Loading…

Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment

The color is a major factor in determining inflammation status in most gingival indices. Current indices have limitations mainly due to subjective nature. Digital color analysis can provide objective and accurate measurements. Thus, the present study aimed to assess by digital tool the gingival colo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dentistry 2022-12, Vol.127, p.104331-104331, Article 104331
Main Authors: Ginesin, Ofir, Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar, Gabay, Eran, Machtei, Eli Eliahu, Mijiritsky, Eitan, Mayer, Yaniv
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523
container_end_page 104331
container_issue
container_start_page 104331
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 127
creator Ginesin, Ofir
Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar
Gabay, Eran
Machtei, Eli Eliahu
Mijiritsky, Eitan
Mayer, Yaniv
description The color is a major factor in determining inflammation status in most gingival indices. Current indices have limitations mainly due to subjective nature. Digital color analysis can provide objective and accurate measurements. Thus, the present study aimed to assess by digital tool the gingival color in the different stages of an active periodontal treatment. Forty patients (19 males and 21 females) diagnosed with periodontitis (stage III/ IV, grade C) and treated surgically were included in the study. Clinical data (probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, gingival index, and gingival recession) and photographs by digital single-lens-reflex (DSLR) camera were recorded before initial periodontal treatment, which included scaling and root surface debridement (T0); the same parameters were then re-evaluated 6-8 weeks (T1) and 3 months after periodontal surgery (regenerative/resective) (T2). Differences between clinical parameters were calculated. The color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIELab) was used to analyze gingival color. In 56 periodontal surgical sites, 168 photographs were taken. The a*-value of the CIELab color system (higher a*- value translate to a stronger red color) was significantly reduced between T0 to T1 and further decreased at T2 (32.01, 29.28, and 27.45 respectively). Significant improvement in clinical parameters were found between T0 to T1 and T1 to T2. Sub-analysis of two distinct surgical interventions revealed that only regenerative procedure improved the a*-value, which was significantly correlated with pocket depth reduction. Photometric analysis can be used to assess gingival color change during periodontal treatment of patients with periodontitis. Gingival inflammation is a major factor in periodontal assessment; nevertheless, all current gingival inflammation indices are partially subjective and only semi-quantitative. The digital photometric analysis may allow for accurate and objective gingival color assessment during periodontal treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104331
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725654679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571222003864</els_id><sourcerecordid>2737713970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqGyX_oJKKFIvvWQZ23GcHDggaAsIiQtI3CyvPVkcJXFqe1fi3-PtUg499DTS6Hnn4yHkK4UVBVqf9ave4pRWDBjLnYpz-oEsaCPbksr66SNZAAcohaTsmHyOsQeAClj7iRzzmgnWiHZBbq_cxiU9FPOzT37EFJwp9KSHl-hi4bti46aN22UgYJz9FLFIvpgxOG_9tA-mgDqN-ZATctTpIeKXt7okjz9_PFxel3f3v24uL-5Kw6lMpdC0g4oxK7oauGhtU3WMybWkICg1FbWam4ZLnh-poVk3tJbCSs4MNFUrGF-S74e5c_C_txiTGl00OAx6Qr-NikkmalHVss3ot3_Q3m9D_m5PcSkpbyVkih8oE3yMATs1Bzfq8KIoqL1q1as_qtVetTqozqnTt9nb9Yj2PfPXbQbODwBmGTuHQUXjcDJoXUCTlPXuvwteAcGVjlk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737713970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Ginesin, Ofir ; Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar ; Gabay, Eran ; Machtei, Eli Eliahu ; Mijiritsky, Eitan ; Mayer, Yaniv</creator><creatorcontrib>Ginesin, Ofir ; Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar ; Gabay, Eran ; Machtei, Eli Eliahu ; Mijiritsky, Eitan ; Mayer, Yaniv</creatorcontrib><description>The color is a major factor in determining inflammation status in most gingival indices. Current indices have limitations mainly due to subjective nature. Digital color analysis can provide objective and accurate measurements. Thus, the present study aimed to assess by digital tool the gingival color in the different stages of an active periodontal treatment. Forty patients (19 males and 21 females) diagnosed with periodontitis (stage III/ IV, grade C) and treated surgically were included in the study. Clinical data (probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, gingival index, and gingival recession) and photographs by digital single-lens-reflex (DSLR) camera were recorded before initial periodontal treatment, which included scaling and root surface debridement (T0); the same parameters were then re-evaluated 6-8 weeks (T1) and 3 months after periodontal surgery (regenerative/resective) (T2). Differences between clinical parameters were calculated. The color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIELab) was used to analyze gingival color. In 56 periodontal surgical sites, 168 photographs were taken. The a*-value of the CIELab color system (higher a*- value translate to a stronger red color) was significantly reduced between T0 to T1 and further decreased at T2 (32.01, 29.28, and 27.45 respectively). Significant improvement in clinical parameters were found between T0 to T1 and T1 to T2. Sub-analysis of two distinct surgical interventions revealed that only regenerative procedure improved the a*-value, which was significantly correlated with pocket depth reduction. Photometric analysis can be used to assess gingival color change during periodontal treatment of patients with periodontitis. Gingival inflammation is a major factor in periodontal assessment; nevertheless, all current gingival inflammation indices are partially subjective and only semi-quantitative. The digital photometric analysis may allow for accurate and objective gingival color assessment during periodontal treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104331</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36252859</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biofilms ; Bleeding on probing gingival ; Color ; Debridement ; Dental Scaling - methods ; Dentistry ; Diagnosis ; Digital cameras ; Digital dentistry ; Female ; Gingiva ; Gingival index ; Gum disease ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Intervention ; Male ; Parameters ; Patients ; Periodontal Attachment Loss ; Periodontal Pocket - surgery ; Periodontal surgery ; Periodontitis ; Photometry ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2022-12, Vol.127, p.104331-104331, Article 104331</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0429-2883 ; 0000-0002-8736-9753 ; 0000-0001-5500-7961</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36252859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ginesin, Ofir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabay, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machtei, Eli Eliahu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mijiritsky, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Yaniv</creatorcontrib><title>Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>The color is a major factor in determining inflammation status in most gingival indices. Current indices have limitations mainly due to subjective nature. Digital color analysis can provide objective and accurate measurements. Thus, the present study aimed to assess by digital tool the gingival color in the different stages of an active periodontal treatment. Forty patients (19 males and 21 females) diagnosed with periodontitis (stage III/ IV, grade C) and treated surgically were included in the study. Clinical data (probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, gingival index, and gingival recession) and photographs by digital single-lens-reflex (DSLR) camera were recorded before initial periodontal treatment, which included scaling and root surface debridement (T0); the same parameters were then re-evaluated 6-8 weeks (T1) and 3 months after periodontal surgery (regenerative/resective) (T2). Differences between clinical parameters were calculated. The color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIELab) was used to analyze gingival color. In 56 periodontal surgical sites, 168 photographs were taken. The a*-value of the CIELab color system (higher a*- value translate to a stronger red color) was significantly reduced between T0 to T1 and further decreased at T2 (32.01, 29.28, and 27.45 respectively). Significant improvement in clinical parameters were found between T0 to T1 and T1 to T2. Sub-analysis of two distinct surgical interventions revealed that only regenerative procedure improved the a*-value, which was significantly correlated with pocket depth reduction. Photometric analysis can be used to assess gingival color change during periodontal treatment of patients with periodontitis. Gingival inflammation is a major factor in periodontal assessment; nevertheless, all current gingival inflammation indices are partially subjective and only semi-quantitative. The digital photometric analysis may allow for accurate and objective gingival color assessment during periodontal treatment.</description><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Bleeding on probing gingival</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Dental Scaling - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Digital cameras</subject><subject>Digital dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gingiva</subject><subject>Gingival index</subject><subject>Gum disease</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss</subject><subject>Periodontal Pocket - surgery</subject><subject>Periodontal surgery</subject><subject>Periodontitis</subject><subject>Photometry</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqGyX_oJKKFIvvWQZ23GcHDggaAsIiQtI3CyvPVkcJXFqe1fi3-PtUg499DTS6Hnn4yHkK4UVBVqf9ave4pRWDBjLnYpz-oEsaCPbksr66SNZAAcohaTsmHyOsQeAClj7iRzzmgnWiHZBbq_cxiU9FPOzT37EFJwp9KSHl-hi4bti46aN22UgYJz9FLFIvpgxOG_9tA-mgDqN-ZATctTpIeKXt7okjz9_PFxel3f3v24uL-5Kw6lMpdC0g4oxK7oauGhtU3WMybWkICg1FbWam4ZLnh-poVk3tJbCSs4MNFUrGF-S74e5c_C_txiTGl00OAx6Qr-NikkmalHVss3ot3_Q3m9D_m5PcSkpbyVkih8oE3yMATs1Bzfq8KIoqL1q1as_qtVetTqozqnTt9nb9Yj2PfPXbQbODwBmGTuHQUXjcDJoXUCTlPXuvwteAcGVjlk</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Ginesin, Ofir</creator><creator>Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar</creator><creator>Gabay, Eran</creator><creator>Machtei, Eli Eliahu</creator><creator>Mijiritsky, Eitan</creator><creator>Mayer, Yaniv</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-2883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-9753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-7961</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment</title><author>Ginesin, Ofir ; Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar ; Gabay, Eran ; Machtei, Eli Eliahu ; Mijiritsky, Eitan ; Mayer, Yaniv</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Bleeding on probing gingival</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Dental Scaling - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Digital cameras</topic><topic>Digital dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gingiva</topic><topic>Gingival index</topic><topic>Gum disease</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss</topic><topic>Periodontal Pocket - surgery</topic><topic>Periodontal surgery</topic><topic>Periodontitis</topic><topic>Photometry</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ginesin, Ofir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabay, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machtei, Eli Eliahu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mijiritsky, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Yaniv</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ginesin, Ofir</au><au>Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar</au><au>Gabay, Eran</au><au>Machtei, Eli Eliahu</au><au>Mijiritsky, Eitan</au><au>Mayer, Yaniv</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><spage>104331</spage><epage>104331</epage><pages>104331-104331</pages><artnum>104331</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>The color is a major factor in determining inflammation status in most gingival indices. Current indices have limitations mainly due to subjective nature. Digital color analysis can provide objective and accurate measurements. Thus, the present study aimed to assess by digital tool the gingival color in the different stages of an active periodontal treatment. Forty patients (19 males and 21 females) diagnosed with periodontitis (stage III/ IV, grade C) and treated surgically were included in the study. Clinical data (probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, gingival index, and gingival recession) and photographs by digital single-lens-reflex (DSLR) camera were recorded before initial periodontal treatment, which included scaling and root surface debridement (T0); the same parameters were then re-evaluated 6-8 weeks (T1) and 3 months after periodontal surgery (regenerative/resective) (T2). Differences between clinical parameters were calculated. The color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIELab) was used to analyze gingival color. In 56 periodontal surgical sites, 168 photographs were taken. The a*-value of the CIELab color system (higher a*- value translate to a stronger red color) was significantly reduced between T0 to T1 and further decreased at T2 (32.01, 29.28, and 27.45 respectively). Significant improvement in clinical parameters were found between T0 to T1 and T1 to T2. Sub-analysis of two distinct surgical interventions revealed that only regenerative procedure improved the a*-value, which was significantly correlated with pocket depth reduction. Photometric analysis can be used to assess gingival color change during periodontal treatment of patients with periodontitis. Gingival inflammation is a major factor in periodontal assessment; nevertheless, all current gingival inflammation indices are partially subjective and only semi-quantitative. The digital photometric analysis may allow for accurate and objective gingival color assessment during periodontal treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36252859</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104331</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-2883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-9753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-7961</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2022-12, Vol.127, p.104331-104331, Article 104331
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725654679
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Biofilms
Bleeding on probing gingival
Color
Debridement
Dental Scaling - methods
Dentistry
Diagnosis
Digital cameras
Digital dentistry
Female
Gingiva
Gingival index
Gum disease
Humans
Inflammation
Intervention
Male
Parameters
Patients
Periodontal Attachment Loss
Periodontal Pocket - surgery
Periodontal surgery
Periodontitis
Photometry
Statistical analysis
Surgery
title Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T14%3A22%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20photometric%20analysis%20of%20gingival%20response%20to%20periodontal%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Ginesin,%20Ofir&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=127&rft.spage=104331&rft.epage=104331&rft.pages=104331-104331&rft.artnum=104331&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104331&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2737713970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5a1f0422d5f60359d84f227b710511c41da3c8373879608b81675d732c0849523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737713970&rft_id=info:pmid/36252859&rfr_iscdi=true