Loading…

Yearly population data at census tract level revealed that more people are now living in highly fire-prone zones in California, USA

Abstract In California (CA), the wildland-urban interface (WUI) faces escalating challenges due to surging population and real estate development. This study evaluates communities along CA’s WUI that have witnessed substantial population growth from 2010 to 2021, utilizing demographic data and the 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Communications 2024-03, Vol.6 (3), p.31004
Main Authors: Laszewski, Slade, Jia, Shenyue, Viner, Jessica, Ho, Wesley, Hoover, Brian, Kim, Seung Hee, Kafatos, Menas C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b89667f2e61a49bac7a65012062bcebf05c89ce8c1f6dde608f94fd26189a9d83
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 31004
container_title Environmental Research Communications
container_volume 6
creator Laszewski, Slade
Jia, Shenyue
Viner, Jessica
Ho, Wesley
Hoover, Brian
Kim, Seung Hee
Kafatos, Menas C
description Abstract In California (CA), the wildland-urban interface (WUI) faces escalating challenges due to surging population and real estate development. This study evaluates communities along CA’s WUI that have witnessed substantial population growth from 2010 to 2021, utilizing demographic data and the 2020 WUI boundaries by the University of Wisconsin-Madison SILVIS Lab. Employing the Mann-Kendall test, we analyze yearly population trends for each census tract along the CA WUI and assess their significance. House ownership, affordability, and wildfire risk are examined as potential drivers of this demographic shift. Our findings indicate that 12.7% of CA’s total population now resides in census tracts with significant population increases over the past decade, labeled as ‘high-growth tracts.’ The Bay Area and Southern California, encompassing 76% of all high-growth tracts in CA, witnessed the most substantial population increase along the WUI. Notably, Riverside County stands out with 29.2% of its residents (approximately 717,000 residents) located in high-growth tracts, exemplifying a significant population surge within CA’s WUI. Our analysis identifies a significant relationship between population increase in the WUI, house ownership, and affordability, where lower-priced homes come at the expense of heightened wildfire risk. However, the impact of house affordability on population growth within the WUI varies by region, playing a more prominent role in explaining population proportions in Southern California’s WUI, while in the universally low-affordability Bay Area, other motivations may drive residents to live within the WUI. Given the rapid growth and insufficient consideration of wildfire risk in the WUI, policymakers must take prompt action, ensuring adequate infrastructure and resources as more individuals relocate to areas with heightened wildfire risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2515-7620/ad2a93
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2954261165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cae7fdb332af4002b23b4e023162c55a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2954261165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b89667f2e61a49bac7a65012062bcebf05c89ce8c1f6dde608f94fd26189a9d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhSMEElXpnaMlJE5NO3YSJz5WK6CVKnGAHjhZE3u865UbBztbVK78cbwEFQ5wGY_Gb75n61XVaw4XHIbhUnS8q3sp4BKtQNU8q06eRs__6l9WZznvAUD0qgXenlQ_vhCm8MjmOB8CLj5OzOKCDBdmaMqHzJaEZmGBHiiwVCoGsmzZFcF9TMRminMghqWd4jcW_IOftsxPbOe3uwJ2PlE9pzgR-15KPl5tMHgX0-TxnN19unpVvXAYMp39Pk-ru_fvPm-u69uPH242V7e1aQGWehyUlL0TJDm2akTTo-yAC5BiNDQ66MygDA2GO2ktSRicap0Vkg8KlR2a0-pm5dqIez0nf4_pUUf0-tcgpq3GtHgTSBuk3tmxaQS6Yi5G0YwtgWi4FKbrsLDerKzyta8Hyovex0OayvO1UF1bTLnsigpWlUkx50TuyZWDPianj9HoYzR6Ta6svF1XfJz_MCkZLXWjoeEArZ6tK8Lzfwj_y_0Jf-mnag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2954261165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Yearly population data at census tract level revealed that more people are now living in highly fire-prone zones in California, USA</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Laszewski, Slade ; Jia, Shenyue ; Viner, Jessica ; Ho, Wesley ; Hoover, Brian ; Kim, Seung Hee ; Kafatos, Menas C</creator><creatorcontrib>Laszewski, Slade ; Jia, Shenyue ; Viner, Jessica ; Ho, Wesley ; Hoover, Brian ; Kim, Seung Hee ; Kafatos, Menas C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In California (CA), the wildland-urban interface (WUI) faces escalating challenges due to surging population and real estate development. This study evaluates communities along CA’s WUI that have witnessed substantial population growth from 2010 to 2021, utilizing demographic data and the 2020 WUI boundaries by the University of Wisconsin-Madison SILVIS Lab. Employing the Mann-Kendall test, we analyze yearly population trends for each census tract along the CA WUI and assess their significance. House ownership, affordability, and wildfire risk are examined as potential drivers of this demographic shift. Our findings indicate that 12.7% of CA’s total population now resides in census tracts with significant population increases over the past decade, labeled as ‘high-growth tracts.’ The Bay Area and Southern California, encompassing 76% of all high-growth tracts in CA, witnessed the most substantial population increase along the WUI. Notably, Riverside County stands out with 29.2% of its residents (approximately 717,000 residents) located in high-growth tracts, exemplifying a significant population surge within CA’s WUI. Our analysis identifies a significant relationship between population increase in the WUI, house ownership, and affordability, where lower-priced homes come at the expense of heightened wildfire risk. However, the impact of house affordability on population growth within the WUI varies by region, playing a more prominent role in explaining population proportions in Southern California’s WUI, while in the universally low-affordability Bay Area, other motivations may drive residents to live within the WUI. Given the rapid growth and insufficient consideration of wildfire risk in the WUI, policymakers must take prompt action, ensuring adequate infrastructure and resources as more individuals relocate to areas with heightened wildfire risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad2a93</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>California ; Census ; Censuses ; climate change ; Demographics ; Demography ; Environmental risk ; Houses ; mann-kendall test ; Ownership ; Population growth ; population trends ; Real estate ; Risk ; wildfire risk ; Wildfires ; Wildland-urban interface</subject><ispartof>Environmental Research Communications, 2024-03, Vol.6 (3), p.31004</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b89667f2e61a49bac7a65012062bcebf05c89ce8c1f6dde608f94fd26189a9d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1603-6932 ; 0000-0003-2971-0447 ; 0009-0009-4695-7610 ; 0000-0002-5949-8996 ; 0000-0003-0628-529X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2954261165?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,25783,27957,27958,37047,44625</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laszewski, Slade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Shenyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kafatos, Menas C</creatorcontrib><title>Yearly population data at census tract level revealed that more people are now living in highly fire-prone zones in California, USA</title><title>Environmental Research Communications</title><addtitle>ERC</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><description>Abstract In California (CA), the wildland-urban interface (WUI) faces escalating challenges due to surging population and real estate development. This study evaluates communities along CA’s WUI that have witnessed substantial population growth from 2010 to 2021, utilizing demographic data and the 2020 WUI boundaries by the University of Wisconsin-Madison SILVIS Lab. Employing the Mann-Kendall test, we analyze yearly population trends for each census tract along the CA WUI and assess their significance. House ownership, affordability, and wildfire risk are examined as potential drivers of this demographic shift. Our findings indicate that 12.7% of CA’s total population now resides in census tracts with significant population increases over the past decade, labeled as ‘high-growth tracts.’ The Bay Area and Southern California, encompassing 76% of all high-growth tracts in CA, witnessed the most substantial population increase along the WUI. Notably, Riverside County stands out with 29.2% of its residents (approximately 717,000 residents) located in high-growth tracts, exemplifying a significant population surge within CA’s WUI. Our analysis identifies a significant relationship between population increase in the WUI, house ownership, and affordability, where lower-priced homes come at the expense of heightened wildfire risk. However, the impact of house affordability on population growth within the WUI varies by region, playing a more prominent role in explaining population proportions in Southern California’s WUI, while in the universally low-affordability Bay Area, other motivations may drive residents to live within the WUI. Given the rapid growth and insufficient consideration of wildfire risk in the WUI, policymakers must take prompt action, ensuring adequate infrastructure and resources as more individuals relocate to areas with heightened wildfire risk.</description><subject>California</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>mann-kendall test</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>population trends</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>wildfire risk</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Wildland-urban interface</subject><issn>2515-7620</issn><issn>2515-7620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhSMEElXpnaMlJE5NO3YSJz5WK6CVKnGAHjhZE3u865UbBztbVK78cbwEFQ5wGY_Gb75n61XVaw4XHIbhUnS8q3sp4BKtQNU8q06eRs__6l9WZznvAUD0qgXenlQ_vhCm8MjmOB8CLj5OzOKCDBdmaMqHzJaEZmGBHiiwVCoGsmzZFcF9TMRminMghqWd4jcW_IOftsxPbOe3uwJ2PlE9pzgR-15KPl5tMHgX0-TxnN19unpVvXAYMp39Pk-ru_fvPm-u69uPH242V7e1aQGWehyUlL0TJDm2akTTo-yAC5BiNDQ66MygDA2GO2ktSRicap0Vkg8KlR2a0-pm5dqIez0nf4_pUUf0-tcgpq3GtHgTSBuk3tmxaQS6Yi5G0YwtgWi4FKbrsLDerKzyta8Hyovex0OayvO1UF1bTLnsigpWlUkx50TuyZWDPianj9HoYzR6Ta6svF1XfJz_MCkZLXWjoeEArZ6tK8Lzfwj_y_0Jf-mnag</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Laszewski, Slade</creator><creator>Jia, Shenyue</creator><creator>Viner, Jessica</creator><creator>Ho, Wesley</creator><creator>Hoover, Brian</creator><creator>Kim, Seung Hee</creator><creator>Kafatos, Menas C</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-6932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-0447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4695-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-8996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-529X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Yearly population data at census tract level revealed that more people are now living in highly fire-prone zones in California, USA</title><author>Laszewski, Slade ; Jia, Shenyue ; Viner, Jessica ; Ho, Wesley ; Hoover, Brian ; Kim, Seung Hee ; Kafatos, Menas C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b89667f2e61a49bac7a65012062bcebf05c89ce8c1f6dde608f94fd26189a9d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>California</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>mann-kendall test</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>population trends</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>wildfire risk</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Wildland-urban interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laszewski, Slade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Shenyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kafatos, Menas C</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laszewski, Slade</au><au>Jia, Shenyue</au><au>Viner, Jessica</au><au>Ho, Wesley</au><au>Hoover, Brian</au><au>Kim, Seung Hee</au><au>Kafatos, Menas C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Yearly population data at census tract level revealed that more people are now living in highly fire-prone zones in California, USA</atitle><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle><stitle>ERC</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>31004</spage><pages>31004-</pages><issn>2515-7620</issn><eissn>2515-7620</eissn><notes>ERC-101735.R2</notes><abstract>Abstract In California (CA), the wildland-urban interface (WUI) faces escalating challenges due to surging population and real estate development. This study evaluates communities along CA’s WUI that have witnessed substantial population growth from 2010 to 2021, utilizing demographic data and the 2020 WUI boundaries by the University of Wisconsin-Madison SILVIS Lab. Employing the Mann-Kendall test, we analyze yearly population trends for each census tract along the CA WUI and assess their significance. House ownership, affordability, and wildfire risk are examined as potential drivers of this demographic shift. Our findings indicate that 12.7% of CA’s total population now resides in census tracts with significant population increases over the past decade, labeled as ‘high-growth tracts.’ The Bay Area and Southern California, encompassing 76% of all high-growth tracts in CA, witnessed the most substantial population increase along the WUI. Notably, Riverside County stands out with 29.2% of its residents (approximately 717,000 residents) located in high-growth tracts, exemplifying a significant population surge within CA’s WUI. Our analysis identifies a significant relationship between population increase in the WUI, house ownership, and affordability, where lower-priced homes come at the expense of heightened wildfire risk. However, the impact of house affordability on population growth within the WUI varies by region, playing a more prominent role in explaining population proportions in Southern California’s WUI, while in the universally low-affordability Bay Area, other motivations may drive residents to live within the WUI. Given the rapid growth and insufficient consideration of wildfire risk in the WUI, policymakers must take prompt action, ensuring adequate infrastructure and resources as more individuals relocate to areas with heightened wildfire risk.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2515-7620/ad2a93</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-6932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-0447</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4695-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-8996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-529X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2515-7620
ispartof Environmental Research Communications, 2024-03, Vol.6 (3), p.31004
issn 2515-7620
2515-7620
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2954261165
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects California
Census
Censuses
climate change
Demographics
Demography
Environmental risk
Houses
mann-kendall test
Ownership
Population growth
population trends
Real estate
Risk
wildfire risk
Wildfires
Wildland-urban interface
title Yearly population data at census tract level revealed that more people are now living in highly fire-prone zones in California, USA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T12%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Yearly%20population%20data%20at%20census%20tract%20level%20revealed%20that%20more%20people%20are%20now%20living%20in%20highly%20fire-prone%20zones%20in%20California,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20Research%20Communications&rft.au=Laszewski,%20Slade&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=31004&rft.pages=31004-&rft.issn=2515-7620&rft.eissn=2515-7620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2515-7620/ad2a93&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2954261165%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b89667f2e61a49bac7a65012062bcebf05c89ce8c1f6dde608f94fd26189a9d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2954261165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true