Subjective Experiences of Men With and Without Spinal Cord Injury: Tolerability of the Juvent and WAVE Whole Body Vibration Plates

Background Device tolerability is an important determinant of subject adherence and intervention effectiveness. Although popular in rehabilitation settings, the tolerability of whole-body vibration (WBV) among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. Objective To assess feedback from SCI a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PM & R 2012-12, Vol.4 (12), p.954-962
Main Authors: Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c), Delparte, Jude J., MSc, Hitzig, Sander L., PhD, Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Cervical Vertebrae
Chronic Disease
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy Modalities
Posture - physiology
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vibration - therapeutic use
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443
container_end_page 962
container_issue 12
container_start_page 954
container_title PM & R
container_volume 4
creator Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c)
Delparte, Jude J., MSc
Hitzig, Sander L., PhD
Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD
description Background Device tolerability is an important determinant of subject adherence and intervention effectiveness. Although popular in rehabilitation settings, the tolerability of whole-body vibration (WBV) among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. Objective To assess feedback from SCI and non-SCI subjects on the usability of passive standing and WBV devices (Juvent [Juvent Medical, Somerset, NJ] and WAVE [WAVE Manufacturing, Windsor, Ontario, Canada]) using a priori specified knee postures, plate amplitudes, and frequencies. Design A matched groups design with repeated measures. Setting A tertiary SCI rehabilitation center. Subjects Eight men with chronic SCI (C4-L2, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A-D) and 10 men without SCI of similar height, weight, and body mass index. Intervention Subjects (N = 18; 8 with SCI) underwent intermittent WBV during passive standing (EasyStand 5000 [Altimate Medical, Morton, MN]) for 45 minutes using the optimized WAVE and Juvent plates. WBV parameters were sequentially altered every 2 minutes and included parameter combinations of (1) postures of 140°, 160°, and 180° knee extension (180° with Juvent only); (2) amplitudes of 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm (WAVE only); and (3) frequencies of 25 Hz, 35 Hz, and 45 Hz. Outcome assessments were completed at 4-minute intervals throughout WBV exposure. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative, semistructured interviews were used to generate neutral, positive, and negative descriptors of the subjects' overall experience and device preference. Results SCI subjects reported a greater frequency of positive descriptors than non-SCI subjects during WBV, regardless of plate, posture, amplitude, or frequency, with the exception of 1 combination of parameters (WAVE plate at 140°, 1.1 mm, and 25 Hz). Non-SCI subjects reported the highest frequency of negative effects with the WAVE plate at 160°, 1.1 mm, 25 Hz, and 35 Hz. Non-SCI subjects preferred the Juvent, whereas SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate. Conclusions SCI and non-SCI subjects reported differing frequencies of positive and negative descriptors and indicated divergent device preferences. SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate and vibration at high frequency. Future research will determine the therapeutic potential and adverse events associated with the device and WBV parameters tolerable for persons with SCI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240905482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1934148212003504</els_id><sourcerecordid>1240905482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQj1w22I6TdRBCKqultGpFxZb2aDn2ROvgjVM7WZorT47TtBw4IE6ew_-Nxt9MkrwmOCWYFO-atNv5JqWY0BQvU4yLJ8khKTO2IHmRPX2sGacHyYsQmhhghBfPkwNKS04wZofJr81QNaB6swe0vuvAG2gVBORqdAEtujH9FslW3xdu6NGmM620aOW8RqdtM_jxPbpyFrysjDX9OIH9FtDZsIe2n9Hj6zW62cYQ-uT0iK5N5WVvXIsurewhvEye1dIGePXwHiXfP6-vVl8W519PTlfH5wvF8pItGGG6oorxHMo8_kwXMue1lppnFNd1zVlVZliRnCxJVoAiVBU1p6xe8oxnjGVHydu5b-fd7QChFzsTFFgrW3BDEIQyXOI86opROkeVdyF4qEXnzU76URAsJveiEZN7MbkXeCmi2gi9eeg_VDvQf5BH2TGwnAM_jYXxP1qKy4tvZ2U-kR9mEqKfvQEvgrpflDY-Lk9oZ_492ce_cGVNa5S0P2CE0LjBx6VGAyJERmymu5nOhlCMszxO_huG07sQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1240905482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subjective Experiences of Men With and Without Spinal Cord Injury: Tolerability of the Juvent and WAVE Whole Body Vibration Plates</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c) ; Delparte, Jude J., MSc ; Hitzig, Sander L., PhD ; Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c) ; Delparte, Jude J., MSc ; Hitzig, Sander L., PhD ; Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Device tolerability is an important determinant of subject adherence and intervention effectiveness. Although popular in rehabilitation settings, the tolerability of whole-body vibration (WBV) among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. Objective To assess feedback from SCI and non-SCI subjects on the usability of passive standing and WBV devices (Juvent [Juvent Medical, Somerset, NJ] and WAVE [WAVE Manufacturing, Windsor, Ontario, Canada]) using a priori specified knee postures, plate amplitudes, and frequencies. Design A matched groups design with repeated measures. Setting A tertiary SCI rehabilitation center. Subjects Eight men with chronic SCI (C4-L2, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A-D) and 10 men without SCI of similar height, weight, and body mass index. Intervention Subjects (N = 18; 8 with SCI) underwent intermittent WBV during passive standing (EasyStand 5000 [Altimate Medical, Morton, MN]) for 45 minutes using the optimized WAVE and Juvent plates. WBV parameters were sequentially altered every 2 minutes and included parameter combinations of (1) postures of 140°, 160°, and 180° knee extension (180° with Juvent only); (2) amplitudes of 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm (WAVE only); and (3) frequencies of 25 Hz, 35 Hz, and 45 Hz. Outcome assessments were completed at 4-minute intervals throughout WBV exposure. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative, semistructured interviews were used to generate neutral, positive, and negative descriptors of the subjects' overall experience and device preference. Results SCI subjects reported a greater frequency of positive descriptors than non-SCI subjects during WBV, regardless of plate, posture, amplitude, or frequency, with the exception of 1 combination of parameters (WAVE plate at 140°, 1.1 mm, and 25 Hz). Non-SCI subjects reported the highest frequency of negative effects with the WAVE plate at 160°, 1.1 mm, 25 Hz, and 35 Hz. Non-SCI subjects preferred the Juvent, whereas SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate. Conclusions SCI and non-SCI subjects reported differing frequencies of positive and negative descriptors and indicated divergent device preferences. SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate and vibration at high frequency. Future research will determine the therapeutic potential and adverse events associated with the device and WBV parameters tolerable for persons with SCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22981004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Chronic Disease ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Posture - physiology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vibration - therapeutic use ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PM &amp; R, 2012-12, Vol.4 (12), p.954-962</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>2012 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>2012 by the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.pmrj.2012.07.006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.pmrj.2012.07.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22981004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delparte, Jude J., MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitzig, Sander L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Subjective Experiences of Men With and Without Spinal Cord Injury: Tolerability of the Juvent and WAVE Whole Body Vibration Plates</title><title>PM &amp; R</title><addtitle>PM R</addtitle><description>Background Device tolerability is an important determinant of subject adherence and intervention effectiveness. Although popular in rehabilitation settings, the tolerability of whole-body vibration (WBV) among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. Objective To assess feedback from SCI and non-SCI subjects on the usability of passive standing and WBV devices (Juvent [Juvent Medical, Somerset, NJ] and WAVE [WAVE Manufacturing, Windsor, Ontario, Canada]) using a priori specified knee postures, plate amplitudes, and frequencies. Design A matched groups design with repeated measures. Setting A tertiary SCI rehabilitation center. Subjects Eight men with chronic SCI (C4-L2, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A-D) and 10 men without SCI of similar height, weight, and body mass index. Intervention Subjects (N = 18; 8 with SCI) underwent intermittent WBV during passive standing (EasyStand 5000 [Altimate Medical, Morton, MN]) for 45 minutes using the optimized WAVE and Juvent plates. WBV parameters were sequentially altered every 2 minutes and included parameter combinations of (1) postures of 140°, 160°, and 180° knee extension (180° with Juvent only); (2) amplitudes of 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm (WAVE only); and (3) frequencies of 25 Hz, 35 Hz, and 45 Hz. Outcome assessments were completed at 4-minute intervals throughout WBV exposure. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative, semistructured interviews were used to generate neutral, positive, and negative descriptors of the subjects' overall experience and device preference. Results SCI subjects reported a greater frequency of positive descriptors than non-SCI subjects during WBV, regardless of plate, posture, amplitude, or frequency, with the exception of 1 combination of parameters (WAVE plate at 140°, 1.1 mm, and 25 Hz). Non-SCI subjects reported the highest frequency of negative effects with the WAVE plate at 160°, 1.1 mm, 25 Hz, and 35 Hz. Non-SCI subjects preferred the Juvent, whereas SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate. Conclusions SCI and non-SCI subjects reported differing frequencies of positive and negative descriptors and indicated divergent device preferences. SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate and vibration at high frequency. Future research will determine the therapeutic potential and adverse events associated with the device and WBV parameters tolerable for persons with SCI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vibration - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1934-1482</issn><issn>1934-1563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQj1w22I6TdRBCKqultGpFxZb2aDn2ROvgjVM7WZorT47TtBw4IE6ew_-Nxt9MkrwmOCWYFO-atNv5JqWY0BQvU4yLJ8khKTO2IHmRPX2sGacHyYsQmhhghBfPkwNKS04wZofJr81QNaB6swe0vuvAG2gVBORqdAEtujH9FslW3xdu6NGmM620aOW8RqdtM_jxPbpyFrysjDX9OIH9FtDZsIe2n9Hj6zW62cYQ-uT0iK5N5WVvXIsurewhvEye1dIGePXwHiXfP6-vVl8W519PTlfH5wvF8pItGGG6oorxHMo8_kwXMue1lppnFNd1zVlVZliRnCxJVoAiVBU1p6xe8oxnjGVHydu5b-fd7QChFzsTFFgrW3BDEIQyXOI86opROkeVdyF4qEXnzU76URAsJveiEZN7MbkXeCmi2gi9eeg_VDvQf5BH2TGwnAM_jYXxP1qKy4tvZ2U-kR9mEqKfvQEvgrpflDY-Lk9oZ_492ce_cGVNa5S0P2CE0LjBx6VGAyJERmymu5nOhlCMszxO_huG07sQ</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c)</creator><creator>Delparte, Jude J., MSc</creator><creator>Hitzig, Sander L., PhD</creator><creator>Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Subjective Experiences of Men With and Without Spinal Cord Injury: Tolerability of the Juvent and WAVE Whole Body Vibration Plates</title><author>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c) ; Delparte, Jude J., MSc ; Hitzig, Sander L., PhD ; Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vibration - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delparte, Jude J., MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitzig, Sander L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>PM &amp; R</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadi, Stephanie C., BSc(c)</au><au>Delparte, Jude J., MSc</au><au>Hitzig, Sander L., PhD</au><au>Craven, Beverley Catharine, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subjective Experiences of Men With and Without Spinal Cord Injury: Tolerability of the Juvent and WAVE Whole Body Vibration Plates</atitle><jtitle>PM &amp; R</jtitle><addtitle>PM R</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>954</spage><epage>962</epage><pages>954-962</pages><issn>1934-1482</issn><eissn>1934-1563</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Background Device tolerability is an important determinant of subject adherence and intervention effectiveness. Although popular in rehabilitation settings, the tolerability of whole-body vibration (WBV) among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. Objective To assess feedback from SCI and non-SCI subjects on the usability of passive standing and WBV devices (Juvent [Juvent Medical, Somerset, NJ] and WAVE [WAVE Manufacturing, Windsor, Ontario, Canada]) using a priori specified knee postures, plate amplitudes, and frequencies. Design A matched groups design with repeated measures. Setting A tertiary SCI rehabilitation center. Subjects Eight men with chronic SCI (C4-L2, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A-D) and 10 men without SCI of similar height, weight, and body mass index. Intervention Subjects (N = 18; 8 with SCI) underwent intermittent WBV during passive standing (EasyStand 5000 [Altimate Medical, Morton, MN]) for 45 minutes using the optimized WAVE and Juvent plates. WBV parameters were sequentially altered every 2 minutes and included parameter combinations of (1) postures of 140°, 160°, and 180° knee extension (180° with Juvent only); (2) amplitudes of 0.7 mm and 1.1 mm (WAVE only); and (3) frequencies of 25 Hz, 35 Hz, and 45 Hz. Outcome assessments were completed at 4-minute intervals throughout WBV exposure. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative, semistructured interviews were used to generate neutral, positive, and negative descriptors of the subjects' overall experience and device preference. Results SCI subjects reported a greater frequency of positive descriptors than non-SCI subjects during WBV, regardless of plate, posture, amplitude, or frequency, with the exception of 1 combination of parameters (WAVE plate at 140°, 1.1 mm, and 25 Hz). Non-SCI subjects reported the highest frequency of negative effects with the WAVE plate at 160°, 1.1 mm, 25 Hz, and 35 Hz. Non-SCI subjects preferred the Juvent, whereas SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate. Conclusions SCI and non-SCI subjects reported differing frequencies of positive and negative descriptors and indicated divergent device preferences. SCI subjects preferred the WAVE plate and vibration at high frequency. Future research will determine the therapeutic potential and adverse events associated with the device and WBV parameters tolerable for persons with SCI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22981004</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-1482
ispartof PM & R, 2012-12, Vol.4 (12), p.954-962
issn 1934-1482
1934-1563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1240905482
source Wiley
subjects Adult
Cervical Vertebrae
Chronic Disease
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy Modalities
Posture - physiology
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vibration - therapeutic use
Young Adult
title Subjective Experiences of Men With and Without Spinal Cord Injury: Tolerability of the Juvent and WAVE Whole Body Vibration Plates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T02%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subjective%20Experiences%20of%20Men%20With%20and%20Without%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury:%20Tolerability%20of%20the%20Juvent%20and%20WAVE%20Whole%20Body%20Vibration%20Plates&rft.jtitle=PM%20&%20R&rft.au=Hadi,%20Stephanie%20C.,%20BSc(c)&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=954&rft.epage=962&rft.pages=954-962&rft.issn=1934-1482&rft.eissn=1934-1563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1240905482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4594-414db2c485e95193d6a58fdad8320fff84b930c1517136ec12c6f824f78383443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1240905482&rft_id=info:pmid/22981004&rfr_iscdi=true