Loading…

Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2023-10, Vol.205, p.S7-S9
Main Authors: Deering, Thomas F., Reiffel, James A., Solomon, Allen J., Tamirisa, Kamala P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S9
container_issue
container_start_page S7
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 205
creator Deering, Thomas F.
Reiffel, James A.
Solomon, Allen J.
Tamirisa, Kamala P.
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870995491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914923007592</els_id><sourcerecordid>2869633934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6a523aa673ef67f4538fe15252271148f1eeca0ab1252d8cdf62f7307c8fb09f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKEggpvWPJo0cSNSfMGAMKjbkElvmJY-xqQdmH9vhpmVG1eXeznncM-H0DXBGcFE3DeZ6RprfJVRTFmGZYYpPUEzIguVEkXYKZphjGmqSK7O0UUITVwJ4WKGbsu12YzgE_qQLM0IyTf4MIVkud6N6y4ph370Q3uJzpxpA1wd5xx9vTx_lm_p4uP1vXxapJYJPqbCcMqMEQUDJwqXcyYdEE45pQUhuXQEwBpsViSeKmkrJ6grGC6sdCusHJuju0Puxg8_E4RRd3Ww0Lamh2EKmsoCK8Xz2GmObv5Im2HyffwuqoQSjCmWRxU_qKwfQvDg9MbXnfE7TbDew9ONPsLTe3gaSx3hRd_jwQex7bYGr4OtobdQ1R7sqKuh_ifhF_Mjd4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869633934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Deering, Thomas F. ; Reiffel, James A. ; Solomon, Allen J. ; Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deering, Thomas F. ; Reiffel, James A. ; Solomon, Allen J. ; Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creatorcontrib><description>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Advocacy ; antiarrhythmic ; Antiarrhythmics ; Arrhythmia ; Atrial fibrillation ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Cardiomyopathy ; Clinical trials ; College professors ; Congestive heart failure ; Councils ; Disease control ; Health risks ; Hospitals ; Internal medicine ; Medicine ; Mortality risk ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; rate control ; Rhythm ; rhythm control ; Risk management ; Signs and symptoms ; Survival ; Tachycardia ; Thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2023-10, Vol.205, p.S7-S9</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deering, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiffel, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Allen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creatorcontrib><title>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><description>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>antiarrhythmic</subject><subject>Antiarrhythmics</subject><subject>Arrhythmia</subject><subject>Atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mortality risk</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>rate control</subject><subject>Rhythm</subject><subject>rhythm control</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tachycardia</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKEggpvWPJo0cSNSfMGAMKjbkElvmJY-xqQdmH9vhpmVG1eXeznncM-H0DXBGcFE3DeZ6RprfJVRTFmGZYYpPUEzIguVEkXYKZphjGmqSK7O0UUITVwJ4WKGbsu12YzgE_qQLM0IyTf4MIVkud6N6y4ph370Q3uJzpxpA1wd5xx9vTx_lm_p4uP1vXxapJYJPqbCcMqMEQUDJwqXcyYdEE45pQUhuXQEwBpsViSeKmkrJ6grGC6sdCusHJuju0Puxg8_E4RRd3Ww0Lamh2EKmsoCK8Xz2GmObv5Im2HyffwuqoQSjCmWRxU_qKwfQvDg9MbXnfE7TbDew9ONPsLTe3gaSx3hRd_jwQex7bYGr4OtobdQ1R7sqKuh_ifhF_Mjd4k</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Deering, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Reiffel, James A.</creator><creator>Solomon, Allen J.</creator><creator>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</title><author>Deering, Thomas F. ; Reiffel, James A. ; Solomon, Allen J. ; Tamirisa, Kamala P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6a523aa673ef67f4538fe15252271148f1eeca0ab1252d8cdf62f7307c8fb09f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>antiarrhythmic</topic><topic>Antiarrhythmics</topic><topic>Arrhythmia</topic><topic>Atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mortality risk</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>rate control</topic><topic>Rhythm</topic><topic>rhythm control</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tachycardia</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deering, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiffel, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Allen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deering, Thomas F.</au><au>Reiffel, James A.</au><au>Solomon, Allen J.</au><au>Tamirisa, Kamala P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>205</volume><spage>S7</spage><epage>S9</epage><pages>S7-S9</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><notes>SourceType-Other Sources-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>content type line 63</notes><notes>ObjectType-Undefined-1</notes><abstract>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially serious health risk, both because of its symptoms and because of its association with an increased risk for heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolism, and death. Chapter 2 discusses selection of appropriate treatments and when to initiate these therapies. Older trials focused on comparing rate versus rhythm control treatment options for AF. It is now recognized that both rate and rhythm control are important and can be used together. This chapter reviews the historical, pivotal rate versus rhythm control trials that failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm over rate control, as well as the trials’ now-recognized limitations with respect to modern therapy. In addition, an in-depth discussion of the more recent trials of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation techniques (which have become available since the original rate versus rhythm trials were performed) is included. These updated trials show that when applied to patient- and disease-specific situations, rhythm control can reduce the risk for mortality and hospitalization. The chapter also reviews the guidelines that have been developed to achieve these goals. Chapter 2 is summarized as follows: (1) Rate control is needed (at rest and during exertion) to reduce rate-related symptoms when rhythm control is ineffective or incomplete and to prevent a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. (2) Previous trials with pharmacological therapy alone comparing rate versus rhythm control using the AADs available at that time failed to show any overall survival benefit of rhythm control over rate control. (3) These earlier trials had many methodological limitations and enrolled participants who did not have access to modern therapies. (4) Newer therapies, including those for stroke prevention, dronedarone (the latest approved AAD), and AF ablation, have improved the safety and efficacy of rhythm control strategies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2023-10, Vol.205, p.S7-S9
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870995491
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Ablation
Advocacy
antiarrhythmic
Antiarrhythmics
Arrhythmia
Atrial fibrillation
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiology
Cardiomyopathy
Clinical trials
College professors
Congestive heart failure
Councils
Disease control
Health risks
Hospitals
Internal medicine
Medicine
Mortality risk
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
rate control
Rhythm
rhythm control
Risk management
Signs and symptoms
Survival
Tachycardia
Thromboembolism
title Chapter 2: Rate Versus Rhythm Control
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T09%3A31%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chapter%202:%20Rate%20Versus%20Rhythm%20Control&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Deering,%20Thomas%20F.&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=205&rft.spage=S7&rft.epage=S9&rft.pages=S7-S9&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2869633934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6a523aa673ef67f4538fe15252271148f1eeca0ab1252d8cdf62f7307c8fb09f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869633934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true