Loading…
Runoff Modeling Efficiency for the Upper Ussuri Basin Using Observational Data and the ERA5 Reanalysis
Experience of using meteorological observations and the ERA5 reanalysis for runoff modeling using the GR4J conceptual model is outlined. The study objects are catchments within the Ussuri River basin (Kirovskii, the Russian Far East). The results of the comparison of ground-based observations and re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Russian meteorology and hydrology 2023-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1048-1058 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-acb682b14ed21d9011045faa9751be9fb5ed38546263fb3c6bd61dc1767e92d33 |
container_end_page | 1058 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1048 |
container_title | Russian meteorology and hydrology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Bugaets, A. N. Lupakov, S. Yu Gonchukov, L. V. Sokolov, O. V. Sidorenko, N. Yu |
description | Experience of using meteorological observations and the ERA5 reanalysis for runoff modeling using the GR4J conceptual model is outlined. The study objects are catchments within the Ussuri River basin (Kirovskii, the Russian Far East). The results of the comparison of ground-based observations and reanalysis data are presented. The hydrological model has been calibrated and verified on the basis of various data sources. The traditional scores NSE, logNSE, and BIAS have been used to evaluate the modeling efficiency. According to the scores, the modeling efficiency is generally "satisfactory" and better. It is shown that for simulations, it is better to use observation network data in case of floods and the reanalysis data in case of spring high water and low flow periods. It is concluded that the effective resolution of the ERA5 data for daily precipitation and air temperature for hydrological modeling in the study area is
(
90–120 km). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3103/S1068373923120051 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2927440489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2927440489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-acb682b14ed21d9011045faa9751be9fb5ed38546263fb3c6bd61dc1767e92d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82omyWY3x1rrH6gUqj0v2U1SU2p2TXaFfntTK3gQTzPD-73H8BC6BHLNgLCbFyCiZAWTlAElJIcjNALJeFYSKY7TnuRsr5-isxg3iRCUFyNkl4NvrcXPrTZb59d4Zq1rnPHNDts24P7N4FXXmYBXMQ7B4VsVnU_Hnl3U0YRP1bvWqy2-U73Cyutvz2w5yfHSqCTsoovn6MSqbTQXP3OMVvez1-ljNl88PE0n86yhouwz1dSipDVwoyloSQAIz61SssihNtLWudGszLmggtmaNaLWAnQDhSiMpJqxMbo65Hah_RhM7KtNO4T0RKyopAXnhJcyUXCgmtDGGIytuuDeVdhVQKp9ndWfOpOHHjwxsX5twm_y_6YvXet2Kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927440489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Runoff Modeling Efficiency for the Upper Ussuri Basin Using Observational Data and the ERA5 Reanalysis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Bugaets, A. N. ; Lupakov, S. Yu ; Gonchukov, L. V. ; Sokolov, O. V. ; Sidorenko, N. Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Bugaets, A. N. ; Lupakov, S. Yu ; Gonchukov, L. V. ; Sokolov, O. V. ; Sidorenko, N. Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Experience of using meteorological observations and the ERA5 reanalysis for runoff modeling using the GR4J conceptual model is outlined. The study objects are catchments within the Ussuri River basin (Kirovskii, the Russian Far East). The results of the comparison of ground-based observations and reanalysis data are presented. The hydrological model has been calibrated and verified on the basis of various data sources. The traditional scores NSE, logNSE, and BIAS have been used to evaluate the modeling efficiency. According to the scores, the modeling efficiency is generally "satisfactory" and better. It is shown that for simulations, it is better to use observation network data in case of floods and the reanalysis data in case of spring high water and low flow periods. It is concluded that the effective resolution of the ERA5 data for daily precipitation and air temperature for hydrological modeling in the study area is
(
90–120 km).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-3739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1068373923120051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Atmospheric models ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Daily precipitation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Efficiency ; Ground-based observation ; Hydrologic models ; Low flow ; Meteorological observations ; Meteorology ; Modelling ; River basins ; Runoff</subject><ispartof>Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2023-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1048-1058</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-acb682b14ed21d9011045faa9751be9fb5ed38546263fb3c6bd61dc1767e92d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bugaets, A. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupakov, S. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonchukov, L. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokolov, O. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidorenko, N. Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Runoff Modeling Efficiency for the Upper Ussuri Basin Using Observational Data and the ERA5 Reanalysis</title><title>Russian meteorology and hydrology</title><addtitle>Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol</addtitle><description>Experience of using meteorological observations and the ERA5 reanalysis for runoff modeling using the GR4J conceptual model is outlined. The study objects are catchments within the Ussuri River basin (Kirovskii, the Russian Far East). The results of the comparison of ground-based observations and reanalysis data are presented. The hydrological model has been calibrated and verified on the basis of various data sources. The traditional scores NSE, logNSE, and BIAS have been used to evaluate the modeling efficiency. According to the scores, the modeling efficiency is generally "satisfactory" and better. It is shown that for simulations, it is better to use observation network data in case of floods and the reanalysis data in case of spring high water and low flow periods. It is concluded that the effective resolution of the ERA5 data for daily precipitation and air temperature for hydrological modeling in the study area is
(
90–120 km).</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ground-based observation</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Low flow</subject><subject>Meteorological observations</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><issn>1068-3739</issn><issn>1934-8096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82omyWY3x1rrH6gUqj0v2U1SU2p2TXaFfntTK3gQTzPD-73H8BC6BHLNgLCbFyCiZAWTlAElJIcjNALJeFYSKY7TnuRsr5-isxg3iRCUFyNkl4NvrcXPrTZb59d4Zq1rnPHNDts24P7N4FXXmYBXMQ7B4VsVnU_Hnl3U0YRP1bvWqy2-U73Cyutvz2w5yfHSqCTsoovn6MSqbTQXP3OMVvez1-ljNl88PE0n86yhouwz1dSipDVwoyloSQAIz61SssihNtLWudGszLmggtmaNaLWAnQDhSiMpJqxMbo65Hah_RhM7KtNO4T0RKyopAXnhJcyUXCgmtDGGIytuuDeVdhVQKp9ndWfOpOHHjwxsX5twm_y_6YvXet2Kw</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Bugaets, A. N.</creator><creator>Lupakov, S. Yu</creator><creator>Gonchukov, L. V.</creator><creator>Sokolov, O. V.</creator><creator>Sidorenko, N. Yu</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Runoff Modeling Efficiency for the Upper Ussuri Basin Using Observational Data and the ERA5 Reanalysis</title><author>Bugaets, A. N. ; Lupakov, S. Yu ; Gonchukov, L. V. ; Sokolov, O. V. ; Sidorenko, N. Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-acb682b14ed21d9011045faa9751be9fb5ed38546263fb3c6bd61dc1767e92d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ground-based observation</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Low flow</topic><topic>Meteorological observations</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bugaets, A. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupakov, S. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonchukov, L. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokolov, O. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidorenko, N. Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Russian meteorology and hydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bugaets, A. N.</au><au>Lupakov, S. Yu</au><au>Gonchukov, L. V.</au><au>Sokolov, O. V.</au><au>Sidorenko, N. Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Runoff Modeling Efficiency for the Upper Ussuri Basin Using Observational Data and the ERA5 Reanalysis</atitle><jtitle>Russian meteorology and hydrology</jtitle><stitle>Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1048</spage><epage>1058</epage><pages>1048-1058</pages><issn>1068-3739</issn><eissn>1934-8096</eissn><abstract>Experience of using meteorological observations and the ERA5 reanalysis for runoff modeling using the GR4J conceptual model is outlined. The study objects are catchments within the Ussuri River basin (Kirovskii, the Russian Far East). The results of the comparison of ground-based observations and reanalysis data are presented. The hydrological model has been calibrated and verified on the basis of various data sources. The traditional scores NSE, logNSE, and BIAS have been used to evaluate the modeling efficiency. According to the scores, the modeling efficiency is generally "satisfactory" and better. It is shown that for simulations, it is better to use observation network data in case of floods and the reanalysis data in case of spring high water and low flow periods. It is concluded that the effective resolution of the ERA5 data for daily precipitation and air temperature for hydrological modeling in the study area is
(
90–120 km).</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.3103/S1068373923120051</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-3739 |
ispartof | Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2023-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1048-1058 |
issn | 1068-3739 1934-8096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2927440489 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Air temperature Atmospheric models Atmospheric Sciences Catchment area Catchments Daily precipitation Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Efficiency Ground-based observation Hydrologic models Low flow Meteorological observations Meteorology Modelling River basins Runoff |
title | Runoff Modeling Efficiency for the Upper Ussuri Basin Using Observational Data and the ERA5 Reanalysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T18%3A20%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Runoff%20Modeling%20Efficiency%20for%20the%20Upper%20Ussuri%20Basin%20Using%20Observational%20Data%20and%20the%20ERA5%20Reanalysis&rft.jtitle=Russian%20meteorology%20and%20hydrology&rft.au=Bugaets,%20A.%20N.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1048&rft.epage=1058&rft.pages=1048-1058&rft.issn=1068-3739&rft.eissn=1934-8096&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1068373923120051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927440489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-acb682b14ed21d9011045faa9751be9fb5ed38546263fb3c6bd61dc1767e92d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927440489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |