Loading…
Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta
Colonial waterbirds are unusual in that competition for nest‐sites or mates may occur at a scale of a few metres, whereas thousands of birds may overlap in their foraging range at a larger scale. Dispersal has been evaluated for only a few such species, and its adaptive significance remains unclear....
Saved in:
Published in: | Ibis (London, England) England), 2002-04, Vol.144 (2), p.192-199 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3 |
container_end_page | 199 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 192 |
container_title | Ibis (London, England) |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Fasola, Mauro Hafner, Heinz Kayser, Yves Bennetts, Robert E. Cezilly, Frank |
description | Colonial waterbirds are unusual in that competition for nest‐sites or mates may occur at a scale of a few metres, whereas thousands of birds may overlap in their foraging range at a larger scale. Dispersal has been evaluated for only a few such species, and its adaptive significance remains unclear. We studied Little Egret dispersal among all the colonies within the Camargue, southern France. The overall probability of dispersal between successive years was 0.45. The probability of dispersal was unaffected by a bird’s age, or by any density‐dependent effect of colony size. Juveniles dispersed at distances that would be expected if colony selection were random, while adults tended to remain within 10 km of their previous colony. We found no obvious environmental ‘trigger’ for an individual to disperse. Although our evidence is inconclusive, the short dispersal distances of adults are not consistent with foraging conditions as the primary trigger for dispersal. Little Egrets generally forage within 8 km of their colony, so birds dispersing less than 10 km would gain little advantage in response to unfavourable foraging conditions. Our data, with 75% of dispersing birds coming from decreasing colonies and 72% joining increasing colonies, suggest that individual dispersal depended on colony dynamics as a whole, i.e. (1) a social component of dispersal at the individual level, or (2) a simultaneous colony response to unfavourable environmental conditions or (3) both. Further investigation at a higher social level may be necessary to understand dispersal of this colonial nesting species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00060.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18440804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18440804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9PwyAUxYnRxDn9Dn3R-NIKhQJNfNFlziWLPjj_vBEGdGF27YRONz-91C76Zny43EPu71zIASBCMEGQ0ItFgggjcY7ylySFME0ghBQmmz3Q-xnsgx6EKI9ROA7BkfeLcGU4Rz0wHFfavlu9lmWkrV8Z54OSy7qaR6ou68oaH9VFNLFNU5poOHem8V1rZDSX7rMVx-CgkKU3J7veB483w-ngNp7cj8aDq0msCElhTDAPn8OFwQRJOcMMEs3yjHGdyZmmUDPCUWYoV6nhlFJM8oJrVhQzpKRWGvfBWbd35eq3tfGNWFqvTFnKytRrLxAnBHJIAnj-N8hyxHnGMQ8o71Dlau-dKcTK2aV0W4GgaCMWC9EmKdokRRux-I5YbIL1dPeK9EqWhZOVsv7XjzNOQgXusuM-bGm2_94vxtfjIII97uzWN2bzY5fuVVCGWSae70YinVLOHjIunvAXQdmdfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791885838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Fasola, Mauro ; Hafner, Heinz ; Kayser, Yves ; Bennetts, Robert E. ; Cezilly, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Fasola, Mauro ; Hafner, Heinz ; Kayser, Yves ; Bennetts, Robert E. ; Cezilly, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Colonial waterbirds are unusual in that competition for nest‐sites or mates may occur at a scale of a few metres, whereas thousands of birds may overlap in their foraging range at a larger scale. Dispersal has been evaluated for only a few such species, and its adaptive significance remains unclear. We studied Little Egret dispersal among all the colonies within the Camargue, southern France. The overall probability of dispersal between successive years was 0.45. The probability of dispersal was unaffected by a bird’s age, or by any density‐dependent effect of colony size. Juveniles dispersed at distances that would be expected if colony selection were random, while adults tended to remain within 10 km of their previous colony. We found no obvious environmental ‘trigger’ for an individual to disperse. Although our evidence is inconclusive, the short dispersal distances of adults are not consistent with foraging conditions as the primary trigger for dispersal. Little Egrets generally forage within 8 km of their colony, so birds dispersing less than 10 km would gain little advantage in response to unfavourable foraging conditions. Our data, with 75% of dispersing birds coming from decreasing colonies and 72% joining increasing colonies, suggest that individual dispersal depended on colony dynamics as a whole, i.e. (1) a social component of dispersal at the individual level, or (2) a simultaneous colony response to unfavourable environmental conditions or (3) both. Further investigation at a higher social level may be necessary to understand dispersal of this colonial nesting species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-1019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-919X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00060.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IBISAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Demecology ; Egretta garzetta ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Ibis (London, England), 2002-04, Vol.144 (2), p.192-199</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1474-919X.2002.00060.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1474-919X.2002.00060.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13584358$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fasola, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafner, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayser, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennetts, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cezilly, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta</title><title>Ibis (London, England)</title><description>Colonial waterbirds are unusual in that competition for nest‐sites or mates may occur at a scale of a few metres, whereas thousands of birds may overlap in their foraging range at a larger scale. Dispersal has been evaluated for only a few such species, and its adaptive significance remains unclear. We studied Little Egret dispersal among all the colonies within the Camargue, southern France. The overall probability of dispersal between successive years was 0.45. The probability of dispersal was unaffected by a bird’s age, or by any density‐dependent effect of colony size. Juveniles dispersed at distances that would be expected if colony selection were random, while adults tended to remain within 10 km of their previous colony. We found no obvious environmental ‘trigger’ for an individual to disperse. Although our evidence is inconclusive, the short dispersal distances of adults are not consistent with foraging conditions as the primary trigger for dispersal. Little Egrets generally forage within 8 km of their colony, so birds dispersing less than 10 km would gain little advantage in response to unfavourable foraging conditions. Our data, with 75% of dispersing birds coming from decreasing colonies and 72% joining increasing colonies, suggest that individual dispersal depended on colony dynamics as a whole, i.e. (1) a social component of dispersal at the individual level, or (2) a simultaneous colony response to unfavourable environmental conditions or (3) both. Further investigation at a higher social level may be necessary to understand dispersal of this colonial nesting species.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Egretta garzetta</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0019-1019</issn><issn>1474-919X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF9PwyAUxYnRxDn9Dn3R-NIKhQJNfNFlziWLPjj_vBEGdGF27YRONz-91C76Zny43EPu71zIASBCMEGQ0ItFgggjcY7ylySFME0ghBQmmz3Q-xnsgx6EKI9ROA7BkfeLcGU4Rz0wHFfavlu9lmWkrV8Z54OSy7qaR6ou68oaH9VFNLFNU5poOHem8V1rZDSX7rMVx-CgkKU3J7veB483w-ngNp7cj8aDq0msCElhTDAPn8OFwQRJOcMMEs3yjHGdyZmmUDPCUWYoV6nhlFJM8oJrVhQzpKRWGvfBWbd35eq3tfGNWFqvTFnKytRrLxAnBHJIAnj-N8hyxHnGMQ8o71Dlau-dKcTK2aV0W4GgaCMWC9EmKdokRRux-I5YbIL1dPeK9EqWhZOVsv7XjzNOQgXusuM-bGm2_94vxtfjIII97uzWN2bzY5fuVVCGWSae70YinVLOHjIunvAXQdmdfQ</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>Fasola, Mauro</creator><creator>Hafner, Heinz</creator><creator>Kayser, Yves</creator><creator>Bennetts, Robert E.</creator><creator>Cezilly, Frank</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta</title><author>Fasola, Mauro ; Hafner, Heinz ; Kayser, Yves ; Bennetts, Robert E. ; Cezilly, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Egretta garzetta</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fasola, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafner, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayser, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennetts, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cezilly, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ibis (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fasola, Mauro</au><au>Hafner, Heinz</au><au>Kayser, Yves</au><au>Bennetts, Robert E.</au><au>Cezilly, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta</atitle><jtitle>Ibis (London, England)</jtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>192-199</pages><issn>0019-1019</issn><eissn>1474-919X</eissn><coden>IBISAL</coden><notes>ArticleID:IBI060</notes><notes>istex:76F768379D20DA59CF2B3DABA7C92E6B3D902A80</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-2T687S58-V</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>Colonial waterbirds are unusual in that competition for nest‐sites or mates may occur at a scale of a few metres, whereas thousands of birds may overlap in their foraging range at a larger scale. Dispersal has been evaluated for only a few such species, and its adaptive significance remains unclear. We studied Little Egret dispersal among all the colonies within the Camargue, southern France. The overall probability of dispersal between successive years was 0.45. The probability of dispersal was unaffected by a bird’s age, or by any density‐dependent effect of colony size. Juveniles dispersed at distances that would be expected if colony selection were random, while adults tended to remain within 10 km of their previous colony. We found no obvious environmental ‘trigger’ for an individual to disperse. Although our evidence is inconclusive, the short dispersal distances of adults are not consistent with foraging conditions as the primary trigger for dispersal. Little Egrets generally forage within 8 km of their colony, so birds dispersing less than 10 km would gain little advantage in response to unfavourable foraging conditions. Our data, with 75% of dispersing birds coming from decreasing colonies and 72% joining increasing colonies, suggest that individual dispersal depended on colony dynamics as a whole, i.e. (1) a social component of dispersal at the individual level, or (2) a simultaneous colony response to unfavourable environmental conditions or (3) both. Further investigation at a higher social level may be necessary to understand dispersal of this colonial nesting species.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00060.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-1019 |
ispartof | Ibis (London, England), 2002-04, Vol.144 (2), p.192-199 |
issn | 0019-1019 1474-919X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18440804 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Aves Biological and medical sciences Demecology Egretta garzetta Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Vertebrata |
title | Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T04%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20dispersal%20among%20colonies%20of%20Little%20Egrets%20Egretta%20garzetta&rft.jtitle=Ibis%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Fasola,%20Mauro&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=192-199&rft.issn=0019-1019&rft.eissn=1474-919X&rft.coden=IBISAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00060.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18440804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4420-4380063fe341aab3704d79578d5abd60d74815e68c2e8666349f8d7ffb1cadcd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791885838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |