Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation

In a recent issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield published a paper entitled, "The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation." They argued that a prohibition on abortion is morally equivalent to a positive mandate for parents to don...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2024-04, Vol.33 (2), p.300-306
Main Author: Latham, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abortion, Induced
Child
Female
Humans
Informed Consent
Organ Transplantation
Pregnancy
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 306
container_issue 2
container_start_page 300
container_title Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
container_volume 33
creator Latham, Elizabeth
description In a recent issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield published a paper entitled, "The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation." They argued that a prohibition on abortion is morally equivalent to a positive mandate for parents to donate organs to their children and that opponents of abortion must be prepared to accept these mandates to remain consistent.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0963180123000579
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902941919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2902941919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-3094f5d481582733661a626f7ee7f8c9ac0e81502fe3c0640bf90a51dbe10a3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkDtPwzAUhS0EoqHwA1hQRoYG7rUTP8aqLQ-pUgcea-Q4NgSlSbGTof-eRC0sTFe633fOcAi5RrhDQHH_AoozlICUAUAm1AmJMOUqoZiKUxKNOBn5hFyE8DU4lAKekwmTICVjIiL0va8b63VR1VW3j1fdZ2XCLJ4Xre-qtpnFuinjjf_QTbxsGz3-LsmZ03WwV8c7JW8Pq9fFU7LePD4v5uvEUMW7hIFKXVamEjNJBWOco-aUO2GtcNIobcAODKizzABPoXAKdIZlYRE0M2xKbg-9O99-9zZ0-bYKxta1bmzbh5wqoCpFhWpQ8aAa34bgrct3vtpqv88R8nGq_N9UQ-bmWN8XW1v-JX63YT-KdGFu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902941919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Latham, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Latham, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield published a paper entitled, "The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation." They argued that a prohibition on abortion is morally equivalent to a positive mandate for parents to donate organs to their children and that opponents of abortion must be prepared to accept these mandates to remain consistent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0963180123000579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38088337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Abortion, Induced ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Organ Transplantation ; Pregnancy ; Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><ispartof>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2024-04, Vol.33 (2), p.300-306</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38088337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latham, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation</title><title>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</title><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><description>In a recent issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield published a paper entitled, "The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation." They argued that a prohibition on abortion is morally equivalent to a positive mandate for parents to donate organs to their children and that opponents of abortion must be prepared to accept these mandates to remain consistent.</description><subject>Abortion, Induced</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><issn>0963-1801</issn><issn>1469-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkDtPwzAUhS0EoqHwA1hQRoYG7rUTP8aqLQ-pUgcea-Q4NgSlSbGTof-eRC0sTFe633fOcAi5RrhDQHH_AoozlICUAUAm1AmJMOUqoZiKUxKNOBn5hFyE8DU4lAKekwmTICVjIiL0va8b63VR1VW3j1fdZ2XCLJ4Xre-qtpnFuinjjf_QTbxsGz3-LsmZ03WwV8c7JW8Pq9fFU7LePD4v5uvEUMW7hIFKXVamEjNJBWOco-aUO2GtcNIobcAODKizzABPoXAKdIZlYRE0M2xKbg-9O99-9zZ0-bYKxta1bmzbh5wqoCpFhWpQ8aAa34bgrct3vtpqv88R8nGq_N9UQ-bmWN8XW1v-JX63YT-KdGFu</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Latham, Elizabeth</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation</title><author>Latham, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-3094f5d481582733661a626f7ee7f8c9ac0e81502fe3c0640bf90a51dbe10a3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Induced</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latham, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latham, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0963-1801</issn><eissn>1469-2147</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>In a recent issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield published a paper entitled, "The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation." They argued that a prohibition on abortion is morally equivalent to a positive mandate for parents to donate organs to their children and that opponents of abortion must be prepared to accept these mandates to remain consistent.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38088337</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0963180123000579</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-1801
ispartof Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2024-04, Vol.33 (2), p.300-306
issn 0963-1801
1469-2147
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902941919
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Abortion, Induced
Child
Female
Humans
Informed Consent
Organ Transplantation
Pregnancy
Tissue and Organ Procurement
title Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T19%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vulnerability%20Ethics,%20Abortion,%20and%20Organ%20Donation&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20quarterly%20of%20healthcare%20ethics&rft.au=Latham,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0963-1801&rft.eissn=1469-2147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0963180123000579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2902941919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-3094f5d481582733661a626f7ee7f8c9ac0e81502fe3c0640bf90a51dbe10a3c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902941919&rft_id=info:pmid/38088337&rfr_iscdi=true