Using Pattern Matching and Modified Analytic Induction in Examining Justice Principles in Child Support Guidelines

This paper reports on the design of a study using pro- cedures of modified analytic induction to investigate how courtroom procedures followed or did not follow child support guidelines. Using concepts from principles of procedural fairness and distribu- tive justice, the research team coded transcr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marriage & family review 1996-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.193-222
Main Authors: Rettig, Kathryn D., Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan, Magistad, Beth Maddock
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analytic induction
Child Support
Child support maintenance
Children
Compliance
Con- gruence
Court hearings & proceedings
Courts
Distributive Justice
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Fairness
Guidelines
Hermeneutics
Induction
Justice
Legal Procedure
Legislation
Minnesota
Procedural justice
Qualitative research
Research Design
Teams
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1a9d4e88ca26eb622c3fe6d77bf617559f9654cc7affcba54ce9a42cb294a7463
cites
container_end_page 222
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 193
container_title Marriage & family review
container_volume 24
creator Rettig, Kathryn D.
Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan
Magistad, Beth Maddock
description This paper reports on the design of a study using pro- cedures of modified analytic induction to investigate how courtroom procedures followed or did not follow child support guidelines. Using concepts from principles of procedural fairness and distribu- tive justice, the research team coded transcripts of public hearings on child support guidelines. This paper reports on work in progress and does not report results or conclusions. The coded examples of justiceprinciples demonstrate how procedures of modified analytic induc- tion lead to the refinement of conceptual definitions when tested against lived experiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1300/J002v24n01_09
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61557229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2060799256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1a9d4e88ca26eb622c3fe6d77bf617559f9654cc7affcba54ce9a42cb294a7463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c9rFDEUB_AgCq7Vo_eg4G30JZMfk2NZam1psaA9h2x-2JRsMiYz1f3vnWG9KIqeEvI-eTzeF6GXBN6SHuDdJQB9oCwD0aAeoQ3hDDolev4YbYAw1TFF1VP0rLV7AAJ84BtUb1vMX_CNmSZfM742k71bH0x2-Lq4GKJ3-DSbdJiixRfZzXaKJeOY8dl3s495xZdzW6oe39SYbRyTb2t9exeTw5_mcSx1wudzdD7F7Ntz9CSY1PyLn-cJun1_9nn7obv6eH6xPb3qLOvp1BGjHPPDYA0VficotX3wwkm5C4JIzlVQgjNrpQnB7sxy9cowandUMSOZ6E_Qm2PfsZavs2-T3sdmfUom-zI3LQjnklL1H7AXAiT8E3IpJe2JXODr3-B9meuyxaYpLK2Uonwd8NXfFFGKiwFgHa47IltLa9UHPda4N_WgCeg1dv1L7Isfjj7mUOrefCs1OT2ZQyo1VLPk03T_568_AHcnsuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199568009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Pattern Matching and Modified Analytic Induction in Examining Justice Principles in Child Support Guidelines</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Behavioral Science Archive 2015</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rettig, Kathryn D. ; Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan ; Magistad, Beth Maddock</creator><creatorcontrib>Rettig, Kathryn D. ; Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan ; Magistad, Beth Maddock</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports on the design of a study using pro- cedures of modified analytic induction to investigate how courtroom procedures followed or did not follow child support guidelines. Using concepts from principles of procedural fairness and distribu- tive justice, the research team coded transcripts of public hearings on child support guidelines. This paper reports on work in progress and does not report results or conclusions. The coded examples of justiceprinciples demonstrate how procedures of modified analytic induc- tion lead to the refinement of conceptual definitions when tested against lived experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-4929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9635</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1300/J002v24n01_09</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MFARDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Analytic induction ; Child Support ; Child support maintenance ; Children ; Compliance ; Con- gruence ; Court hearings &amp; proceedings ; Courts ; Distributive Justice ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Fairness ; Guidelines ; Hermeneutics ; Induction ; Justice ; Legal Procedure ; Legislation ; Minnesota ; Procedural justice ; Qualitative research ; Research Design ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Marriage &amp; family review, 1996-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.193-222</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1996</rights><rights>Copyright Haworth Press, Inc. 1996</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1a9d4e88ca26eb622c3fe6d77bf617559f9654cc7affcba54ce9a42cb294a7463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199568009/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199568009?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,12873,21422,21423,27377,27957,27958,31034,31035,33646,33647,33809,33810,34565,34566,43768,44150,60134,60923,74578,74996</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rettig, Kathryn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magistad, Beth Maddock</creatorcontrib><title>Using Pattern Matching and Modified Analytic Induction in Examining Justice Principles in Child Support Guidelines</title><title>Marriage &amp; family review</title><description>This paper reports on the design of a study using pro- cedures of modified analytic induction to investigate how courtroom procedures followed or did not follow child support guidelines. Using concepts from principles of procedural fairness and distribu- tive justice, the research team coded transcripts of public hearings on child support guidelines. This paper reports on work in progress and does not report results or conclusions. The coded examples of justiceprinciples demonstrate how procedures of modified analytic induc- tion lead to the refinement of conceptual definitions when tested against lived experiences.</description><subject>Analytic induction</subject><subject>Child Support</subject><subject>Child support maintenance</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Con- gruence</subject><subject>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Distributive Justice</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hermeneutics</subject><subject>Induction</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Legal Procedure</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>0149-4929</issn><issn>1540-9635</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c9rFDEUB_AgCq7Vo_eg4G30JZMfk2NZam1psaA9h2x-2JRsMiYz1f3vnWG9KIqeEvI-eTzeF6GXBN6SHuDdJQB9oCwD0aAeoQ3hDDolev4YbYAw1TFF1VP0rLV7AAJ84BtUb1vMX_CNmSZfM742k71bH0x2-Lq4GKJ3-DSbdJiixRfZzXaKJeOY8dl3s495xZdzW6oe39SYbRyTb2t9exeTw5_mcSx1wudzdD7F7Ntz9CSY1PyLn-cJun1_9nn7obv6eH6xPb3qLOvp1BGjHPPDYA0VficotX3wwkm5C4JIzlVQgjNrpQnB7sxy9cowandUMSOZ6E_Qm2PfsZavs2-T3sdmfUom-zI3LQjnklL1H7AXAiT8E3IpJe2JXODr3-B9meuyxaYpLK2Uonwd8NXfFFGKiwFgHa47IltLa9UHPda4N_WgCeg1dv1L7Isfjj7mUOrefCs1OT2ZQyo1VLPk03T_568_AHcnsuY</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Rettig, Kathryn D.</creator><creator>Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan</creator><creator>Magistad, Beth Maddock</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Using Pattern Matching and Modified Analytic Induction in Examining Justice Principles in Child Support Guidelines</title><author>Rettig, Kathryn D. ; Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan ; Magistad, Beth Maddock</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1a9d4e88ca26eb622c3fe6d77bf617559f9654cc7affcba54ce9a42cb294a7463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Analytic induction</topic><topic>Child Support</topic><topic>Child support maintenance</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Con- gruence</topic><topic>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Distributive Justice</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hermeneutics</topic><topic>Induction</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Legal Procedure</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rettig, Kathryn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magistad, Beth Maddock</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Marriage &amp; family review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rettig, Kathryn D.</au><au>Tam, Vicky Chiu-Wan</au><au>Magistad, Beth Maddock</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Pattern Matching and Modified Analytic Induction in Examining Justice Principles in Child Support Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Marriage &amp; family review</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>193-222</pages><issn>0149-4929</issn><eissn>1540-9635</eissn><coden>MFARDJ</coden><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>This paper reports on the design of a study using pro- cedures of modified analytic induction to investigate how courtroom procedures followed or did not follow child support guidelines. Using concepts from principles of procedural fairness and distribu- tive justice, the research team coded transcripts of public hearings on child support guidelines. This paper reports on work in progress and does not report results or conclusions. The coded examples of justiceprinciples demonstrate how procedures of modified analytic induc- tion lead to the refinement of conceptual definitions when tested against lived experiences.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1300/J002v24n01_09</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-4929
ispartof Marriage & family review, 1996-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.193-222
issn 0149-4929
1540-9635
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61557229
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Behavioral Science Archive 2015; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Analytic induction
Child Support
Child support maintenance
Children
Compliance
Con- gruence
Court hearings & proceedings
Courts
Distributive Justice
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Fairness
Guidelines
Hermeneutics
Induction
Justice
Legal Procedure
Legislation
Minnesota
Procedural justice
Qualitative research
Research Design
Teams
title Using Pattern Matching and Modified Analytic Induction in Examining Justice Principles in Child Support Guidelines
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T02%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Pattern%20Matching%20and%20Modified%20Analytic%20Induction%20in%20Examining%20Justice%20Principles%20in%20Child%20Support%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Marriage%20&%20family%20review&rft.au=Rettig,%20Kathryn%20D.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=193-222&rft.issn=0149-4929&rft.eissn=1540-9635&rft.coden=MFARDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1300/J002v24n01_09&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2060799256%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1a9d4e88ca26eb622c3fe6d77bf617559f9654cc7affcba54ce9a42cb294a7463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199568009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true