Loading…
Mental Health Professionals' Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5
Objective To examine the conceptualizations held by psychiatrists and psychologists around the world of the relationships among mental disorders in order to inform decisions about the structure of the classification of mental and behavioral disorders in World Health Organization's International...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of clinical psychology 2013-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1191-1212 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753 |
| container_end_page | 1212 |
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1191 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Reed, Geoffrey M. Roberts, Michael C. Keeley, Jared Hooppell, Catherine Matsumoto, Chihiro Sharan, Pratap Robles, Rebeca Carvalho, Hudson Wu, Chunyan Gureje, Oye Leal-Leturia, Itzear Flanagan, Elizabeth H. Correia, João Mendonça Maruta, Toshimasa Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís de Jesus Mari, Jair Xiao, Zeping Evans, Spencer C. Saxena, Shekhar Medina-Mora, María Elena |
| description | Objective
To examine the conceptualizations held by psychiatrists and psychologists around the world of the relationships among mental disorders in order to inform decisions about the structure of the classification of mental and behavioral disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th Revision (ICD‐11).
Method
517 mental health professionals in 8 countries sorted 60 cards containing the names of mental disorders into groups of similar disorders, and then formed a hierarchical structure by aggregating and disaggregating these groupings. Distance matrices were created from the sorting data and used in cluster and correlation analyses.
Results
Clinicians’ taxonomies were rational, interpretable, and extremely stable across countries, diagnostic system used, and profession. Clinicians’ consensus classification structure was different from ICD‐10 and the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM‐IV), but in many respects consistent with ICD‐11 proposals.
Conclusions
The clinical utility of the ICD‐11 may be improved by making its structure more compatible with the common conceptual organization of mental disorders observed across diverse global clinicians. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jclp.22031 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1445913131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1445913131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9u0zAUxi0EYqVwwwMgSwiBkDLsOHaS3aEUtkJXJlHEpeX4j-bixMVOxPoCPDfO2g2JC-SLI5_z-84nnQ-A5xidYoTyd1vpdqd5jgh-AGYY1WVWsLJ-CGZpiLO6ZPkJeBLjFiFUIEwfg5O8wHlOKjYDvy91PwgHL7RwwzW8Ct7oGK3vhYuv4VoMY0jTjbjxve-sjtAbeJQsbPRB6RDP4LLbOSvFkHQRGh_gcK1h42yfmg5-G6yzw36STv1ls8gwhqJXt9_F18uMPgWPTHLUz451DjYfP2yai2z15XzZvF9lsqgxzhghGiuKWlnVRUEpxrIkSlMtCWHKSFMpVTBMWiNoibSRuUJVq5BUqKUlJXPw5rB2F_zPUceBdzZK7ZzotR8jx2lpjcn05uDlP-jWj2E6y0QxRsu8rhL19kDJ4GMM2vBdsJ0Ie44Rn8LhUzj8NpwEvziuHNtOq3v0Lo0EvDoCIqbDmSB6aeNfrqxxQcjkig_cL-v0_j-W_FOzurozzw4aGwd9c68R4QdnJSkp_74-55_pmqBFU3FG_gDjrbRG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1446657298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental Health Professionals' Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Reed, Geoffrey M. ; Roberts, Michael C. ; Keeley, Jared ; Hooppell, Catherine ; Matsumoto, Chihiro ; Sharan, Pratap ; Robles, Rebeca ; Carvalho, Hudson ; Wu, Chunyan ; Gureje, Oye ; Leal-Leturia, Itzear ; Flanagan, Elizabeth H. ; Correia, João Mendonça ; Maruta, Toshimasa ; Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís ; de Jesus Mari, Jair ; Xiao, Zeping ; Evans, Spencer C. ; Saxena, Shekhar ; Medina-Mora, María Elena</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, Geoffrey M. ; Roberts, Michael C. ; Keeley, Jared ; Hooppell, Catherine ; Matsumoto, Chihiro ; Sharan, Pratap ; Robles, Rebeca ; Carvalho, Hudson ; Wu, Chunyan ; Gureje, Oye ; Leal-Leturia, Itzear ; Flanagan, Elizabeth H. ; Correia, João Mendonça ; Maruta, Toshimasa ; Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís ; de Jesus Mari, Jair ; Xiao, Zeping ; Evans, Spencer C. ; Saxena, Shekhar ; Medina-Mora, María Elena</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To examine the conceptualizations held by psychiatrists and psychologists around the world of the relationships among mental disorders in order to inform decisions about the structure of the classification of mental and behavioral disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th Revision (ICD‐11).
Method
517 mental health professionals in 8 countries sorted 60 cards containing the names of mental disorders into groups of similar disorders, and then formed a hierarchical structure by aggregating and disaggregating these groupings. Distance matrices were created from the sorting data and used in cluster and correlation analyses.
Results
Clinicians’ taxonomies were rational, interpretable, and extremely stable across countries, diagnostic system used, and profession. Clinicians’ consensus classification structure was different from ICD‐10 and the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM‐IV), but in many respects consistent with ICD‐11 proposals.
Conclusions
The clinical utility of the ICD‐11 may be improved by making its structure more compatible with the common conceptual organization of mental disorders observed across diverse global clinicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24122386</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPYAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior disorders ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; classification, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) ; clinical utility ; cross-cultural applicability ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) ; Female ; General aspects ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; International Classification of Diseases ; International Classification of Diseases (ICD) ; low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - classification ; Middle Aged ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Vocabularies & taxonomies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychology, 2013-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1191-1212</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjclp.22031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjclp.22031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27914338$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24122386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooppell, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Chihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharan, Pratap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robles, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Hudson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gureje, Oye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leal-Leturia, Itzear</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, Elizabeth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, João Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruta, Toshimasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus Mari, Jair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zeping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Spencer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Shekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medina-Mora, María Elena</creatorcontrib><title>Mental Health Professionals' Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5</title><title>Journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective
To examine the conceptualizations held by psychiatrists and psychologists around the world of the relationships among mental disorders in order to inform decisions about the structure of the classification of mental and behavioral disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th Revision (ICD‐11).
Method
517 mental health professionals in 8 countries sorted 60 cards containing the names of mental disorders into groups of similar disorders, and then formed a hierarchical structure by aggregating and disaggregating these groupings. Distance matrices were created from the sorting data and used in cluster and correlation analyses.
Results
Clinicians’ taxonomies were rational, interpretable, and extremely stable across countries, diagnostic system used, and profession. Clinicians’ consensus classification structure was different from ICD‐10 and the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM‐IV), but in many respects consistent with ICD‐11 proposals.
Conclusions
The clinical utility of the ICD‐11 may be improved by making its structure more compatible with the common conceptual organization of mental disorders observed across diverse global clinicians.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>classification, International Classification of Diseases (ICD)</subject><subject>clinical utility</subject><subject>cross-cultural applicability</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Classification of Diseases</subject><subject>International Classification of Diseases (ICD)</subject><subject>low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - classification</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Vocabularies & taxonomies</subject><issn>0021-9762</issn><issn>1097-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kd9u0zAUxi0EYqVwwwMgSwiBkDLsOHaS3aEUtkJXJlHEpeX4j-bixMVOxPoCPDfO2g2JC-SLI5_z-84nnQ-A5xidYoTyd1vpdqd5jgh-AGYY1WVWsLJ-CGZpiLO6ZPkJeBLjFiFUIEwfg5O8wHlOKjYDvy91PwgHL7RwwzW8Ct7oGK3vhYuv4VoMY0jTjbjxve-sjtAbeJQsbPRB6RDP4LLbOSvFkHQRGh_gcK1h42yfmg5-G6yzw36STv1ls8gwhqJXt9_F18uMPgWPTHLUz451DjYfP2yai2z15XzZvF9lsqgxzhghGiuKWlnVRUEpxrIkSlMtCWHKSFMpVTBMWiNoibSRuUJVq5BUqKUlJXPw5rB2F_zPUceBdzZK7ZzotR8jx2lpjcn05uDlP-jWj2E6y0QxRsu8rhL19kDJ4GMM2vBdsJ0Ie44Rn8LhUzj8NpwEvziuHNtOq3v0Lo0EvDoCIqbDmSB6aeNfrqxxQcjkig_cL-v0_j-W_FOzurozzw4aGwd9c68R4QdnJSkp_74-55_pmqBFU3FG_gDjrbRG</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Reed, Geoffrey M.</creator><creator>Roberts, Michael C.</creator><creator>Keeley, Jared</creator><creator>Hooppell, Catherine</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Chihiro</creator><creator>Sharan, Pratap</creator><creator>Robles, Rebeca</creator><creator>Carvalho, Hudson</creator><creator>Wu, Chunyan</creator><creator>Gureje, Oye</creator><creator>Leal-Leturia, Itzear</creator><creator>Flanagan, Elizabeth H.</creator><creator>Correia, João Mendonça</creator><creator>Maruta, Toshimasa</creator><creator>Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís</creator><creator>de Jesus Mari, Jair</creator><creator>Xiao, Zeping</creator><creator>Evans, Spencer C.</creator><creator>Saxena, Shekhar</creator><creator>Medina-Mora, María Elena</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Mental Health Professionals' Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5</title><author>Reed, Geoffrey M. ; Roberts, Michael C. ; Keeley, Jared ; Hooppell, Catherine ; Matsumoto, Chihiro ; Sharan, Pratap ; Robles, Rebeca ; Carvalho, Hudson ; Wu, Chunyan ; Gureje, Oye ; Leal-Leturia, Itzear ; Flanagan, Elizabeth H. ; Correia, João Mendonça ; Maruta, Toshimasa ; Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís ; de Jesus Mari, Jair ; Xiao, Zeping ; Evans, Spencer C. ; Saxena, Shekhar ; Medina-Mora, María Elena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>classification, International Classification of Diseases (ICD)</topic><topic>clinical utility</topic><topic>cross-cultural applicability</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Classification of Diseases</topic><topic>International Classification of Diseases (ICD)</topic><topic>low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - classification</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Vocabularies & taxonomies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooppell, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Chihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharan, Pratap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robles, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Hudson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gureje, Oye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leal-Leturia, Itzear</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, Elizabeth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, João Mendonça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruta, Toshimasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus Mari, Jair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zeping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Spencer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Shekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medina-Mora, María Elena</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, Geoffrey M.</au><au>Roberts, Michael C.</au><au>Keeley, Jared</au><au>Hooppell, Catherine</au><au>Matsumoto, Chihiro</au><au>Sharan, Pratap</au><au>Robles, Rebeca</au><au>Carvalho, Hudson</au><au>Wu, Chunyan</au><au>Gureje, Oye</au><au>Leal-Leturia, Itzear</au><au>Flanagan, Elizabeth H.</au><au>Correia, João Mendonça</au><au>Maruta, Toshimasa</au><au>Ayuso-Mateos, José Luís</au><au>de Jesus Mari, Jair</au><au>Xiao, Zeping</au><au>Evans, Spencer C.</au><au>Saxena, Shekhar</au><au>Medina-Mora, María Elena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental Health Professionals' Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1212</epage><pages>1191-1212</pages><issn>0021-9762</issn><eissn>1097-4679</eissn><coden>JCPYAO</coden><notes>istex:68CB95BB05CE3BFA4B1E54B22ECC61BC7CC470DF</notes><notes>ArticleID:JCLP22031</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-K5N30DC8-6</notes><notes>João Correia is now at the Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</notes><notes>The authors are grateful to Dr. Roger Blashfield for his very helpful comments regarding the design of the study and the interpretation and presentation of the data. The World Health Organization Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse has received direct support that contributed to the conduct of this study from several sources: The International Union of Psychological Science, the National Institute of Mental Health (USA), the World Psychiatric Association, the Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health (Spain), and the Santander Bank UAM/UNAM endowed Chair for Psychiatry (Spain/Mexico). P. Sharan received a grant from Eli Lilly (India) unrelated to this project; J. Mari received speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, and Janssen unrelated to this project.</notes><notes>Most of the authors of this article are members of the WHO International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD‐10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders and/or of Working Groups that report to the International Advisory Group. G. Reed and S. Saxena are members of the WHO Secretariat, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, WHO. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and, except as specifically noted, do not represent the official policies or positions of the International Advisory Group or of WHO. The WHO Research Ethics Review Committee as well as applicable local Institutional Review Boards reviewed and approved all procedures.</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Objective
To examine the conceptualizations held by psychiatrists and psychologists around the world of the relationships among mental disorders in order to inform decisions about the structure of the classification of mental and behavioral disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th Revision (ICD‐11).
Method
517 mental health professionals in 8 countries sorted 60 cards containing the names of mental disorders into groups of similar disorders, and then formed a hierarchical structure by aggregating and disaggregating these groupings. Distance matrices were created from the sorting data and used in cluster and correlation analyses.
Results
Clinicians’ taxonomies were rational, interpretable, and extremely stable across countries, diagnostic system used, and profession. Clinicians’ consensus classification structure was different from ICD‐10 and the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM‐IV), but in many respects consistent with ICD‐11 proposals.
Conclusions
The clinical utility of the ICD‐11 may be improved by making its structure more compatible with the common conceptual organization of mental disorders observed across diverse global clinicians.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24122386</pmid><doi>10.1002/jclp.22031</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9762 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical psychology, 2013-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1191-1212 |
| issn | 0021-9762 1097-4679 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1445913131 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
| subjects | Adult Behavior disorders Biological and medical sciences Classification classification, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) clinical utility cross-cultural applicability Cross-Cultural Comparison Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) Female General aspects Health Personnel Humans International Classification of Diseases International Classification of Diseases (ICD) low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries Male Medical sciences Mental disorders Mental Disorders - classification Middle Aged Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Vocabularies & taxonomies |
| title | Mental Health Professionals' Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T14%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20Health%20Professionals'%20Natural%20Taxonomies%20of%20Mental%20Disorders:%20Implications%20for%20the%20Clinical%20Utility%20of%20the%20ICD-11%20and%20the%20DSM-5&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Reed,%20Geoffrey%20M.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1212&rft.pages=1191-1212&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft.coden=JCPYAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jclp.22031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1445913131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-633e1d50bc89445511c73de5ec336dfcf8dd4613bfa570efc2d08bd0cd0b5753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1446657298&rft_id=info:pmid/24122386&rfr_iscdi=true |