Loading…
Low pressure robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the AirSeal System at OLV hospital: results from a prospective study
Abstract Background Limited studies examined effects of pneumoperiotneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and with AirSeal. To assess the effect on hemodynamics of a lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP, 8 mmHg) with AirSeal, during RARP in steep Trendelenburg 45°(ST). Materials an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical genitourinary cancer 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.e1029-e1037 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53 |
container_end_page | e1037 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e1029 |
container_title | Clinical genitourinary cancer |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | La Falce, Sabrina Novara, Giacomo Gandaglia, Giorgio Umari, Paolo De Naeyer, Geert D’Hondt, Frederiek Beresian, Jean Carette, Rik Penicka, Martin Mo, Yujiing Vandenbroucke, Geert Mottrie, Alexandre |
description | Abstract Background Limited studies examined effects of pneumoperiotneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and with AirSeal. To assess the effect on hemodynamics of a lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP, 8 mmHg) with AirSeal, during RARP in steep Trendelenburg 45°(ST). Materials and Methods This is a IRB-approved, prospective, interventional, single-center study including patients treated with RARP at OLV Hospital by one extremely experienced surgeon (Jul 2015-Feb 2016). Intraoperative monitoring included: arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, intrathoracic pressure, airways pressures, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic areas/volumes, ejection fraction, by transesophageal echocardiography, an esophageal catheter and FloTrac/Vigileo system. Measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia with patient in horizontal (T0), 5-min after 8 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (TP), 5-min after ST (TT1), every 30 min thereafter until the end of surgery (TH). Parameters modification at the pre-specified times was assessed by Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, as appropriate. All analyses were performed by SPSS vers. 23.0. Results 53 consecutive patients were enrolled. Mean patients age was 62.6 ± 6.9 years. Comorbidity was relatively limited (51% with Charlson Comorbidity Index as low as 0). Despite the ST, working always at 8 mmHg with AirSeal, only CVP and Mean airways pressure showed a statistically significant variation during the operative time. Although other significant hemodynamic/respiratory changes were observed adding pneumoperitoneum and then ST, all variables remained always within limits safely manageable by Anesthesiologists. Conclusion The combination of ST, LPP and extreme surgeon’s experience allows to safely perform RARP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.027 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915558358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1558767317301647</els_id><sourcerecordid>1915558358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd-L1DAQx4Mo3rn6D_ggefSlddK0TSsiHIe_YOEeVn0NaTp1s7abNUnvKP7zTt3TBx-EQALznQ-TzzD2XEAuQNSvDrkdv9m8AKFyqHIo1AN2KVrZZFA3xUN6V1WTqVrJC_YkxgNAWQkFj9lF0dR1q6C8ZD-3_o6fAsY4B-TBdz5lJkYXE_Y8mN5ZM1Ldx2QS2uSnhd-5tOdpj_zKhR1SebdQeuIm8ZvtV7738eSSGV9zos5jinwInqq_KSdiuFvkMc398pQ9GswY8dn9vWFf3r_7fP0x2958-HR9tc1sKUTKlEVhu5pmLiTIBpUsu3KwRtbQthUMJTTdAK0BI8TQ9tCI0mBXt2i6Xg5dJTfs5ZlLE_yYMSY9uWhxHM0R_Ry1aElU1Ug6G1aco5aGjQEHfQpuMmHRAvQqXR_0Kl2v0jVUmqRT04t7_txN2P9t-WOZAm_OAaRf3joMOlqHR4u9CyRE9979n__2n3Y7uuO6me-4YDz4ORzJnxY6Fhr0bl37unWhJBFLJX8BqmKqHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915558358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low pressure robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the AirSeal System at OLV hospital: results from a prospective study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>La Falce, Sabrina ; Novara, Giacomo ; Gandaglia, Giorgio ; Umari, Paolo ; De Naeyer, Geert ; D’Hondt, Frederiek ; Beresian, Jean ; Carette, Rik ; Penicka, Martin ; Mo, Yujiing ; Vandenbroucke, Geert ; Mottrie, Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>La Falce, Sabrina ; Novara, Giacomo ; Gandaglia, Giorgio ; Umari, Paolo ; De Naeyer, Geert ; D’Hondt, Frederiek ; Beresian, Jean ; Carette, Rik ; Penicka, Martin ; Mo, Yujiing ; Vandenbroucke, Geert ; Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Limited studies examined effects of pneumoperiotneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and with AirSeal. To assess the effect on hemodynamics of a lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP, 8 mmHg) with AirSeal, during RARP in steep Trendelenburg 45°(ST). Materials and Methods This is a IRB-approved, prospective, interventional, single-center study including patients treated with RARP at OLV Hospital by one extremely experienced surgeon (Jul 2015-Feb 2016). Intraoperative monitoring included: arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, intrathoracic pressure, airways pressures, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic areas/volumes, ejection fraction, by transesophageal echocardiography, an esophageal catheter and FloTrac/Vigileo system. Measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia with patient in horizontal (T0), 5-min after 8 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (TP), 5-min after ST (TT1), every 30 min thereafter until the end of surgery (TH). Parameters modification at the pre-specified times was assessed by Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, as appropriate. All analyses were performed by SPSS vers. 23.0. Results 53 consecutive patients were enrolled. Mean patients age was 62.6 ± 6.9 years. Comorbidity was relatively limited (51% with Charlson Comorbidity Index as low as 0). Despite the ST, working always at 8 mmHg with AirSeal, only CVP and Mean airways pressure showed a statistically significant variation during the operative time. Although other significant hemodynamic/respiratory changes were observed adding pneumoperitoneum and then ST, all variables remained always within limits safely manageable by Anesthesiologists. Conclusion The combination of ST, LPP and extreme surgeon’s experience allows to safely perform RARP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-7673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28669704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Blood Pressure ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Low impact surgery ; Low pressure pneumoperitoneum ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; Operative Time ; Pneumoperitoneum - epidemiology ; Pneumoperitoneum - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - instrumentation ; RARP ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Steep Trendelenburg ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.e1029-e1037</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4693-5058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28669704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>La Falce, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandaglia, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umari, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Naeyer, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Hondt, Frederiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beresian, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carette, Rik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penicka, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Yujiing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbroucke, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Low pressure robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the AirSeal System at OLV hospital: results from a prospective study</title><title>Clinical genitourinary cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Genitourin Cancer</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Limited studies examined effects of pneumoperiotneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and with AirSeal. To assess the effect on hemodynamics of a lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP, 8 mmHg) with AirSeal, during RARP in steep Trendelenburg 45°(ST). Materials and Methods This is a IRB-approved, prospective, interventional, single-center study including patients treated with RARP at OLV Hospital by one extremely experienced surgeon (Jul 2015-Feb 2016). Intraoperative monitoring included: arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, intrathoracic pressure, airways pressures, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic areas/volumes, ejection fraction, by transesophageal echocardiography, an esophageal catheter and FloTrac/Vigileo system. Measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia with patient in horizontal (T0), 5-min after 8 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (TP), 5-min after ST (TT1), every 30 min thereafter until the end of surgery (TH). Parameters modification at the pre-specified times was assessed by Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, as appropriate. All analyses were performed by SPSS vers. 23.0. Results 53 consecutive patients were enrolled. Mean patients age was 62.6 ± 6.9 years. Comorbidity was relatively limited (51% with Charlson Comorbidity Index as low as 0). Despite the ST, working always at 8 mmHg with AirSeal, only CVP and Mean airways pressure showed a statistically significant variation during the operative time. Although other significant hemodynamic/respiratory changes were observed adding pneumoperitoneum and then ST, all variables remained always within limits safely manageable by Anesthesiologists. Conclusion The combination of ST, LPP and extreme surgeon’s experience allows to safely perform RARP.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low impact surgery</subject><subject>Low pressure pneumoperitoneum</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Pneumoperitoneum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pneumoperitoneum - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>RARP</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Steep Trendelenburg</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1558-7673</issn><issn>1938-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kd-L1DAQx4Mo3rn6D_ggefSlddK0TSsiHIe_YOEeVn0NaTp1s7abNUnvKP7zTt3TBx-EQALznQ-TzzD2XEAuQNSvDrkdv9m8AKFyqHIo1AN2KVrZZFA3xUN6V1WTqVrJC_YkxgNAWQkFj9lF0dR1q6C8ZD-3_o6fAsY4B-TBdz5lJkYXE_Y8mN5ZM1Ldx2QS2uSnhd-5tOdpj_zKhR1SebdQeuIm8ZvtV7738eSSGV9zos5jinwInqq_KSdiuFvkMc398pQ9GswY8dn9vWFf3r_7fP0x2958-HR9tc1sKUTKlEVhu5pmLiTIBpUsu3KwRtbQthUMJTTdAK0BI8TQ9tCI0mBXt2i6Xg5dJTfs5ZlLE_yYMSY9uWhxHM0R_Ry1aElU1Ug6G1aco5aGjQEHfQpuMmHRAvQqXR_0Kl2v0jVUmqRT04t7_txN2P9t-WOZAm_OAaRf3joMOlqHR4u9CyRE9979n__2n3Y7uuO6me-4YDz4ORzJnxY6Fhr0bl37unWhJBFLJX8BqmKqHg</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>La Falce, Sabrina</creator><creator>Novara, Giacomo</creator><creator>Gandaglia, Giorgio</creator><creator>Umari, Paolo</creator><creator>De Naeyer, Geert</creator><creator>D’Hondt, Frederiek</creator><creator>Beresian, Jean</creator><creator>Carette, Rik</creator><creator>Penicka, Martin</creator><creator>Mo, Yujiing</creator><creator>Vandenbroucke, Geert</creator><creator>Mottrie, Alexandre</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-5058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Low pressure robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the AirSeal System at OLV hospital: results from a prospective study</title><author>La Falce, Sabrina ; Novara, Giacomo ; Gandaglia, Giorgio ; Umari, Paolo ; De Naeyer, Geert ; D’Hondt, Frederiek ; Beresian, Jean ; Carette, Rik ; Penicka, Martin ; Mo, Yujiing ; Vandenbroucke, Geert ; Mottrie, Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low impact surgery</topic><topic>Low pressure pneumoperitoneum</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Pneumoperitoneum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pneumoperitoneum - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>RARP</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Steep Trendelenburg</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>La Falce, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandaglia, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umari, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Naeyer, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Hondt, Frederiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beresian, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carette, Rik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penicka, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Yujiing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbroucke, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical genitourinary cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>La Falce, Sabrina</au><au>Novara, Giacomo</au><au>Gandaglia, Giorgio</au><au>Umari, Paolo</au><au>De Naeyer, Geert</au><au>D’Hondt, Frederiek</au><au>Beresian, Jean</au><au>Carette, Rik</au><au>Penicka, Martin</au><au>Mo, Yujiing</au><au>Vandenbroucke, Geert</au><au>Mottrie, Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low pressure robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the AirSeal System at OLV hospital: results from a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical genitourinary cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Genitourin Cancer</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e1029</spage><epage>e1037</epage><pages>e1029-e1037</pages><issn>1558-7673</issn><eissn>1938-0682</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Abstract Background Limited studies examined effects of pneumoperiotneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and with AirSeal. To assess the effect on hemodynamics of a lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP, 8 mmHg) with AirSeal, during RARP in steep Trendelenburg 45°(ST). Materials and Methods This is a IRB-approved, prospective, interventional, single-center study including patients treated with RARP at OLV Hospital by one extremely experienced surgeon (Jul 2015-Feb 2016). Intraoperative monitoring included: arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, intrathoracic pressure, airways pressures, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic areas/volumes, ejection fraction, by transesophageal echocardiography, an esophageal catheter and FloTrac/Vigileo system. Measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia with patient in horizontal (T0), 5-min after 8 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (TP), 5-min after ST (TT1), every 30 min thereafter until the end of surgery (TH). Parameters modification at the pre-specified times was assessed by Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, as appropriate. All analyses were performed by SPSS vers. 23.0. Results 53 consecutive patients were enrolled. Mean patients age was 62.6 ± 6.9 years. Comorbidity was relatively limited (51% with Charlson Comorbidity Index as low as 0). Despite the ST, working always at 8 mmHg with AirSeal, only CVP and Mean airways pressure showed a statistically significant variation during the operative time. Although other significant hemodynamic/respiratory changes were observed adding pneumoperitoneum and then ST, all variables remained always within limits safely manageable by Anesthesiologists. Conclusion The combination of ST, LPP and extreme surgeon’s experience allows to safely perform RARP.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28669704</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.027</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-5058</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1558-7673 |
ispartof | Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017-12, Vol.15 (6), p.e1029-e1037 |
issn | 1558-7673 1938-0682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915558358 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Aged Blood Pressure Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Hemodynamics Humans Low impact surgery Low pressure pneumoperitoneum Male Middle Aged Monitoring, Intraoperative Operative Time Pneumoperitoneum - epidemiology Pneumoperitoneum - etiology Prospective Studies Prostatectomy - adverse effects Prostatectomy - instrumentation RARP Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Steep Trendelenburg Urology |
title | Low pressure robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the AirSeal System at OLV hospital: results from a prospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T09%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20pressure%20robot-assisted%20radical%20prostatectomy%20with%20the%20AirSeal%20System%20at%20OLV%20hospital:%20results%20from%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20genitourinary%20cancer&rft.au=La%20Falce,%20Sabrina&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e1029&rft.epage=e1037&rft.pages=e1029-e1037&rft.issn=1558-7673&rft.eissn=1938-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1915558358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7ce1cb628623038e734b4fca3609950f408bf09a0a11f9d0814aeb69eabd3fb53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915558358&rft_id=info:pmid/28669704&rfr_iscdi=true |