Loading…

Impact of Gender and Antithrombin Strategy on Early and Late Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the ACUITY Trial)

Women with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome are at increased risk for ischemic and bleeding complications compared with men. We examined the impact of gender and antithrombotic therapy for non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome on outcomes in patients in the ACUITY trial. Patients were ran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2009-05, Vol.103 (9), p.1196-1203
Main Authors: Lansky, Alexandra J., MD, Mehran, Roxana, MD, Cristea, Ecatarina, MD, Parise, Helen, ScD, Feit, Frederick, MD, Ohman, E. Magnus, MD, White, Harvey D., MD, Alexander, Karen P., MD, Bertrand, Michel E., MD, Desmet, Walter, MD, Hamon, Martial, MD, Stone, Gregg W., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Women with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome are at increased risk for ischemic and bleeding complications compared with men. We examined the impact of gender and antithrombotic therapy for non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome on outcomes in patients in the ACUITY trial. Patients were randomized to heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), bivalirudin plus a GPI, or bivalirudin alone. We compared major bleeding unconnected to coronary artery bypass grafting, composite ischemia (death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization), and net clinical outcome (composite ischemia or bleeding) in (1) men versus women overall and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and (2) women overall and undergoing PCI by antithrombotic strategy. Of 13,819 patients enrolled, 4,157 were women (30.1%). Women had similar 30-day composite ischemia (7% vs 8%, p = 0.07) but greater 30-day rates of major bleeding (8% vs 3% p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.030