Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks

Performance was measured on seven common psychoacoustical tasks for about 75 highly trained subjects. Because some psychoacoustical outcomes varied by race, the subjects were partitioned into White and Non-White categories for analysis. Sex, race, and menstrual-cycle differences in performance are d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2018-04, Vol.143 (4), p.2355-2367
Main Authors: McFadden, Dennis, Pasanen, Edward G., Maloney, Mindy M., Leshikar, Erin M., Pho, Michelle H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adult
Audiometry
Auditory Pathways - physiology
Differential Threshold
Female
Humans
Male
Menstrual Cycle
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
Psychoacoustics
Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Racial Groups - statistics & numerical data
Sex Factors
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23
container_end_page 2367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2355
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 143
creator McFadden, Dennis
Pasanen, Edward G.
Maloney, Mindy M.
Leshikar, Erin M.
Pho, Michelle H.
description Performance was measured on seven common psychoacoustical tasks for about 75 highly trained subjects. Because some psychoacoustical outcomes varied by race, the subjects were partitioned into White and Non-White categories for analysis. Sex, race, and menstrual-cycle differences in performance are described in a companion paper [McFadden, Pasanen, Maloney, Leshikar, and Pho (2018). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, 2338–2354]. Also measured for all subjects were three types of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs): spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The experimental question was whether and how OAEs were correlated with psychoacoustical performance. In accord with past findings, the SOAEs and CEOAEs exhibited substantial sex and race differences, but the DPOAEs did not. Somewhat surprisingly, the correlations between OAEs and psychoacoustical performance were generally weak. No form of OAE was highly correlated with any psychoacoustical task for both sexes within a race category. Thus, there was no compelling evidence that the mechanisms underlying OAEs also contribute systematically to performance in any of the simultaneous or temporal masking tasks studied here. Especially surprising were the weak correlations between OAEs and detection of a tone in the quiet. Apparently individual differences in psychoacoustical performance reside more in post-cochlear (neural) mechanisms than in individual differences in the cochlear (“mechanical”) mechanisms underlying the OAEs measured here.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.5030999
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033376832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2033376832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhq2qqISPQ_9AtUeotOCvddYXpCqiFAmJCz31YDmTcVm6ay-2k4p_jyFpgAOVLI2teeYdz7yEfGb0hDHOTtlJQwXVWn8gE9ZwWrcNlx_JhFLKaqmV2iV7Kd2VZ9MK_Ynscj1list2Qn7NQozY29wFn6o55r-Ivgo5WAjLlDuocOhSes5av6hGjC7EwXrAqvMVhGEIvhrTA9xuS2xfZZv-pAOy42yf8HAT98nP7-c3sx_11fXF5ezbVQ1SNrnmVjktOeOKSYCpbQFAoyrHTSWloAGdnLfIkC3KRSjmSoWkDlAJZbnYJ2dr3XE5H3AB6HO0vRljN9j4YILtzNuM727N77AyjWaN4E0RONoIxHC_xJRNmRmw763HMpLhVAgxVa146nW8RiGGlCK6bRtGzZMZhpmNGYX98vpfW_Lf9gvwdQ0k6PKzBf9VexdehfgCmnHhxCORiKQ7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2033376832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>McFadden, Dennis ; Pasanen, Edward G. ; Maloney, Mindy M. ; Leshikar, Erin M. ; Pho, Michelle H.</creator><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Dennis ; Pasanen, Edward G. ; Maloney, Mindy M. ; Leshikar, Erin M. ; Pho, Michelle H.</creatorcontrib><description>Performance was measured on seven common psychoacoustical tasks for about 75 highly trained subjects. Because some psychoacoustical outcomes varied by race, the subjects were partitioned into White and Non-White categories for analysis. Sex, race, and menstrual-cycle differences in performance are described in a companion paper [McFadden, Pasanen, Maloney, Leshikar, and Pho (2018). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, 2338–2354]. Also measured for all subjects were three types of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs): spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The experimental question was whether and how OAEs were correlated with psychoacoustical performance. In accord with past findings, the SOAEs and CEOAEs exhibited substantial sex and race differences, but the DPOAEs did not. Somewhat surprisingly, the correlations between OAEs and psychoacoustical performance were generally weak. No form of OAE was highly correlated with any psychoacoustical task for both sexes within a race category. Thus, there was no compelling evidence that the mechanisms underlying OAEs also contribute systematically to performance in any of the simultaneous or temporal masking tasks studied here. Especially surprising were the weak correlations between OAEs and detection of a tone in the quiet. Apparently individual differences in psychoacoustical performance reside more in post-cochlear (neural) mechanisms than in individual differences in the cochlear (“mechanical”) mechanisms underlying the OAEs measured here.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.5030999</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29716248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adult ; Audiometry ; Auditory Pathways - physiology ; Differential Threshold ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Menstrual Cycle ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ; Psychoacoustics ; Psychological and Physiological Acoustics ; Racial Groups - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sex Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018-04, Vol.143 (4), p.2355-2367</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2018 Acoustical Society of America. 2018 Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,786,790,891,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasanen, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maloney, Mindy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshikar, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pho, Michelle H.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Performance was measured on seven common psychoacoustical tasks for about 75 highly trained subjects. Because some psychoacoustical outcomes varied by race, the subjects were partitioned into White and Non-White categories for analysis. Sex, race, and menstrual-cycle differences in performance are described in a companion paper [McFadden, Pasanen, Maloney, Leshikar, and Pho (2018). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, 2338–2354]. Also measured for all subjects were three types of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs): spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The experimental question was whether and how OAEs were correlated with psychoacoustical performance. In accord with past findings, the SOAEs and CEOAEs exhibited substantial sex and race differences, but the DPOAEs did not. Somewhat surprisingly, the correlations between OAEs and psychoacoustical performance were generally weak. No form of OAE was highly correlated with any psychoacoustical task for both sexes within a race category. Thus, there was no compelling evidence that the mechanisms underlying OAEs also contribute systematically to performance in any of the simultaneous or temporal masking tasks studied here. Especially surprising were the weak correlations between OAEs and detection of a tone in the quiet. Apparently individual differences in psychoacoustical performance reside more in post-cochlear (neural) mechanisms than in individual differences in the cochlear (“mechanical”) mechanisms underlying the OAEs measured here.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Auditory Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Differential Threshold</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Psychological and Physiological Acoustics</subject><subject>Racial Groups - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhq2qqISPQ_9AtUeotOCvddYXpCqiFAmJCz31YDmTcVm6ay-2k4p_jyFpgAOVLI2teeYdz7yEfGb0hDHOTtlJQwXVWn8gE9ZwWrcNlx_JhFLKaqmV2iV7Kd2VZ9MK_Ynscj1list2Qn7NQozY29wFn6o55r-Ivgo5WAjLlDuocOhSes5av6hGjC7EwXrAqvMVhGEIvhrTA9xuS2xfZZv-pAOy42yf8HAT98nP7-c3sx_11fXF5ezbVQ1SNrnmVjktOeOKSYCpbQFAoyrHTSWloAGdnLfIkC3KRSjmSoWkDlAJZbnYJ2dr3XE5H3AB6HO0vRljN9j4YILtzNuM727N77AyjWaN4E0RONoIxHC_xJRNmRmw763HMpLhVAgxVa146nW8RiGGlCK6bRtGzZMZhpmNGYX98vpfW_Lf9gvwdQ0k6PKzBf9VexdehfgCmnHhxCORiKQ7</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>McFadden, Dennis</creator><creator>Pasanen, Edward G.</creator><creator>Maloney, Mindy M.</creator><creator>Leshikar, Erin M.</creator><creator>Pho, Michelle H.</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks</title><author>McFadden, Dennis ; Pasanen, Edward G. ; Maloney, Mindy M. ; Leshikar, Erin M. ; Pho, Michelle H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Auditory Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Differential Threshold</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Psychological and Physiological Acoustics</topic><topic>Racial Groups - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasanen, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maloney, Mindy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshikar, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pho, Michelle H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McFadden, Dennis</au><au>Pasanen, Edward G.</au><au>Maloney, Mindy M.</au><au>Leshikar, Erin M.</au><au>Pho, Michelle H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2355</spage><epage>2367</epage><pages>2355-2367</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>Electronic mail: mcfadden@utexas.edu</notes><abstract>Performance was measured on seven common psychoacoustical tasks for about 75 highly trained subjects. Because some psychoacoustical outcomes varied by race, the subjects were partitioned into White and Non-White categories for analysis. Sex, race, and menstrual-cycle differences in performance are described in a companion paper [McFadden, Pasanen, Maloney, Leshikar, and Pho (2018). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, 2338–2354]. Also measured for all subjects were three types of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs): spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The experimental question was whether and how OAEs were correlated with psychoacoustical performance. In accord with past findings, the SOAEs and CEOAEs exhibited substantial sex and race differences, but the DPOAEs did not. Somewhat surprisingly, the correlations between OAEs and psychoacoustical performance were generally weak. No form of OAE was highly correlated with any psychoacoustical task for both sexes within a race category. Thus, there was no compelling evidence that the mechanisms underlying OAEs also contribute systematically to performance in any of the simultaneous or temporal masking tasks studied here. Especially surprising were the weak correlations between OAEs and detection of a tone in the quiet. Apparently individual differences in psychoacoustical performance reside more in post-cochlear (neural) mechanisms than in individual differences in the cochlear (“mechanical”) mechanisms underlying the OAEs measured here.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>29716248</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.5030999</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018-04, Vol.143 (4), p.2355-2367
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2033376832
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adult
Audiometry
Auditory Pathways - physiology
Differential Threshold
Female
Humans
Male
Menstrual Cycle
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
Psychoacoustics
Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Racial Groups - statistics & numerical data
Sex Factors
Young Adult
title Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-28T01%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlations%20between%20otoacoustic%20emissions%20and%20performance%20in%20common%20psychoacoustical%20tasks&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=McFadden,%20Dennis&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2355&rft.epage=2367&rft.pages=2355-2367&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.5030999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2033376832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2a6f94212614cc7a8ccc9e69e6f7400c9cef4b8e1e1df4b361fa6f40fce636a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2033376832&rft_id=info:pmid/29716248&rfr_iscdi=true