Loading…
Genome-wide assessment of population structure in Florida’s coastal seaside sparrows
The distribution and genetic relatedness of subspecies among the populations of seaside sparrow ( Ammospiza maritima [Wilson 1810]) along the coast of Florida are poorly understood. We evaluated genetic support for three defined Florida Gulf coast subspecies, as well as a fourth subspecies on the At...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Conservation genetics 2022-04, Vol.23 (2), p.285-297 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93 |
| container_end_page | 297 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 285 |
| container_title | Conservation genetics |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Enloe, Carolyn Cox, W. Andrew Pandey, Akanksha Taylor, Sabrina S. Woltmann, Stefan Kimball, Rebecca T. |
| description | The distribution and genetic relatedness of subspecies among the populations of seaside sparrow (
Ammospiza maritima
[Wilson 1810]) along the coast of Florida are poorly understood. We evaluated genetic support for three defined Florida Gulf coast subspecies, as well as a fourth subspecies on the Atlantic coast, and assessed whether genetic clusters corresponded geographically with the defined ranges of subspecific designations. Data generated using double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) suggest that the Florida endemics,
A. m. peninsulae
and
A. m. juncicola
, are genetically indistinguishable, but that the third Gulf coast subspecies,
A. m. fisheri
, and the Atlantic coast subspecies,
A. m. macgillivraii
, are genetically distinct units. These three distinct genetic groups were identified in three main geographic areas within the state of Florida, USA: (1) Florida’s panhandle (2) Florida’s Gulf coast peninsula, and (3) the Atlantic coast. Admixture was detected between genetic clusters in sites near the transition zone between the Florida panhandle and peninsula. Geographic distributions of genetic clusters on the Gulf coast do not match currently defined subspecific ranges for
A. m. fisheri
and
A. m. peninsulae
. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10592-021-01411-9 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642696213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642696213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK6-gKeA52iSNsnmKIu7CgseFK8hbafSpW1qpmXx5mv4ej6JrRW8OZeZwz_fMB8hl4JfC87NDQqurGRcCsZFKgSzR2QhlJHMmsQcT7PWjGspTskZ4p5zoaURC_KyhTY0wA5VAdQjAmIDbU9DSbvQDbXvq9BS7OOQ90MEWrV0U4dYFf7r4xNpHjz2vqYIHicCdj7GcMBzclL6GuHity_J0-bueX3Pdo_bh_XtjuWJsD0DASYpTaoBUjmWsjnPpLGpysqV9uVKWQCd5zbzxhdFoeTKZAlX2oLKbLIkVzO1i-FtAOzdPgyxHQ86qVOp7fhvMqbknMpjQIxQui5WjY_vTnA32XOzPTfacz_23IRO5iUcw-0rxD_0P1vfaG10hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642696213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genome-wide assessment of population structure in Florida’s coastal seaside sparrows</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Enloe, Carolyn ; Cox, W. Andrew ; Pandey, Akanksha ; Taylor, Sabrina S. ; Woltmann, Stefan ; Kimball, Rebecca T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Enloe, Carolyn ; Cox, W. Andrew ; Pandey, Akanksha ; Taylor, Sabrina S. ; Woltmann, Stefan ; Kimball, Rebecca T.</creatorcontrib><description>The distribution and genetic relatedness of subspecies among the populations of seaside sparrow (
Ammospiza maritima
[Wilson 1810]) along the coast of Florida are poorly understood. We evaluated genetic support for three defined Florida Gulf coast subspecies, as well as a fourth subspecies on the Atlantic coast, and assessed whether genetic clusters corresponded geographically with the defined ranges of subspecific designations. Data generated using double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) suggest that the Florida endemics,
A. m. peninsulae
and
A. m. juncicola
, are genetically indistinguishable, but that the third Gulf coast subspecies,
A. m. fisheri
, and the Atlantic coast subspecies,
A. m. macgillivraii
, are genetically distinct units. These three distinct genetic groups were identified in three main geographic areas within the state of Florida, USA: (1) Florida’s panhandle (2) Florida’s Gulf coast peninsula, and (3) the Atlantic coast. Admixture was detected between genetic clusters in sites near the transition zone between the Florida panhandle and peninsula. Geographic distributions of genetic clusters on the Gulf coast do not match currently defined subspecific ranges for
A. m. fisheri
and
A. m. peninsulae
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-0621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10592-021-01411-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Clusters ; Coastal structures ; Coasts ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; DNA sequencing ; Ecology ; Endangered & extinct species ; Environmental protection ; Evolutionary Biology ; Genetics ; Genomes ; Geographical distribution ; Life Sciences ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Population ; Population structure ; Research Article ; Transition zone ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation genetics, 2022-04, Vol.23 (2), p.285-297</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4499-1067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enloe, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, W. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Akanksha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Sabrina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woltmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Rebecca T.</creatorcontrib><title>Genome-wide assessment of population structure in Florida’s coastal seaside sparrows</title><title>Conservation genetics</title><addtitle>Conserv Genet</addtitle><description>The distribution and genetic relatedness of subspecies among the populations of seaside sparrow (
Ammospiza maritima
[Wilson 1810]) along the coast of Florida are poorly understood. We evaluated genetic support for three defined Florida Gulf coast subspecies, as well as a fourth subspecies on the Atlantic coast, and assessed whether genetic clusters corresponded geographically with the defined ranges of subspecific designations. Data generated using double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) suggest that the Florida endemics,
A. m. peninsulae
and
A. m. juncicola
, are genetically indistinguishable, but that the third Gulf coast subspecies,
A. m. fisheri
, and the Atlantic coast subspecies,
A. m. macgillivraii
, are genetically distinct units. These three distinct genetic groups were identified in three main geographic areas within the state of Florida, USA: (1) Florida’s panhandle (2) Florida’s Gulf coast peninsula, and (3) the Atlantic coast. Admixture was detected between genetic clusters in sites near the transition zone between the Florida panhandle and peninsula. Geographic distributions of genetic clusters on the Gulf coast do not match currently defined subspecific ranges for
A. m. fisheri
and
A. m. peninsulae
.</description><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Coastal structures</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Transition zone</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1566-0621</issn><issn>1572-9737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK6-gKeA52iSNsnmKIu7CgseFK8hbafSpW1qpmXx5mv4ej6JrRW8OZeZwz_fMB8hl4JfC87NDQqurGRcCsZFKgSzR2QhlJHMmsQcT7PWjGspTskZ4p5zoaURC_KyhTY0wA5VAdQjAmIDbU9DSbvQDbXvq9BS7OOQ90MEWrV0U4dYFf7r4xNpHjz2vqYIHicCdj7GcMBzclL6GuHity_J0-bueX3Pdo_bh_XtjuWJsD0DASYpTaoBUjmWsjnPpLGpysqV9uVKWQCd5zbzxhdFoeTKZAlX2oLKbLIkVzO1i-FtAOzdPgyxHQ86qVOp7fhvMqbknMpjQIxQui5WjY_vTnA32XOzPTfacz_23IRO5iUcw-0rxD_0P1vfaG10hg</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Enloe, Carolyn</creator><creator>Cox, W. Andrew</creator><creator>Pandey, Akanksha</creator><creator>Taylor, Sabrina S.</creator><creator>Woltmann, Stefan</creator><creator>Kimball, Rebecca T.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-1067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Genome-wide assessment of population structure in Florida’s coastal seaside sparrows</title><author>Enloe, Carolyn ; Cox, W. Andrew ; Pandey, Akanksha ; Taylor, Sabrina S. ; Woltmann, Stefan ; Kimball, Rebecca T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Coastal structures</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Transition zone</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enloe, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, W. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Akanksha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Sabrina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woltmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Rebecca T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enloe, Carolyn</au><au>Cox, W. Andrew</au><au>Pandey, Akanksha</au><au>Taylor, Sabrina S.</au><au>Woltmann, Stefan</au><au>Kimball, Rebecca T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genome-wide assessment of population structure in Florida’s coastal seaside sparrows</atitle><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle><stitle>Conserv Genet</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>285-297</pages><issn>1566-0621</issn><eissn>1572-9737</eissn><abstract>The distribution and genetic relatedness of subspecies among the populations of seaside sparrow (
Ammospiza maritima
[Wilson 1810]) along the coast of Florida are poorly understood. We evaluated genetic support for three defined Florida Gulf coast subspecies, as well as a fourth subspecies on the Atlantic coast, and assessed whether genetic clusters corresponded geographically with the defined ranges of subspecific designations. Data generated using double digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) suggest that the Florida endemics,
A. m. peninsulae
and
A. m. juncicola
, are genetically indistinguishable, but that the third Gulf coast subspecies,
A. m. fisheri
, and the Atlantic coast subspecies,
A. m. macgillivraii
, are genetically distinct units. These three distinct genetic groups were identified in three main geographic areas within the state of Florida, USA: (1) Florida’s panhandle (2) Florida’s Gulf coast peninsula, and (3) the Atlantic coast. Admixture was detected between genetic clusters in sites near the transition zone between the Florida panhandle and peninsula. Geographic distributions of genetic clusters on the Gulf coast do not match currently defined subspecific ranges for
A. m. fisheri
and
A. m. peninsulae
.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10592-021-01411-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-1067</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1566-0621 |
| ispartof | Conservation genetics, 2022-04, Vol.23 (2), p.285-297 |
| issn | 1566-0621 1572-9737 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2642696213 |
| source | Springer Link |
| subjects | Animal Genetics and Genomics Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Clusters Coastal structures Coasts Conservation Biology/Ecology DNA sequencing Ecology Endangered & extinct species Environmental protection Evolutionary Biology Genetics Genomes Geographical distribution Life Sciences Mitochondrial DNA Plant Genetics and Genomics Population Population structure Research Article Transition zone Wildlife conservation |
| title | Genome-wide assessment of population structure in Florida’s coastal seaside sparrows |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T20%3A32%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genome-wide%20assessment%20of%20population%20structure%20in%20Florida%E2%80%99s%20coastal%20seaside%20sparrows&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20genetics&rft.au=Enloe,%20Carolyn&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=285-297&rft.issn=1566-0621&rft.eissn=1572-9737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10592-021-01411-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642696213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e1e73f746ee4222259c0b27945bf86af859ee6cc9ba7addd5287b30569e5b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642696213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |