Loading…

ENTEROBACTERIAL DETECTION AND ESCHERICHIA COLI ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN PARROTS SEIZED FROM THE ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE

Enteric bacteria are considered important potential pathogens in avian clinical medicine, causing either primary or opportunistic infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of enterobacteria in the intestinal microbiota of psittacine birds and to determine the antimicrobial susc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine 2013-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-7
Main Authors: Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley, Neto, José Hidasi, Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso, Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho, de Sá Jayme, Valéria, Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine
container_volume 44
creator Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley
Neto, José Hidasi
Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso
Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho
de Sá Jayme, Valéria
Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora
description Enteric bacteria are considered important potential pathogens in avian clinical medicine, causing either primary or opportunistic infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of enterobacteria in the intestinal microbiota of psittacine birds and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Escherichia coli isolates cultured. Fecal samples were collected from 300 parrots captured from the illegal wildlife trade in Goiás, Brazil and were processed using conventional bacteriological procedures. A total of 508 isolates were obtained from 300 fecal samples: 172 E. coli (33.9% of isolates; 57.3% of individuals); 153 Enterobacter spp. (30.1% of isolates; 51.0% of individuals); 89 Klebsiella spp. (17.7% of isolates; 29.7% of individuals); 59 Citrobacter spp. (11.6% of isolates; 19.7% of individuals), 21 Proteus vulgaris (4.2% of isolates; 7.0% of individuals), 5 Providencia alcalifaciens (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 5 Serratia sp. (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 3 Hafnia aivei (0.59% of isolates; 1.00% of individuals), and 1 Salmonella sp. (0.20% of isolates; 0.33% of individuals). Escherichia coli isolates were subsequently tested for susceptibility to the following antibiotics: amoxicillin (70.93% of the isolates were resistant), ampicillin (75.58%), ciprofloxacin (23.25%), chloramphenicol (33.14%), doxycycline (64.53%), enrofloxacin (41.28%), tetracycline (69.19%), and sulfonamide (71.51%). Multi-resistance to three and four groups of antibiotics occurred in 40 samples (23.25%) and 4 samples (2.32%), respectively. These results demonstrate that illegally traded birds are carriers of potentially pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli strains with antimicrobial resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1638/1042-7260-44.1.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323807116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23361444</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23361444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9P2zAUxy20CVjHncsmH7mk86_Y8TFzXGopJFNihMTFctpUKmoJxO2h_z2uCmi37fSs9_l8n6X3ALjGaIo5zX5hxEgiCEcJY1M8xWfgEksqEpKR9Et8f-AL8C2EJ4QwJ5idgwtCU5RyyS_BQVdWN_XvXMVi8hIW2mplTV3BvCqgbtU89tXc5FDVpYlNa-6Miomj3OjWtDavlIamgn_ypqltC1ttHnUBZ019B-08orLUt9F-MGVRmpmGtskL_R18XflN6K_e6wTcz7RV86Ssb43Ky6Sjku6SjCKGU0akWAoqmO-k9BmlOEvJouOS9dSLBRNRTrul5FEQHjEq5BJR71ecTsDNae7LOLzu-7Bz23VY9JuNf-6HfXCYEpohgfH_qDhDkhImoopO6mIcQhj7lXsZ11s_HhxG7ngbd1y-Oy7fMeZwzE7Az_fp-27bLz8DH8eIwo-T8BR2w_gXpxwzxiKfnni3Hobn_t8_vgEWl5TC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318093247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ENTEROBACTERIAL DETECTION AND ESCHERICHIA COLI ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN PARROTS SEIZED FROM THE ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley ; Neto, José Hidasi ; Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso ; Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho ; de Sá Jayme, Valéria ; Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</creator><creatorcontrib>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley ; Neto, José Hidasi ; Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso ; Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho ; de Sá Jayme, Valéria ; Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</creatorcontrib><description>Enteric bacteria are considered important potential pathogens in avian clinical medicine, causing either primary or opportunistic infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of enterobacteria in the intestinal microbiota of psittacine birds and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Escherichia coli isolates cultured. Fecal samples were collected from 300 parrots captured from the illegal wildlife trade in Goiás, Brazil and were processed using conventional bacteriological procedures. A total of 508 isolates were obtained from 300 fecal samples: 172 E. coli (33.9% of isolates; 57.3% of individuals); 153 Enterobacter spp. (30.1% of isolates; 51.0% of individuals); 89 Klebsiella spp. (17.7% of isolates; 29.7% of individuals); 59 Citrobacter spp. (11.6% of isolates; 19.7% of individuals), 21 Proteus vulgaris (4.2% of isolates; 7.0% of individuals), 5 Providencia alcalifaciens (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 5 Serratia sp. (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 3 Hafnia aivei (0.59% of isolates; 1.00% of individuals), and 1 Salmonella sp. (0.20% of isolates; 0.33% of individuals). Escherichia coli isolates were subsequently tested for susceptibility to the following antibiotics: amoxicillin (70.93% of the isolates were resistant), ampicillin (75.58%), ciprofloxacin (23.25%), chloramphenicol (33.14%), doxycycline (64.53%), enrofloxacin (41.28%), tetracycline (69.19%), and sulfonamide (71.51%). Multi-resistance to three and four groups of antibiotics occurred in 40 samples (23.25%) and 4 samples (2.32%), respectively. These results demonstrate that illegally traded birds are carriers of potentially pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli strains with antimicrobial resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-7260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1638/1042-7260-44.1.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23505696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</publisher><subject>Amoxicillin ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; antimicrobials ; Bird Diseases - microbiology ; Citrobacter ; Commerce ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Crime ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary ; Parrots ; wild birds ; wildlife traffic ; zoonosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine, 2013-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</rights><rights>Copyright 2013 American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23361444$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23361444$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,58593,58826</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23505696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, José Hidasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá Jayme, Valéria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</creatorcontrib><title>ENTEROBACTERIAL DETECTION AND ESCHERICHIA COLI ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN PARROTS SEIZED FROM THE ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE</title><title>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine</title><addtitle>J Zoo Wildl Med</addtitle><description>Enteric bacteria are considered important potential pathogens in avian clinical medicine, causing either primary or opportunistic infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of enterobacteria in the intestinal microbiota of psittacine birds and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Escherichia coli isolates cultured. Fecal samples were collected from 300 parrots captured from the illegal wildlife trade in Goiás, Brazil and were processed using conventional bacteriological procedures. A total of 508 isolates were obtained from 300 fecal samples: 172 E. coli (33.9% of isolates; 57.3% of individuals); 153 Enterobacter spp. (30.1% of isolates; 51.0% of individuals); 89 Klebsiella spp. (17.7% of isolates; 29.7% of individuals); 59 Citrobacter spp. (11.6% of isolates; 19.7% of individuals), 21 Proteus vulgaris (4.2% of isolates; 7.0% of individuals), 5 Providencia alcalifaciens (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 5 Serratia sp. (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 3 Hafnia aivei (0.59% of isolates; 1.00% of individuals), and 1 Salmonella sp. (0.20% of isolates; 0.33% of individuals). Escherichia coli isolates were subsequently tested for susceptibility to the following antibiotics: amoxicillin (70.93% of the isolates were resistant), ampicillin (75.58%), ciprofloxacin (23.25%), chloramphenicol (33.14%), doxycycline (64.53%), enrofloxacin (41.28%), tetracycline (69.19%), and sulfonamide (71.51%). Multi-resistance to three and four groups of antibiotics occurred in 40 samples (23.25%) and 4 samples (2.32%), respectively. These results demonstrate that illegally traded birds are carriers of potentially pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli strains with antimicrobial resistance.</description><subject>Amoxicillin</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>antimicrobials</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Citrobacter</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Parrots</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife traffic</subject><subject>zoonosis</subject><issn>1042-7260</issn><issn>1937-2825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9P2zAUxy20CVjHncsmH7mk86_Y8TFzXGopJFNihMTFctpUKmoJxO2h_z2uCmi37fSs9_l8n6X3ALjGaIo5zX5hxEgiCEcJY1M8xWfgEksqEpKR9Et8f-AL8C2EJ4QwJ5idgwtCU5RyyS_BQVdWN_XvXMVi8hIW2mplTV3BvCqgbtU89tXc5FDVpYlNa-6Miomj3OjWtDavlIamgn_ypqltC1ttHnUBZ019B-08orLUt9F-MGVRmpmGtskL_R18XflN6K_e6wTcz7RV86Ssb43Ky6Sjku6SjCKGU0akWAoqmO-k9BmlOEvJouOS9dSLBRNRTrul5FEQHjEq5BJR71ecTsDNae7LOLzu-7Bz23VY9JuNf-6HfXCYEpohgfH_qDhDkhImoopO6mIcQhj7lXsZ11s_HhxG7ngbd1y-Oy7fMeZwzE7Az_fp-27bLz8DH8eIwo-T8BR2w_gXpxwzxiKfnni3Hobn_t8_vgEWl5TC</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley</creator><creator>Neto, José Hidasi</creator><creator>Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso</creator><creator>Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho</creator><creator>de Sá Jayme, Valéria</creator><creator>Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</creator><general>American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>ENTEROBACTERIAL DETECTION AND ESCHERICHIA COLI ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN PARROTS SEIZED FROM THE ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE</title><author>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley ; Neto, José Hidasi ; Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso ; Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho ; de Sá Jayme, Valéria ; Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Amoxicillin</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>antimicrobials</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Citrobacter</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Parrots</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife traffic</topic><topic>zoonosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, José Hidasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá Jayme, Valéria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hidasi, Hilari Wanderley</au><au>Neto, José Hidasi</au><au>Moraes, Dunya Mara Cardoso</au><au>Linhares, Guido Fontgallad Coelho</au><au>de Sá Jayme, Valéria</au><au>Andrade, Maria Auxiliadora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ENTEROBACTERIAL DETECTION AND ESCHERICHIA COLI ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN PARROTS SEIZED FROM THE ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Zoo Wildl Med</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>1042-7260</issn><eissn>1937-2825</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><abstract>Enteric bacteria are considered important potential pathogens in avian clinical medicine, causing either primary or opportunistic infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of enterobacteria in the intestinal microbiota of psittacine birds and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Escherichia coli isolates cultured. Fecal samples were collected from 300 parrots captured from the illegal wildlife trade in Goiás, Brazil and were processed using conventional bacteriological procedures. A total of 508 isolates were obtained from 300 fecal samples: 172 E. coli (33.9% of isolates; 57.3% of individuals); 153 Enterobacter spp. (30.1% of isolates; 51.0% of individuals); 89 Klebsiella spp. (17.7% of isolates; 29.7% of individuals); 59 Citrobacter spp. (11.6% of isolates; 19.7% of individuals), 21 Proteus vulgaris (4.2% of isolates; 7.0% of individuals), 5 Providencia alcalifaciens (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 5 Serratia sp. (0.98% of isolates; 1.67% of individuals), 3 Hafnia aivei (0.59% of isolates; 1.00% of individuals), and 1 Salmonella sp. (0.20% of isolates; 0.33% of individuals). Escherichia coli isolates were subsequently tested for susceptibility to the following antibiotics: amoxicillin (70.93% of the isolates were resistant), ampicillin (75.58%), ciprofloxacin (23.25%), chloramphenicol (33.14%), doxycycline (64.53%), enrofloxacin (41.28%), tetracycline (69.19%), and sulfonamide (71.51%). Multi-resistance to three and four groups of antibiotics occurred in 40 samples (23.25%) and 4 samples (2.32%), respectively. These results demonstrate that illegally traded birds are carriers of potentially pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli strains with antimicrobial resistance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</pub><pmid>23505696</pmid><doi>10.1638/1042-7260-44.1.1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-7260
ispartof Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine, 2013-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-7
issn 1042-7260
1937-2825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323807116
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Amoxicillin
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
antimicrobials
Bird Diseases - microbiology
Citrobacter
Commerce
Conservation of Natural Resources
Crime
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary
Parrots
wild birds
wildlife traffic
zoonosis
title ENTEROBACTERIAL DETECTION AND ESCHERICHIA COLI ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN PARROTS SEIZED FROM THE ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T08%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ENTEROBACTERIAL%20DETECTION%20AND%20ESCHERICHIA%20COLI%20ANTIMICROBIAL%20RESISTANCE%20IN%20PARROTS%20SEIZED%20FROM%20THE%20ILLEGAL%20WILDLIFE%20TRADE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20zoo%20and%20wildlife%20medicine&rft.au=Hidasi,%20Hilari%20Wanderley&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=1042-7260&rft.eissn=1937-2825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1638/1042-7260-44.1.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23361444%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b393t-8304154297d7374ab99a8331852cb694e3a7c47b395bd964ab7a04379d03aaf63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318093247&rft_id=info:pmid/23505696&rft_jstor_id=23361444&rfr_iscdi=true