Loading…
Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making
In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using...
Saved in:
Published in: | Business ethics quarterly 2006-10, Vol.16 (4), p.449-473 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73 |
container_end_page | 473 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Business ethics quarterly |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ashkanasy, Neal M. Windsor, Carolyn A. Treviño, Linda K. |
description | In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5840/beq200616447 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36610464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3857792</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3857792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1vEzEQxa0KpIbCrUcOFgdOWfDH2t5wa9MPQCkVqFURF8veHRenznprO4Hy17MhqEKcZkbv955GeggdUvJGNDV5a-GeESKprGu1hyaMCl5xzuQTNKFEsIoK8nUfPct5SQils4ZP0K9j0-GjYQiQse_x9jo2KUHI-AtsfPYFund4Hm97X_wG8EVMJuAT2ECIwwr6MsUf17ngm5jCaIXgweXp6P1hUjcupu_wafnu2z-udgyMfXVh7nx_-xw9dSZkePF3HqDrs9Or-ftqcXn-YX60qFouWKm4saJppHQz66wSorXUCmiVpR3jriYEbGMot0oywYV0XCpnrJFCdk62VvED9HqXO6R4v4Zc9MrnFkIwPcR11lxKSmpZj-Cr_8BlXKd-_E0zKjlrmGIjNN1BbYo5J3B6SH5l0oOmRG9b0P-2MOIvd_gyl5geWd4IpWbbtGon-1zg56Ns0p2Wiiuh5flnTRffPrGThmvGfwNiq5Je</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216328272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Ashkanasy, Neal M. ; Windsor, Carolyn A. ; Treviño, Linda K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashkanasy, Neal M. ; Windsor, Carolyn A. ; Treviño, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-3326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/beq200616447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Business studies ; Cognitive development ; Decision making ; Descriptive ethics ; Environmental ethics ; Ethical behavior ; Ethics ; Kohlbergs stages of moral development ; Managers ; Moral development ; Moral judgment ; Morality ; Motivation ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational effectiveness ; Pragmatic ethics ; Punishment ; Scandals ; Social ethics ; Studies ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Business ethics quarterly, 2006-10, Vol.16 (4), p.449-473</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 The Society for Business Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright Loyola University of Chicago Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3857792$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3857792$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,783,787,27936,27937,33235,33236,58566,58799</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><title>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</title><title>Business ethics quarterly</title><description>In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Descriptive ethics</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Kohlbergs stages of moral development</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Moral development</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational effectiveness</subject><subject>Pragmatic ethics</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>1052-150X</issn><issn>2153-3326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1vEzEQxa0KpIbCrUcOFgdOWfDH2t5wa9MPQCkVqFURF8veHRenznprO4Hy17MhqEKcZkbv955GeggdUvJGNDV5a-GeESKprGu1hyaMCl5xzuQTNKFEsIoK8nUfPct5SQils4ZP0K9j0-GjYQiQse_x9jo2KUHI-AtsfPYFund4Hm97X_wG8EVMJuAT2ECIwwr6MsUf17ngm5jCaIXgweXp6P1hUjcupu_wafnu2z-udgyMfXVh7nx_-xw9dSZkePF3HqDrs9Or-ftqcXn-YX60qFouWKm4saJppHQz66wSorXUCmiVpR3jriYEbGMot0oywYV0XCpnrJFCdk62VvED9HqXO6R4v4Zc9MrnFkIwPcR11lxKSmpZj-Cr_8BlXKd-_E0zKjlrmGIjNN1BbYo5J3B6SH5l0oOmRG9b0P-2MOIvd_gyl5geWd4IpWbbtGon-1zg56Ns0p2Wiiuh5flnTRffPrGThmvGfwNiq5Je</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</creator><creator>Windsor, Carolyn A.</creator><creator>Treviño, Linda K.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Philosophical Documentation Center</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</title><author>Ashkanasy, Neal M. ; Windsor, Carolyn A. ; Treviño, Linda K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Descriptive ethics</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Kohlbergs stages of moral development</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Moral development</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational effectiveness</topic><topic>Pragmatic ethics</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</au><au>Windsor, Carolyn A.</au><au>Treviño, Linda K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>449-473</pages><issn>1052-150X</issn><eissn>2153-3326</eissn><abstract>In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.5840/beq200616447</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-150X |
ispartof | Business ethics quarterly, 2006-10, Vol.16 (4), p.449-473 |
issn | 1052-150X 2153-3326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36610464 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; JSTOR |
subjects | Business ethics Business studies Cognitive development Decision making Descriptive ethics Environmental ethics Ethical behavior Ethics Kohlbergs stages of moral development Managers Moral development Moral judgment Morality Motivation Organizational behavior Organizational effectiveness Pragmatic ethics Punishment Scandals Social ethics Studies Work environment |
title | Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-15T10%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bad%20Apples%20in%20Bad%20Barrels%20Revisited:%20Cognitive%20Moral%20Development,%20Just%20World%20Beliefs,%20Rewards,%20and%20Ethical%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Business%20ethics%20quarterly&rft.au=Ashkanasy,%20Neal%20M.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=449-473&rft.issn=1052-150X&rft.eissn=2153-3326&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/beq200616447&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3857792%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216328272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3857792&rfr_iscdi=true |