Assessing and optimizing the effectiveness of protected areas along China’s coastal region: A social-ecological protected area network study

Effectiveness of protected areas (EPA) evaluation has been used to measure the effectiveness of existing protected areas (PAs) and to identify prioritized and inefficient PAs. However, the current EPA evaluation remains incomplete, primarily due either to the scale of evaluation focusing on only iso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2024-01, Vol.349, p.119338-119338, Article 119338
Main Authors: Zhao, Ye, Qian, Wenqi, Liu, Xinyu, Wu, Chao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coastal region
Conservation gaps
Effectiveness of protected areas
Protected area network
Social-ecological connectivity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3
container_end_page 119338
container_issue
container_start_page 119338
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 349
creator Zhao, Ye
Qian, Wenqi
Liu, Xinyu
Wu, Chao
description Effectiveness of protected areas (EPA) evaluation has been used to measure the effectiveness of existing protected areas (PAs) and to identify prioritized and inefficient PAs. However, the current EPA evaluation remains incomplete, primarily due either to the scale of evaluation focusing on only isolated PAs without considering network connectivity or to the difficulty of balancing social and ecological synergy in practice. To address this issue, we proposed a social-ecological connectivity pathway to maximize the evaluation and optimization of EPA in a coastal region: first, we selected social and ecological indicators for habitat suitability evaluation and simulated the protected area network (PAN); second, we evaluated the rationality of network connectivity; and ultimately, we identified conservation gaps to the post-2020 global biodiversity target. Considering the complexity of coastal ecosystems, we selected the four coastal cities of the Shandong Peninsula, China as a case study. We find that (1) the social-ecological PAN consists of 370 primary corridors and 110 secondary corridors; there are 12 cross-ecosystem types in the identified PANs, three of which span marine to terrestrial ecosystems, while the remaining nine span terrestrial interior ecosystems; (2) 66 nodes were identified as spatial gaps; the benefit gap indicated that 51.75% of PAs were inefficiently protected but 48.25% were appropriately protected; regarding quantity gap, the marine PAs gap (25.41%) is much larger than the terrestrial PAs gap (15.80%), suggesting a possible priority in the marine PAs appropriately. Our study reveals that the EPA in the coastal region is currently weak and urgently needs to improve. Thus, we propose measures to optimize the EPA and suggest its potential application to other PAs in complex and vulnerable coastal regions. [Display omitted] •We propose a social-ecological protected area network connectivity approach in a coastal region.•Connecting PAs across ecosystems is of great value in improving the conservation EPA.•The gap between the number and scale of marine PAs is far -larger than that of terrestrial PAs.•There are three existing levels of conservation gaps in the post-2020 global biodiversity target.•The coastline area has large potential to achieve the 2030 targets.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119338
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2888031422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479723021266</els_id><sourcerecordid>2888031422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUEGOEzEQtBBIhIUnIPnIZULbnpnMcEFRxMJKK3GBs-Wx21mHiR3cTtBy4gXc-R4vwVH2sidOpe6uKnUVY68FLAWI_u1uucN42pu4lCDVUohRqeEJWwgYu2boFTxlC1AgmnY1rp6zF0Q7AFBSrBbs95oIiULcchMdT4cS9uHneSx3yNF7tCWcMFYOT54fcip1g46bjIa4mVOlbu5CNH9__SFuk6FiZp5xG1J8x9eckg1mbtCmOW2DrbfHHjxi-ZHyN07l6O5fsmfezISvHvCKfb3-8GXzqbn9_PFms75trGpladrem05hP7UDTAggW2N70aIcBxjcAMZ1YpJd58D3zkzj6EVF7LyfbKdap67Ym4tvfeb7EanofSCL82wipiNpOQwDKNFKWandhWpzIsro9SGHvcn3WoA-9693-qF_fe5fX_qvuvcXHdYcp4BZkw0YLbqQa3ztUviPwz-f3JXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888031422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing and optimizing the effectiveness of protected areas along China’s coastal region: A social-ecological protected area network study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Zhao, Ye ; Qian, Wenqi ; Liu, Xinyu ; Wu, Chao</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ye ; Qian, Wenqi ; Liu, Xinyu ; Wu, Chao</creatorcontrib><description>Effectiveness of protected areas (EPA) evaluation has been used to measure the effectiveness of existing protected areas (PAs) and to identify prioritized and inefficient PAs. However, the current EPA evaluation remains incomplete, primarily due either to the scale of evaluation focusing on only isolated PAs without considering network connectivity or to the difficulty of balancing social and ecological synergy in practice. To address this issue, we proposed a social-ecological connectivity pathway to maximize the evaluation and optimization of EPA in a coastal region: first, we selected social and ecological indicators for habitat suitability evaluation and simulated the protected area network (PAN); second, we evaluated the rationality of network connectivity; and ultimately, we identified conservation gaps to the post-2020 global biodiversity target. Considering the complexity of coastal ecosystems, we selected the four coastal cities of the Shandong Peninsula, China as a case study. We find that (1) the social-ecological PAN consists of 370 primary corridors and 110 secondary corridors; there are 12 cross-ecosystem types in the identified PANs, three of which span marine to terrestrial ecosystems, while the remaining nine span terrestrial interior ecosystems; (2) 66 nodes were identified as spatial gaps; the benefit gap indicated that 51.75% of PAs were inefficiently protected but 48.25% were appropriately protected; regarding quantity gap, the marine PAs gap (25.41%) is much larger than the terrestrial PAs gap (15.80%), suggesting a possible priority in the marine PAs appropriately. Our study reveals that the EPA in the coastal region is currently weak and urgently needs to improve. Thus, we propose measures to optimize the EPA and suggest its potential application to other PAs in complex and vulnerable coastal regions. [Display omitted] •We propose a social-ecological protected area network connectivity approach in a coastal region.•Connecting PAs across ecosystems is of great value in improving the conservation EPA.•The gap between the number and scale of marine PAs is far -larger than that of terrestrial PAs.•There are three existing levels of conservation gaps in the post-2020 global biodiversity target.•The coastline area has large potential to achieve the 2030 targets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Coastal region ; Conservation gaps ; Effectiveness of protected areas ; Protected area network ; Social-ecological connectivity</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2024-01, Vol.349, p.119338-119338, Article 119338</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3</cites><orcidid>0009-0001-7995-8021 ; 0000-0001-7861-9303 ; 0009-0000-4115-4346 ; 0000-0003-3233-856X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wenqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chao</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing and optimizing the effectiveness of protected areas along China’s coastal region: A social-ecological protected area network study</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>Effectiveness of protected areas (EPA) evaluation has been used to measure the effectiveness of existing protected areas (PAs) and to identify prioritized and inefficient PAs. However, the current EPA evaluation remains incomplete, primarily due either to the scale of evaluation focusing on only isolated PAs without considering network connectivity or to the difficulty of balancing social and ecological synergy in practice. To address this issue, we proposed a social-ecological connectivity pathway to maximize the evaluation and optimization of EPA in a coastal region: first, we selected social and ecological indicators for habitat suitability evaluation and simulated the protected area network (PAN); second, we evaluated the rationality of network connectivity; and ultimately, we identified conservation gaps to the post-2020 global biodiversity target. Considering the complexity of coastal ecosystems, we selected the four coastal cities of the Shandong Peninsula, China as a case study. We find that (1) the social-ecological PAN consists of 370 primary corridors and 110 secondary corridors; there are 12 cross-ecosystem types in the identified PANs, three of which span marine to terrestrial ecosystems, while the remaining nine span terrestrial interior ecosystems; (2) 66 nodes were identified as spatial gaps; the benefit gap indicated that 51.75% of PAs were inefficiently protected but 48.25% were appropriately protected; regarding quantity gap, the marine PAs gap (25.41%) is much larger than the terrestrial PAs gap (15.80%), suggesting a possible priority in the marine PAs appropriately. Our study reveals that the EPA in the coastal region is currently weak and urgently needs to improve. Thus, we propose measures to optimize the EPA and suggest its potential application to other PAs in complex and vulnerable coastal regions. [Display omitted] •We propose a social-ecological protected area network connectivity approach in a coastal region.•Connecting PAs across ecosystems is of great value in improving the conservation EPA.•The gap between the number and scale of marine PAs is far -larger than that of terrestrial PAs.•There are three existing levels of conservation gaps in the post-2020 global biodiversity target.•The coastline area has large potential to achieve the 2030 targets.</description><subject>Coastal region</subject><subject>Conservation gaps</subject><subject>Effectiveness of protected areas</subject><subject>Protected area network</subject><subject>Social-ecological connectivity</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUEGOEzEQtBBIhIUnIPnIZULbnpnMcEFRxMJKK3GBs-Wx21mHiR3cTtBy4gXc-R4vwVH2sidOpe6uKnUVY68FLAWI_u1uucN42pu4lCDVUohRqeEJWwgYu2boFTxlC1AgmnY1rp6zF0Q7AFBSrBbs95oIiULcchMdT4cS9uHneSx3yNF7tCWcMFYOT54fcip1g46bjIa4mVOlbu5CNH9__SFuk6FiZp5xG1J8x9eckg1mbtCmOW2DrbfHHjxi-ZHyN07l6O5fsmfezISvHvCKfb3-8GXzqbn9_PFms75trGpladrem05hP7UDTAggW2N70aIcBxjcAMZ1YpJd58D3zkzj6EVF7LyfbKdap67Ym4tvfeb7EanofSCL82wipiNpOQwDKNFKWandhWpzIsro9SGHvcn3WoA-9693-qF_fe5fX_qvuvcXHdYcp4BZkw0YLbqQa3ztUviPwz-f3JXQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Zhao, Ye</creator><creator>Qian, Wenqi</creator><creator>Liu, Xinyu</creator><creator>Wu, Chao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7995-8021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4115-4346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-856X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Assessing and optimizing the effectiveness of protected areas along China’s coastal region: A social-ecological protected area network study</title><author>Zhao, Ye ; Qian, Wenqi ; Liu, Xinyu ; Wu, Chao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Coastal region</topic><topic>Conservation gaps</topic><topic>Effectiveness of protected areas</topic><topic>Protected area network</topic><topic>Social-ecological connectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wenqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Ye</au><au>Qian, Wenqi</au><au>Liu, Xinyu</au><au>Wu, Chao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing and optimizing the effectiveness of protected areas along China’s coastal region: A social-ecological protected area network study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>349</volume><spage>119338</spage><epage>119338</epage><pages>119338-119338</pages><artnum>119338</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Effectiveness of protected areas (EPA) evaluation has been used to measure the effectiveness of existing protected areas (PAs) and to identify prioritized and inefficient PAs. However, the current EPA evaluation remains incomplete, primarily due either to the scale of evaluation focusing on only isolated PAs without considering network connectivity or to the difficulty of balancing social and ecological synergy in practice. To address this issue, we proposed a social-ecological connectivity pathway to maximize the evaluation and optimization of EPA in a coastal region: first, we selected social and ecological indicators for habitat suitability evaluation and simulated the protected area network (PAN); second, we evaluated the rationality of network connectivity; and ultimately, we identified conservation gaps to the post-2020 global biodiversity target. Considering the complexity of coastal ecosystems, we selected the four coastal cities of the Shandong Peninsula, China as a case study. We find that (1) the social-ecological PAN consists of 370 primary corridors and 110 secondary corridors; there are 12 cross-ecosystem types in the identified PANs, three of which span marine to terrestrial ecosystems, while the remaining nine span terrestrial interior ecosystems; (2) 66 nodes were identified as spatial gaps; the benefit gap indicated that 51.75% of PAs were inefficiently protected but 48.25% were appropriately protected; regarding quantity gap, the marine PAs gap (25.41%) is much larger than the terrestrial PAs gap (15.80%), suggesting a possible priority in the marine PAs appropriately. Our study reveals that the EPA in the coastal region is currently weak and urgently needs to improve. Thus, we propose measures to optimize the EPA and suggest its potential application to other PAs in complex and vulnerable coastal regions. [Display omitted] •We propose a social-ecological protected area network connectivity approach in a coastal region.•Connecting PAs across ecosystems is of great value in improving the conservation EPA.•The gap between the number and scale of marine PAs is far -larger than that of terrestrial PAs.•There are three existing levels of conservation gaps in the post-2020 global biodiversity target.•The coastline area has large potential to achieve the 2030 targets.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119338</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7995-8021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4115-4346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-856X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2024-01, Vol.349, p.119338-119338, Article 119338
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2888031422
source Elsevier
subjects Coastal region
Conservation gaps
Effectiveness of protected areas
Protected area network
Social-ecological connectivity
title Assessing and optimizing the effectiveness of protected areas along China’s coastal region: A social-ecological protected area network study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T12%3A19%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20and%20optimizing%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20protected%20areas%20along%20China%E2%80%99s%20coastal%20region:%20A%20social-ecological%20protected%20area%20network%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Zhao,%20Ye&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=349&rft.spage=119338&rft.epage=119338&rft.pages=119338-119338&rft.artnum=119338&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2888031422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-46fa53e6b480be0024ac614e29808d80ad51b255d0f6dab99f16dae5ffbc534d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888031422&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true