Loading…
Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapi...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of cardiology 2023-10, Vol.205, p.S7-S9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | S9 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S7 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 205 |
creator | Deering, Thomas F. Reiffel, James A. Solomon, Allen J. Tamirisa, Kamala P. |
description | Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870995491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914923007592</els_id><sourcerecordid>2869633934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6a523aa673ef67f4538fe15252271148f1eeca0ab1252d8cdf62f7307c8fb09f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKEggpvWPJo0cSNSfMGAMKjbkElvmJY-xqQdmH9vhpmVG1eXeznncM-H0DXBGcFE3DeZ6RprfJVRTFmGZYYpPUEzIguVEkXYKZphjGmqSK7O0UUITVwJ4WKGbsu12YzgE_qQLM0IyTf4MIVkud6N6y4ph370Q3uJzpxpA1wd5xx9vTx_lm_p4uP1vXxapJYJPqbCcMqMEQUDJwqXcyYdEE45pQUhuXQEwBpsViSeKmkrJ6grGC6sdCusHJuju0Puxg8_E4RRd3Ww0Lamh2EKmsoCK8Xz2GmObv5Im2HyffwuqoQSjCmWRxU_qKwfQvDg9MbXnfE7TbDew9ONPsLTe3gaSx3hRd_jwQex7bYGr4OtobdQ1R7sqKuh_ifhF_Mjd4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869633934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Deering, Thomas F. ; Reiffel, James A. ; Solomon, Allen J. ; Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deering, Thomas F. ; Reiffel, James A. ; Solomon, Allen J. ; Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creatorcontrib><description>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Advocacy ; antiarrhythmic ; Antiarrhythmics ; Arrhythmia ; Atrial fibrillation ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Cardiomyopathy ; Clinical trials ; College professors ; Congestive heart failure ; Councils ; Disease control ; Health risks ; Hospitals ; Internal medicine ; Medicine ; Mortality risk ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; rate control ; Rhythm ; rhythm control ; Risk management ; Signs and symptoms ; Survival ; Tachycardia ; Thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2023-10, Vol.205, p.S7-S9</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deering, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiffel, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Allen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creatorcontrib><title>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><description>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>antiarrhythmic</subject><subject>Antiarrhythmics</subject><subject>Arrhythmia</subject><subject>Atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mortality risk</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>rate control</subject><subject>Rhythm</subject><subject>rhythm control</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tachycardia</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKEggpvWPJo0cSNSfMGAMKjbkElvmJY-xqQdmH9vhpmVG1eXeznncM-H0DXBGcFE3DeZ6RprfJVRTFmGZYYpPUEzIguVEkXYKZphjGmqSK7O0UUITVwJ4WKGbsu12YzgE_qQLM0IyTf4MIVkud6N6y4ph370Q3uJzpxpA1wd5xx9vTx_lm_p4uP1vXxapJYJPqbCcMqMEQUDJwqXcyYdEE45pQUhuXQEwBpsViSeKmkrJ6grGC6sdCusHJuju0Puxg8_E4RRd3Ww0Lamh2EKmsoCK8Xz2GmObv5Im2HyffwuqoQSjCmWRxU_qKwfQvDg9MbXnfE7TbDew9ONPsLTe3gaSx3hRd_jwQex7bYGr4OtobdQ1R7sqKuh_ifhF_Mjd4k</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Deering, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Reiffel, James A.</creator><creator>Solomon, Allen J.</creator><creator>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</title><author>Deering, Thomas F. ; Reiffel, James A. ; Solomon, Allen J. ; Tamirisa, Kamala P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6a523aa673ef67f4538fe15252271148f1eeca0ab1252d8cdf62f7307c8fb09f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>antiarrhythmic</topic><topic>Antiarrhythmics</topic><topic>Arrhythmia</topic><topic>Atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mortality risk</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>rate control</topic><topic>Rhythm</topic><topic>rhythm control</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tachycardia</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deering, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiffel, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Allen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deering, Thomas F.</au><au>Reiffel, James A.</au><au>Solomon, Allen J.</au><au>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>205</volume><spage>S7</spage><epage>S9</epage><pages>S7-S9</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><notes>SourceType-Other Sources-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>content type line 63</notes><notes>ObjectType-Undefined-1</notes><abstract>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 2023-10, Vol.205, p.S7-S9 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870995491 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Ablation Advocacy antiarrhythmic Antiarrhythmics Arrhythmia Atrial fibrillation Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiology Cardiomyopathy Clinical trials College professors Congestive heart failure Councils Disease control Health risks Hospitals Internal medicine Medicine Mortality risk Obstetrics Pregnancy rate control Rhythm rhythm control Risk management Signs and symptoms Survival Tachycardia Thromboembolism |
title | Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T09%3A31%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chapter%202:%20Rate%20Versus%20Rhythm%20Control&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Deering,%20Thomas%20F.&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=205&rft.spage=S7&rft.epage=S9&rft.pages=S7-S9&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2869633934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6a523aa673ef67f4538fe15252271148f1eeca0ab1252d8cdf62f7307c8fb09f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869633934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |