Loading…
Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis
Best management for acute appendicitis (AA) in adults with liver cirrhosis is controversial and needs more investigation. We aimed to examine the impact of different treatment modalities on outcomes in this complex patient population. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was qu...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American surgeon 2019-10, Vol.85 (10), p.1129-1133 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3 |
container_end_page | 1133 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1129 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Garcia, Monika Gerber, Ari Zakhary, Bishoy Finco, Tiago Kazi, Albert Zhang, Xiaofei Brenner, Megan Coimbra, Raul |
description | Best management for acute appendicitis (AA) in adults with liver cirrhosis is controversial and needs more investigation. We aimed to examine the impact of different treatment modalities on outcomes in this complex patient population. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify AA patients with no cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Each cohort was further stratified according to the treatment type: nonoperative management, open appendectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Chisquare, ANOVA, and binary regression analyses were used to determine differences between groups and risk factors for mortality and complications, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 108,289 AA patients were analyzed; of those, 304 with CC and 134 with DC were identified. Compared with CC and no cirrhosis, DC patients had significantly higher mortality, higher cost, and longer hospital length of stay. LA is accompanied by higher survival, lower cost, shorter duration of hospitalization, and lower incidence of complications across all groups. We conclude that LA is the best management strategy for AA in cirrhotic patients. Even in decompensated cirrhotics, which are associated with worse clinical outcomes, LA is still a favorable option over open appendectomy and nonoperative management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481908501011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2309811485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313481908501011</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2311515156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8BL17qZpqmH96WxS9Q14OeS5pM3SxtWpMW2X9vygqCggzDMMPzDjMvIefArgCybMEY48CTHAqWCwYM4IDMQAgRFXnMD8lsAqKJOCYn3m9Dm6QCZkQ-SSvfsUU7UGk1XY-D6lr0tKvpUo0D0mXfo9VGmcF4aiwdNkhfHHq0CidqZZzbdN74a7qkz3Iwnf00OuisbHZhfEqOatl4PPuuc_J2e_O6uo8e13cPq-VjpMJVQ5RqXbAsq1gqWJwmKDJeJEUBeUgu47hOeKwzjrHQdZrVGrVMqvBFpVOVgar4nFzu9_au-xjRD2VrvMKmkRa70ZcxZ0UOkOQioBe_0G03unDvRAGIKdJAxXtKuc57h3XZO9NKtyuBlZPr5V_Xg2ixF_ng6s_afxRflEJ__g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311515156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Garcia, Monika ; Gerber, Ari ; Zakhary, Bishoy ; Finco, Tiago ; Kazi, Albert ; Zhang, Xiaofei ; Brenner, Megan ; Coimbra, Raul</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Monika ; Gerber, Ari ; Zakhary, Bishoy ; Finco, Tiago ; Kazi, Albert ; Zhang, Xiaofei ; Brenner, Megan ; Coimbra, Raul</creatorcontrib><description>Best management for acute appendicitis (AA) in adults with liver cirrhosis is controversial and needs more investigation. We aimed to examine the impact of different treatment modalities on outcomes in this complex patient population. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify AA patients with no cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Each cohort was further stratified according to the treatment type: nonoperative management, open appendectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Chisquare, ANOVA, and binary regression analyses were used to determine differences between groups and risk factors for mortality and complications, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 108,289 AA patients were analyzed; of those, 304 with CC and 134 with DC were identified. Compared with CC and no cirrhosis, DC patients had significantly higher mortality, higher cost, and longer hospital length of stay. LA is accompanied by higher survival, lower cost, shorter duration of hospitalization, and lower incidence of complications across all groups. We conclude that LA is the best management strategy for AA in cirrhotic patients. Even in decompensated cirrhotics, which are associated with worse clinical outcomes, LA is still a favorable option over open appendectomy and nonoperative management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481908501011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Cirrhosis ; Clinical outcomes ; Comorbidity ; Complications ; Laparoscopy ; Liver cirrhosis ; Management ; Mortality ; Patients ; Regression analysis ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Urinary tract infections ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2019-10, Vol.85 (10), p.1129-1133</ispartof><rights>2019 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakhary, Bishoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finco, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazi, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coimbra, Raul</creatorcontrib><title>Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis</title><title>The American surgeon</title><description>Best management for acute appendicitis (AA) in adults with liver cirrhosis is controversial and needs more investigation. We aimed to examine the impact of different treatment modalities on outcomes in this complex patient population. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify AA patients with no cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Each cohort was further stratified according to the treatment type: nonoperative management, open appendectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Chisquare, ANOVA, and binary regression analyses were used to determine differences between groups and risk factors for mortality and complications, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 108,289 AA patients were analyzed; of those, 304 with CC and 134 with DC were identified. Compared with CC and no cirrhosis, DC patients had significantly higher mortality, higher cost, and longer hospital length of stay. LA is accompanied by higher survival, lower cost, shorter duration of hospitalization, and lower incidence of complications across all groups. We conclude that LA is the best management strategy for AA in cirrhotic patients. Even in decompensated cirrhotics, which are associated with worse clinical outcomes, LA is still a favorable option over open appendectomy and nonoperative management.</description><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Appendicitis</subject><subject>Cirrhosis</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8BL17qZpqmH96WxS9Q14OeS5pM3SxtWpMW2X9vygqCggzDMMPzDjMvIefArgCybMEY48CTHAqWCwYM4IDMQAgRFXnMD8lsAqKJOCYn3m9Dm6QCZkQ-SSvfsUU7UGk1XY-D6lr0tKvpUo0D0mXfo9VGmcF4aiwdNkhfHHq0CidqZZzbdN74a7qkz3Iwnf00OuisbHZhfEqOatl4PPuuc_J2e_O6uo8e13cPq-VjpMJVQ5RqXbAsq1gqWJwmKDJeJEUBeUgu47hOeKwzjrHQdZrVGrVMqvBFpVOVgar4nFzu9_au-xjRD2VrvMKmkRa70ZcxZ0UOkOQioBe_0G03unDvRAGIKdJAxXtKuc57h3XZO9NKtyuBlZPr5V_Xg2ixF_ng6s_afxRflEJ__g</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Garcia, Monika</creator><creator>Gerber, Ari</creator><creator>Zakhary, Bishoy</creator><creator>Finco, Tiago</creator><creator>Kazi, Albert</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiaofei</creator><creator>Brenner, Megan</creator><creator>Coimbra, Raul</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis</title><author>Garcia, Monika ; Gerber, Ari ; Zakhary, Bishoy ; Finco, Tiago ; Kazi, Albert ; Zhang, Xiaofei ; Brenner, Megan ; Coimbra, Raul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Appendicitis</topic><topic>Cirrhosis</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakhary, Bishoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finco, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazi, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coimbra, Raul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia, Monika</au><au>Gerber, Ari</au><au>Zakhary, Bishoy</au><au>Finco, Tiago</au><au>Kazi, Albert</au><au>Zhang, Xiaofei</au><au>Brenner, Megan</au><au>Coimbra, Raul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1133</epage><pages>1129-1133</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Best management for acute appendicitis (AA) in adults with liver cirrhosis is controversial and needs more investigation. We aimed to examine the impact of different treatment modalities on outcomes in this complex patient population. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 was queried to identify AA patients with no cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Each cohort was further stratified according to the treatment type: nonoperative management, open appendectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Chisquare, ANOVA, and binary regression analyses were used to determine differences between groups and risk factors for mortality and complications, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 108,289 AA patients were analyzed; of those, 304 with CC and 134 with DC were identified. Compared with CC and no cirrhosis, DC patients had significantly higher mortality, higher cost, and longer hospital length of stay. LA is accompanied by higher survival, lower cost, shorter duration of hospitalization, and lower incidence of complications across all groups. We conclude that LA is the best management strategy for AA in cirrhotic patients. Even in decompensated cirrhotics, which are associated with worse clinical outcomes, LA is still a favorable option over open appendectomy and nonoperative management.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/000313481908501011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2019-10, Vol.85 (10), p.1129-1133 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2309811485 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Appendectomy Appendicitis Cirrhosis Clinical outcomes Comorbidity Complications Laparoscopy Liver cirrhosis Management Mortality Patients Regression analysis Risk analysis Risk factors Statistical analysis Surgery Urinary tract infections Variance analysis |
title | Management and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis in the Presence of Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T01%3A26%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20and%20Outcomes%20of%20Acute%20Appendicitis%20in%20the%20Presence%20of%20Cirrhosis:%20A%20Nationwide%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Garcia,%20Monika&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1133&rft.pages=1129-1133&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481908501011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311515156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6dd9077b0650264e5739499189913a22f432d73e25df67fdeda4b004bd6c71cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311515156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313481908501011&rfr_iscdi=true |