Loading…

Risk factors for pre‐eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence

Objective To compare pre‐eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre‐eclampsia prevention. Design Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre‐eclampsia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2024-01, Vol.131 (1), p.46-62
Main Authors: Elawad, Terteel, Scott, Georgia, Bone, Jeffrey N., Elwell, Helen, Lopez, Cristina Escalona, Filippi, Veronique, Green, Marcus, Khalil, Asma, Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W., Mistry, Hiten D., Pickerill, Kelly, Shanmugam, Reshma, Singer, Joel, Townsend, Rosemarie, Tsigas, Eleni Z., Vidler, Marianne, Volvert, Marie‐Laure, Dadelszen, Peter, Magee, Laura A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 131
creator Elawad, Terteel
Scott, Georgia
Bone, Jeffrey N.
Elwell, Helen
Lopez, Cristina Escalona
Filippi, Veronique
Green, Marcus
Khalil, Asma
Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W.
Mistry, Hiten D.
Pickerill, Kelly
Shanmugam, Reshma
Singer, Joel
Townsend, Rosemarie
Tsigas, Eleni Z.
Vidler, Marianne
Volvert, Marie‐Laure
Dadelszen, Peter
Magee, Laura A.
description Objective To compare pre‐eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre‐eclampsia prevention. Design Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre‐eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021. Setting Published studies and CPGs. Population Pregnant women. Methods We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. Main outcome measure Pre‐eclampsia. Results Of 78 pre‐eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually ‘probable’ (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten ‘major’ risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre‐eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity (‘moderate’ risk factor) was definitely associated with pre‐eclampsia (high‐quality evidence). The other ten ‘moderate’ risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre‐eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality): being overweight; ‘prehypertension’ at booking; and blood pressure of 130–139/80–89 mmHg in early pregnancy. Conclusions Pre‐eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed. Linked article: This article is commented on by Stefan C. Kane et al., pp. 63 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17311.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.17320
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723160430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896516184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOHTEQhi0UxL2miyyloVmY8WUvdOEohERISIi0sXy8s8Gwt9hnQXR5hDwjT4IPByhocDPWzDe_Rh9j-wiHmN4RqgIz0KI8xEIKWGNbb51Pz3_IQIpyk23HeAOAuQC5wTZlqpUGtcV-X_p4yxvrFkOIvBkCHwM9_vtPrrXdGL3lvueu9b13tk2zBHpH_M_ka0pdisd8NnSjDT4OPb_3i2u-uCZOd2neO9pl641tI-291B326_Tb1ewsO7_4_mP29TxzCgVkWM_zQuucQJCqAYocQVdIVWMhV02NhWsqOyctK11o5YRqBNSlxGKOyqGTO-xglTuG4e9EcWE6Hx21re1pmKIRhZCYg5KQ0C_v0JthCn26zoiyyjXmWKpEHa0oF4YYAzVmDL6z4cEgmKV6sxRtlqLNs_q08fkld5p3VL_xr64ToFfAvW_p4aM8c_LzYhX8BFq4jRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896516184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors for pre‐eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Elawad, Terteel ; Scott, Georgia ; Bone, Jeffrey N. ; Elwell, Helen ; Lopez, Cristina Escalona ; Filippi, Veronique ; Green, Marcus ; Khalil, Asma ; Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W. ; Mistry, Hiten D. ; Pickerill, Kelly ; Shanmugam, Reshma ; Singer, Joel ; Townsend, Rosemarie ; Tsigas, Eleni Z. ; Vidler, Marianne ; Volvert, Marie‐Laure ; Dadelszen, Peter ; Magee, Laura A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elawad, Terteel ; Scott, Georgia ; Bone, Jeffrey N. ; Elwell, Helen ; Lopez, Cristina Escalona ; Filippi, Veronique ; Green, Marcus ; Khalil, Asma ; Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W. ; Mistry, Hiten D. ; Pickerill, Kelly ; Shanmugam, Reshma ; Singer, Joel ; Townsend, Rosemarie ; Tsigas, Eleni Z. ; Vidler, Marianne ; Volvert, Marie‐Laure ; Dadelszen, Peter ; Magee, Laura A. ; PRECISE Network ; the PRECISE Network</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare pre‐eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre‐eclampsia prevention. Design Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre‐eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021. Setting Published studies and CPGs. Population Pregnant women. Methods We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. Main outcome measure Pre‐eclampsia. Results Of 78 pre‐eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually ‘probable’ (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten ‘major’ risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre‐eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity (‘moderate’ risk factor) was definitely associated with pre‐eclampsia (high‐quality evidence). The other ten ‘moderate’ risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre‐eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality): being overweight; ‘prehypertension’ at booking; and blood pressure of 130–139/80–89 mmHg in early pregnancy. Conclusions Pre‐eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed. Linked article: This article is commented on by Stefan C. Kane et al., pp. 63 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17311.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36209504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aspirin ; Blood Pressure ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; determinants ; Eclampsia ; Female ; Humans ; Obesity ; outcomes ; Population studies ; Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology ; Pre-Eclampsia - etiology ; Pre-Eclampsia - prevention &amp; control ; Pregnancy ; prevention ; pre‐eclampsia ; Prophylaxis ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-01, Vol.131 (1), p.46-62</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2802-7670 ; 0000-0001-5846-3014 ; 0000-0003-4136-3070 ; 0000-0002-1355-610X ; 0000-0002-4561-8256 ; 0000-0003-2564-7348 ; 0000-0002-0527-4145</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,783,787,27936,27937</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36209504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elawad, Terteel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bone, Jeffrey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwell, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Cristina Escalona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippi, Veronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Asma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Hiten D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickerill, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmugam, Reshma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsigas, Eleni Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidler, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volvert, Marie‐Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadelszen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRECISE Network</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the PRECISE Network</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors for pre‐eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To compare pre‐eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre‐eclampsia prevention. Design Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre‐eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021. Setting Published studies and CPGs. Population Pregnant women. Methods We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. Main outcome measure Pre‐eclampsia. Results Of 78 pre‐eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually ‘probable’ (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten ‘major’ risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre‐eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity (‘moderate’ risk factor) was definitely associated with pre‐eclampsia (high‐quality evidence). The other ten ‘moderate’ risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre‐eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality): being overweight; ‘prehypertension’ at booking; and blood pressure of 130–139/80–89 mmHg in early pregnancy. Conclusions Pre‐eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed. Linked article: This article is commented on by Stefan C. Kane et al., pp. 63 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17311.</description><subject>Aspirin</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>determinants</subject><subject>Eclampsia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - etiology</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>pre‐eclampsia</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtOHTEQhi0UxL2miyyloVmY8WUvdOEohERISIi0sXy8s8Gwt9hnQXR5hDwjT4IPByhocDPWzDe_Rh9j-wiHmN4RqgIz0KI8xEIKWGNbb51Pz3_IQIpyk23HeAOAuQC5wTZlqpUGtcV-X_p4yxvrFkOIvBkCHwM9_vtPrrXdGL3lvueu9b13tk2zBHpH_M_ka0pdisd8NnSjDT4OPb_3i2u-uCZOd2neO9pl641tI-291B326_Tb1ewsO7_4_mP29TxzCgVkWM_zQuucQJCqAYocQVdIVWMhV02NhWsqOyctK11o5YRqBNSlxGKOyqGTO-xglTuG4e9EcWE6Hx21re1pmKIRhZCYg5KQ0C_v0JthCn26zoiyyjXmWKpEHa0oF4YYAzVmDL6z4cEgmKV6sxRtlqLNs_q08fkld5p3VL_xr64ToFfAvW_p4aM8c_LzYhX8BFq4jRE</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Elawad, Terteel</creator><creator>Scott, Georgia</creator><creator>Bone, Jeffrey N.</creator><creator>Elwell, Helen</creator><creator>Lopez, Cristina Escalona</creator><creator>Filippi, Veronique</creator><creator>Green, Marcus</creator><creator>Khalil, Asma</creator><creator>Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W.</creator><creator>Mistry, Hiten D.</creator><creator>Pickerill, Kelly</creator><creator>Shanmugam, Reshma</creator><creator>Singer, Joel</creator><creator>Townsend, Rosemarie</creator><creator>Tsigas, Eleni Z.</creator><creator>Vidler, Marianne</creator><creator>Volvert, Marie‐Laure</creator><creator>Dadelszen, Peter</creator><creator>Magee, Laura A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-3014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-3070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-610X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4561-8256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-7348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-4145</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Risk factors for pre‐eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence</title><author>Elawad, Terteel ; Scott, Georgia ; Bone, Jeffrey N. ; Elwell, Helen ; Lopez, Cristina Escalona ; Filippi, Veronique ; Green, Marcus ; Khalil, Asma ; Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W. ; Mistry, Hiten D. ; Pickerill, Kelly ; Shanmugam, Reshma ; Singer, Joel ; Townsend, Rosemarie ; Tsigas, Eleni Z. ; Vidler, Marianne ; Volvert, Marie‐Laure ; Dadelszen, Peter ; Magee, Laura A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aspirin</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>determinants</topic><topic>Eclampsia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - etiology</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>pre‐eclampsia</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elawad, Terteel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bone, Jeffrey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwell, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Cristina Escalona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippi, Veronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Asma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Hiten D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickerill, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmugam, Reshma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsigas, Eleni Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidler, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volvert, Marie‐Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadelszen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRECISE Network</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the PRECISE Network</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elawad, Terteel</au><au>Scott, Georgia</au><au>Bone, Jeffrey N.</au><au>Elwell, Helen</au><au>Lopez, Cristina Escalona</au><au>Filippi, Veronique</au><au>Green, Marcus</au><au>Khalil, Asma</au><au>Kinshella, Mai‐Lei W.</au><au>Mistry, Hiten D.</au><au>Pickerill, Kelly</au><au>Shanmugam, Reshma</au><au>Singer, Joel</au><au>Townsend, Rosemarie</au><au>Tsigas, Eleni Z.</au><au>Vidler, Marianne</au><au>Volvert, Marie‐Laure</au><au>Dadelszen, Peter</au><au>Magee, Laura A.</au><aucorp>PRECISE Network</aucorp><aucorp>the PRECISE Network</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors for pre‐eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>46-62</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Objective To compare pre‐eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre‐eclampsia prevention. Design Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre‐eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021. Setting Published studies and CPGs. Population Pregnant women. Methods We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. Main outcome measure Pre‐eclampsia. Results Of 78 pre‐eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually ‘probable’ (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten ‘major’ risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre‐eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity (‘moderate’ risk factor) was definitely associated with pre‐eclampsia (high‐quality evidence). The other ten ‘moderate’ risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre‐eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality): being overweight; ‘prehypertension’ at booking; and blood pressure of 130–139/80–89 mmHg in early pregnancy. Conclusions Pre‐eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed. Linked article: This article is commented on by Stefan C. Kane et al., pp. 63 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17311.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36209504</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.17320</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-3014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-3070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-610X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4561-8256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-7348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-4145</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-01, Vol.131 (1), p.46-62
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723160430
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aspirin
Blood Pressure
Clinical medicine
Clinical practice guidelines
determinants
Eclampsia
Female
Humans
Obesity
outcomes
Population studies
Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology
Pre-Eclampsia - etiology
Pre-Eclampsia - prevention & control
Pregnancy
prevention
pre‐eclampsia
Prophylaxis
Risk Factors
title Risk factors for pre‐eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-13T08%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20for%20pre%E2%80%90eclampsia%20in%20clinical%20practice%20guidelines:%20Comparison%20with%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Elawad,%20Terteel&rft.aucorp=PRECISE%20Network&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=46-62&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896516184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-1db67556e02e4d007610591e9fa064fd17cf9abe5395754c24f20d8317b14c1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896516184&rft_id=info:pmid/36209504&rfr_iscdi=true