Loading…

Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions

A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-fiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer education 2023-12, Vol.38 (6), p.1808-1815
Main Authors: Tipre, Meghan, Hardy, Claudia, Bowman, Tara, Glover, Marcus, Gullet, Patricia, Baity, Denise, Levy, Kathy, L Baskin, Monica
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13
container_end_page 1815
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1808
container_title Journal of cancer education
container_volume 38
creator Tipre, Meghan
Hardy, Claudia
Bowman, Tara
Glover, Marcus
Gullet, Patricia
Baity, Denise
Levy, Kathy
L Baskin, Monica
description A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants ( n = 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants ( n =50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839246724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2891049517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1PwyAYxonRuDn9BzwYEi9eqnyUQr25xq9kiybTM6EMZmdHK7Qx_vcyNzXx4IGX8PJ7Hl4eAI4xOscI8YuAKRY8QYSuF80SsgOGmKXxGOsuGCIhWCJwzgbgIIQlim2C2D4YUJ4yIXg6BLOicdq0HZyqtq3cAr5X3Qsc10q_wqlxl3CsvK-MD7Br4KNvQqc6AwsVRR7OtDfGrVXKzeGsqfuualw4BHtW1cEcbfcReL65firuksnD7X1xNUk05axLskzTsiwZyqjFWOUqxWRuMxObPEOGYGGZ0STPraWICs35nCBLS820VlZhOgJnG9_WN2-9CZ1cVUGbulbONH2QRNCcpBknaURP_6DLpvcuThepHKM0Z5hHimwoHT8avLGy9dVK-Q-JkVxHLjeRyxi3_Ipckig62Vr35crMfyTfGUeAboAQr9zC-N-3_7H9BGwoiz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891049517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Tipre, Meghan ; Hardy, Claudia ; Bowman, Tara ; Glover, Marcus ; Gullet, Patricia ; Baity, Denise ; Levy, Kathy ; L Baskin, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Tipre, Meghan ; Hardy, Claudia ; Bowman, Tara ; Glover, Marcus ; Gullet, Patricia ; Baity, Denise ; Levy, Kathy ; L Baskin, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants ( n = 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants ( n =50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income &lt;$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under “fear of consequences of test,” “lack of knowledge,” and “costs/no insurance” as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with “dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)” were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0154</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37458874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Cluster analysis ; Concept mapping ; Males ; Medical screening ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prostate cancer ; Role models</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer education, 2023-12, Vol.38 (6), p.1808-1815</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0859-6024</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37458874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tipre, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gullet, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baity, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L Baskin, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</title><title>Journal of cancer education</title><addtitle>J Canc Educ</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><description>A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants ( n = 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants ( n =50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income &lt;$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under “fear of consequences of test,” “lack of knowledge,” and “costs/no insurance” as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with “dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)” were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Concept mapping</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Role models</subject><issn>0885-8195</issn><issn>1543-0154</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1PwyAYxonRuDn9BzwYEi9eqnyUQr25xq9kiybTM6EMZmdHK7Qx_vcyNzXx4IGX8PJ7Hl4eAI4xOscI8YuAKRY8QYSuF80SsgOGmKXxGOsuGCIhWCJwzgbgIIQlim2C2D4YUJ4yIXg6BLOicdq0HZyqtq3cAr5X3Qsc10q_wqlxl3CsvK-MD7Br4KNvQqc6AwsVRR7OtDfGrVXKzeGsqfuualw4BHtW1cEcbfcReL65firuksnD7X1xNUk05axLskzTsiwZyqjFWOUqxWRuMxObPEOGYGGZ0STPraWICs35nCBLS820VlZhOgJnG9_WN2-9CZ1cVUGbulbONH2QRNCcpBknaURP_6DLpvcuThepHKM0Z5hHimwoHT8avLGy9dVK-Q-JkVxHLjeRyxi3_Ipckig62Vr35crMfyTfGUeAboAQr9zC-N-3_7H9BGwoiz0</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Tipre, Meghan</creator><creator>Hardy, Claudia</creator><creator>Bowman, Tara</creator><creator>Glover, Marcus</creator><creator>Gullet, Patricia</creator><creator>Baity, Denise</creator><creator>Levy, Kathy</creator><creator>L Baskin, Monica</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-6024</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</title><author>Tipre, Meghan ; Hardy, Claudia ; Bowman, Tara ; Glover, Marcus ; Gullet, Patricia ; Baity, Denise ; Levy, Kathy ; L Baskin, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Concept mapping</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Role models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tipre, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gullet, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baity, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L Baskin, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tipre, Meghan</au><au>Hardy, Claudia</au><au>Bowman, Tara</au><au>Glover, Marcus</au><au>Gullet, Patricia</au><au>Baity, Denise</au><au>Levy, Kathy</au><au>L Baskin, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle><stitle>J Canc Educ</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1815</epage><pages>1808-1815</pages><issn>0885-8195</issn><eissn>1543-0154</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>A structured participatory approach of group concept mapping (GCM) was used to understand barriers and concerns around prostate cancer screening (PCS) among African American (AA) men. One-hundred thirteen AA men aged 35–70 years enrolled from one urban and three rural counties in Alabama. Eighty-five men brainstormed and generated 41 unique ideas in response to a single prompt. Participants ( n = 70) sorted ideas into groups and rated them in terms of importance and feasibility to change opinions. Multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Participants ( n =50) discussed visual concept maps during three focus-groups and recommended solutions to address key barriers. The mean age of respondents was 52 (±10), 50% were rural, 37% were college-educated, 56% with income &lt;$44,500, and 22% with PROCASE Knowledge Index ≤5. Cluster analyses revealed eight clusters. Participants ranked barriers grouped under “fear of consequences of test,” “lack of knowledge,” and “costs/no insurance” as most important to improve PCS among AA men. The same three clusters along with “dislike for digital rectal exam (DRE)” were ranked as most difficult to change. No major differences were noted by urban/rural status. Solutions to address barriers included education at a younger age, alternate testing options and open discussion about DRE, and clear and precise messaging by peers and relatable role models. Our study identified specific barriers to PCS among AA with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. Culturally sensitive interventions delivered by trained healthcare professionals, peers, and relatable role models, can potentially increase PCS among AA men.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37458874</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-6024</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-8195
ispartof Journal of cancer education, 2023-12, Vol.38 (6), p.1808-1815
issn 0885-8195
1543-0154
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839246724
source Springer Link
subjects Barriers
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cancer Research
Cluster analysis
Concept mapping
Males
Medical screening
Multivariate Analysis
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Prostate cancer
Role models
title Concept Mapping with Black Men: Barriers to Prostate Cancer Screening and Solutions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T14%3A11%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concept%20Mapping%20with%20Black%20Men:%20Barriers%20to%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Screening%20and%20Solutions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20education&rft.au=Tipre,%20Meghan&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1815&rft.pages=1808-1815&rft.issn=0885-8195&rft.eissn=1543-0154&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13187-023-02336-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891049517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-66c3bbb5063f11a9a412df6e3bb760e218f5ec299ff3038c77d20f3bc5ccafa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891049517&rft_id=info:pmid/37458874&rfr_iscdi=true