Loading…

Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands

River systems are important regulators of anthropogenic nitrogen flux between land and ocean. Nitrogen dynamics in small headwater streams have been extensively measured, whereas less is known about contributions of other components of stream networks to nitrogen removal, including larger streams or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeochemistry 2014-08, Vol.120 (1-3), p.239-257
Main Authors: Wollheim, W. M, Harms, T. K, Peterson, B. J, Morkeski, K, Hopkinson, C. S, Stewart, R. J, Gooseff, M. N, Briggs, M. A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03
container_end_page 257
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 239
container_title Biogeochemistry
container_volume 120
creator Wollheim, W. M
Harms, T. K
Peterson, B. J
Morkeski, K
Hopkinson, C. S
Stewart, R. J
Gooseff, M. N
Briggs, M. A
description River systems are important regulators of anthropogenic nitrogen flux between land and ocean. Nitrogen dynamics in small headwater streams have been extensively measured, whereas less is known about contributions of other components of stream networks to nitrogen removal, including larger streams or fluvial wetlands. Here, we quantified nitrate reaction rates in higher-order stream channels and in surface transient storage (STS) zones (sub-systems with greater water residence time than the main channel) of the Ipswich River watershed, a temperate basin characterized by suburban development. We characterized uptake in STS both within higher-order stream channels and in fluvial wetlands that remain connected to advective fluxes but not constrained within channels. We compare reaction rates in these systems to those previously measured in headwater streams in the same basin. We found that (1) nitrate reaction rates (as uptake velocity, f) in higher-order streams (n = 2) differed from each other but were consistent with previous estimates from headwater streams, (2) nitrate reaction rates in STS zones within higher-order stream channels (n = 2) were higher than rates estimated at the whole-stream scale, (3) ambient nitrate reaction rates in fluvial wetland STS (n = 7) were high but comparable to headwater streams with low nitrate concentration, (4) nitrate reaction rates were higher in fluvial wetland STS compared to headwater stream channels at elevated nitrate concentration, and (5) efficiency loss (EL) similar to that found in headwater streams was also apparent in fluvial wetlands. These results indicate that STS are potential hotspots of biogeochemical activity and should be explicitly integrated into network scale biogeochemical models. Further, experimental evidence of EL in fluvial wetlands suggests that the effectiveness of STS to retain N may decline if N loading increases.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10533-014-9993-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727697119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24716970</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24716970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-r1DAUxYMoOI5-ABdiQIS3qeb2Jk2zlIc-hYcu9IELIdzmz9ix045Jq8y3N0MfKi5cJeH-zsnhXMYeg3gBQuiXGYRCrATIyhiD1ekO24DSWClQn--yjYCmrWrV4H32IOe9EMJogRv25X0_J5oDX44zfQvcn0Y69C7zKfK8pEgu8AKMuQ_jzPM8JdoF3o_lmgIduPtK4xiGzGn0PA7Lj54G_jPMQ3nnh-xepCGHR7fnlt28ef3p8m11_eHq3eWr68pJ1c5VJ5w0xvu6A-gCdR49KGpb7zqnXWckRh-DxjoKT6ozJiC6rnGmJnRIArfsYvU9pun7EvJsD312YSghwrRkC7rWjdEApqDP_kH305LGks6CkrqWDSAWClbKpSnnFKI9pv5A6WRB2HPfdu3blr7tuW97Kprnt86UHQ2xlOb6_FtYt41GVLJw9crlMhp3If2V4D_mT1bR_ryCP6ZSQ3Ne5JY9XeeRJku7VD6--VgXAyFAoW4l_gLr5aUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547246133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Wollheim, W. M ; Harms, T. K ; Peterson, B. J ; Morkeski, K ; Hopkinson, C. S ; Stewart, R. J ; Gooseff, M. N ; Briggs, M. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, W. M ; Harms, T. K ; Peterson, B. J ; Morkeski, K ; Hopkinson, C. S ; Stewart, R. J ; Gooseff, M. N ; Briggs, M. A</creatorcontrib><description>River systems are important regulators of anthropogenic nitrogen flux between land and ocean. Nitrogen dynamics in small headwater streams have been extensively measured, whereas less is known about contributions of other components of stream networks to nitrogen removal, including larger streams or fluvial wetlands. Here, we quantified nitrate reaction rates in higher-order stream channels and in surface transient storage (STS) zones (sub-systems with greater water residence time than the main channel) of the Ipswich River watershed, a temperate basin characterized by suburban development. We characterized uptake in STS both within higher-order stream channels and in fluvial wetlands that remain connected to advective fluxes but not constrained within channels. We compare reaction rates in these systems to those previously measured in headwater streams in the same basin. We found that (1) nitrate reaction rates (as uptake velocity, f) in higher-order streams (n = 2) differed from each other but were consistent with previous estimates from headwater streams, (2) nitrate reaction rates in STS zones within higher-order stream channels (n = 2) were higher than rates estimated at the whole-stream scale, (3) ambient nitrate reaction rates in fluvial wetland STS (n = 7) were high but comparable to headwater streams with low nitrate concentration, (4) nitrate reaction rates were higher in fluvial wetland STS compared to headwater stream channels at elevated nitrate concentration, and (5) efficiency loss (EL) similar to that found in headwater streams was also apparent in fluvial wetlands. These results indicate that STS are potential hotspots of biogeochemical activity and should be explicitly integrated into network scale biogeochemical models. Further, experimental evidence of EL in fluvial wetlands suggests that the effectiveness of STS to retain N may decline if N loading increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-014-9993-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biogeochemistry ; Biogeosciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecosystems ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Chemistry ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluvial channels ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater fishes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Headwaters ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Kinetics ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Nitrates ; nitrogen ; Pollution, environment geology ; Reaction kinetics ; rivers ; Stream channels ; Streams ; Surface chemistry ; Synecology ; watersheds ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2014-08, Vol.120 (1-3), p.239-257</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24716970$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24716970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,58593,58826</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28673354$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, T. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morkeski, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, C. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooseff, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggs, M. A</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description>River systems are important regulators of anthropogenic nitrogen flux between land and ocean. Nitrogen dynamics in small headwater streams have been extensively measured, whereas less is known about contributions of other components of stream networks to nitrogen removal, including larger streams or fluvial wetlands. Here, we quantified nitrate reaction rates in higher-order stream channels and in surface transient storage (STS) zones (sub-systems with greater water residence time than the main channel) of the Ipswich River watershed, a temperate basin characterized by suburban development. We characterized uptake in STS both within higher-order stream channels and in fluvial wetlands that remain connected to advective fluxes but not constrained within channels. We compare reaction rates in these systems to those previously measured in headwater streams in the same basin. We found that (1) nitrate reaction rates (as uptake velocity, f) in higher-order streams (n = 2) differed from each other but were consistent with previous estimates from headwater streams, (2) nitrate reaction rates in STS zones within higher-order stream channels (n = 2) were higher than rates estimated at the whole-stream scale, (3) ambient nitrate reaction rates in fluvial wetland STS (n = 7) were high but comparable to headwater streams with low nitrate concentration, (4) nitrate reaction rates were higher in fluvial wetland STS compared to headwater stream channels at elevated nitrate concentration, and (5) efficiency loss (EL) similar to that found in headwater streams was also apparent in fluvial wetlands. These results indicate that STS are potential hotspots of biogeochemical activity and should be explicitly integrated into network scale biogeochemical models. Further, experimental evidence of EL in fluvial wetlands suggests that the effectiveness of STS to retain N may decline if N loading increases.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluvial channels</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Headwaters</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Reaction kinetics</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>Stream channels</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surface chemistry</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-r1DAUxYMoOI5-ABdiQIS3qeb2Jk2zlIc-hYcu9IELIdzmz9ix045Jq8y3N0MfKi5cJeH-zsnhXMYeg3gBQuiXGYRCrATIyhiD1ekO24DSWClQn--yjYCmrWrV4H32IOe9EMJogRv25X0_J5oDX44zfQvcn0Y69C7zKfK8pEgu8AKMuQ_jzPM8JdoF3o_lmgIduPtK4xiGzGn0PA7Lj54G_jPMQ3nnh-xepCGHR7fnlt28ef3p8m11_eHq3eWr68pJ1c5VJ5w0xvu6A-gCdR49KGpb7zqnXWckRh-DxjoKT6ozJiC6rnGmJnRIArfsYvU9pun7EvJsD312YSghwrRkC7rWjdEApqDP_kH305LGks6CkrqWDSAWClbKpSnnFKI9pv5A6WRB2HPfdu3blr7tuW97Kprnt86UHQ2xlOb6_FtYt41GVLJw9crlMhp3If2V4D_mT1bR_ryCP6ZSQ3Ne5JY9XeeRJku7VD6--VgXAyFAoW4l_gLr5aUU</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Wollheim, W. M</creator><creator>Harms, T. K</creator><creator>Peterson, B. J</creator><creator>Morkeski, K</creator><creator>Hopkinson, C. S</creator><creator>Stewart, R. J</creator><creator>Gooseff, M. N</creator><creator>Briggs, M. A</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands</title><author>Wollheim, W. M ; Harms, T. K ; Peterson, B. J ; Morkeski, K ; Hopkinson, C. S ; Stewart, R. J ; Gooseff, M. N ; Briggs, M. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluvial channels</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Headwaters</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Reaction kinetics</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>Stream channels</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surface chemistry</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, T. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morkeski, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, C. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooseff, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggs, M. A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wollheim, W. M</au><au>Harms, T. K</au><au>Peterson, B. J</au><au>Morkeski, K</au><au>Hopkinson, C. S</au><au>Stewart, R. J</au><au>Gooseff, M. N</au><au>Briggs, M. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>239-257</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><coden>BIOGEP</coden><notes>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-9993-y</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>River systems are important regulators of anthropogenic nitrogen flux between land and ocean. Nitrogen dynamics in small headwater streams have been extensively measured, whereas less is known about contributions of other components of stream networks to nitrogen removal, including larger streams or fluvial wetlands. Here, we quantified nitrate reaction rates in higher-order stream channels and in surface transient storage (STS) zones (sub-systems with greater water residence time than the main channel) of the Ipswich River watershed, a temperate basin characterized by suburban development. We characterized uptake in STS both within higher-order stream channels and in fluvial wetlands that remain connected to advective fluxes but not constrained within channels. We compare reaction rates in these systems to those previously measured in headwater streams in the same basin. We found that (1) nitrate reaction rates (as uptake velocity, f) in higher-order streams (n = 2) differed from each other but were consistent with previous estimates from headwater streams, (2) nitrate reaction rates in STS zones within higher-order stream channels (n = 2) were higher than rates estimated at the whole-stream scale, (3) ambient nitrate reaction rates in fluvial wetland STS (n = 7) were high but comparable to headwater streams with low nitrate concentration, (4) nitrate reaction rates were higher in fluvial wetland STS compared to headwater stream channels at elevated nitrate concentration, and (5) efficiency loss (EL) similar to that found in headwater streams was also apparent in fluvial wetlands. These results indicate that STS are potential hotspots of biogeochemical activity and should be explicitly integrated into network scale biogeochemical models. Further, experimental evidence of EL in fluvial wetlands suggests that the effectiveness of STS to retain N may decline if N loading increases.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-014-9993-y</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-2563
ispartof Biogeochemistry, 2014-08, Vol.120 (1-3), p.239-257
issn 0168-2563
1573-515X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727697119
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biogeochemistry
Biogeosciences
Biological and medical sciences
Creeks & streams
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Ecosystems
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environmental Chemistry
Exact sciences and technology
Fluvial channels
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater fishes
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Headwaters
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Kinetics
Life Sciences
Marine
Nitrates
nitrogen
Pollution, environment geology
Reaction kinetics
rivers
Stream channels
Streams
Surface chemistry
Synecology
watersheds
Wetlands
title Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T17%3A39%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrate%20uptake%20dynamics%20of%20surface%20transient%20storage%20in%20stream%20channels%20and%20fluvial%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Wollheim,%20W.%20M&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=239-257&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft.coden=BIOGEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-014-9993-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24716970%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-b0c499dd2b11beabd3d15a88dcbc7cb943fdfe732f0da5b99e33cb6c92a3c3a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547246133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24716970&rfr_iscdi=true