Loading…

Comparison of targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)

Targeted absolute protein quantification yields valuable information about physiological adaptation of organisms and is thereby of high interest. Especially for this purpose, two proteomic mass spectrometry-based techniques namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2014, Vol.406 (1), p.283-291
Main Authors: Schiffmann, Christian, Hansen, Rasmus, Baumann, Sven, Kublik, Anja, Nielsen, Per Halkjær, Adrian, Lorenz, von Bergen, Martin, Jehmlich, Nico, Seifert, Jana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3
container_end_page 291
container_issue 1
container_start_page 283
container_title Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
container_volume 406
creator Schiffmann, Christian
Hansen, Rasmus
Baumann, Sven
Kublik, Anja
Nielsen, Per Halkjær
Adrian, Lorenz
von Bergen, Martin
Jehmlich, Nico
Seifert, Jana
description Targeted absolute protein quantification yields valuable information about physiological adaptation of organisms and is thereby of high interest. Especially for this purpose, two proteomic mass spectrometry-based techniques namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM) are commonly applied. The objective of this study was to establish an optimal quantification assay for proteins with the focus on those involved in housekeeping functions and putative reductive dehalogenase proteins from the strictly anaerobic bacterium Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1. This microbe is small and slow-growing; hence, it provides little biomass for comprehensive proteomic analysis. We therefore compared SRM and PRM techniques. Eleven peptides were successfully quantified by both methods. In addition, six peptides were solely quantified by SRM and four by PRM, respectively. Peptides were spiked into a background of Escherichia coli lysate and the majority of peptides were quantifiable down to 500 amol absolute on column by both methods. Peptide quantification in CBDB1 lysate resulted in the detection of 15 peptides using SRM and 14 peptides with the PRM assay. Resulting quantification of five dehalogenases revealed copy numbers of
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00216-013-7451-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660067232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660067232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAGyQJTZlkTJ27HHuEl1RQGoF4mcdOc7k4iqJUztBuk_TV8VpSoUQiLuyrfnmzJHnZNlzDmccQL-OAIJjDrzItVQ81w-yY468zAUqeHh_l-IoexLjFQBXJcfH2ZGQQoBGfpzdbH0_muCiH5hv2WTCjiZq2Ejj5Bpi17MZJtc6ayaXEBOj2UfW-sACNbOd3A9iDX03nd_RYCJFVu9ZpI7WUiBjbxt7P7jJBzfs2OmXz5evmBnSkEB2DvFW7C_cp8Q9zR61pov07O48yb6dv_26fZ9ffHz3YfvmIrdK8ilvdaOEhqI2iG2Jm1rbTUG1JamFrZHbBkR6KVsX1CAqjaKtgSMUpi1raIqT7HTVHYO_nilOVe-ipa4zA_k5VhwRALUoxGGo1PIQNJmXoKTWB6CAxbJl_D8qN6BLpWSR0Jd_oFd-DkP6yWRTg8ANlJAovlI2-BgDtdUYXG_CvuJQLUmr1qRVKWnV4qFa_L64U57rnpr7jl_RSoBYgTgu66Tw2-h_qv4Exeve_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1670269080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Schiffmann, Christian ; Hansen, Rasmus ; Baumann, Sven ; Kublik, Anja ; Nielsen, Per Halkjær ; Adrian, Lorenz ; von Bergen, Martin ; Jehmlich, Nico ; Seifert, Jana</creator><creatorcontrib>Schiffmann, Christian ; Hansen, Rasmus ; Baumann, Sven ; Kublik, Anja ; Nielsen, Per Halkjær ; Adrian, Lorenz ; von Bergen, Martin ; Jehmlich, Nico ; Seifert, Jana</creatorcontrib><description>Targeted absolute protein quantification yields valuable information about physiological adaptation of organisms and is thereby of high interest. Especially for this purpose, two proteomic mass spectrometry-based techniques namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM) are commonly applied. The objective of this study was to establish an optimal quantification assay for proteins with the focus on those involved in housekeeping functions and putative reductive dehalogenase proteins from the strictly anaerobic bacterium Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1. This microbe is small and slow-growing; hence, it provides little biomass for comprehensive proteomic analysis. We therefore compared SRM and PRM techniques. Eleven peptides were successfully quantified by both methods. In addition, six peptides were solely quantified by SRM and four by PRM, respectively. Peptides were spiked into a background of Escherichia coli lysate and the majority of peptides were quantifiable down to 500 amol absolute on column by both methods. Peptide quantification in CBDB1 lysate resulted in the detection of 15 peptides using SRM and 14 peptides with the PRM assay. Resulting quantification of five dehalogenases revealed copy numbers of &lt;10 to 115 protein molecules per cell indicating clear differences in abundance of RdhA proteins during growth on hexachlorobenzene. Our results indicated that both methods show comparable sensitivity and that the combination of the mass spectrometry assays resulted in higher peptide coverage and thus more reliable protein quantification. Figure Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1 cultivated on hexachlorobenzene were used to compare two targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases, namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-2642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-7451-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24220761</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Anaerobiosis ; Analytical Chemistry ; Assaying ; Bacterial Proteins - chemistry ; Bacterial Proteins - metabolism ; Biochemistry ; Biomass ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chloroflexi - chemistry ; Chloroflexi - drug effects ; Chloroflexi - metabolism ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Escherichia coli - chemistry ; Food Science ; Genomes ; Hexachlorobenzene - metabolism ; Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology ; Hydrolases - chemistry ; Hydrolases - metabolism ; Isoenzymes - chemistry ; Isoenzymes - metabolism ; Laboratory Medicine ; Mass spectrometry ; Metabolism ; Microorganisms ; Monitoring ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Peptide Fragments - analysis ; Peptides ; Precursors ; Proteins ; Proteomics ; Proteomics - methods ; Reproduction ; Research Paper ; Respiration ; Scientific imaging ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><ispartof>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2014, Vol.406 (1), p.283-291</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24220761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schiffmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Rasmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kublik, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adrian, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Bergen, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jehmlich, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifert, Jana</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</title><title>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><description>Targeted absolute protein quantification yields valuable information about physiological adaptation of organisms and is thereby of high interest. Especially for this purpose, two proteomic mass spectrometry-based techniques namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM) are commonly applied. The objective of this study was to establish an optimal quantification assay for proteins with the focus on those involved in housekeeping functions and putative reductive dehalogenase proteins from the strictly anaerobic bacterium Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1. This microbe is small and slow-growing; hence, it provides little biomass for comprehensive proteomic analysis. We therefore compared SRM and PRM techniques. Eleven peptides were successfully quantified by both methods. In addition, six peptides were solely quantified by SRM and four by PRM, respectively. Peptides were spiked into a background of Escherichia coli lysate and the majority of peptides were quantifiable down to 500 amol absolute on column by both methods. Peptide quantification in CBDB1 lysate resulted in the detection of 15 peptides using SRM and 14 peptides with the PRM assay. Resulting quantification of five dehalogenases revealed copy numbers of &lt;10 to 115 protein molecules per cell indicating clear differences in abundance of RdhA proteins during growth on hexachlorobenzene. Our results indicated that both methods show comparable sensitivity and that the combination of the mass spectrometry assays resulted in higher peptide coverage and thus more reliable protein quantification. Figure Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1 cultivated on hexachlorobenzene were used to compare two targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases, namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chloroflexi - chemistry</subject><subject>Chloroflexi - drug effects</subject><subject>Chloroflexi - metabolism</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - chemistry</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Hexachlorobenzene - metabolism</subject><subject>Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology</subject><subject>Hydrolases - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrolases - metabolism</subject><subject>Isoenzymes - chemistry</subject><subject>Isoenzymes - metabolism</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - analysis</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Precursors</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Proteomics - methods</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><issn>1618-2642</issn><issn>1618-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAGyQJTZlkTJ27HHuEl1RQGoF4mcdOc7k4iqJUztBuk_TV8VpSoUQiLuyrfnmzJHnZNlzDmccQL-OAIJjDrzItVQ81w-yY468zAUqeHh_l-IoexLjFQBXJcfH2ZGQQoBGfpzdbH0_muCiH5hv2WTCjiZq2Ejj5Bpi17MZJtc6ayaXEBOj2UfW-sACNbOd3A9iDX03nd_RYCJFVu9ZpI7WUiBjbxt7P7jJBzfs2OmXz5evmBnSkEB2DvFW7C_cp8Q9zR61pov07O48yb6dv_26fZ9ffHz3YfvmIrdK8ilvdaOEhqI2iG2Jm1rbTUG1JamFrZHbBkR6KVsX1CAqjaKtgSMUpi1raIqT7HTVHYO_nilOVe-ipa4zA_k5VhwRALUoxGGo1PIQNJmXoKTWB6CAxbJl_D8qN6BLpWSR0Jd_oFd-DkP6yWRTg8ANlJAovlI2-BgDtdUYXG_CvuJQLUmr1qRVKWnV4qFa_L64U57rnpr7jl_RSoBYgTgu66Tw2-h_qv4Exeve_g</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Schiffmann, Christian</creator><creator>Hansen, Rasmus</creator><creator>Baumann, Sven</creator><creator>Kublik, Anja</creator><creator>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creator><creator>Adrian, Lorenz</creator><creator>von Bergen, Martin</creator><creator>Jehmlich, Nico</creator><creator>Seifert, Jana</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Comparison of targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</title><author>Schiffmann, Christian ; Hansen, Rasmus ; Baumann, Sven ; Kublik, Anja ; Nielsen, Per Halkjær ; Adrian, Lorenz ; von Bergen, Martin ; Jehmlich, Nico ; Seifert, Jana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chloroflexi - chemistry</topic><topic>Chloroflexi - drug effects</topic><topic>Chloroflexi - metabolism</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - chemistry</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Hexachlorobenzene - metabolism</topic><topic>Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology</topic><topic>Hydrolases - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrolases - metabolism</topic><topic>Isoenzymes - chemistry</topic><topic>Isoenzymes - metabolism</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - analysis</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Precursors</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Proteomics - methods</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schiffmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Rasmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kublik, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adrian, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Bergen, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jehmlich, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifert, Jana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schiffmann, Christian</au><au>Hansen, Rasmus</au><au>Baumann, Sven</au><au>Kublik, Anja</au><au>Nielsen, Per Halkjær</au><au>Adrian, Lorenz</au><au>von Bergen, Martin</au><au>Jehmlich, Nico</au><au>Seifert, Jana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</atitle><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle><stitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</stitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>406</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>283-291</pages><issn>1618-2642</issn><eissn>1618-2650</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Targeted absolute protein quantification yields valuable information about physiological adaptation of organisms and is thereby of high interest. Especially for this purpose, two proteomic mass spectrometry-based techniques namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM) are commonly applied. The objective of this study was to establish an optimal quantification assay for proteins with the focus on those involved in housekeeping functions and putative reductive dehalogenase proteins from the strictly anaerobic bacterium Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1. This microbe is small and slow-growing; hence, it provides little biomass for comprehensive proteomic analysis. We therefore compared SRM and PRM techniques. Eleven peptides were successfully quantified by both methods. In addition, six peptides were solely quantified by SRM and four by PRM, respectively. Peptides were spiked into a background of Escherichia coli lysate and the majority of peptides were quantifiable down to 500 amol absolute on column by both methods. Peptide quantification in CBDB1 lysate resulted in the detection of 15 peptides using SRM and 14 peptides with the PRM assay. Resulting quantification of five dehalogenases revealed copy numbers of &lt;10 to 115 protein molecules per cell indicating clear differences in abundance of RdhA proteins during growth on hexachlorobenzene. Our results indicated that both methods show comparable sensitivity and that the combination of the mass spectrometry assays resulted in higher peptide coverage and thus more reliable protein quantification. Figure Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain CBDB1 cultivated on hexachlorobenzene were used to compare two targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases, namely selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24220761</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00216-013-7451-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-2642
ispartof Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2014, Vol.406 (1), p.283-291
issn 1618-2642
1618-2650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660067232
source Springer Link
subjects Accuracy
Anaerobiosis
Analytical Chemistry
Assaying
Bacterial Proteins - chemistry
Bacterial Proteins - metabolism
Biochemistry
Biomass
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chloroflexi - chemistry
Chloroflexi - drug effects
Chloroflexi - metabolism
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods
Escherichia coli - chemistry
Food Science
Genomes
Hexachlorobenzene - metabolism
Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology
Hydrolases - chemistry
Hydrolases - metabolism
Isoenzymes - chemistry
Isoenzymes - metabolism
Laboratory Medicine
Mass spectrometry
Metabolism
Microorganisms
Monitoring
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Oxidation-Reduction
Peptide Fragments - analysis
Peptides
Precursors
Proteins
Proteomics
Proteomics - methods
Reproduction
Research Paper
Respiration
Scientific imaging
Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods
title Comparison of targeted peptide quantification assays for reductive dehalogenases by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) and precursor reaction monitoring (PRM)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T07%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20targeted%20peptide%20quantification%20assays%20for%20reductive%20dehalogenases%20by%20selective%20reaction%20monitoring%20(SRM)%20and%20precursor%20reaction%20monitoring%20(PRM)&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20and%20bioanalytical%20chemistry&rft.au=Schiffmann,%20Christian&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=406&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=283-291&rft.issn=1618-2642&rft.eissn=1618-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00216-013-7451-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660067232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-f7d52703ba66f869b7c93ebce472cb61cd02bce5cb3ed665762fb01603af8b0d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1670269080&rft_id=info:pmid/24220761&rfr_iscdi=true