Following science on social media: The effects of humor and source likability

Science communicators have been encouraged to use humor in their online engagement efforts. Yet, humor’s effectiveness for engaging people with science remains an open question. We report the results of an experiment designed to elicit varied levels of mirth in respondents, which was positively asso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) England), 2021-07, Vol.30 (5), p.552-569
Main Authors: Yeo, Sara K., Cacciatore, Michael A., Su, Leona Yi-Fan, McKasy, Meaghan, O’Neill, Liane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Digital media
Downstream effects
Humans
Humor
Internet
Knowledge
Manipulation
Mass media effects
Motivation
Respondents
Science
Social Media
Social networks
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33
container_end_page 569
container_issue 5
container_start_page 552
container_title Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
container_volume 30
creator Yeo, Sara K.
Cacciatore, Michael A.
Su, Leona Yi-Fan
McKasy, Meaghan
O’Neill, Liane
description Science communicators have been encouraged to use humor in their online engagement efforts. Yet, humor’s effectiveness for engaging people with science remains an open question. We report the results of an experiment designed to elicit varied levels of mirth in respondents, which was positively associated with perceived likability of the communicator and motivation to follow more science on social media. Furthermore, mirth and perceived likability serially mediated the effect of the experimental manipulation on motivation and factual science knowledge served as a moderator. This indicates that, while humor might be an effective means of reaching audiences, downstream effects are likely to vary depending on individuals’ knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0963662520986942
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479040723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0963662520986942</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2548837320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUxoMobk7vniTgxUv1Ja9NWm8ynAoTL_NcujTZMttmNi2y_96MTYWBp_fg_b7vfXyEXDK4ZUzKO8gECsETDlkqspgfkSFDwSIhIDsmw-052t4H5Mz7FQBgzMUpGSDGgmEmhuR14qrKfdlmQb2yulGauoZ6p2xR0VqXtrins6Wm2hitOk-docu-di0tmjJgfRsElf0o5ray3eacnJii8vpiP0fkffI4Gz9H07enl_HDNFIoki5KJYZFMYlY6jgxcwYSSqMYlxKQC8V1BlJKrlPG0gyTFIwSGkGkaOYKcURudr7r1n322nd5bb3SVVU02vU-57HMIAbJt-j1AboKqZuQLudJnKYokUOgYEep1nnfapOvW1sX7SZnkG-rzg-rDpKrvXE_D0X9Cn66DUC0A3yx0H9f_zX8BgTVgy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548837320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Following science on social media: The effects of humor and source likability</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Yeo, Sara K. ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Su, Leona Yi-Fan ; McKasy, Meaghan ; O’Neill, Liane</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sara K. ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Su, Leona Yi-Fan ; McKasy, Meaghan ; O’Neill, Liane</creatorcontrib><description>Science communicators have been encouraged to use humor in their online engagement efforts. Yet, humor’s effectiveness for engaging people with science remains an open question. We report the results of an experiment designed to elicit varied levels of mirth in respondents, which was positively associated with perceived likability of the communicator and motivation to follow more science on social media. Furthermore, mirth and perceived likability serially mediated the effect of the experimental manipulation on motivation and factual science knowledge served as a moderator. This indicates that, while humor might be an effective means of reaching audiences, downstream effects are likely to vary depending on individuals’ knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-6625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0963662520986942</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33461396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Digital media ; Downstream effects ; Humans ; Humor ; Internet ; Knowledge ; Manipulation ; Mass media effects ; Motivation ; Respondents ; Science ; Social Media ; Social networks</subject><ispartof>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2021-07, Vol.30 (5), p.552-569</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8357-4621 ; 0000-0002-2043-8400 ; 0000-0002-8661-7196 ; 0000-0002-3489-612X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27899,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciatore, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Leona Yi-Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKasy, Meaghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Neill, Liane</creatorcontrib><title>Following science on social media: The effects of humor and source likability</title><title>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</title><addtitle>Public Underst Sci</addtitle><description>Science communicators have been encouraged to use humor in their online engagement efforts. Yet, humor’s effectiveness for engaging people with science remains an open question. We report the results of an experiment designed to elicit varied levels of mirth in respondents, which was positively associated with perceived likability of the communicator and motivation to follow more science on social media. Furthermore, mirth and perceived likability serially mediated the effect of the experimental manipulation on motivation and factual science knowledge served as a moderator. This indicates that, while humor might be an effective means of reaching audiences, downstream effects are likely to vary depending on individuals’ knowledge.</description><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Downstream effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humor</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Mass media effects</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><issn>0963-6625</issn><issn>1361-6609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUxoMobk7vniTgxUv1Ja9NWm8ynAoTL_NcujTZMttmNi2y_96MTYWBp_fg_b7vfXyEXDK4ZUzKO8gECsETDlkqspgfkSFDwSIhIDsmw-052t4H5Mz7FQBgzMUpGSDGgmEmhuR14qrKfdlmQb2yulGauoZ6p2xR0VqXtrins6Wm2hitOk-docu-di0tmjJgfRsElf0o5ray3eacnJii8vpiP0fkffI4Gz9H07enl_HDNFIoki5KJYZFMYlY6jgxcwYSSqMYlxKQC8V1BlJKrlPG0gyTFIwSGkGkaOYKcURudr7r1n322nd5bb3SVVU02vU-57HMIAbJt-j1AboKqZuQLudJnKYokUOgYEep1nnfapOvW1sX7SZnkG-rzg-rDpKrvXE_D0X9Cn66DUC0A3yx0H9f_zX8BgTVgy0</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Yeo, Sara K.</creator><creator>Cacciatore, Michael A.</creator><creator>Su, Leona Yi-Fan</creator><creator>McKasy, Meaghan</creator><creator>O’Neill, Liane</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-4621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-8400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-7196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-612X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Following science on social media: The effects of humor and source likability</title><author>Yeo, Sara K. ; Cacciatore, Michael A. ; Su, Leona Yi-Fan ; McKasy, Meaghan ; O’Neill, Liane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Downstream effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humor</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Mass media effects</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciatore, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Leona Yi-Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKasy, Meaghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Neill, Liane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeo, Sara K.</au><au>Cacciatore, Michael A.</au><au>Su, Leona Yi-Fan</au><au>McKasy, Meaghan</au><au>O’Neill, Liane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Following science on social media: The effects of humor and source likability</atitle><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Underst Sci</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>552-569</pages><issn>0963-6625</issn><eissn>1361-6609</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Science communicators have been encouraged to use humor in their online engagement efforts. Yet, humor’s effectiveness for engaging people with science remains an open question. We report the results of an experiment designed to elicit varied levels of mirth in respondents, which was positively associated with perceived likability of the communicator and motivation to follow more science on social media. Furthermore, mirth and perceived likability serially mediated the effect of the experimental manipulation on motivation and factual science knowledge served as a moderator. This indicates that, while humor might be an effective means of reaching audiences, downstream effects are likely to vary depending on individuals’ knowledge.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33461396</pmid><doi>10.1177/0963662520986942</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-4621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-8400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-7196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-612X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-6625
ispartof Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2021-07, Vol.30 (5), p.552-569
issn 0963-6625
1361-6609
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479040723
source PAIS Index; SAGE
subjects Digital media
Downstream effects
Humans
Humor
Internet
Knowledge
Manipulation
Mass media effects
Motivation
Respondents
Science
Social Media
Social networks
title Following science on social media: The effects of humor and source likability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T21%3A29%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Following%20science%20on%20social%20media:%20The%20effects%20of%20humor%20and%20source%20likability&rft.jtitle=Public%20understanding%20of%20science%20(Bristol,%20England)&rft.au=Yeo,%20Sara%20K.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=552-569&rft.issn=0963-6625&rft.eissn=1361-6609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0963662520986942&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548837320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-873c36c1733de45fb1070dfc12770326c2e907772e811893580fc6e30683fbc33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548837320&rft_id=info:pmid/33461396&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0963662520986942&rfr_iscdi=true