Loading…
Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare
The introduction of top‐down centrally driven solutions to governance of healthcare, at the same time as increasing policy emphasis on greater ‘bottom up’ patient and public involvement in all aspects of healthcare, has set up complex tensions for policy implementation and healthcare practice. This...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Health & social care in the community 2014-07, Vol.22 (4), p.405-416 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3 |
| container_end_page | 416 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 405 |
| container_title | Health & social care in the community |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Ross, Fiona Smith, Pam Byng, Richard Christian, Sara Allan, Helen Price, Linnie Brearley, Sally |
| description | The introduction of top‐down centrally driven solutions to governance of healthcare, at the same time as increasing policy emphasis on greater ‘bottom up’ patient and public involvement in all aspects of healthcare, has set up complex tensions for policy implementation and healthcare practice. This paper explores the interplay of these agendas in the context of changes in primary healthcare services provided by the National Health Service in England. Specifically, it looks at service user involvement in a qualitative study of the professional response to changes in the governance and incentives in the care of people with long‐term conditions. Service users influenced and guided the study at local and national levels. Vignettes of patient stories developed by service users informed in‐depth interviews with 56 health and social care professionals engaged in the development of local policies and services for people with complex long‐term illness, and themes generated by cross case analysis were validated through service users. The findings presented here focus on four themes about risk and comparison of professionals' and service users' perspectives of the issues: managing risks/consistent support, the risks of letting go/feeling in control, professional identity/helping people to help themselves, and managing expectations/professionals losing out. In this study, service user involvement added value by validating understandings of governance, framing debates to focus on what matters at the point of care and enabling perspective sharing and interaction. We suggest that more collaborative forms of governance in healthcare that take account of service user perspectives and enable interaction with professional groups could help validate processes of quality assurance and provide motivation for continuous quality improvement. We offer a model for ‘opening up’ collaborative projects to evaluation and critical reflection of the interrelationships between the context, methods and outcomes of service user involvement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/hsc.12097 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561036824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2112154268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EomnhwB9AlrjQw7b-WNtrbiiCFikElQ9xtLzObNZlYwd7Q-i_xyFpD0hI8WXs0TOPrHkRekHJBS3nss_ugjKi1SM0oVyKiglWP0YToqWsSE3JCTrN-ZYQyhlRT9EJqyVlrNETZGdgU_BhibsUV3gNcT0A3vqxx0MMy2qEtMIuhoUffQz5DQ6wxT5kv-zHjLuY8DL-ghRscFD6eJ38yqY73IMdxt7ZBM_Qk84OGZ4f6hn69v7d1-l1Nft09WH6dlY5wYSqbEO4s1IDaZm0LVNMadnpVjXl2jRWMlm78mXbOrEoT2pbq6Tj2nasJRz4GXq9965T_LmBPJqVzw6GwQaIm2yokJRw2bD6CFQ0WhMijkFr1UimRHMEyuta0VrvrK_-QW_jpixxyIZRyoqUyZ3wfE-5FHNO0JnDdg0lZhe8KcGbv8EX9uXBuGlXsHgg75MuwOUe2PoB7v5vMtdfpvfKaj_h8wi_HyZs-mGk4kqY7_MrM_18M5fyZm4-8j_xTcS3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112154268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ross, Fiona ; Smith, Pam ; Byng, Richard ; Christian, Sara ; Allan, Helen ; Price, Linnie ; Brearley, Sally</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Fiona ; Smith, Pam ; Byng, Richard ; Christian, Sara ; Allan, Helen ; Price, Linnie ; Brearley, Sally</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of top‐down centrally driven solutions to governance of healthcare, at the same time as increasing policy emphasis on greater ‘bottom up’ patient and public involvement in all aspects of healthcare, has set up complex tensions for policy implementation and healthcare practice. This paper explores the interplay of these agendas in the context of changes in primary healthcare services provided by the National Health Service in England. Specifically, it looks at service user involvement in a qualitative study of the professional response to changes in the governance and incentives in the care of people with long‐term conditions. Service users influenced and guided the study at local and national levels. Vignettes of patient stories developed by service users informed in‐depth interviews with 56 health and social care professionals engaged in the development of local policies and services for people with complex long‐term illness, and themes generated by cross case analysis were validated through service users. The findings presented here focus on four themes about risk and comparison of professionals' and service users' perspectives of the issues: managing risks/consistent support, the risks of letting go/feeling in control, professional identity/helping people to help themselves, and managing expectations/professionals losing out. In this study, service user involvement added value by validating understandings of governance, framing debates to focus on what matters at the point of care and enabling perspective sharing and interaction. We suggest that more collaborative forms of governance in healthcare that take account of service user perspectives and enable interaction with professional groups could help validate processes of quality assurance and provide motivation for continuous quality improvement. We offer a model for ‘opening up’ collaborative projects to evaluation and critical reflection of the interrelationships between the context, methods and outcomes of service user involvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24612289</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HSCCEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology ; Chronic Disease - therapy ; Citizen participation ; Client participation ; Clinical Governance ; Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Governance ; Governing Board - organization & administration ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health Policy ; Health services ; Health services utilization ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Incentives ; Interviews as Topic ; Learning ; Long term sickness ; long-term conditions ; Losing ; Medical personnel ; Motivation ; Patient Participation ; Patients ; Policy implementation ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Professional identity ; Professionals ; Quality ; Quality control ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; risk ; service user involvement ; Social services ; United Kingdom ; User involvement ; Vignettes</subject><ispartof>Health & social care in the community, 2014-07, Vol.22 (4), p.405-416</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhsc.12097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhsc.12097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27899,27957,27958,31034,31035,33809,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byng, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Linnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brearley, Sally</creatorcontrib><title>Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare</title><title>Health & social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>The introduction of top‐down centrally driven solutions to governance of healthcare, at the same time as increasing policy emphasis on greater ‘bottom up’ patient and public involvement in all aspects of healthcare, has set up complex tensions for policy implementation and healthcare practice. This paper explores the interplay of these agendas in the context of changes in primary healthcare services provided by the National Health Service in England. Specifically, it looks at service user involvement in a qualitative study of the professional response to changes in the governance and incentives in the care of people with long‐term conditions. Service users influenced and guided the study at local and national levels. Vignettes of patient stories developed by service users informed in‐depth interviews with 56 health and social care professionals engaged in the development of local policies and services for people with complex long‐term illness, and themes generated by cross case analysis were validated through service users. The findings presented here focus on four themes about risk and comparison of professionals' and service users' perspectives of the issues: managing risks/consistent support, the risks of letting go/feeling in control, professional identity/helping people to help themselves, and managing expectations/professionals losing out. In this study, service user involvement added value by validating understandings of governance, framing debates to focus on what matters at the point of care and enabling perspective sharing and interaction. We suggest that more collaborative forms of governance in healthcare that take account of service user perspectives and enable interaction with professional groups could help validate processes of quality assurance and provide motivation for continuous quality improvement. We offer a model for ‘opening up’ collaborative projects to evaluation and critical reflection of the interrelationships between the context, methods and outcomes of service user involvement.</description><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Client participation</subject><subject>Clinical Governance</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Governing Board - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Long term sickness</subject><subject>long-term conditions</subject><subject>Losing</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>service user involvement</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>User involvement</subject><subject>Vignettes</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EomnhwB9AlrjQw7b-WNtrbiiCFikElQ9xtLzObNZlYwd7Q-i_xyFpD0hI8WXs0TOPrHkRekHJBS3nss_ugjKi1SM0oVyKiglWP0YToqWsSE3JCTrN-ZYQyhlRT9EJqyVlrNETZGdgU_BhibsUV3gNcT0A3vqxx0MMy2qEtMIuhoUffQz5DQ6wxT5kv-zHjLuY8DL-ghRscFD6eJ38yqY73IMdxt7ZBM_Qk84OGZ4f6hn69v7d1-l1Nft09WH6dlY5wYSqbEO4s1IDaZm0LVNMadnpVjXl2jRWMlm78mXbOrEoT2pbq6Tj2nasJRz4GXq9965T_LmBPJqVzw6GwQaIm2yokJRw2bD6CFQ0WhMijkFr1UimRHMEyuta0VrvrK_-QW_jpixxyIZRyoqUyZ3wfE-5FHNO0JnDdg0lZhe8KcGbv8EX9uXBuGlXsHgg75MuwOUe2PoB7v5vMtdfpvfKaj_h8wi_HyZs-mGk4kqY7_MrM_18M5fyZm4-8j_xTcS3</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Ross, Fiona</creator><creator>Smith, Pam</creator><creator>Byng, Richard</creator><creator>Christian, Sara</creator><creator>Allan, Helen</creator><creator>Price, Linnie</creator><creator>Brearley, Sally</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare</title><author>Ross, Fiona ; Smith, Pam ; Byng, Richard ; Christian, Sara ; Allan, Helen ; Price, Linnie ; Brearley, Sally</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Client participation</topic><topic>Clinical Governance</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Governing Board - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Long term sickness</topic><topic>long-term conditions</topic><topic>Losing</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>service user involvement</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>User involvement</topic><topic>Vignettes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byng, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Linnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brearley, Sally</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Fiona</au><au>Smith, Pam</au><au>Byng, Richard</au><au>Christian, Sara</au><au>Allan, Helen</au><au>Price, Linnie</au><au>Brearley, Sally</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare</atitle><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>405-416</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><coden>HSCCEL</coden><notes>National Co-ordinating Centre for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-CRQN66QN-M</notes><notes>ArticleID:HSC12097</notes><notes>istex:EA4D0612904C2C72B1C3E2620F3943EB43ACFF5E</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>The introduction of top‐down centrally driven solutions to governance of healthcare, at the same time as increasing policy emphasis on greater ‘bottom up’ patient and public involvement in all aspects of healthcare, has set up complex tensions for policy implementation and healthcare practice. This paper explores the interplay of these agendas in the context of changes in primary healthcare services provided by the National Health Service in England. Specifically, it looks at service user involvement in a qualitative study of the professional response to changes in the governance and incentives in the care of people with long‐term conditions. Service users influenced and guided the study at local and national levels. Vignettes of patient stories developed by service users informed in‐depth interviews with 56 health and social care professionals engaged in the development of local policies and services for people with complex long‐term illness, and themes generated by cross case analysis were validated through service users. The findings presented here focus on four themes about risk and comparison of professionals' and service users' perspectives of the issues: managing risks/consistent support, the risks of letting go/feeling in control, professional identity/helping people to help themselves, and managing expectations/professionals losing out. In this study, service user involvement added value by validating understandings of governance, framing debates to focus on what matters at the point of care and enabling perspective sharing and interaction. We suggest that more collaborative forms of governance in healthcare that take account of service user perspectives and enable interaction with professional groups could help validate processes of quality assurance and provide motivation for continuous quality improvement. We offer a model for ‘opening up’ collaborative projects to evaluation and critical reflection of the interrelationships between the context, methods and outcomes of service user involvement.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24612289</pmid><doi>10.1111/hsc.12097</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0966-0410 |
| ispartof | Health & social care in the community, 2014-07, Vol.22 (4), p.405-416 |
| issn | 0966-0410 1365-2524 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561036824 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Chronic Disease - psychology Chronic Disease - therapy Citizen participation Client participation Clinical Governance Clinical outcomes Collaboration Governance Governing Board - organization & administration Health care Health care policy Health Policy Health services Health services utilization Humans Illnesses Incentives Interviews as Topic Learning Long term sickness long-term conditions Losing Medical personnel Motivation Patient Participation Patients Policy implementation Primary care Primary health care Primary Health Care - organization & administration Professional identity Professionals Quality Quality control Quality management Quality of care risk service user involvement Social services United Kingdom User involvement Vignettes |
| title | Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T15%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20from%20people%20with%20long-term%20conditions:%20new%20insights%20for%20governance%20in%20primary%20healthcare&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Ross,%20Fiona&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=405-416&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft.coden=HSCCEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hsc.12097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2112154268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5257-a803ca69e0b26ab272796f9b7827288a6264c289abc5d8a61aba76c39af2b03e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112154268&rft_id=info:pmid/24612289&rfr_iscdi=true |