with the control condyle. The results of this study suggest that the neocondyle created by osteodistraction develops nearly normal biomechanical properties for functional loading by 24 weeks after creation.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/154405910808700503
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69132814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_154405910808700503</sage_id><sourcerecordid>69132814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ARcSXLiLvfNIMrPU4AsKdaHrcDu5sSlpps6ki_57E1ooKLg6cPjOuZfD2DWHe86zbMoTpSAxHDToDCABecLGgxkP7ikbAwgRg1TJiF2EsALgRmh5zkZcq97Vcszyx9qtyS6xrS020bt3G_JdTSFyVdQtKcpdW-6aXj1hR2W02EXz0JEr69B5tF3t2kt2VmET6OqgE_b5_PSRv8az-ctb_jCLrTRZF2NJCCrNEgvaAioQxirDlUGOlYZMai4lElWitGBQSltWuLClphSNSI2csLt978a77y2FrljXwVLTYEtuG4rUcCk0Vz14-wtcua1v-98KAUb1Q4kBEnvIeheCp6rY-HqNfldwKIZ9i7_79qGbQ_N2sabyGDkM2gPTPRDwi45n_6n8ASqvgeY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209450324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Zhu, S. ; Hu, J. ; Zou, S. ; Kakudo, K. ; Tsunokuma, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, S. ; Hu, J. ; Zou, S. ; Kakudo, K. ; Tsunokuma, M.</creatorcontrib><description>A new condyle can be reconstructed by osteodistraction, but the biomechanical properties of the neocondyle remain unknown. This study examined the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of neocondylar cancellous bone could reach control levels 24 weeks after its creation by osteodistraction. The right mandibular condyles were removed and reconstructed by osteo-distraction in 16 adult goats. Their contralateral condyles served as controls. Microstructural and mechanical properties were examined by microcomputed tomography and mechanical testing. At 24 weeks after distraction, the neocondyle grew larger in size, but the shape and histological features were similar to those of the controls. The cancellous bone of the neocondyle even appeared to be more dense and stiffer in comparison with the control condyle. The results of this study suggest that the neocondyle created by osteodistraction develops nearly normal biomechanical properties for functional loading by 24 weeks after creation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-0591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18434583</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDREAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Compressive Strength ; Dentistry ; Goats ; Male ; Mandibular Condyle - physiology ; Mandibular Condyle - surgery ; Mandibular Condyle - ultrastructure ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Temporomandibular Joint - physiology ; Temporomandibular Joint - surgery ; Temporomandibular Joint - ultrastructure</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental research, 2008-05, Vol.87 (5), p.490-494</ispartof><rights>International and American Associations for Dental Research</rights><rights>Copyright American Association for Dental Research/American Academy of Implant Dentistry May 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18434583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakudo, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsunokuma, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction</title><title>Journal of dental research</title><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><description>A new condyle can be reconstructed by osteodistraction, but the biomechanical properties of the neocondyle remain unknown. This study examined the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of neocondylar cancellous bone could reach control levels 24 weeks after its creation by osteodistraction. The right mandibular condyles were removed and reconstructed by osteo-distraction in 16 adult goats. Their contralateral condyles served as controls. Microstructural and mechanical properties were examined by microcomputed tomography and mechanical testing. At 24 weeks after distraction, the neocondyle grew larger in size, but the shape and histological features were similar to those of the controls. The cancellous bone of the neocondyle even appeared to be more dense and stiffer in comparison with the control condyle. The results of this study suggest that the neocondyle created by osteodistraction develops nearly normal biomechanical properties for functional loading by 24 weeks after creation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - physiology</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - surgery</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint - ultrastructure</subject><issn>0022-0345</issn><issn>1544-0591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ARcSXLiLvfNIMrPU4AsKdaHrcDu5sSlpps6ki_57E1ooKLg6cPjOuZfD2DWHe86zbMoTpSAxHDToDCABecLGgxkP7ikbAwgRg1TJiF2EsALgRmh5zkZcq97Vcszyx9qtyS6xrS020bt3G_JdTSFyVdQtKcpdW-6aXj1hR2W02EXz0JEr69B5tF3t2kt2VmET6OqgE_b5_PSRv8az-ctb_jCLrTRZF2NJCCrNEgvaAioQxirDlUGOlYZMai4lElWitGBQSltWuLClphSNSI2csLt978a77y2FrljXwVLTYEtuG4rUcCk0Vz14-wtcua1v-98KAUb1Q4kBEnvIeheCp6rY-HqNfldwKIZ9i7_79qGbQ_N2sabyGDkM2gPTPRDwi45n_6n8ASqvgeY</recordid><startdate>200805</startdate><enddate>200805</enddate><creator>Zhu, S.</creator><creator>Hu, J.</creator><creator>Zou, S.</creator><creator>Kakudo, K.</creator><creator>Tsunokuma, M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200805</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction</title><author>Zhu, S. ; Hu, J. ; Zou, S. ; Kakudo, K. ; Tsunokuma, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - physiology</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - surgery</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint - ultrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakudo, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsunokuma, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, S.</au><au>Hu, J.</au><au>Zou, S.</au><au>Kakudo, K.</au><au>Tsunokuma, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><date>2008-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>490-494</pages><issn>0022-0345</issn><eissn>1544-0591</eissn><coden>JDREAF</coden><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>A new condyle can be reconstructed by osteodistraction, but the biomechanical properties of the neocondyle remain unknown. This study examined the hypothesis that the biomechanical properties of neocondylar cancellous bone could reach control levels 24 weeks after its creation by osteodistraction. The right mandibular condyles were removed and reconstructed by osteo-distraction in 16 adult goats. Their contralateral condyles served as controls. Microstructural and mechanical properties were examined by microcomputed tomography and mechanical testing. At 24 weeks after distraction, the neocondyle grew larger in size, but the shape and histological features were similar to those of the controls. The cancellous bone of the neocondyle even appeared to be more dense and stiffer in comparison with the control condyle. The results of this study suggest that the neocondyle created by osteodistraction develops nearly normal biomechanical properties for functional loading by 24 weeks after creation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18434583</pmid><doi>10.1177/154405910808700503</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0345
ispartof Journal of dental research, 2008-05, Vol.87 (5), p.490-494
issn 0022-0345
1544-0591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69132814
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Regeneration - physiology
Compressive Strength
Dentistry
Goats
Male
Mandibular Condyle - physiology
Mandibular Condyle - surgery
Mandibular Condyle - ultrastructure
Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Statistics, Nonparametric
Temporomandibular Joint - physiology
Temporomandibular Joint - surgery
Temporomandibular Joint - ultrastructure
title Biomechanical Properties of the Condyle Created by Osteodistraction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T23%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Properties%20of%20the%20Condyle%20Created%20by%20Osteodistraction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Zhu,%20S.&rft.date=2008-05&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=490-494&rft.issn=0022-0345&rft.eissn=1544-0591&rft.coden=JDREAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/154405910808700503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69132814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-adea04675c08c0a4029c49149a1af80738133aeef2dc09a33cdfabcd8e6a92693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209450324&rft_id=info:pmid/18434583&rft_sage_id=10.1177_154405910808700503&rfr_iscdi=true