Loading…
Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions
A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-fiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cancer education 2023-12, Vol.38 (6), p.1808-1815 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13 |
container_end_page | 1815 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1808 |
container_title | Journal of cancer education |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Tipre, Meghan Hardy, Claudia Bowman, Tara Glover, Marcus Gullet, Patricia Baity, Denise Levy, Kathy L Baskin, Monica |
description | A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants (
n
= 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants (
n
=50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839246724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2891049517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1PwyAYxonRuDn9BzwYEi9eqnyUQr25xq9kiybTM6EMZmdHK7Qx_vcyNzXx4IGX8PJ7Hl4eAI4xOscI8YuAKRY8QYSuF80SsgOGmKXxGOsuGCIhWCJwzgbgIIQlim2C2D4YUJ4yIXg6BLOicdq0HZyqtq3cAr5X3Qsc10q_wqlxl3CsvK-MD7Br4KNvQqc6AwsVRR7OtDfGrVXKzeGsqfuualw4BHtW1cEcbfcReL65firuksnD7X1xNUk05axLskzTsiwZyqjFWOUqxWRuMxObPEOGYGGZ0STPraWICs35nCBLS820VlZhOgJnG9_WN2-9CZ1cVUGbulbONH2QRNCcpBknaURP_6DLpvcuThepHKM0Z5hHimwoHT8avLGy9dVK-Q-JkVxHLjeRyxi3_Ipckig62Vr35crMfyTfGUeAboAQr9zC-N-3_7H9BGwoiz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891049517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Tipre, Meghan ; Hardy, Claudia ; Bowman, Tara ; Glover, Marcus ; Gullet, Patricia ; Baity, Denise ; Levy, Kathy ; L Baskin, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Tipre, Meghan ; Hardy, Claudia ; Bowman, Tara ; Glover, Marcus ; Gullet, Patricia ; Baity, Denise ; Levy, Kathy ; L Baskin, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants (
n
= 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants (
n
=50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income <$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under “fear of consequences of test,” “lack of knowledge,” and “costs/no insurance” as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with “dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)” were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0154</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37458874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Cluster analysis ; Concept mapping ; Males ; Medical screening ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prostate cancer ; Role models</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer education, 2023-12, Vol.38 (6), p.1808-1815</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0859-6024</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37458874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tipre, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gullet, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baity, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L Baskin, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</title><title>Journal of cancer education</title><addtitle>J Canc Educ</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><description>A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants (
n
= 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants (
n
=50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income <$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under “fear of consequences of test,” “lack of knowledge,” and “costs/no insurance” as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with “dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)” were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Concept mapping</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Role models</subject><issn>0885-8195</issn><issn>1543-0154</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1PwyAYxonRuDn9BzwYEi9eqnyUQr25xq9kiybTM6EMZmdHK7Qx_vcyNzXx4IGX8PJ7Hl4eAI4xOscI8YuAKRY8QYSuF80SsgOGmKXxGOsuGCIhWCJwzgbgIIQlim2C2D4YUJ4yIXg6BLOicdq0HZyqtq3cAr5X3Qsc10q_wqlxl3CsvK-MD7Br4KNvQqc6AwsVRR7OtDfGrVXKzeGsqfuualw4BHtW1cEcbfcReL65firuksnD7X1xNUk05axLskzTsiwZyqjFWOUqxWRuMxObPEOGYGGZ0STPraWICs35nCBLS820VlZhOgJnG9_WN2-9CZ1cVUGbulbONH2QRNCcpBknaURP_6DLpvcuThepHKM0Z5hHimwoHT8avLGy9dVK-Q-JkVxHLjeRyxi3_Ipckig62Vr35crMfyTfGUeAboAQr9zC-N-3_7H9BGwoiz0</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Tipre, Meghan</creator><creator>Hardy, Claudia</creator><creator>Bowman, Tara</creator><creator>Glover, Marcus</creator><creator>Gullet, Patricia</creator><creator>Baity, Denise</creator><creator>Levy, Kathy</creator><creator>L Baskin, Monica</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-6024</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</title><author>Tipre, Meghan ; Hardy, Claudia ; Bowman, Tara ; Glover, Marcus ; Gullet, Patricia ; Baity, Denise ; Levy, Kathy ; L Baskin, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Concept mapping</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Role models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tipre, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gullet, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baity, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L Baskin, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tipre, Meghan</au><au>Hardy, Claudia</au><au>Bowman, Tara</au><au>Glover, Marcus</au><au>Gullet, Patricia</au><au>Baity, Denise</au><au>Levy, Kathy</au><au>L Baskin, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle><stitle>J Canc Educ</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1815</epage><pages>1808-1815</pages><issn>0885-8195</issn><eissn>1543-0154</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants (
n
= 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants (
n
=50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income <$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under “fear of consequences of test,” “lack of knowledge,” and “costs/no insurance” as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with “dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)” were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37458874</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-6024</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8195 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer education, 2023-12, Vol.38 (6), p.1808-1815 |
issn | 0885-8195 1543-0154 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839246724 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Barriers Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Cluster analysis Concept mapping Males Medical screening Multivariate Analysis Pharmacology/Toxicology Prostate cancer Role models |
title | Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T14%3A11%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concept%20Mapping%20with%20Black%20Men:%20Barriers%20to%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Screening%20and%20Solutions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20education&rft.au=Tipre,%20Meghan&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1815&rft.pages=1808-1815&rft.issn=0885-8195&rft.eissn=1543-0154&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891049517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891049517&rft_id=info:pmid/37458874&rfr_iscdi=true |