Loading…

Shared resource laboratories: impact of new design criteria to consolidate flow cytometry diagnostic service

Summary Introduction:  The Shared Resource Laboratory (SRL) model recently described for research activities would also appear to be highly suitable for diagnostic services. Using modern SRL design criteria and benchmarks, the aim of our study was to verify whether the consolidation of a diagnostic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of laboratory hematology 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.533-540
Main Authors: MONTI, F., ROSETTI, M., MASPERI, P., TOMMASINI, N., DORIZZI, R. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663
container_end_page 540
container_issue 5
container_start_page 533
container_title International journal of laboratory hematology
container_volume 34
creator MONTI, F.
ROSETTI, M.
MASPERI, P.
TOMMASINI, N.
DORIZZI, R. M.
description Summary Introduction:  The Shared Resource Laboratory (SRL) model recently described for research activities would also appear to be highly suitable for diagnostic services. Using modern SRL design criteria and benchmarks, the aim of our study was to verify whether the consolidation of a diagnostic cytofluorimetric activity could improve the overall service. Methods:  Outcome indicators such as impact on analytical quality, clinical satisfaction, team work involvement, and economic performance were evaluated in the planning and setting up of a new central laboratory. Comparison with preconsolidation status allowed us to investigate possible indicators of improvement. Results:  A total of 30 140 cytofluorimetric analyses performed before and after consolidation at the Central Laboratory in Pievesestina in north‐central Italy were evaluated. The overall score of the clinical satisfaction questionnaire (range, between 1 and 5) increased from 4.3 to 4.9. Full‐time equivalent (FTE) operators were reduced from 9 to 4.5 and cytofluorimeters from 6 to 2; economic indicator analyses showed a 17.75% reduction in unitary test costs. Conclusions:  The adoption of new benchmarks and design criteria increased the quality of cytofluorimetric analysis, thus improving specialized diagnostic services and promoting the shared resource clinical laboratory.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2012.01431.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036876523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1036876523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wF5CPXBI8dmwnHJBQBW3RAhIUlZvldSbFSxJvbS-7---bsGXPzGVG8vO-lh5CKLASpnmzKkFLKKQUP0vOgJcMKgHl7gk5PT48Pd4cTshZSivGpK5Y85yccK5AgNCnpP_-y0ZsacQUNtEh7e0yRJtD9JjeUj-srcs0dHTELW0x-buRuugzRm9pDtSFMYXetzYj7fqwpW6fw4A57mnr7d0YUvaOJox_vMMX5Fln-4QvH_c5-fHxw83FVbH4enl98X5RuIrVUFit26qCpRUt1ACN7TruWq5l13JbS4usqRqhlVSonGvEUjEHyDuoK0CtlDgnrw-96xjuN5iyGXxy2Pd2xLBJBphQ9ZTnYkLrA-piSCliZ9bRDzbuJ8jMrs3KzBrNrNTMrs1f12Y3RV89_rJZDtgeg__kTsC7A7D1Pe7_u9hcf1pczedUUBwKfMq4OxbY-NsoLbQ0t18ujbj9fKMWzTcjxQOxo56C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036876523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shared resource laboratories: impact of new design criteria to consolidate flow cytometry diagnostic service</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>MONTI, F. ; ROSETTI, M. ; MASPERI, P. ; TOMMASINI, N. ; DORIZZI, R. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>MONTI, F. ; ROSETTI, M. ; MASPERI, P. ; TOMMASINI, N. ; DORIZZI, R. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Introduction:  The Shared Resource Laboratory (SRL) model recently described for research activities would also appear to be highly suitable for diagnostic services. Using modern SRL design criteria and benchmarks, the aim of our study was to verify whether the consolidation of a diagnostic cytofluorimetric activity could improve the overall service. Methods:  Outcome indicators such as impact on analytical quality, clinical satisfaction, team work involvement, and economic performance were evaluated in the planning and setting up of a new central laboratory. Comparison with preconsolidation status allowed us to investigate possible indicators of improvement. Results:  A total of 30 140 cytofluorimetric analyses performed before and after consolidation at the Central Laboratory in Pievesestina in north‐central Italy were evaluated. The overall score of the clinical satisfaction questionnaire (range, between 1 and 5) increased from 4.3 to 4.9. Full‐time equivalent (FTE) operators were reduced from 9 to 4.5 and cytofluorimeters from 6 to 2; economic indicator analyses showed a 17.75% reduction in unitary test costs. Conclusions:  The adoption of new benchmarks and design criteria increased the quality of cytofluorimetric analysis, thus improving specialized diagnostic services and promoting the shared resource clinical laboratory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-5521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-553X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2012.01431.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22613137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Benchmarking - economics ; Benchmarking - standards ; Benchmarking - statistics & numerical data ; Blood Specimen Collection - economics ; Blood Specimen Collection - standards ; Blood Specimen Collection - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - economics ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - statistics & numerical data ; consolidation ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; design criteria ; Diagnostic Services - economics ; Diagnostic Services - standards ; Diagnostic Services - statistics & numerical data ; flow cytometry ; Flow Cytometry - economics ; Flow Cytometry - standards ; Flow Cytometry - statistics & numerical data ; Health Resources - economics ; Health Resources - standards ; Health Resources - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; laboratory service ; Medical Laboratory Personnel - economics ; Medical Laboratory Personnel - standards ; Medical Laboratory Personnel - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Shared resource laboratory]]></subject><ispartof>International journal of laboratory hematology, 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.533-540</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1751-553X.2012.01431.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1751-553X.2012.01431.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22613137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MONTI, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSETTI, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MASPERI, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOMMASINI, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DORIZZI, R. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Shared resource laboratories: impact of new design criteria to consolidate flow cytometry diagnostic service</title><title>International journal of laboratory hematology</title><addtitle>Int J Lab Hematol</addtitle><description>Summary Introduction:  The Shared Resource Laboratory (SRL) model recently described for research activities would also appear to be highly suitable for diagnostic services. Using modern SRL design criteria and benchmarks, the aim of our study was to verify whether the consolidation of a diagnostic cytofluorimetric activity could improve the overall service. Methods:  Outcome indicators such as impact on analytical quality, clinical satisfaction, team work involvement, and economic performance were evaluated in the planning and setting up of a new central laboratory. Comparison with preconsolidation status allowed us to investigate possible indicators of improvement. Results:  A total of 30 140 cytofluorimetric analyses performed before and after consolidation at the Central Laboratory in Pievesestina in north‐central Italy were evaluated. The overall score of the clinical satisfaction questionnaire (range, between 1 and 5) increased from 4.3 to 4.9. Full‐time equivalent (FTE) operators were reduced from 9 to 4.5 and cytofluorimeters from 6 to 2; economic indicator analyses showed a 17.75% reduction in unitary test costs. Conclusions:  The adoption of new benchmarks and design criteria increased the quality of cytofluorimetric analysis, thus improving specialized diagnostic services and promoting the shared resource clinical laboratory.</description><subject>Benchmarking - economics</subject><subject>Benchmarking - standards</subject><subject>Benchmarking - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - economics</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - standards</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - economics</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>consolidation</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>design criteria</subject><subject>Diagnostic Services - economics</subject><subject>Diagnostic Services - standards</subject><subject>Diagnostic Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>flow cytometry</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - economics</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - standards</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Resources - economics</subject><subject>Health Resources - standards</subject><subject>Health Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laboratory service</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Personnel - economics</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Personnel - standards</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Shared resource laboratory</subject><issn>1751-5521</issn><issn>1751-553X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wF5CPXBI8dmwnHJBQBW3RAhIUlZvldSbFSxJvbS-7---bsGXPzGVG8vO-lh5CKLASpnmzKkFLKKQUP0vOgJcMKgHl7gk5PT48Pd4cTshZSivGpK5Y85yccK5AgNCnpP_-y0ZsacQUNtEh7e0yRJtD9JjeUj-srcs0dHTELW0x-buRuugzRm9pDtSFMYXetzYj7fqwpW6fw4A57mnr7d0YUvaOJox_vMMX5Fln-4QvH_c5-fHxw83FVbH4enl98X5RuIrVUFit26qCpRUt1ACN7TruWq5l13JbS4usqRqhlVSonGvEUjEHyDuoK0CtlDgnrw-96xjuN5iyGXxy2Pd2xLBJBphQ9ZTnYkLrA-piSCliZ9bRDzbuJ8jMrs3KzBrNrNTMrs1f12Y3RV89_rJZDtgeg__kTsC7A7D1Pe7_u9hcf1pczedUUBwKfMq4OxbY-NsoLbQ0t18ujbj9fKMWzTcjxQOxo56C</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>MONTI, F.</creator><creator>ROSETTI, M.</creator><creator>MASPERI, P.</creator><creator>TOMMASINI, N.</creator><creator>DORIZZI, R. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Shared resource laboratories: impact of new design criteria to consolidate flow cytometry diagnostic service</title><author>MONTI, F. ; ROSETTI, M. ; MASPERI, P. ; TOMMASINI, N. ; DORIZZI, R. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking - economics</topic><topic>Benchmarking - standards</topic><topic>Benchmarking - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - economics</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - standards</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - economics</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>consolidation</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>design criteria</topic><topic>Diagnostic Services - economics</topic><topic>Diagnostic Services - standards</topic><topic>Diagnostic Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>flow cytometry</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - economics</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - standards</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Resources - economics</topic><topic>Health Resources - standards</topic><topic>Health Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laboratory service</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Personnel - economics</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Personnel - standards</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Shared resource laboratory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MONTI, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSETTI, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MASPERI, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOMMASINI, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DORIZZI, R. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of laboratory hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MONTI, F.</au><au>ROSETTI, M.</au><au>MASPERI, P.</au><au>TOMMASINI, N.</au><au>DORIZZI, R. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shared resource laboratories: impact of new design criteria to consolidate flow cytometry diagnostic service</atitle><jtitle>International journal of laboratory hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Lab Hematol</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>533-540</pages><issn>1751-5521</issn><eissn>1751-553X</eissn><notes>ArticleID:IJLH1431</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-3WMT6L9R-5</notes><notes>istex:DFB2F50B89796C62BC475EEA5932D857AE29EC3F</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Summary Introduction:  The Shared Resource Laboratory (SRL) model recently described for research activities would also appear to be highly suitable for diagnostic services. Using modern SRL design criteria and benchmarks, the aim of our study was to verify whether the consolidation of a diagnostic cytofluorimetric activity could improve the overall service. Methods:  Outcome indicators such as impact on analytical quality, clinical satisfaction, team work involvement, and economic performance were evaluated in the planning and setting up of a new central laboratory. Comparison with preconsolidation status allowed us to investigate possible indicators of improvement. Results:  A total of 30 140 cytofluorimetric analyses performed before and after consolidation at the Central Laboratory in Pievesestina in north‐central Italy were evaluated. The overall score of the clinical satisfaction questionnaire (range, between 1 and 5) increased from 4.3 to 4.9. Full‐time equivalent (FTE) operators were reduced from 9 to 4.5 and cytofluorimeters from 6 to 2; economic indicator analyses showed a 17.75% reduction in unitary test costs. Conclusions:  The adoption of new benchmarks and design criteria increased the quality of cytofluorimetric analysis, thus improving specialized diagnostic services and promoting the shared resource clinical laboratory.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22613137</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-553X.2012.01431.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-5521
ispartof International journal of laboratory hematology, 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.533-540
issn 1751-5521
1751-553X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036876523
source Wiley
subjects Benchmarking - economics
Benchmarking - standards
Benchmarking - statistics & numerical data
Blood Specimen Collection - economics
Blood Specimen Collection - standards
Blood Specimen Collection - statistics & numerical data
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - economics
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - statistics & numerical data
consolidation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
design criteria
Diagnostic Services - economics
Diagnostic Services - standards
Diagnostic Services - statistics & numerical data
flow cytometry
Flow Cytometry - economics
Flow Cytometry - standards
Flow Cytometry - statistics & numerical data
Health Resources - economics
Health Resources - standards
Health Resources - statistics & numerical data
Humans
laboratory service
Medical Laboratory Personnel - economics
Medical Laboratory Personnel - standards
Medical Laboratory Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Shared resource laboratory
title Shared resource laboratories: impact of new design criteria to consolidate flow cytometry diagnostic service
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T01%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shared%20resource%20laboratories:%20impact%20of%20new%20design%20criteria%20to%20consolidate%20flow%20cytometry%20diagnostic%20service&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20laboratory%20hematology&rft.au=MONTI,%20F.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=533-540&rft.issn=1751-5521&rft.eissn=1751-553X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-553X.2012.01431.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1036876523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-a77d441ba3d18119aff2cd275fd2a85ae094937656e6cc93b60c1e2f1841e7663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036876523&rft_id=info:pmid/22613137&rfr_iscdi=true