Loading…

Predictors of Excess Cement and Tissue Response to Fixed Implant-Supported Dentures after Cementation

Background The cementation of fixed implant‐supported restorations involves the risk of excess cement remaining in the peri‐implant tissue that may cause a peri‐implant tissue response with attachment loss. Purpose The aim was to study the peri‐implant tissue response after cementation and to detect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2015-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.e45-e53
Main Authors: Korsch, Michael, Robra, Bernt-Peter, Walther, Winfried
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493
container_end_page e53
container_issue S1
container_start_page e45
container_title Clinical implant dentistry and related research
container_volume 17
creator Korsch, Michael
Robra, Bernt-Peter
Walther, Winfried
description Background The cementation of fixed implant‐supported restorations involves the risk of excess cement remaining in the peri‐implant tissue that may cause a peri‐implant tissue response with attachment loss. Purpose The aim was to study the peri‐implant tissue response after cementation and to detect potential predictors of excess cement. Material and Methods Clinical complications after cementation in several index cases led to a recall of all patients treated with a special methacrylate cement (one hundred five patients with one hundred eighty‐eight implants) and systematic reevaluation of 71 patients (68%) with one hundred twenty‐six implants (67%). In all cases, suprastructures including abutments were removed, and findings were documented. Results Implant diameter was significantly associated with the frequency of excess cement. Implant location or system had no significant effect. Excess cement in turn was associated with bleeding on probing, suppuration, and peri‐implant attachment loss. In the absence of excess cement 58.8% of implants had no peri‐implant attachment loss versus 37.3% when excess cement was present. With increasing retention time of the methacrylate cement, more peri‐implant attachment loss was detected. However, the latter association was not significant. Conclusion Larger diameters are significantly associated with excess cement in peri‐implant tissue. Consequences of excess cement may be increased bleeding on probing, suppuration, and possibly peri‐implant attachment loss.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cid.12122
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652420281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652420281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EoqWw4AWQl7BI65_YcZaQ_o1atUCLkNhYjnMtGSZxajti-va4nWl33I2vrO98ujoIvafkkJY5sn44pIwy9gLt04aoSjGiXpZdMF4R1bZ76E1KvwlhlEr6Gu0xrppWMbqP4GuEwdscYsLB4ZONhZRwByNMGZtpwLc-pQXwd0hzmBLgHPCp38CAV-O8NlOubpZ5DjGXn-OSWSIkbFyGuJOY7MP0Fr1yZp3g3e49QD9OT2678-ry-mzVfb6srOCKVY6RgQtqWq4k63urjOh7p5SzjForW-5AyNY4MtSCcAuGGilq2Ssj276uW36APm69cwx3C6SsR58srMuhEJakqRSsZoQpWtBPW9TGkFIEp-foRxPvNSX6oVVdWtWPrRb2w0679CMMz-RTjQU42gJ__Rru_2_S3er4SVltEz5l2DwnTPyjZcMboX9enekvF-JX8410-ob_A08okKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652420281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of Excess Cement and Tissue Response to Fixed Implant-Supported Dentures after Cementation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Korsch, Michael ; Robra, Bernt-Peter ; Walther, Winfried</creator><creatorcontrib>Korsch, Michael ; Robra, Bernt-Peter ; Walther, Winfried</creatorcontrib><description>Background The cementation of fixed implant‐supported restorations involves the risk of excess cement remaining in the peri‐implant tissue that may cause a peri‐implant tissue response with attachment loss. Purpose The aim was to study the peri‐implant tissue response after cementation and to detect potential predictors of excess cement. Material and Methods Clinical complications after cementation in several index cases led to a recall of all patients treated with a special methacrylate cement (one hundred five patients with one hundred eighty‐eight implants) and systematic reevaluation of 71 patients (68%) with one hundred twenty‐six implants (67%). In all cases, suprastructures including abutments were removed, and findings were documented. Results Implant diameter was significantly associated with the frequency of excess cement. Implant location or system had no significant effect. Excess cement in turn was associated with bleeding on probing, suppuration, and peri‐implant attachment loss. In the absence of excess cement 58.8% of implants had no peri‐implant attachment loss versus 37.3% when excess cement was present. With increasing retention time of the methacrylate cement, more peri‐implant attachment loss was detected. However, the latter association was not significant. Conclusion Larger diameters are significantly associated with excess cement in peri‐implant tissue. Consequences of excess cement may be increased bleeding on probing, suppuration, and possibly peri‐implant attachment loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cid.12122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23879821</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; cement-retained dentures ; Cementation ; Crowns ; Dental Cements - adverse effects ; Dental Cements - chemistry ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dentistry ; Denture, Partial ; excess cement ; Female ; Humans ; implants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; peri-implantitis ; Periodontal Attachment Loss - chemically induced ; Periodontal Index ; Suppuration - chemically induced</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2015-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.e45-e53</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcid.12122$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcid.12122$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23879821$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robra, Bernt-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walther, Winfried</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of Excess Cement and Tissue Response to Fixed Implant-Supported Dentures after Cementation</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><description>Background The cementation of fixed implant‐supported restorations involves the risk of excess cement remaining in the peri‐implant tissue that may cause a peri‐implant tissue response with attachment loss. Purpose The aim was to study the peri‐implant tissue response after cementation and to detect potential predictors of excess cement. Material and Methods Clinical complications after cementation in several index cases led to a recall of all patients treated with a special methacrylate cement (one hundred five patients with one hundred eighty‐eight implants) and systematic reevaluation of 71 patients (68%) with one hundred twenty‐six implants (67%). In all cases, suprastructures including abutments were removed, and findings were documented. Results Implant diameter was significantly associated with the frequency of excess cement. Implant location or system had no significant effect. Excess cement in turn was associated with bleeding on probing, suppuration, and peri‐implant attachment loss. In the absence of excess cement 58.8% of implants had no peri‐implant attachment loss versus 37.3% when excess cement was present. With increasing retention time of the methacrylate cement, more peri‐implant attachment loss was detected. However, the latter association was not significant. Conclusion Larger diameters are significantly associated with excess cement in peri‐implant tissue. Consequences of excess cement may be increased bleeding on probing, suppuration, and possibly peri‐implant attachment loss.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>cement-retained dentures</subject><subject>Cementation</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Cements - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Partial</subject><subject>excess cement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>peri-implantitis</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss - chemically induced</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>Suppuration - chemically induced</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EoqWw4AWQl7BI65_YcZaQ_o1atUCLkNhYjnMtGSZxajti-va4nWl33I2vrO98ujoIvafkkJY5sn44pIwy9gLt04aoSjGiXpZdMF4R1bZ76E1KvwlhlEr6Gu0xrppWMbqP4GuEwdscYsLB4ZONhZRwByNMGZtpwLc-pQXwd0hzmBLgHPCp38CAV-O8NlOubpZ5DjGXn-OSWSIkbFyGuJOY7MP0Fr1yZp3g3e49QD9OT2678-ry-mzVfb6srOCKVY6RgQtqWq4k63urjOh7p5SzjForW-5AyNY4MtSCcAuGGilq2Ssj276uW36APm69cwx3C6SsR58srMuhEJakqRSsZoQpWtBPW9TGkFIEp-foRxPvNSX6oVVdWtWPrRb2w0679CMMz-RTjQU42gJ__Rru_2_S3er4SVltEz5l2DwnTPyjZcMboX9enekvF-JX8410-ob_A08okKw</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Korsch, Michael</creator><creator>Robra, Bernt-Peter</creator><creator>Walther, Winfried</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Predictors of Excess Cement and Tissue Response to Fixed Implant-Supported Dentures after Cementation</title><author>Korsch, Michael ; Robra, Bernt-Peter ; Walther, Winfried</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>cement-retained dentures</topic><topic>Cementation</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Cements - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Partial</topic><topic>excess cement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>peri-implantitis</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss - chemically induced</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>Suppuration - chemically induced</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robra, Bernt-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walther, Winfried</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korsch, Michael</au><au>Robra, Bernt-Peter</au><au>Walther, Winfried</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of Excess Cement and Tissue Response to Fixed Implant-Supported Dentures after Cementation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>e45</spage><epage>e53</epage><pages>e45-e53</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><notes>istex:6E0B4C3507D6932DE4AB49A5F33512E2E9CBB1E5</notes><notes>ArticleID:CID12122</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-BK5Z7Q0C-S</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Background The cementation of fixed implant‐supported restorations involves the risk of excess cement remaining in the peri‐implant tissue that may cause a peri‐implant tissue response with attachment loss. Purpose The aim was to study the peri‐implant tissue response after cementation and to detect potential predictors of excess cement. Material and Methods Clinical complications after cementation in several index cases led to a recall of all patients treated with a special methacrylate cement (one hundred five patients with one hundred eighty‐eight implants) and systematic reevaluation of 71 patients (68%) with one hundred twenty‐six implants (67%). In all cases, suprastructures including abutments were removed, and findings were documented. Results Implant diameter was significantly associated with the frequency of excess cement. Implant location or system had no significant effect. Excess cement in turn was associated with bleeding on probing, suppuration, and peri‐implant attachment loss. In the absence of excess cement 58.8% of implants had no peri‐implant attachment loss versus 37.3% when excess cement was present. With increasing retention time of the methacrylate cement, more peri‐implant attachment loss was detected. However, the latter association was not significant. Conclusion Larger diameters are significantly associated with excess cement in peri‐implant tissue. Consequences of excess cement may be increased bleeding on probing, suppuration, and possibly peri‐implant attachment loss.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23879821</pmid><doi>10.1111/cid.12122</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-0899
ispartof Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2015-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.e45-e53
issn 1523-0899
1708-8208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652420281
source Wiley
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
cement-retained dentures
Cementation
Crowns
Dental Cements - adverse effects
Dental Cements - chemistry
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Dentistry
Denture, Partial
excess cement
Female
Humans
implants
Male
Middle Aged
peri-implantitis
Periodontal Attachment Loss - chemically induced
Periodontal Index
Suppuration - chemically induced
title Predictors of Excess Cement and Tissue Response to Fixed Implant-Supported Dentures after Cementation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T06%3A36%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20Excess%20Cement%20and%20Tissue%20Response%20to%20Fixed%20Implant-Supported%20Dentures%20after%20Cementation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Korsch,%20Michael&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=e45&rft.epage=e53&rft.pages=e45-e53&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cid.12122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652420281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5382-f20d351a93862bbc8a5bbf88fc21cc693fe569af0d4503cea1a6546b8a69b4493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652420281&rft_id=info:pmid/23879821&rfr_iscdi=true