Loading…

The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States

Food loss at the retail and consumer levels in the United States includes 14.8 billion pounds of fruit and 23.4 billion pounds of vegetables, valued at $15.1 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively, in 2008 retail market prices. The total value of these losses is $42.8 billion per year, or roughly $...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of consumer affairs 2011-09, Vol.45 (3), p.492-515
Main Authors: BUZBY, JEAN C., HYMAN, JEFFREY, STEWART, HAYDEN, WELLS, HODAN F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803
container_end_page 515
container_issue 3
container_start_page 492
container_title The Journal of consumer affairs
container_volume 45
creator BUZBY, JEAN C.
HYMAN, JEFFREY
STEWART, HAYDEN
WELLS, HODAN F.
description Food loss at the retail and consumer levels in the United States includes 14.8 billion pounds of fruit and 23.4 billion pounds of vegetables, valued at $15.1 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively, in 2008 retail market prices. The total value of these losses is $42.8 billion per year, or roughly $141 per capita. To most efficiently reduce the annual food loss, it may be beneficial to focus efforts on the four fruits (fresh apples, grapes, peaches and strawberries) and four vegetables (fresh and canned tomatoes and fresh and frozen potatoes) that have the greatest amount of loss.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01214.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030885815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A270041587</galeid><jstor_id>23859830</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A270041587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEEmPwEZAieAGJBDuJY-cFqatY2VStEvv3aDnOTeeSJpvtQPftuVmmQlGFlkhxlPs7x9e5JwhCSmKK1-dVTHnGojwneZwQSmNCE5rFm2fBwbbwPDggJEkiQrh4GbxybkWQIpwcBNcXNxBeqaaHsKvD7-CVaaJQtVU47VrXr8FGc_gJTXhse-MfClewRKxsIJx3zoELTRt6dLlsjYcqPPfKg3sdvKhV4-DN43oYXB5_vZh-i-aL2cl0Mo80NpdFnGWVKGua5rqkRV7mdVIUNVMl4XmiWQWiSFhRCK6ZRohRxqnOcxA6q6pSkPQw-DD63trurgfn5do4DU2jWuh6JylJiRBMUIbou3_QVdfbFruTAncgOU9ShN6P0FI1IE1bd94qPXjKScIJySgTHKloD7WEFqxquhZqg593-HgPj3cFa6P3Cj7uCJDxsPFL1TsnT87PnsyK2fx_jT-yumsanKrE0UwXu_ynv_iyd6YFhw9nljfejVvs4GLEtcVoWKjlrTVrZe9xDnKIq1zJIZVySKUc4iof4io3KP0ySn_hr7h_sk6eLqaT4RUN3o4GK-c7uzVIUsEKkZI_RzcOj7ytK_tD5jzlTF6fzSTJjhgRR0Kepr8BWx4Azg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898706723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>BUZBY, JEAN C. ; HYMAN, JEFFREY ; STEWART, HAYDEN ; WELLS, HODAN F.</creator><creatorcontrib>BUZBY, JEAN C. ; HYMAN, JEFFREY ; STEWART, HAYDEN ; WELLS, HODAN F.</creatorcontrib><description>Food loss at the retail and consumer levels in the United States includes 14.8 billion pounds of fruit and 23.4 billion pounds of vegetables, valued at $15.1 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively, in 2008 retail market prices. The total value of these losses is $42.8 billion per year, or roughly $141 per capita. To most efficiently reduce the annual food loss, it may be beneficial to focus efforts on the four fruits (fresh apples, grapes, peaches and strawberries) and four vegetables (fresh and canned tomatoes and fresh and frozen potatoes) that have the greatest amount of loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01214.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Canned foods industry ; Canning industry ; Citrus fruits ; Consumerism ; Consumers ; Food ; Food availability ; Food consumption ; Food economics ; Food security ; Food supply ; Food systems ; Food wastes ; Fruit industry ; Grapes ; International economic relations ; Markets ; OTHER RESEARCH IN THE CONSUMER INTEREST ; Prices ; Produce industry ; Retail industry ; Retail trade ; Retailing ; Studies ; Tomatoes ; United States ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>The Journal of consumer affairs, 2011-09, Vol.45 (3), p.492-515</ispartof><rights>2011 The American Council on Consumer Interests</rights><rights>Copyright 2011 by The American Council on Consumer Interests</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Fall 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6606.2011.01214.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6606.2011.01214.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27898,27899,27957,27958,50923,51032,58593,58826</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BUZBY, JEAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HYMAN, JEFFREY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, HAYDEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLS, HODAN F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States</title><title>The Journal of consumer affairs</title><addtitle>Journal of Consumer Affairs</addtitle><description>Food loss at the retail and consumer levels in the United States includes 14.8 billion pounds of fruit and 23.4 billion pounds of vegetables, valued at $15.1 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively, in 2008 retail market prices. The total value of these losses is $42.8 billion per year, or roughly $141 per capita. To most efficiently reduce the annual food loss, it may be beneficial to focus efforts on the four fruits (fresh apples, grapes, peaches and strawberries) and four vegetables (fresh and canned tomatoes and fresh and frozen potatoes) that have the greatest amount of loss.</description><subject>Canned foods industry</subject><subject>Canning industry</subject><subject>Citrus fruits</subject><subject>Consumerism</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food economics</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Food systems</subject><subject>Food wastes</subject><subject>Fruit industry</subject><subject>Grapes</subject><subject>International economic relations</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>OTHER RESEARCH IN THE CONSUMER INTEREST</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Produce industry</subject><subject>Retail industry</subject><subject>Retail trade</subject><subject>Retailing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0022-0078</issn><issn>1745-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEEmPwEZAieAGJBDuJY-cFqatY2VStEvv3aDnOTeeSJpvtQPftuVmmQlGFlkhxlPs7x9e5JwhCSmKK1-dVTHnGojwneZwQSmNCE5rFm2fBwbbwPDggJEkiQrh4GbxybkWQIpwcBNcXNxBeqaaHsKvD7-CVaaJQtVU47VrXr8FGc_gJTXhse-MfClewRKxsIJx3zoELTRt6dLlsjYcqPPfKg3sdvKhV4-DN43oYXB5_vZh-i-aL2cl0Mo80NpdFnGWVKGua5rqkRV7mdVIUNVMl4XmiWQWiSFhRCK6ZRohRxqnOcxA6q6pSkPQw-DD63trurgfn5do4DU2jWuh6JylJiRBMUIbou3_QVdfbFruTAncgOU9ShN6P0FI1IE1bd94qPXjKScIJySgTHKloD7WEFqxquhZqg593-HgPj3cFa6P3Cj7uCJDxsPFL1TsnT87PnsyK2fx_jT-yumsanKrE0UwXu_ynv_iyd6YFhw9nljfejVvs4GLEtcVoWKjlrTVrZe9xDnKIq1zJIZVySKUc4iof4io3KP0ySn_hr7h_sk6eLqaT4RUN3o4GK-c7uzVIUsEKkZI_RzcOj7ytK_tD5jzlTF6fzSTJjhgRR0Kepr8BWx4Azg</recordid><startdate>20110922</startdate><enddate>20110922</enddate><creator>BUZBY, JEAN C.</creator><creator>HYMAN, JEFFREY</creator><creator>STEWART, HAYDEN</creator><creator>WELLS, HODAN F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110922</creationdate><title>The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States</title><author>BUZBY, JEAN C. ; HYMAN, JEFFREY ; STEWART, HAYDEN ; WELLS, HODAN F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Canned foods industry</topic><topic>Canning industry</topic><topic>Citrus fruits</topic><topic>Consumerism</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food economics</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Food systems</topic><topic>Food wastes</topic><topic>Fruit industry</topic><topic>Grapes</topic><topic>International economic relations</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>OTHER RESEARCH IN THE CONSUMER INTEREST</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Produce industry</topic><topic>Retail industry</topic><topic>Retail trade</topic><topic>Retailing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BUZBY, JEAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HYMAN, JEFFREY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, HAYDEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLS, HODAN F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of consumer affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BUZBY, JEAN C.</au><au>HYMAN, JEFFREY</au><au>STEWART, HAYDEN</au><au>WELLS, HODAN F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of consumer affairs</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Consumer Affairs</addtitle><date>2011-09-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>492-515</pages><issn>0022-0078</issn><eissn>1745-6606</eissn><notes>istex:48F0553615CBB8C259A2E21FC0660DC7657DF6BA</notes><notes>ArticleID:JOCA1214</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-04B508B8-J</notes><notes>The views expressed here are those of the authors and cannot be attributed to the Economic Research Service or the US Department of Agriculture.</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Food loss at the retail and consumer levels in the United States includes 14.8 billion pounds of fruit and 23.4 billion pounds of vegetables, valued at $15.1 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively, in 2008 retail market prices. The total value of these losses is $42.8 billion per year, or roughly $141 per capita. To most efficiently reduce the annual food loss, it may be beneficial to focus efforts on the four fruits (fresh apples, grapes, peaches and strawberries) and four vegetables (fresh and canned tomatoes and fresh and frozen potatoes) that have the greatest amount of loss.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01214.x</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0078
ispartof The Journal of consumer affairs, 2011-09, Vol.45 (3), p.492-515
issn 0022-0078
1745-6606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030885815
source Business Source Ultimate; Wiley; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Canned foods industry
Canning industry
Citrus fruits
Consumerism
Consumers
Food
Food availability
Food consumption
Food economics
Food security
Food supply
Food systems
Food wastes
Fruit industry
Grapes
International economic relations
Markets
OTHER RESEARCH IN THE CONSUMER INTEREST
Prices
Produce industry
Retail industry
Retail trade
Retailing
Studies
Tomatoes
United States
Vegetables
title The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T21%3A22%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Value%20of%20Retail-%20and%20Consumer-Level%20Fruit%20and%20Vegetable%20Losses%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20consumer%20affairs&rft.au=BUZBY,%20JEAN%20C.&rft.date=2011-09-22&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=492-515&rft.issn=0022-0078&rft.eissn=1745-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01214.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA270041587%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7454-754d8bf136cb196b6f299f5ab0762c5de89259987c5c13651571c66e8c4ddb803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898706723&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A270041587&rft_jstor_id=23859830&rfr_iscdi=true