Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: A theoretical review

In this theoretical review, evidence for the link between spoken and written word knowledge is summarised, highlighting the specific hypotheses posed in this field and the extent to which they are informative regarding causation. A brief overview of major theories of orthographic learning draws atte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 2022-07, Vol.27 (2), p.253-278
Main Authors: Wegener, Signy, Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Wang, Hua-Chen, Castles, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognitive processes
Knowledge level
Learning disabilities
Learning Processes
Oral Language
Orthographic Symbols
Pronunciation
Reading Instruction
Reading processes
Special education
Speech communication
Students with disabilities
Visual Aids
Vocabulary Development
Vocabulary skills
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53
container_end_page 278
container_issue 2
container_start_page 253
container_title Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties
container_volume 27
creator Wegener, Signy
Beyersmann, Elisabeth
Wang, Hua-Chen
Castles, Anne
description In this theoretical review, evidence for the link between spoken and written word knowledge is summarised, highlighting the specific hypotheses posed in this field and the extent to which they are informative regarding causation. A brief overview of major theories of orthographic learning draws attention to how each characterises the role of oral vocabulary within the learning process, and the timing of its influence. The theoretical foundations and evidence for two cognitive mechanisms that seek to explain the relationship between spoken and written word knowledge are outlined, drawing attention to a key difference between them: the proposed timing of the effect. Set for variability (or mispronunciation correction) is thought to operate from the point of visual exposure, while orthographic skeletons are thought to exert an influence on written word learning that begins before exposure to written words. The review closes with a discussion of directions for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19404158.2022.2097717
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736918760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1370587</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.231735</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2736918760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhiMEEqXwEypZ4rytP-IvDoiqammril7gbDn2ZOuSxss4u6v-exyy7ZGLbc37zjvjp2lOGD1l1NAzZlvaMmlOOeW8HlZrpt80R3N91TKl3r6-pXnffCjlkVJFJedHzY979APZ5eC77eDxmfwe836AuAbix0gG8DimcU2mTBB8JCPsyT5jLF_IOZkeICNMKdQIhF2C_cfmXe-HAp8O93Hz6-ry58X16u7--83F-d0qCMunFVivlfeaK-Cad5H3ujMiiBaY1p2VLFYpKmN7yyhE66VsjWat4VR0EKQ4bj4vuRvMf7ZQJveYtzjWkY5roSwzWtHqkosrYC4FoXcbTE_1l45RN6NzL-jcjM4d0NW-k6UPMIXXnstbJjSVZta_Ljo-pcl5SJvJlUoqPLg09vlfNePaxZzmSUIwdXBxUePn9b8tAYvdV6JDdJN_HjL26MeQihP_3_Ev2SqTww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736918760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: A theoretical review</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Wegener, Signy ; Beyersmann, Elisabeth ; Wang, Hua-Chen ; Castles, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Signy ; Beyersmann, Elisabeth ; Wang, Hua-Chen ; Castles, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>In this theoretical review, evidence for the link between spoken and written word knowledge is summarised, highlighting the specific hypotheses posed in this field and the extent to which they are informative regarding causation. A brief overview of major theories of orthographic learning draws attention to how each characterises the role of oral vocabulary within the learning process, and the timing of its influence. The theoretical foundations and evidence for two cognitive mechanisms that seek to explain the relationship between spoken and written word knowledge are outlined, drawing attention to a key difference between them: the proposed timing of the effect. Set for variability (or mispronunciation correction) is thought to operate from the point of visual exposure, while orthographic skeletons are thought to exert an influence on written word learning that begins before exposure to written words. The review closes with a discussion of directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-4158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-4166</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19404158.2022.2097717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Carlton South: Routledge</publisher><subject>Cognitive processes ; Knowledge level ; Learning disabilities ; Learning Processes ; Oral Language ; Orthographic Symbols ; Pronunciation ; Reading Instruction ; Reading processes ; Special education ; Speech communication ; Students with disabilities ; Visual Aids ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary skills</subject><ispartof>Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 2022-07, Vol.27 (2), p.253-278</ispartof><rights>2022 Learning Difficulties Australia 2022</rights><rights>2022 Learning Difficulties Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9845-147X ; 0000-0001-5364-0202 ; 0000-0001-8228-8260 ; 0000-0001-9653-6106</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,783,787,795,27934,27936,27937</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1370587$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Signy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyersmann, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hua-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castles, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: A theoretical review</title><title>Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties</title><description>In this theoretical review, evidence for the link between spoken and written word knowledge is summarised, highlighting the specific hypotheses posed in this field and the extent to which they are informative regarding causation. A brief overview of major theories of orthographic learning draws attention to how each characterises the role of oral vocabulary within the learning process, and the timing of its influence. The theoretical foundations and evidence for two cognitive mechanisms that seek to explain the relationship between spoken and written word knowledge are outlined, drawing attention to a key difference between them: the proposed timing of the effect. Set for variability (or mispronunciation correction) is thought to operate from the point of visual exposure, while orthographic skeletons are thought to exert an influence on written word learning that begins before exposure to written words. The review closes with a discussion of directions for future research.</description><subject>Cognitive processes</subject><subject>Knowledge level</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Orthographic Symbols</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Reading processes</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Speech communication</subject><subject>Students with disabilities</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary skills</subject><issn>1940-4158</issn><issn>1940-4166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhiMEEqXwEypZ4rytP-IvDoiqammril7gbDn2ZOuSxss4u6v-exyy7ZGLbc37zjvjp2lOGD1l1NAzZlvaMmlOOeW8HlZrpt80R3N91TKl3r6-pXnffCjlkVJFJedHzY979APZ5eC77eDxmfwe836AuAbix0gG8DimcU2mTBB8JCPsyT5jLF_IOZkeICNMKdQIhF2C_cfmXe-HAp8O93Hz6-ry58X16u7--83F-d0qCMunFVivlfeaK-Cad5H3ujMiiBaY1p2VLFYpKmN7yyhE66VsjWat4VR0EKQ4bj4vuRvMf7ZQJveYtzjWkY5roSwzWtHqkosrYC4FoXcbTE_1l45RN6NzL-jcjM4d0NW-k6UPMIXXnstbJjSVZta_Ljo-pcl5SJvJlUoqPLg09vlfNePaxZzmSUIwdXBxUePn9b8tAYvdV6JDdJN_HjL26MeQihP_3_Ev2SqTww</recordid><startdate>20220703</startdate><enddate>20220703</enddate><creator>Wegener, Signy</creator><creator>Beyersmann, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Wang, Hua-Chen</creator><creator>Castles, Anne</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-147X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5364-0202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-8260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-6106</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220703</creationdate><title>Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: A theoretical review</title><author>Wegener, Signy ; Beyersmann, Elisabeth ; Wang, Hua-Chen ; Castles, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cognitive processes</topic><topic>Knowledge level</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Orthographic Symbols</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Reading processes</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Speech communication</topic><topic>Students with disabilities</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Signy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyersmann, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hua-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castles, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wegener, Signy</au><au>Beyersmann, Elisabeth</au><au>Wang, Hua-Chen</au><au>Castles, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1370587</ericid><atitle>Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: A theoretical review</atitle><jtitle>Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties</jtitle><date>2022-07-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>253-278</pages><issn>1940-4158</issn><eissn>1940-4166</eissn><abstract>In this theoretical review, evidence for the link between spoken and written word knowledge is summarised, highlighting the specific hypotheses posed in this field and the extent to which they are informative regarding causation. A brief overview of major theories of orthographic learning draws attention to how each characterises the role of oral vocabulary within the learning process, and the timing of its influence. The theoretical foundations and evidence for two cognitive mechanisms that seek to explain the relationship between spoken and written word knowledge are outlined, drawing attention to a key difference between them: the proposed timing of the effect. Set for variability (or mispronunciation correction) is thought to operate from the point of visual exposure, while orthographic skeletons are thought to exert an influence on written word learning that begins before exposure to written words. The review closes with a discussion of directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Carlton South</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/19404158.2022.2097717</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-147X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5364-0202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-8260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-6106</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1940-4158
ispartof Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 2022-07, Vol.27 (2), p.253-278
issn 1940-4158
1940-4166
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2736918760
source ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Cognitive processes
Knowledge level
Learning disabilities
Learning Processes
Oral Language
Orthographic Symbols
Pronunciation
Reading Instruction
Reading processes
Special education
Speech communication
Students with disabilities
Visual Aids
Vocabulary Development
Vocabulary skills
title Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: A theoretical review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-17T12%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20vocabulary%20knowledge%20and%20learning%20to%20read%20new%20words:%20A%20theoretical%20review&rft.jtitle=Australian%20Journal%20of%20Learning%20Difficulties&rft.au=Wegener,%20Signy&rft.date=2022-07-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=253-278&rft.issn=1940-4158&rft.eissn=1940-4166&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19404158.2022.2097717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736918760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e9a76aa726e272bd2f7b83c34e177b951d726d689f910ed9a55487148203bec53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736918760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1370587&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.231735&rfr_iscdi=true