Loading…
In vivo biocompatibility versus degree of conversion of resin-reinforced cements in different time periods
ABSTRACT This study focused on test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the degree of conversion and biocompatibility of different resin reinforced glass ionomer cements (RRGICs). Forty‐eight male Wistar rats were used, distributed into four groups (n = 12), as follows: Group C (...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Microscopy research and technique 2014-05, Vol.77 (5), p.335-340 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623 |
| container_end_page | 340 |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 335 |
| container_title | Microscopy research and technique |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Lacerda-Santos, Rogério De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti Pithon, Matheus Melo Alves, Pollianna Muniz Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório |
| description | ABSTRACT
This study focused on test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the degree of conversion and biocompatibility of different resin reinforced glass ionomer cements (RRGICs). Forty‐eight male Wistar rats were used, distributed into four groups (n = 12), as follows: Group C (Control, polyethylene), Group FOB (Fuji Ortho Band), Group UBL (Ultra band Lok), and Group MCG (Multicure Glass), in subcutaneous tissue. The events of edema, necrosis, granulation tissue, multinuclear giant cells, young fibroblasts, and collagen formation were analyzed at 7, 15, and 30 days. The degree of conversion was evaluated by the Fourier method. Biocompatibility and degree of conversion were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests, and ANOVA and Tukey's test, respectively (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jemt.22348 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677941835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1518622269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1TAQhq0K1Bvd8ADIEhuElOJrHC9RVUpLKWrVqoiNlThj5ENiH-zklPP2JJy2CxbQ1dy--TWjH6GXlBxSQti7BfTDIWNcVFtolxKtiqmrn8251IWm5OsO2st5QQilkopttMNESaWSahctTgNe-VXEjY829st68I3v_LDGK0h5zLiF7wkAR4dtDHPPxzBXCbIPRQIfXEwWWmyhhzBk7ANuvXOQpgoPvge8hORjm1-g567uMhzcx3108-H4-uhjcf7l5PTo_Xlhp6uqonJEtyVhgtSuAc6JZDXXjnAlpATdCl7V2mqQvG2cUzANgFsBmilbupLxffRmo7tM8ecIeTC9zxa6rg4Qx2xoqZQWtOLy_6gUVFDJuH4CSquSMVbO6Ou_0EUcU5h-niklBSeKTNTbDWVTzDmBM8vk-zqtDSVm9tXMvpo_vk7wq3vJsemhfUQfjJwAugHufAfrf0iZs-PP1w-ixWbH5wF-Pe7U6YcpFVfS3F6cmG-fbunVJefmjP8GaQK8TQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517543070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo biocompatibility versus degree of conversion of resin-reinforced cements in different time periods</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério ; De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões ; De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti ; Pithon, Matheus Melo ; Alves, Pollianna Muniz ; Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro ; Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</creator><creatorcontrib>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério ; De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões ; De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti ; Pithon, Matheus Melo ; Alves, Pollianna Muniz ; Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro ; Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
This study focused on test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the degree of conversion and biocompatibility of different resin reinforced glass ionomer cements (RRGICs). Forty‐eight male Wistar rats were used, distributed into four groups (n = 12), as follows: Group C (Control, polyethylene), Group FOB (Fuji Ortho Band), Group UBL (Ultra band Lok), and Group MCG (Multicure Glass), in subcutaneous tissue. The events of edema, necrosis, granulation tissue, multinuclear giant cells, young fibroblasts, and collagen formation were analyzed at 7, 15, and 30 days. The degree of conversion was evaluated by the Fourier method. Biocompatibility and degree of conversion were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests, and ANOVA and Tukey's test, respectively (P < 0.05). It was observed that, there was significant difference between Groups FOB and UBL for the presence of young fibroblasts at 15 days (P = 0.034) and between the Control and MCG Groups for the presence of multinucleated giant cells at 30 days (P = 0.009). Monomer conversion increased progressively until day 30, with significant difference between Group FOB and Groups UBL and MCG (P = 0.013) at 15 days. The null hypothesis was partially accepted, Fuji Ortho Band showed a less monomer conversion and a smaller number of young fibroblasts in the time of 15 days. Microsc. Res. Tech. 77:335–340, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-910X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22348</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24615757</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRTEEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acrylic Resins - adverse effects ; Acrylic Resins - metabolism ; Aluminum Silicates - adverse effects ; Aluminum Silicates - metabolism ; Analysis of variance ; Animals ; Biocompatibility ; Cements ; Conversion ; Edema - chemically induced ; Fibroblasts ; Fibroblasts - metabolism ; Giant Cells - metabolism ; glass ionomer cements ; Glass Ionomer Cements - adverse effects ; Glass Ionomer Cements - metabolism ; Inflammation - chemically induced ; Male ; Materials Testing - methods ; Monomers ; Necrosis - chemically induced ; Null hypothesis ; orthodontics ; Polyethylenes ; Rats, Wistar ; Resin Cements - adverse effects ; Resin Cements - metabolism ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Microscopy research and technique, 2014-05, Vol.77 (5), p.335-340</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjemt.22348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjemt.22348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24615757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pithon, Matheus Melo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Pollianna Muniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo biocompatibility versus degree of conversion of resin-reinforced cements in different time periods</title><title>Microscopy research and technique</title><addtitle>Microsc. Res. Tech</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
This study focused on test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the degree of conversion and biocompatibility of different resin reinforced glass ionomer cements (RRGICs). Forty‐eight male Wistar rats were used, distributed into four groups (n = 12), as follows: Group C (Control, polyethylene), Group FOB (Fuji Ortho Band), Group UBL (Ultra band Lok), and Group MCG (Multicure Glass), in subcutaneous tissue. The events of edema, necrosis, granulation tissue, multinuclear giant cells, young fibroblasts, and collagen formation were analyzed at 7, 15, and 30 days. The degree of conversion was evaluated by the Fourier method. Biocompatibility and degree of conversion were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests, and ANOVA and Tukey's test, respectively (P < 0.05). It was observed that, there was significant difference between Groups FOB and UBL for the presence of young fibroblasts at 15 days (P = 0.034) and between the Control and MCG Groups for the presence of multinucleated giant cells at 30 days (P = 0.009). Monomer conversion increased progressively until day 30, with significant difference between Group FOB and Groups UBL and MCG (P = 0.013) at 15 days. The null hypothesis was partially accepted, Fuji Ortho Band showed a less monomer conversion and a smaller number of young fibroblasts in the time of 15 days. Microsc. Res. Tech. 77:335–340, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Acrylic Resins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Acrylic Resins - metabolism</subject><subject>Aluminum Silicates - adverse effects</subject><subject>Aluminum Silicates - metabolism</subject><subject>Analysis of variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Cements</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Edema - chemically induced</subject><subject>Fibroblasts</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Giant Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>glass ionomer cements</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - adverse effects</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - metabolism</subject><subject>Inflammation - chemically induced</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Monomers</subject><subject>Necrosis - chemically induced</subject><subject>Null hypothesis</subject><subject>orthodontics</subject><subject>Polyethylenes</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Resin Cements - adverse effects</subject><subject>Resin Cements - metabolism</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1059-910X</issn><issn>1097-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctu1TAQhq0K1Bvd8ADIEhuElOJrHC9RVUpLKWrVqoiNlThj5ENiH-zklPP2JJy2CxbQ1dy--TWjH6GXlBxSQti7BfTDIWNcVFtolxKtiqmrn8251IWm5OsO2st5QQilkopttMNESaWSahctTgNe-VXEjY829st68I3v_LDGK0h5zLiF7wkAR4dtDHPPxzBXCbIPRQIfXEwWWmyhhzBk7ANuvXOQpgoPvge8hORjm1-g567uMhzcx3108-H4-uhjcf7l5PTo_Xlhp6uqonJEtyVhgtSuAc6JZDXXjnAlpATdCl7V2mqQvG2cUzANgFsBmilbupLxffRmo7tM8ecIeTC9zxa6rg4Qx2xoqZQWtOLy_6gUVFDJuH4CSquSMVbO6Ou_0EUcU5h-niklBSeKTNTbDWVTzDmBM8vk-zqtDSVm9tXMvpo_vk7wq3vJsemhfUQfjJwAugHufAfrf0iZs-PP1w-ixWbH5wF-Pe7U6YcpFVfS3F6cmG-fbunVJefmjP8GaQK8TQ</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério</creator><creator>De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões</creator><creator>De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti</creator><creator>Pithon, Matheus Melo</creator><creator>Alves, Pollianna Muniz</creator><creator>Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro</creator><creator>Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>In vivo biocompatibility versus degree of conversion of resin-reinforced cements in different time periods</title><author>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério ; De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões ; De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti ; Pithon, Matheus Melo ; Alves, Pollianna Muniz ; Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro ; Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acrylic Resins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Acrylic Resins - metabolism</topic><topic>Aluminum Silicates - adverse effects</topic><topic>Aluminum Silicates - metabolism</topic><topic>Analysis of variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Cements</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Edema - chemically induced</topic><topic>Fibroblasts</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Giant Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>glass ionomer cements</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - adverse effects</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - metabolism</topic><topic>Inflammation - chemically induced</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Monomers</topic><topic>Necrosis - chemically induced</topic><topic>Null hypothesis</topic><topic>orthodontics</topic><topic>Polyethylenes</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Resin Cements - adverse effects</topic><topic>Resin Cements - metabolism</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pithon, Matheus Melo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Pollianna Muniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microscopy research and technique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lacerda-Santos, Rogério</au><au>De Farias, Maria Isabel Serpa Simões</au><au>De Carvalho, Fabiola Galbiatti</au><au>Pithon, Matheus Melo</au><au>Alves, Pollianna Muniz</au><au>Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro</au><au>Guênes, Gymenna Maria Tenório</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo biocompatibility versus degree of conversion of resin-reinforced cements in different time periods</atitle><jtitle>Microscopy research and technique</jtitle><addtitle>Microsc. Res. Tech</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>335-340</pages><issn>1059-910X</issn><eissn>1097-0029</eissn><coden>MRTEEO</coden><notes>National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq (PIBIC scholarship)</notes><notes>istex:E44AFEBDD7BA11439599130F66A89519DEC2DBB3</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-ZKW1RQ33-J</notes><notes>ArticleID:JEMT22348</notes><notes>REVIEW EDITOR: Dr. Chuanbin Mao</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>ABSTRACT
This study focused on test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the degree of conversion and biocompatibility of different resin reinforced glass ionomer cements (RRGICs). Forty‐eight male Wistar rats were used, distributed into four groups (n = 12), as follows: Group C (Control, polyethylene), Group FOB (Fuji Ortho Band), Group UBL (Ultra band Lok), and Group MCG (Multicure Glass), in subcutaneous tissue. The events of edema, necrosis, granulation tissue, multinuclear giant cells, young fibroblasts, and collagen formation were analyzed at 7, 15, and 30 days. The degree of conversion was evaluated by the Fourier method. Biocompatibility and degree of conversion were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests, and ANOVA and Tukey's test, respectively (P < 0.05). It was observed that, there was significant difference between Groups FOB and UBL for the presence of young fibroblasts at 15 days (P = 0.034) and between the Control and MCG Groups for the presence of multinucleated giant cells at 30 days (P = 0.009). Monomer conversion increased progressively until day 30, with significant difference between Group FOB and Groups UBL and MCG (P = 0.013) at 15 days. The null hypothesis was partially accepted, Fuji Ortho Band showed a less monomer conversion and a smaller number of young fibroblasts in the time of 15 days. Microsc. Res. Tech. 77:335–340, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24615757</pmid><doi>10.1002/jemt.22348</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1059-910X |
| ispartof | Microscopy research and technique, 2014-05, Vol.77 (5), p.335-340 |
| issn | 1059-910X 1097-0029 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677941835 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
| subjects | Acrylic Resins - adverse effects Acrylic Resins - metabolism Aluminum Silicates - adverse effects Aluminum Silicates - metabolism Analysis of variance Animals Biocompatibility Cements Conversion Edema - chemically induced Fibroblasts Fibroblasts - metabolism Giant Cells - metabolism glass ionomer cements Glass Ionomer Cements - adverse effects Glass Ionomer Cements - metabolism Inflammation - chemically induced Male Materials Testing - methods Monomers Necrosis - chemically induced Null hypothesis orthodontics Polyethylenes Rats, Wistar Resin Cements - adverse effects Resin Cements - metabolism Time Factors |
| title | In vivo biocompatibility versus degree of conversion of resin-reinforced cements in different time periods |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T17%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20biocompatibility%20versus%20degree%20of%20conversion%20of%20resin-reinforced%20cements%20in%20different%20time%20periods&rft.jtitle=Microscopy%20research%20and%20technique&rft.au=Lacerda-Santos,%20Rog%C3%A9rio&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=335-340&rft.issn=1059-910X&rft.eissn=1097-0029&rft.coden=MRTEEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jemt.22348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1518622269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-8f09d60240afbe33052a39f037455e9d438a9c9e53dbff7e037e3c4e927c6f623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517543070&rft_id=info:pmid/24615757&rfr_iscdi=true |