Loading…

Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption

•Coagulation/flocculation did not lead to an appreciable removal of microcystin.•PAC adsorption was able to achieve 84% of total microcystin removal.•Microcystin removal was 69.4% and 74.8% by PES–5kDa and PES–10kDa UF membrane.•Advanced treatment process successfully removed more than 94% of total...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hazardous materials 2018-02, Vol.343, p.29-35
Main Authors: Şengül, Ayşe Büşra, Ersan, Gamze, Tüfekçi, Neşe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3
container_end_page 35
container_issue
container_start_page 29
container_title Journal of hazardous materials
container_volume 343
creator Şengül, Ayşe Büşra
Ersan, Gamze
Tüfekçi, Neşe
description •Coagulation/flocculation did not lead to an appreciable removal of microcystin.•PAC adsorption was able to achieve 84% of total microcystin removal.•Microcystin removal was 69.4% and 74.8% by PES–5kDa and PES–10kDa UF membrane.•Advanced treatment process successfully removed more than 94% of total microcystin.•Advanced treatment process succesfully used for total microcystin removal. In this study, we investigated the performance of conventional (coagulation/flocculation→powdered activated carbon [PAC] adsorption) and advanced treatment (coagulation/flocculation→PAC adsorption→submerged ultrafiltration [UF] membrane) processes separately and sequentially for the removal of total (intra- and extracellular) microcystin. Results of the conventional treatment process demonstrated that coagulation/flocculation alone was not effective (up to 70%) for the removal of total microcystin, while the uptake of total microcystin was achieved up to 84% by PAC adsorption (PAC dose of 20mg/L). In addition, the adsorption kinetic mechanism of PAC was also examined using several kinetic models. Results showed that the pseudo-second order (PSOM) and Weber-Morris intraparticle diffusion model (IPDM) are the most suitable models for this study (r2>0.98 and p-values ≤0.05). On the other hand, up to 94% of microcystin was effectively removed when the coagulation/flocculation and PAC systems were combined with UF membranes. Also, the permeate concentration was found to be 0.3mg/L, which is below the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline value of 1μg/L. Overall results indicated that higher removal of microcystin occurred using the advanced treatment process. Therefore, this combined system appears to be a promising treatment technique for the removal of total microcystin.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942736562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304389417306994</els_id><sourcerecordid>1942736562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EokvhEUA-toekdpx4kxOqVhSQKoEQPVvOeNx6lcSL7Wy7PBWPiMMuXLnMH-k3M5rvI-QtZyVnXF5ty-2D_jnqVFaMr0vWlYy3z8iKt2tRCCHkc7JigtWFaLv6jLyKcctYJpv6JTmr2k60vJEr8usbjn6vB-otdVMKuqB6MhSfcgk4DPOgAx0dBA-HmNxE-wONcz9iuEdD5yFj1i0xOT_Ri7ubSzri2Ac9IQU_9m7K2KNLD7nT93nbwl3ZwQOcmj_3dv7RYMiohuT2OuUKdOiXlV-vN5dUm-jDbsFfkxdWDxHfnPI5ubv58H3zqbj98vHz5vq2gJpVKUdrJWrdSbA1z2VWoZGg11AxUa9rDQx5BYaJzjZZCd5KgwaE7QAl2l6ck4vj3l3wP2aMSY0uLorkz_wcFe_qai1kI6uMNkc0qxRjQKt2wY06HBRnajFLbdXJLLWYpVinsll57t3pxCKo-Tf1150MvD8CmB_dOwwqgsMJ0LiAkJTx7j8nfgM6hq3Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1942736562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra ; Ersan, Gamze ; Tüfekçi, Neşe</creator><creatorcontrib>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra ; Ersan, Gamze ; Tüfekçi, Neşe</creatorcontrib><description>•Coagulation/flocculation did not lead to an appreciable removal of microcystin.•PAC adsorption was able to achieve 84% of total microcystin removal.•Microcystin removal was 69.4% and 74.8% by PES–5kDa and PES–10kDa UF membrane.•Advanced treatment process successfully removed more than 94% of total microcystin.•Advanced treatment process succesfully used for total microcystin removal. In this study, we investigated the performance of conventional (coagulation/flocculation→powdered activated carbon [PAC] adsorption) and advanced treatment (coagulation/flocculation→PAC adsorption→submerged ultrafiltration [UF] membrane) processes separately and sequentially for the removal of total (intra- and extracellular) microcystin. Results of the conventional treatment process demonstrated that coagulation/flocculation alone was not effective (up to 70%) for the removal of total microcystin, while the uptake of total microcystin was achieved up to 84% by PAC adsorption (PAC dose of 20mg/L). In addition, the adsorption kinetic mechanism of PAC was also examined using several kinetic models. Results showed that the pseudo-second order (PSOM) and Weber-Morris intraparticle diffusion model (IPDM) are the most suitable models for this study (r2&gt;0.98 and p-values ≤0.05). On the other hand, up to 94% of microcystin was effectively removed when the coagulation/flocculation and PAC systems were combined with UF membranes. Also, the permeate concentration was found to be 0.3mg/L, which is below the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline value of 1μg/L. Overall results indicated that higher removal of microcystin occurred using the advanced treatment process. Therefore, this combined system appears to be a promising treatment technique for the removal of total microcystin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28938156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Carbon - chemistry ; Coagulation/flocculation ; Cyanobacteria ; Flocculation ; Membrane process ; Membranes, Artificial ; Microcystin ; Microcystins - chemistry ; Microcystis aeruginosa ; Powdered activated carbon ; Ultrafiltration - instrumentation ; Ultrafiltration - methods ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water Purification - instrumentation ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of hazardous materials, 2018-02, Vol.343, p.29-35</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersan, Gamze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tüfekçi, Neşe</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption</title><title>Journal of hazardous materials</title><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><description>•Coagulation/flocculation did not lead to an appreciable removal of microcystin.•PAC adsorption was able to achieve 84% of total microcystin removal.•Microcystin removal was 69.4% and 74.8% by PES–5kDa and PES–10kDa UF membrane.•Advanced treatment process successfully removed more than 94% of total microcystin.•Advanced treatment process succesfully used for total microcystin removal. In this study, we investigated the performance of conventional (coagulation/flocculation→powdered activated carbon [PAC] adsorption) and advanced treatment (coagulation/flocculation→PAC adsorption→submerged ultrafiltration [UF] membrane) processes separately and sequentially for the removal of total (intra- and extracellular) microcystin. Results of the conventional treatment process demonstrated that coagulation/flocculation alone was not effective (up to 70%) for the removal of total microcystin, while the uptake of total microcystin was achieved up to 84% by PAC adsorption (PAC dose of 20mg/L). In addition, the adsorption kinetic mechanism of PAC was also examined using several kinetic models. Results showed that the pseudo-second order (PSOM) and Weber-Morris intraparticle diffusion model (IPDM) are the most suitable models for this study (r2&gt;0.98 and p-values ≤0.05). On the other hand, up to 94% of microcystin was effectively removed when the coagulation/flocculation and PAC systems were combined with UF membranes. Also, the permeate concentration was found to be 0.3mg/L, which is below the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline value of 1μg/L. Overall results indicated that higher removal of microcystin occurred using the advanced treatment process. Therefore, this combined system appears to be a promising treatment technique for the removal of total microcystin.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>Coagulation/flocculation</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Membrane process</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Microcystin</subject><subject>Microcystins - chemistry</subject><subject>Microcystis aeruginosa</subject><subject>Powdered activated carbon</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration - methods</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Purification - instrumentation</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>0304-3894</issn><issn>1873-3336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EokvhEUA-toekdpx4kxOqVhSQKoEQPVvOeNx6lcSL7Wy7PBWPiMMuXLnMH-k3M5rvI-QtZyVnXF5ty-2D_jnqVFaMr0vWlYy3z8iKt2tRCCHkc7JigtWFaLv6jLyKcctYJpv6JTmr2k60vJEr8usbjn6vB-otdVMKuqB6MhSfcgk4DPOgAx0dBA-HmNxE-wONcz9iuEdD5yFj1i0xOT_Ri7ubSzri2Ac9IQU_9m7K2KNLD7nT93nbwl3ZwQOcmj_3dv7RYMiohuT2OuUKdOiXlV-vN5dUm-jDbsFfkxdWDxHfnPI5ubv58H3zqbj98vHz5vq2gJpVKUdrJWrdSbA1z2VWoZGg11AxUa9rDQx5BYaJzjZZCd5KgwaE7QAl2l6ck4vj3l3wP2aMSY0uLorkz_wcFe_qai1kI6uMNkc0qxRjQKt2wY06HBRnajFLbdXJLLWYpVinsll57t3pxCKo-Tf1150MvD8CmB_dOwwqgsMJ0LiAkJTx7j8nfgM6hq3Y</recordid><startdate>20180205</startdate><enddate>20180205</enddate><creator>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra</creator><creator>Ersan, Gamze</creator><creator>Tüfekçi, Neşe</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180205</creationdate><title>Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption</title><author>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra ; Ersan, Gamze ; Tüfekçi, Neşe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>Coagulation/flocculation</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Membrane process</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Microcystin</topic><topic>Microcystins - chemistry</topic><topic>Microcystis aeruginosa</topic><topic>Powdered activated carbon</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration - methods</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Purification - instrumentation</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersan, Gamze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tüfekçi, Neşe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şengül, Ayşe Büşra</au><au>Ersan, Gamze</au><au>Tüfekçi, Neşe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><date>2018-02-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>343</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>29-35</pages><issn>0304-3894</issn><eissn>1873-3336</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>•Coagulation/flocculation did not lead to an appreciable removal of microcystin.•PAC adsorption was able to achieve 84% of total microcystin removal.•Microcystin removal was 69.4% and 74.8% by PES–5kDa and PES–10kDa UF membrane.•Advanced treatment process successfully removed more than 94% of total microcystin.•Advanced treatment process succesfully used for total microcystin removal. In this study, we investigated the performance of conventional (coagulation/flocculation→powdered activated carbon [PAC] adsorption) and advanced treatment (coagulation/flocculation→PAC adsorption→submerged ultrafiltration [UF] membrane) processes separately and sequentially for the removal of total (intra- and extracellular) microcystin. Results of the conventional treatment process demonstrated that coagulation/flocculation alone was not effective (up to 70%) for the removal of total microcystin, while the uptake of total microcystin was achieved up to 84% by PAC adsorption (PAC dose of 20mg/L). In addition, the adsorption kinetic mechanism of PAC was also examined using several kinetic models. Results showed that the pseudo-second order (PSOM) and Weber-Morris intraparticle diffusion model (IPDM) are the most suitable models for this study (r2&gt;0.98 and p-values ≤0.05). On the other hand, up to 94% of microcystin was effectively removed when the coagulation/flocculation and PAC systems were combined with UF membranes. Also, the permeate concentration was found to be 0.3mg/L, which is below the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline value of 1μg/L. Overall results indicated that higher removal of microcystin occurred using the advanced treatment process. Therefore, this combined system appears to be a promising treatment technique for the removal of total microcystin.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28938156</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-3894
ispartof Journal of hazardous materials, 2018-02, Vol.343, p.29-35
issn 0304-3894
1873-3336
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942736562
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adsorption
Carbon - chemistry
Coagulation/flocculation
Cyanobacteria
Flocculation
Membrane process
Membranes, Artificial
Microcystin
Microcystins - chemistry
Microcystis aeruginosa
Powdered activated carbon
Ultrafiltration - instrumentation
Ultrafiltration - methods
Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry
Water Purification - instrumentation
Water Purification - methods
title Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T17%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20intra-%20and%20extracellular%20microcystin%20by%20submerged%20ultrafiltration%20(UF)%20membrane%20combined%20with%20coagulation/flocculation%20and%20powdered%20activated%20carbon%20(PAC)%20adsorption&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hazardous%20materials&rft.au=%C5%9Eeng%C3%BCl,%20Ay%C5%9Fe%20B%C3%BC%C5%9Fra&rft.date=2018-02-05&rft.volume=343&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=29-35&rft.issn=0304-3894&rft.eissn=1873-3336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942736562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c4ff6eaa96cf41f6e89456ca7c203474ac0e12cd039f5156186dedc3f9ce6efb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1942736562&rft_id=info:pmid/28938156&rfr_iscdi=true