Loading…

Rates of event capture of home video EEG

•A review was undertaken of an Australia-wide ambulatory video-EEG monitoring service.•Patients were in view of camera for 94.90% of events, and 84.89% of studies had all events on camera.•84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Recording electrographic and be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical neurophysiology 2023-05, Vol.149, p.12-17
Main Authors: Nurse, Ewan S., Perera, Thilini, Hannon, Timothy, Wong, Victoria, Fernandes, Kiran M., Cook, Mark J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3
container_end_page 17
container_issue
container_start_page 12
container_title Clinical neurophysiology
container_volume 149
creator Nurse, Ewan S.
Perera, Thilini
Hannon, Timothy
Wong, Victoria
Fernandes, Kiran M.
Cook, Mark J.
description •A review was undertaken of an Australia-wide ambulatory video-EEG monitoring service.•Patients were in view of camera for 94.90% of events, and 84.89% of studies had all events on camera.•84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Recording electrographic and behavioral information during epileptic and other paroxysmal events is important during video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. This study was undertaken to measure the event capture rate of an home service operating across Australia using a shoulder-worn EEG device and telescopic pole-mounted camera. Neurologist reports were accessed retrospectively. Studies with confirmed events were identified and assessed for event capture by recording modality, whether events were reported or discovered, and physiological state. 6,265 studies were identified, of which 2,788 (44.50%) had events. A total of 15,691 events were captured, of which 77.89% were reported. The EEG amplifier was active for 99.83% of events. The patient was in view of the camera for 94.90% of events. 84.89% of studies had all events on camera, and 2.65% had zero events on camera (mean = 93.66%, median = 100.00%). 84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Event capture was similar to previously reported rates from home studies, with higher capture rates on video. Most patients have all events captured on camera. Home monitoring is capable of high rates of event capture, and the use of wide-angle cameras allows for all events to be captured in the majority of studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.165
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2783494798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245723002031</els_id><sourcerecordid>2783494798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_A5E-7qU1uaRN8iLImFMYCKLPoU2vLKM_ZtIO_O_tqPro0x3H53vHfQi5ZTRhlGX3-8TWrj3sEqDAEwoJy9IzMmdKQqx0Cudjz5WKQaRyRq5C2FNKJRVwSWY8U5nUTMzJ8i3vMURdFeER2z6y-aEfPJ4Gu67B6OhK7KL1enNNLqq8DnjzUxfk42n9vnqOt6-bl9XjNrY8gz5OGRSMWURUOqcFK1PNuGSWo1RlVoHSiLSwwIWgFhVSXQJkkhVpBRJ5wRdkOe09-O5zwNCbxgWLdZ232A3BgFRcaCG1GlExodZ3IXiszMG7JvdfhlFzcmT2ZnJkTo4MBTM6GmN3PxeGosHyL_QrZQQeJgDHP48OvQnWYWuxdB5tb8rO_X_hG6lsd2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2783494798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rates of event capture of home video EEG</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Nurse, Ewan S. ; Perera, Thilini ; Hannon, Timothy ; Wong, Victoria ; Fernandes, Kiran M. ; Cook, Mark J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nurse, Ewan S. ; Perera, Thilini ; Hannon, Timothy ; Wong, Victoria ; Fernandes, Kiran M. ; Cook, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><description>•A review was undertaken of an Australia-wide ambulatory video-EEG monitoring service.•Patients were in view of camera for 94.90% of events, and 84.89% of studies had all events on camera.•84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Recording electrographic and behavioral information during epileptic and other paroxysmal events is important during video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. This study was undertaken to measure the event capture rate of an home service operating across Australia using a shoulder-worn EEG device and telescopic pole-mounted camera. Neurologist reports were accessed retrospectively. Studies with confirmed events were identified and assessed for event capture by recording modality, whether events were reported or discovered, and physiological state. 6,265 studies were identified, of which 2,788 (44.50%) had events. A total of 15,691 events were captured, of which 77.89% were reported. The EEG amplifier was active for 99.83% of events. The patient was in view of the camera for 94.90% of events. 84.89% of studies had all events on camera, and 2.65% had zero events on camera (mean = 93.66%, median = 100.00%). 84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Event capture was similar to previously reported rates from home studies, with higher capture rates on video. Most patients have all events captured on camera. Home monitoring is capable of high rates of event capture, and the use of wide-angle cameras allows for all events to be captured in the majority of studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36867914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Ambulatory EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - diagnosis ; Home EEG ; Humans ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Non-epileptic seizures ; Retrospective Studies ; Seizures ; Sleep ; Video EEG</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2023-05, Vol.149, p.12-17</ispartof><rights>2023 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8981-0074 ; 0000-0003-1913-3332</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nurse, Ewan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Thilini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Kiran M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><title>Rates of event capture of home video EEG</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>•A review was undertaken of an Australia-wide ambulatory video-EEG monitoring service.•Patients were in view of camera for 94.90% of events, and 84.89% of studies had all events on camera.•84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Recording electrographic and behavioral information during epileptic and other paroxysmal events is important during video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. This study was undertaken to measure the event capture rate of an home service operating across Australia using a shoulder-worn EEG device and telescopic pole-mounted camera. Neurologist reports were accessed retrospectively. Studies with confirmed events were identified and assessed for event capture by recording modality, whether events were reported or discovered, and physiological state. 6,265 studies were identified, of which 2,788 (44.50%) had events. A total of 15,691 events were captured, of which 77.89% were reported. The EEG amplifier was active for 99.83% of events. The patient was in view of the camera for 94.90% of events. 84.89% of studies had all events on camera, and 2.65% had zero events on camera (mean = 93.66%, median = 100.00%). 84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Event capture was similar to previously reported rates from home studies, with higher capture rates on video. Most patients have all events captured on camera. Home monitoring is capable of high rates of event capture, and the use of wide-angle cameras allows for all events to be captured in the majority of studies.</description><subject>Ambulatory EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Home EEG</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>Non-epileptic seizures</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Video EEG</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_A5E-7qU1uaRN8iLImFMYCKLPoU2vLKM_ZtIO_O_tqPro0x3H53vHfQi5ZTRhlGX3-8TWrj3sEqDAEwoJy9IzMmdKQqx0Cudjz5WKQaRyRq5C2FNKJRVwSWY8U5nUTMzJ8i3vMURdFeER2z6y-aEfPJ4Gu67B6OhK7KL1enNNLqq8DnjzUxfk42n9vnqOt6-bl9XjNrY8gz5OGRSMWURUOqcFK1PNuGSWo1RlVoHSiLSwwIWgFhVSXQJkkhVpBRJ5wRdkOe09-O5zwNCbxgWLdZ232A3BgFRcaCG1GlExodZ3IXiszMG7JvdfhlFzcmT2ZnJkTo4MBTM6GmN3PxeGosHyL_QrZQQeJgDHP48OvQnWYWuxdB5tb8rO_X_hG6lsd2w</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Nurse, Ewan S.</creator><creator>Perera, Thilini</creator><creator>Hannon, Timothy</creator><creator>Wong, Victoria</creator><creator>Fernandes, Kiran M.</creator><creator>Cook, Mark J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-0074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-3332</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Rates of event capture of home video EEG</title><author>Nurse, Ewan S. ; Perera, Thilini ; Hannon, Timothy ; Wong, Victoria ; Fernandes, Kiran M. ; Cook, Mark J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Home EEG</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>Non-epileptic seizures</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Video EEG</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nurse, Ewan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Thilini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Kiran M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nurse, Ewan S.</au><au>Perera, Thilini</au><au>Hannon, Timothy</au><au>Wong, Victoria</au><au>Fernandes, Kiran M.</au><au>Cook, Mark J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rates of event capture of home video EEG</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>149</volume><spage>12</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>12-17</pages><issn>1388-2457</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>•A review was undertaken of an Australia-wide ambulatory video-EEG monitoring service.•Patients were in view of camera for 94.90% of events, and 84.89% of studies had all events on camera.•84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Recording electrographic and behavioral information during epileptic and other paroxysmal events is important during video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. This study was undertaken to measure the event capture rate of an home service operating across Australia using a shoulder-worn EEG device and telescopic pole-mounted camera. Neurologist reports were accessed retrospectively. Studies with confirmed events were identified and assessed for event capture by recording modality, whether events were reported or discovered, and physiological state. 6,265 studies were identified, of which 2,788 (44.50%) had events. A total of 15,691 events were captured, of which 77.89% were reported. The EEG amplifier was active for 99.83% of events. The patient was in view of the camera for 94.90% of events. 84.89% of studies had all events on camera, and 2.65% had zero events on camera (mean = 93.66%, median = 100.00%). 84.42% of events from wakefulness were reported, compared to 54.27% from sleep. Event capture was similar to previously reported rates from home studies, with higher capture rates on video. Most patients have all events captured on camera. Home monitoring is capable of high rates of event capture, and the use of wide-angle cameras allows for all events to be captured in the majority of studies.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36867914</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.165</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-0074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-3332</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-2457
ispartof Clinical neurophysiology, 2023-05, Vol.149, p.12-17
issn 1388-2457
1872-8952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2783494798
source Elsevier
subjects Ambulatory EEG
Electroencephalography
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - diagnosis
Home EEG
Humans
Monitoring, Physiologic
Non-epileptic seizures
Retrospective Studies
Seizures
Sleep
Video EEG
title Rates of event capture of home video EEG
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T21%3A31%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rates%20of%20event%20capture%20of%20home%20video%20EEG&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Nurse,%20Ewan%20S.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=149&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=12-17&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2783494798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-512b11ceee89a0b1d591371c3e78d6f289ee0bc23440ce8e09d22671b5f27e3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2783494798&rft_id=info:pmid/36867914&rfr_iscdi=true