Loading…

Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape

We investigated the influence of landscape and wetland characteristics on pond-breeding amphibian assemblages in south-central New Hampshire, a relatively low populated and heavily forested region of the northeastern United States. This allowed us to better understand landscape influences in less di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological conservation 2005-05, Vol.123 (2), p.139-149
Main Authors: Herrmann, H.L., Babbitt, K.J., Baber, M.J., Congalton, R.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263
container_end_page 149
container_issue 2
container_start_page 139
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 123
creator Herrmann, H.L.
Babbitt, K.J.
Baber, M.J.
Congalton, R.G.
description We investigated the influence of landscape and wetland characteristics on pond-breeding amphibian assemblages in south-central New Hampshire, a relatively low populated and heavily forested region of the northeastern United States. This allowed us to better understand landscape influences in less disturbed areas, and to determine critical landscape disturbance thresholds, above which amphibians are negatively impacted. We sampled 61 wetlands for larval amphibians in 1998 and 1999 to examine the influence of forest cover and road density (at seven buffer distances between 100 and 2000 m) and wetland characteristics on larval amphibian assemblages. Assemblages were influenced primarily by forest cover and wetland hydroperiod. Species richness was most strongly influenced by the proportion of forest cover within 1000 m of the wetland. Several species were also influenced by forest cover, but were differentially influenced by buffer widths. Our study suggests that, at least in the northeast US, wetlands with
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17610931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000632070400432X</els_id><sourcerecordid>17610931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWKtv4GI2upvxJJlJOhtBijcouNGtIZOc0JTppCZTwbc3pYXudBVy_ksOXwi5plBRoOJuVXU-mDBUDKCuoKmANSdkQmeSl6yl8pRMAECUnIE8JxcprfJVctFMyOejc2jGVARX9HqwyegNFmapozYjRp9Gb7I4FHq9WfrO66GweRh9tx19HvusFC5ETGNpw9oPekR7bLokZ073Ca8O55R8PD2-z1_Kxdvz6_xhURrezsaSwoxhQx1jgtsaO9kKSgVzTloGvEZw3azOskFmJDNW6wacph3rOLOQQ1Nyu-_dxPC1zcuotU8G-7wIhm1SVAoKLaf_G2vJWwF1NtZ7o4khpYhObaJf6_ijKKgddbVSe-pqR11BozL1HLs59OsMoHdRD8anY1Y0tOGw893vfZipfHuMKhmPg0HrY_4PZYP_-6FfOPea1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14739604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Herrmann, H.L. ; Babbitt, K.J. ; Baber, M.J. ; Congalton, R.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, H.L. ; Babbitt, K.J. ; Baber, M.J. ; Congalton, R.G.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the influence of landscape and wetland characteristics on pond-breeding amphibian assemblages in south-central New Hampshire, a relatively low populated and heavily forested region of the northeastern United States. This allowed us to better understand landscape influences in less disturbed areas, and to determine critical landscape disturbance thresholds, above which amphibians are negatively impacted. We sampled 61 wetlands for larval amphibians in 1998 and 1999 to examine the influence of forest cover and road density (at seven buffer distances between 100 and 2000 m) and wetland characteristics on larval amphibian assemblages. Assemblages were influenced primarily by forest cover and wetland hydroperiod. Species richness was most strongly influenced by the proportion of forest cover within 1000 m of the wetland. Several species were also influenced by forest cover, but were differentially influenced by buffer widths. Our study suggests that, at least in the northeast US, wetlands with &lt;40% forest cover within a 1000 m radius may have depauperate larval amphibian assemblages, and forest cover above 60% within a 1000 m radius is likely to ensure species rich and abundant larval amphibian assemblages. Given the above, current federal and state regulations that focus amphibian protection efforts on narrow terrestrial buffers surrounding wetlands are likely to be inadequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.025</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anurans ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buffers ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hydroperiod ; Landscape ecology ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Salamanders ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2005-05, Vol.123 (2), p.139-149</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16515305$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, H.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babbitt, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baber, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congalton, R.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>We investigated the influence of landscape and wetland characteristics on pond-breeding amphibian assemblages in south-central New Hampshire, a relatively low populated and heavily forested region of the northeastern United States. This allowed us to better understand landscape influences in less disturbed areas, and to determine critical landscape disturbance thresholds, above which amphibians are negatively impacted. We sampled 61 wetlands for larval amphibians in 1998 and 1999 to examine the influence of forest cover and road density (at seven buffer distances between 100 and 2000 m) and wetland characteristics on larval amphibian assemblages. Assemblages were influenced primarily by forest cover and wetland hydroperiod. Species richness was most strongly influenced by the proportion of forest cover within 1000 m of the wetland. Several species were also influenced by forest cover, but were differentially influenced by buffer widths. Our study suggests that, at least in the northeast US, wetlands with &lt;40% forest cover within a 1000 m radius may have depauperate larval amphibian assemblages, and forest cover above 60% within a 1000 m radius is likely to ensure species rich and abundant larval amphibian assemblages. Given the above, current federal and state regulations that focus amphibian protection efforts on narrow terrestrial buffers surrounding wetlands are likely to be inadequate.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anurans</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hydroperiod</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Salamanders</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWKtv4GI2upvxJJlJOhtBijcouNGtIZOc0JTppCZTwbc3pYXudBVy_ksOXwi5plBRoOJuVXU-mDBUDKCuoKmANSdkQmeSl6yl8pRMAECUnIE8JxcprfJVctFMyOejc2jGVARX9HqwyegNFmapozYjRp9Gb7I4FHq9WfrO66GweRh9tx19HvusFC5ETGNpw9oPekR7bLokZ073Ca8O55R8PD2-z1_Kxdvz6_xhURrezsaSwoxhQx1jgtsaO9kKSgVzTloGvEZw3azOskFmJDNW6wacph3rOLOQQ1Nyu-_dxPC1zcuotU8G-7wIhm1SVAoKLaf_G2vJWwF1NtZ7o4khpYhObaJf6_ijKKgddbVSe-pqR11BozL1HLs59OsMoHdRD8anY1Y0tOGw893vfZipfHuMKhmPg0HrY_4PZYP_-6FfOPea1Q</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Herrmann, H.L.</creator><creator>Babbitt, K.J.</creator><creator>Baber, M.J.</creator><creator>Congalton, R.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape</title><author>Herrmann, H.L. ; Babbitt, K.J. ; Baber, M.J. ; Congalton, R.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anurans</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hydroperiod</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Salamanders</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, H.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babbitt, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baber, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congalton, R.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrmann, H.L.</au><au>Babbitt, K.J.</au><au>Baber, M.J.</au><au>Congalton, R.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>139-149</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>We investigated the influence of landscape and wetland characteristics on pond-breeding amphibian assemblages in south-central New Hampshire, a relatively low populated and heavily forested region of the northeastern United States. This allowed us to better understand landscape influences in less disturbed areas, and to determine critical landscape disturbance thresholds, above which amphibians are negatively impacted. We sampled 61 wetlands for larval amphibians in 1998 and 1999 to examine the influence of forest cover and road density (at seven buffer distances between 100 and 2000 m) and wetland characteristics on larval amphibian assemblages. Assemblages were influenced primarily by forest cover and wetland hydroperiod. Species richness was most strongly influenced by the proportion of forest cover within 1000 m of the wetland. Several species were also influenced by forest cover, but were differentially influenced by buffer widths. Our study suggests that, at least in the northeast US, wetlands with &lt;40% forest cover within a 1000 m radius may have depauperate larval amphibian assemblages, and forest cover above 60% within a 1000 m radius is likely to ensure species rich and abundant larval amphibian assemblages. Given the above, current federal and state regulations that focus amphibian protection efforts on narrow terrestrial buffers surrounding wetlands are likely to be inadequate.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.025</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2005-05, Vol.123 (2), p.139-149
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17610931
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Amphibians
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Anurans
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Buffers
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hydroperiod
Landscape ecology
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Salamanders
Wetlands
title Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T00%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20landscape%20characteristics%20on%20amphibian%20distribution%20in%20a%20forest-dominated%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Herrmann,%20H.L.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=139-149&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17610931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-1082e51f2263d4eb7961162ff7d2034e0fb841f2ce2c72cdaa50fa1b2b32d0263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14739604&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true