Loading…

The OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score: a potential predictive outcome to assess the risk of relapse during follow-up

To determine whether the OMERACT giant cell arteritis (GCA) Ultrasonography (US) Score (OGUS) change after treatment can be used for assessing the probability of relapse. Multicenter retrospective study of GCA patients referred to two US GCA fast-track clinics over 2 years. Patients underwent US eva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2024-05
Main Authors: Molina-Collada, Juan, Monjo-Henry, Irene, Fernández-Fernández, Elisa, Álvaro-Gracia, José María, de Miguel, Eugenio
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
container_volume
creator Molina-Collada, Juan
Monjo-Henry, Irene
Fernández-Fernández, Elisa
Álvaro-Gracia, José María
de Miguel, Eugenio
description To determine whether the OMERACT giant cell arteritis (GCA) Ultrasonography (US) Score (OGUS) change after treatment can be used for assessing the probability of relapse. Multicenter retrospective study of GCA patients referred to two US GCA fast-track clinics over 2 years. Patients underwent US evaluation at baseline, 3 and 6 months. EULAR definitions for remission and relapse were checked at 3 and 6 months. OGUS changes at 0-3 months and 0-6 months were compared among patients with and without relapse at 6 months, as well as those with and without remission at 6 months. A total of 76 patients were included (mean age 77.2 years, 55.3% females). Nineteen (26%) patients relapsed at 6-months, of whom 14(19.1%) showed a minor relapse. EULAR remission at 6 months was achieved by 32(43.8%) patients. The standardized mean difference of OGUS between baseline and 3 and 6 months was -0.25 and -0.38, respectively. OGUS significantly improved between baseline and 6 months (1.18 vs 0.99,p=0.004) and from 3-6 months (1.08 vs 0.99,p=0.04) in non-relapsing patients, whereas no significant changes at 3 (1.17 vs 1.17;p=0.736) and 6 (1.17 vs 1.21;p=0.343) months were observed in those who experienced relapse. Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was lower in patients who relapsed (-0.1 vs 0.16,p=0.037). Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was greater in patients who achieved remission at 6 months (0.28vs -0.07,p=0.001). The absence of OGUS improvement during follow-up in GCA may be used to assess the probability of relapse and the absence of remission at 6 months.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rheumatology/keae260
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053137828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3053137828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1012-898b62d97fbdbea381d3a7e15e0efdbbd273c7cd9599524e839da23712b2d6183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1OwzAQhC0EolB4A4T2yCXgn6ZxuKGKP6moEpRz5MSb1tSJg-2A-gC8N1SUitPuYWZHOx8hZ4xeMpqLK7_EvlHRWbdYX61QIR_TPXLERmOeUCH4_m7nowE5DuGNUpoyIQ_JQMiMSSb5EfmaLxFmT7fPN5M53BvVRqjQWlA-ojfRBHi10avgWrfwqluu4aVyHq9BQecittEoC51HbapoPhBcHyvXIEQHKgQMAeJPgDdhBa4Gj1Z1AUH33rQLqJ217jPpuxNyUCsb8HQ7h-T17nY-eUims_vHyc00qRhlPJG5LMdc51ld6hKVkEwLlSFLkWKty1LzTFRZpfM0z1M-QilyrbjIGC-5HjMphuTi927n3XuPIRaNCZt_VYuuD4WgqWAik3wjHf1KK-9C8FgXnTeN8uuC0WIDoPgPoNgC-LGdbxP6skG9M_01Lr4BO4-JFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053137828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score: a potential predictive outcome to assess the risk of relapse during follow-up</title><source>Oxford Academic</source><creator>Molina-Collada, Juan ; Monjo-Henry, Irene ; Fernández-Fernández, Elisa ; Álvaro-Gracia, José María ; de Miguel, Eugenio</creator><creatorcontrib>Molina-Collada, Juan ; Monjo-Henry, Irene ; Fernández-Fernández, Elisa ; Álvaro-Gracia, José María ; de Miguel, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether the OMERACT giant cell arteritis (GCA) Ultrasonography (US) Score (OGUS) change after treatment can be used for assessing the probability of relapse. Multicenter retrospective study of GCA patients referred to two US GCA fast-track clinics over 2 years. Patients underwent US evaluation at baseline, 3 and 6 months. EULAR definitions for remission and relapse were checked at 3 and 6 months. OGUS changes at 0-3 months and 0-6 months were compared among patients with and without relapse at 6 months, as well as those with and without remission at 6 months. A total of 76 patients were included (mean age 77.2 years, 55.3% females). Nineteen (26%) patients relapsed at 6-months, of whom 14(19.1%) showed a minor relapse. EULAR remission at 6 months was achieved by 32(43.8%) patients. The standardized mean difference of OGUS between baseline and 3 and 6 months was -0.25 and -0.38, respectively. OGUS significantly improved between baseline and 6 months (1.18 vs 0.99,p=0.004) and from 3-6 months (1.08 vs 0.99,p=0.04) in non-relapsing patients, whereas no significant changes at 3 (1.17 vs 1.17;p=0.736) and 6 (1.17 vs 1.21;p=0.343) months were observed in those who experienced relapse. Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was lower in patients who relapsed (-0.1 vs 0.16,p=0.037). Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was greater in patients who achieved remission at 6 months (0.28vs -0.07,p=0.001). The absence of OGUS improvement during follow-up in GCA may be used to assess the probability of relapse and the absence of remission at 6 months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-0332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38718182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024-05</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1628-5042 ; 0000-0002-0343-3747 ; 0000-0001-5191-7802 ; 0000-0002-3252-8016 ; 0000-0001-5146-1964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38718182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molina-Collada, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monjo-Henry, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Fernández, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvaro-Gracia, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miguel, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><title>The OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score: a potential predictive outcome to assess the risk of relapse during follow-up</title><title>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><description>To determine whether the OMERACT giant cell arteritis (GCA) Ultrasonography (US) Score (OGUS) change after treatment can be used for assessing the probability of relapse. Multicenter retrospective study of GCA patients referred to two US GCA fast-track clinics over 2 years. Patients underwent US evaluation at baseline, 3 and 6 months. EULAR definitions for remission and relapse were checked at 3 and 6 months. OGUS changes at 0-3 months and 0-6 months were compared among patients with and without relapse at 6 months, as well as those with and without remission at 6 months. A total of 76 patients were included (mean age 77.2 years, 55.3% females). Nineteen (26%) patients relapsed at 6-months, of whom 14(19.1%) showed a minor relapse. EULAR remission at 6 months was achieved by 32(43.8%) patients. The standardized mean difference of OGUS between baseline and 3 and 6 months was -0.25 and -0.38, respectively. OGUS significantly improved between baseline and 6 months (1.18 vs 0.99,p=0.004) and from 3-6 months (1.08 vs 0.99,p=0.04) in non-relapsing patients, whereas no significant changes at 3 (1.17 vs 1.17;p=0.736) and 6 (1.17 vs 1.21;p=0.343) months were observed in those who experienced relapse. Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was lower in patients who relapsed (-0.1 vs 0.16,p=0.037). Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was greater in patients who achieved remission at 6 months (0.28vs -0.07,p=0.001). The absence of OGUS improvement during follow-up in GCA may be used to assess the probability of relapse and the absence of remission at 6 months.</description><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1462-0332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkc1OwzAQhC0EolB4A4T2yCXgn6ZxuKGKP6moEpRz5MSb1tSJg-2A-gC8N1SUitPuYWZHOx8hZ4xeMpqLK7_EvlHRWbdYX61QIR_TPXLERmOeUCH4_m7nowE5DuGNUpoyIQ_JQMiMSSb5EfmaLxFmT7fPN5M53BvVRqjQWlA-ojfRBHi10avgWrfwqluu4aVyHq9BQecittEoC51HbapoPhBcHyvXIEQHKgQMAeJPgDdhBa4Gj1Z1AUH33rQLqJ217jPpuxNyUCsb8HQ7h-T17nY-eUims_vHyc00qRhlPJG5LMdc51ld6hKVkEwLlSFLkWKty1LzTFRZpfM0z1M-QilyrbjIGC-5HjMphuTi927n3XuPIRaNCZt_VYuuD4WgqWAik3wjHf1KK-9C8FgXnTeN8uuC0WIDoPgPoNgC-LGdbxP6skG9M_01Lr4BO4-JFQ</recordid><startdate>20240508</startdate><enddate>20240508</enddate><creator>Molina-Collada, Juan</creator><creator>Monjo-Henry, Irene</creator><creator>Fernández-Fernández, Elisa</creator><creator>Álvaro-Gracia, José María</creator><creator>de Miguel, Eugenio</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1628-5042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-3747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-7802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-8016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-1964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240508</creationdate><title>The OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score: a potential predictive outcome to assess the risk of relapse during follow-up</title><author>Molina-Collada, Juan ; Monjo-Henry, Irene ; Fernández-Fernández, Elisa ; Álvaro-Gracia, José María ; de Miguel, Eugenio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1012-898b62d97fbdbea381d3a7e15e0efdbbd273c7cd9599524e839da23712b2d6183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molina-Collada, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monjo-Henry, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Fernández, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvaro-Gracia, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miguel, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molina-Collada, Juan</au><au>Monjo-Henry, Irene</au><au>Fernández-Fernández, Elisa</au><au>Álvaro-Gracia, José María</au><au>de Miguel, Eugenio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score: a potential predictive outcome to assess the risk of relapse during follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><date>2024-05-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1462-0324</issn><eissn>1462-0332</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>To determine whether the OMERACT giant cell arteritis (GCA) Ultrasonography (US) Score (OGUS) change after treatment can be used for assessing the probability of relapse. Multicenter retrospective study of GCA patients referred to two US GCA fast-track clinics over 2 years. Patients underwent US evaluation at baseline, 3 and 6 months. EULAR definitions for remission and relapse were checked at 3 and 6 months. OGUS changes at 0-3 months and 0-6 months were compared among patients with and without relapse at 6 months, as well as those with and without remission at 6 months. A total of 76 patients were included (mean age 77.2 years, 55.3% females). Nineteen (26%) patients relapsed at 6-months, of whom 14(19.1%) showed a minor relapse. EULAR remission at 6 months was achieved by 32(43.8%) patients. The standardized mean difference of OGUS between baseline and 3 and 6 months was -0.25 and -0.38, respectively. OGUS significantly improved between baseline and 6 months (1.18 vs 0.99,p=0.004) and from 3-6 months (1.08 vs 0.99,p=0.04) in non-relapsing patients, whereas no significant changes at 3 (1.17 vs 1.17;p=0.736) and 6 (1.17 vs 1.21;p=0.343) months were observed in those who experienced relapse. Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was lower in patients who relapsed (-0.1 vs 0.16,p=0.037). Mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was greater in patients who achieved remission at 6 months (0.28vs -0.07,p=0.001). The absence of OGUS improvement during follow-up in GCA may be used to assess the probability of relapse and the absence of remission at 6 months.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38718182</pmid><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/keae260</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1628-5042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-3747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-7802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-8016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-1964</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-0324
ispartof Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024-05
issn 1462-0324
1462-0332
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053137828
source Oxford Academic
title The OMERACT Giant cell arteritis Ultrasonography Score: a potential predictive outcome to assess the risk of relapse during follow-up
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T20%3A40%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20OMERACT%20Giant%20cell%20arteritis%20Ultrasonography%20Score:%20a%20potential%20predictive%20outcome%20to%20assess%20the%20risk%20of%20relapse%20during%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=Rheumatology%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Molina-Collada,%20Juan&rft.date=2024-05-08&rft.issn=1462-0324&rft.eissn=1462-0332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keae260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3053137828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1012-898b62d97fbdbea381d3a7e15e0efdbbd273c7cd9599524e839da23712b2d6183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053137828&rft_id=info:pmid/38718182&rfr_iscdi=true