Loading…

Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population

While evolution occurs when selection acts on a heritable trait, empirical studies of natural systems have frequently reported phenotypic stasis under these conditions. We performed quantitative genetic analyses of weight and hindleg length in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolutionary ecology 2007-06, Vol.21 (3), p.337-356, Article 337
Main Authors: Wilson, A. J, Pemberton, J. M, Pilkington, J. G, Clutton-Brock, T. H, Coltman, D. W, Kruuk, L. E. B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13
container_end_page 356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 337
container_title Evolutionary ecology
container_volume 21
creator Wilson, A. J
Pemberton, J. M
Pilkington, J. G
Clutton-Brock, T. H
Coltman, D. W
Kruuk, L. E. B
description While evolution occurs when selection acts on a heritable trait, empirical studies of natural systems have frequently reported phenotypic stasis under these conditions. We performed quantitative genetic analyses of weight and hindleg length in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to test whether genetic constraints can explain previously reported stasis in body size despite evidence for strong positive directional selection. Genetic, maternal and environmental covariance structures were estimated across ontogeny using random regression animal models. Heritability increased with age for weight and hindleg length, though both measures of size were highly heritable across ontogeny. Genetic correlations among ages were generally strong and uniformly positive, and the covariance structures were also highly integrated across ontogeny. Consequently, we found no constraint to the evolution of larger size itself. Rather we expect size at all ages to increase in response to positive selection acting at any age. Consistent with expectation, predicted breeding values for age-specific size traits have increased over a twenty-year period, while maternal performance for offspring size has declined. Re-examination of the phenotypic data confirmed that sheep are not getting larger, but also showed that there are significant negative trends in size at all ages. The genetic evolution is therefore cryptic, with the response to selection presumably being masked at the phenotypic level by a plastic response to changing environmental conditions. Density-dependence, coupled with systematically increasing population size, may contribute to declining body size but is insufficient to completely explain it. Our results demonstrate that an increased understanding of the genetic basis of quantitative traits, and of how plasticity and microevolution can occur simultaneously, is necessary for developing predictive models of phenotypic change in nature.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10682-006-9106-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19697453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19688062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PD-DJ4MFbddK82qOILxBE1IuXkKbJGqlNTVpl99Obsp48eUpIfjPM8EfoiMAZAZDniYCoygJAFHW-FusttCBc0qJiUm6jBZSiLqTgdBftpfQOAJRRsUCvj5PuRz_q0X9ZvLS9Hb1JODi8jOF7fMO6b7GJqyE_Y_sVumn0oZ__m9CucPJri32fFfapm-0QhqnTMzpAO053yR7-nvvo5frq-fK2uH-4ubu8uC8M5dVYUEtMTVsuGsK01obVpJWOajCsaduKUsIt087xxjjgojSNa0tu69o6kNQRuo9ON32HGD4nm0b14ZOxXR7HhikpUotaMk7_A6sKRJnhyR_4HqbY5yWU5MAYYaLKiGyQiSGlaJ0aov_QcaUIqDkTtclE5UzUnIla55rjTY3TQell9Em9PJVAaOaSQMnoDzRGigM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750441468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Wilson, A. J ; Pemberton, J. M ; Pilkington, J. G ; Clutton-Brock, T. H ; Coltman, D. W ; Kruuk, L. E. B</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, A. J ; Pemberton, J. M ; Pilkington, J. G ; Clutton-Brock, T. H ; Coltman, D. W ; Kruuk, L. E. B</creatorcontrib><description>While evolution occurs when selection acts on a heritable trait, empirical studies of natural systems have frequently reported phenotypic stasis under these conditions. We performed quantitative genetic analyses of weight and hindleg length in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to test whether genetic constraints can explain previously reported stasis in body size despite evidence for strong positive directional selection. Genetic, maternal and environmental covariance structures were estimated across ontogeny using random regression animal models. Heritability increased with age for weight and hindleg length, though both measures of size were highly heritable across ontogeny. Genetic correlations among ages were generally strong and uniformly positive, and the covariance structures were also highly integrated across ontogeny. Consequently, we found no constraint to the evolution of larger size itself. Rather we expect size at all ages to increase in response to positive selection acting at any age. Consistent with expectation, predicted breeding values for age-specific size traits have increased over a twenty-year period, while maternal performance for offspring size has declined. Re-examination of the phenotypic data confirmed that sheep are not getting larger, but also showed that there are significant negative trends in size at all ages. The genetic evolution is therefore cryptic, with the response to selection presumably being masked at the phenotypic level by a plastic response to changing environmental conditions. Density-dependence, coupled with systematically increasing population size, may contribute to declining body size but is insufficient to completely explain it. Our results demonstrate that an increased understanding of the genetic basis of quantitative traits, and of how plasticity and microevolution can occur simultaneously, is necessary for developing predictive models of phenotypic change in nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10682-006-9106-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal models ; Body size ; Covariance ; cryptic evolytion ; Density dependence ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental conditions ; Evolution ; Evolution &amp; development ; Genetic analysis ; Genetics ; growth ; Heritability ; Offspring ; Ontogeny ; Ovis aries ; Phenotypic plasticity ; Population decline ; Population growth ; Population number ; Positive selection ; Prediction models ; Regression analysis ; Sheep</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary ecology, 2007-06, Vol.21 (3), p.337-356, Article 337</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, A. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pemberton, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilkington, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clutton-Brock, T. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coltman, D. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruuk, L. E. B</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population</title><title>Evolutionary ecology</title><description>While evolution occurs when selection acts on a heritable trait, empirical studies of natural systems have frequently reported phenotypic stasis under these conditions. We performed quantitative genetic analyses of weight and hindleg length in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to test whether genetic constraints can explain previously reported stasis in body size despite evidence for strong positive directional selection. Genetic, maternal and environmental covariance structures were estimated across ontogeny using random regression animal models. Heritability increased with age for weight and hindleg length, though both measures of size were highly heritable across ontogeny. Genetic correlations among ages were generally strong and uniformly positive, and the covariance structures were also highly integrated across ontogeny. Consequently, we found no constraint to the evolution of larger size itself. Rather we expect size at all ages to increase in response to positive selection acting at any age. Consistent with expectation, predicted breeding values for age-specific size traits have increased over a twenty-year period, while maternal performance for offspring size has declined. Re-examination of the phenotypic data confirmed that sheep are not getting larger, but also showed that there are significant negative trends in size at all ages. The genetic evolution is therefore cryptic, with the response to selection presumably being masked at the phenotypic level by a plastic response to changing environmental conditions. Density-dependence, coupled with systematically increasing population size, may contribute to declining body size but is insufficient to completely explain it. Our results demonstrate that an increased understanding of the genetic basis of quantitative traits, and of how plasticity and microevolution can occur simultaneously, is necessary for developing predictive models of phenotypic change in nature.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>cryptic evolytion</subject><subject>Density dependence</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution &amp; development</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>growth</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Ovis aries</subject><subject>Phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Positive selection</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><issn>0269-7653</issn><issn>1573-8477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PD-DJ4MFbddK82qOILxBE1IuXkKbJGqlNTVpl99Obsp48eUpIfjPM8EfoiMAZAZDniYCoygJAFHW-FusttCBc0qJiUm6jBZSiLqTgdBftpfQOAJRRsUCvj5PuRz_q0X9ZvLS9Hb1JODi8jOF7fMO6b7GJqyE_Y_sVumn0oZ__m9CucPJri32fFfapm-0QhqnTMzpAO053yR7-nvvo5frq-fK2uH-4ubu8uC8M5dVYUEtMTVsuGsK01obVpJWOajCsaduKUsIt087xxjjgojSNa0tu69o6kNQRuo9ON32HGD4nm0b14ZOxXR7HhikpUotaMk7_A6sKRJnhyR_4HqbY5yWU5MAYYaLKiGyQiSGlaJ0aov_QcaUIqDkTtclE5UzUnIla55rjTY3TQell9Em9PJVAaOaSQMnoDzRGigM</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Wilson, A. J</creator><creator>Pemberton, J. M</creator><creator>Pilkington, J. G</creator><creator>Clutton-Brock, T. H</creator><creator>Coltman, D. W</creator><creator>Kruuk, L. E. B</creator><general>Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population</title><author>Wilson, A. J ; Pemberton, J. M ; Pilkington, J. G ; Clutton-Brock, T. H ; Coltman, D. W ; Kruuk, L. E. B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>cryptic evolytion</topic><topic>Density dependence</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution &amp; development</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>growth</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Ovis aries</topic><topic>Phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Positive selection</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, A. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pemberton, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilkington, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clutton-Brock, T. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coltman, D. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruuk, L. E. B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, A. J</au><au>Pemberton, J. M</au><au>Pilkington, J. G</au><au>Clutton-Brock, T. H</au><au>Coltman, D. W</au><au>Kruuk, L. E. B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>337-356</pages><artnum>337</artnum><issn>0269-7653</issn><eissn>1573-8477</eissn><notes>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9106-z</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>While evolution occurs when selection acts on a heritable trait, empirical studies of natural systems have frequently reported phenotypic stasis under these conditions. We performed quantitative genetic analyses of weight and hindleg length in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to test whether genetic constraints can explain previously reported stasis in body size despite evidence for strong positive directional selection. Genetic, maternal and environmental covariance structures were estimated across ontogeny using random regression animal models. Heritability increased with age for weight and hindleg length, though both measures of size were highly heritable across ontogeny. Genetic correlations among ages were generally strong and uniformly positive, and the covariance structures were also highly integrated across ontogeny. Consequently, we found no constraint to the evolution of larger size itself. Rather we expect size at all ages to increase in response to positive selection acting at any age. Consistent with expectation, predicted breeding values for age-specific size traits have increased over a twenty-year period, while maternal performance for offspring size has declined. Re-examination of the phenotypic data confirmed that sheep are not getting larger, but also showed that there are significant negative trends in size at all ages. The genetic evolution is therefore cryptic, with the response to selection presumably being masked at the phenotypic level by a plastic response to changing environmental conditions. Density-dependence, coupled with systematically increasing population size, may contribute to declining body size but is insufficient to completely explain it. Our results demonstrate that an increased understanding of the genetic basis of quantitative traits, and of how plasticity and microevolution can occur simultaneously, is necessary for developing predictive models of phenotypic change in nature.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/s10682-006-9106-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7653
ispartof Evolutionary ecology, 2007-06, Vol.21 (3), p.337-356, Article 337
issn 0269-7653
1573-8477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19697453
source Springer Link
subjects Age
Animal models
Body size
Covariance
cryptic evolytion
Density dependence
Empirical analysis
Environmental conditions
Evolution
Evolution & development
Genetic analysis
Genetics
growth
Heritability
Offspring
Ontogeny
Ovis aries
Phenotypic plasticity
Population decline
Population growth
Population number
Positive selection
Prediction models
Regression analysis
Sheep
title Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T11%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20genetics%20of%20growth%20and%20cryptic%20evolution%20of%20body%20size%20in%20an%20island%20population&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20ecology&rft.au=Wilson,%20A.%20J&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=337-356&rft.artnum=337&rft.issn=0269-7653&rft.eissn=1573-8477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10682-006-9106-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19688062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3e1c93d56b14aaac491d7f3a0c4bdd83315e4aff5bcf0562cbfd25e99ef073f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750441468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true