Loading…

Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making

In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Business ethics quarterly 2006-10, Vol.16 (4), p.449-473
Main Authors: Ashkanasy, Neal M., Windsor, Carolyn A., Treviño, Linda K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73
container_end_page 473
container_issue 4
container_start_page 449
container_title Business ethics quarterly
container_volume 16
creator Ashkanasy, Neal M.
Windsor, Carolyn A.
Treviño, Linda K.
description In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.
doi_str_mv 10.5840/beq200616447
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36610464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3857792</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3857792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1vEzEQxa0KpIbCrUcOFgdOWfDH2t5wa9MPQCkVqFURF8veHRenznprO4Hy17MhqEKcZkbv955GeggdUvJGNDV5a-GeESKprGu1hyaMCl5xzuQTNKFEsIoK8nUfPct5SQils4ZP0K9j0-GjYQiQse_x9jo2KUHI-AtsfPYFund4Hm97X_wG8EVMJuAT2ECIwwr6MsUf17ngm5jCaIXgweXp6P1hUjcupu_wafnu2z-udgyMfXVh7nx_-xw9dSZkePF3HqDrs9Or-ftqcXn-YX60qFouWKm4saJppHQz66wSorXUCmiVpR3jriYEbGMot0oywYV0XCpnrJFCdk62VvED9HqXO6R4v4Zc9MrnFkIwPcR11lxKSmpZj-Cr_8BlXKd-_E0zKjlrmGIjNN1BbYo5J3B6SH5l0oOmRG9b0P-2MOIvd_gyl5geWd4IpWbbtGon-1zg56Ns0p2Wiiuh5flnTRffPrGThmvGfwNiq5Je</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216328272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Ashkanasy, Neal M. ; Windsor, Carolyn A. ; Treviño, Linda K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashkanasy, Neal M. ; Windsor, Carolyn A. ; Treviño, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-3326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/beq200616447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Business studies ; Cognitive development ; Decision making ; Descriptive ethics ; Environmental ethics ; Ethical behavior ; Ethics ; Kohlbergs stages of moral development ; Managers ; Moral development ; Moral judgment ; Morality ; Motivation ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational effectiveness ; Pragmatic ethics ; Punishment ; Scandals ; Social ethics ; Studies ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Business ethics quarterly, 2006-10, Vol.16 (4), p.449-473</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 The Society for Business Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright Loyola University of Chicago Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3857792$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3857792$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,783,787,27936,27937,33235,33236,58566,58799</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><title>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</title><title>Business ethics quarterly</title><description>In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Descriptive ethics</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Kohlbergs stages of moral development</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Moral development</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational effectiveness</subject><subject>Pragmatic ethics</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>1052-150X</issn><issn>2153-3326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1vEzEQxa0KpIbCrUcOFgdOWfDH2t5wa9MPQCkVqFURF8veHRenznprO4Hy17MhqEKcZkbv955GeggdUvJGNDV5a-GeESKprGu1hyaMCl5xzuQTNKFEsIoK8nUfPct5SQils4ZP0K9j0-GjYQiQse_x9jo2KUHI-AtsfPYFund4Hm97X_wG8EVMJuAT2ECIwwr6MsUf17ngm5jCaIXgweXp6P1hUjcupu_wafnu2z-udgyMfXVh7nx_-xw9dSZkePF3HqDrs9Or-ftqcXn-YX60qFouWKm4saJppHQz66wSorXUCmiVpR3jriYEbGMot0oywYV0XCpnrJFCdk62VvED9HqXO6R4v4Zc9MrnFkIwPcR11lxKSmpZj-Cr_8BlXKd-_E0zKjlrmGIjNN1BbYo5J3B6SH5l0oOmRG9b0P-2MOIvd_gyl5geWd4IpWbbtGon-1zg56Ns0p2Wiiuh5flnTRffPrGThmvGfwNiq5Je</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</creator><creator>Windsor, Carolyn A.</creator><creator>Treviño, Linda K.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Philosophical Documentation Center</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</title><author>Ashkanasy, Neal M. ; Windsor, Carolyn A. ; Treviño, Linda K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Descriptive ethics</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Kohlbergs stages of moral development</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Moral development</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational effectiveness</topic><topic>Pragmatic ethics</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashkanasy, Neal M.</au><au>Windsor, Carolyn A.</au><au>Treviño, Linda K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>449-473</pages><issn>1052-150X</issn><eissn>2153-3326</eissn><abstract>In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.5840/beq200616447</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-150X
ispartof Business ethics quarterly, 2006-10, Vol.16 (4), p.449-473
issn 1052-150X
2153-3326
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36610464
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; JSTOR
subjects Business ethics
Business studies
Cognitive development
Decision making
Descriptive ethics
Environmental ethics
Ethical behavior
Ethics
Kohlbergs stages of moral development
Managers
Moral development
Moral judgment
Morality
Motivation
Organizational behavior
Organizational effectiveness
Pragmatic ethics
Punishment
Scandals
Social ethics
Studies
Work environment
title Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-15T10%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bad%20Apples%20in%20Bad%20Barrels%20Revisited:%20Cognitive%20Moral%20Development,%20Just%20World%20Beliefs,%20Rewards,%20and%20Ethical%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Business%20ethics%20quarterly&rft.au=Ashkanasy,%20Neal%20M.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=449-473&rft.issn=1052-150X&rft.eissn=2153-3326&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/beq200616447&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3857792%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3ab58866f9bfb755cb1b5ec7b1d23f400eb8a13b7625356f367faba656df6cb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216328272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3857792&rfr_iscdi=true