Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making

There is evidence for reliable individual differences in the tendency to use an intuitive (i.e., spontaneous, affect-based) and a deliberative (i.e., effortful, planned, and analytic) decision mode. Even though other individual characteristics in decision making (e.g., risk attitude) seem to be doma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied research in memory and cognition 2015-09, Vol.4 (3), p.303-311
Main Authors: Pachur, Thorsten, Spaar, Melanie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognitive Ability
Decision Making
Decision style
Deliberation
Domain specificity
Expertise
Female
Human
Individual Differences
Intuition
Male
Preferences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003
container_end_page 311
container_issue 3
container_start_page 303
container_title Journal of applied research in memory and cognition
container_volume 4
creator Pachur, Thorsten
Spaar, Melanie
description There is evidence for reliable individual differences in the tendency to use an intuitive (i.e., spontaneous, affect-based) and a deliberative (i.e., effortful, planned, and analytic) decision mode. Even though other individual characteristics in decision making (e.g., risk attitude) seem to be domain-specific, it is commonly assumed that a person's decision style is relatively stable across decision domains. Using a domain-specific extension of the Unified Scale to Assess Individual Differences in Intuition and Deliberation (USID), we found that preference for intuition and preference for deliberation showed considerable variability across domains (e.g., choosing a dress vs. choosing a doctor). In addition, domain-specific preferences for intuition were consistently correlated with self-rated expertise in making decisions in the respective domain. Our results indicate that a person's domain-general decision style does not necessarily generalize across decision domains, and that the domain-specificity of preferences for intuition seems to be driven partly by differences in expertise.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624966320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211368115000418</els_id><sourcerecordid>2624966320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouKz7DzwUvAmt-eim7UWQ9RMULwreQjqdSOpuWpNW2H9vasWrc5nJ8L5vmIeQU0YzRpm8aLNW-52GjFO2zmiRUSoPyIJzxlIhq7fDv7lkx2QVQktjScridkGerrudti4NPYI1FpLeo0GPDjAkpvOJdcNoB9u5RLsmaXBra_T6Z2FdfIMN07zTH9a9n5Ajo7cBV799SV5vb1429-nj893D5uox1Xm5HlJuKBVYAWremEKUpSyKWoiyRuDrBvIGKOaccVGyghqRQ11JYwSL2hqa6F2Sszm3993niGFQbTd6F79UXPK8klLwSZXPKvBdCPEu1Xu7036vGFUTO9WqmZ2a2ClaqAgm2i5nG8YLvix6FcBOQBrrEQbVdPa_gPM5QPda9WEP2g8Wthhg9JHsoCZDroQSVIhvqMyI3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624966320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Pachur, Thorsten ; Spaar, Melanie</creator><contributor>Marewski, Julian N ; Hoffrage, Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pachur, Thorsten ; Spaar, Melanie ; Marewski, Julian N ; Hoffrage, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>There is evidence for reliable individual differences in the tendency to use an intuitive (i.e., spontaneous, affect-based) and a deliberative (i.e., effortful, planned, and analytic) decision mode. Even though other individual characteristics in decision making (e.g., risk attitude) seem to be domain-specific, it is commonly assumed that a person's decision style is relatively stable across decision domains. Using a domain-specific extension of the Unified Scale to Assess Individual Differences in Intuition and Deliberation (USID), we found that preference for intuition and preference for deliberation showed considerable variability across domains (e.g., choosing a dress vs. choosing a doctor). In addition, domain-specific preferences for intuition were consistently correlated with self-rated expertise in making decisions in the respective domain. Our results indicate that a person's domain-general decision style does not necessarily generalize across decision domains, and that the domain-specificity of preferences for intuition seems to be driven partly by differences in expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-3681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-369X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washigton: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Cognitive Ability ; Decision Making ; Decision style ; Deliberation ; Domain specificity ; Expertise ; Female ; Human ; Individual Differences ; Intuition ; Male ; Preferences</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2015-09, Vol.4 (3), p.303-311</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition</rights><rights>2015, Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6391-4107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Marewski, Julian N</contributor><contributor>Hoffrage, Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pachur, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaar, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making</title><title>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition</title><description>There is evidence for reliable individual differences in the tendency to use an intuitive (i.e., spontaneous, affect-based) and a deliberative (i.e., effortful, planned, and analytic) decision mode. Even though other individual characteristics in decision making (e.g., risk attitude) seem to be domain-specific, it is commonly assumed that a person's decision style is relatively stable across decision domains. Using a domain-specific extension of the Unified Scale to Assess Individual Differences in Intuition and Deliberation (USID), we found that preference for intuition and preference for deliberation showed considerable variability across domains (e.g., choosing a dress vs. choosing a doctor). In addition, domain-specific preferences for intuition were consistently correlated with self-rated expertise in making decisions in the respective domain. Our results indicate that a person's domain-general decision style does not necessarily generalize across decision domains, and that the domain-specificity of preferences for intuition seems to be driven partly by differences in expertise.</description><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision style</subject><subject>Deliberation</subject><subject>Domain specificity</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><issn>2211-3681</issn><issn>2211-369X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouKz7DzwUvAmt-eim7UWQ9RMULwreQjqdSOpuWpNW2H9vasWrc5nJ8L5vmIeQU0YzRpm8aLNW-52GjFO2zmiRUSoPyIJzxlIhq7fDv7lkx2QVQktjScridkGerrudti4NPYI1FpLeo0GPDjAkpvOJdcNoB9u5RLsmaXBra_T6Z2FdfIMN07zTH9a9n5Ajo7cBV799SV5vb1429-nj893D5uox1Xm5HlJuKBVYAWremEKUpSyKWoiyRuDrBvIGKOaccVGyghqRQ11JYwSL2hqa6F2Sszm3993niGFQbTd6F79UXPK8klLwSZXPKvBdCPEu1Xu7036vGFUTO9WqmZ2a2ClaqAgm2i5nG8YLvix6FcBOQBrrEQbVdPa_gPM5QPda9WEP2g8Wthhg9JHsoCZDroQSVIhvqMyI3Q</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Pachur, Thorsten</creator><creator>Spaar, Melanie</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-4107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making</title><author>Pachur, Thorsten ; Spaar, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision style</topic><topic>Deliberation</topic><topic>Domain specificity</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pachur, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaar, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pachur, Thorsten</au><au>Spaar, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>303-311</pages><issn>2211-3681</issn><eissn>2211-369X</eissn><abstract>There is evidence for reliable individual differences in the tendency to use an intuitive (i.e., spontaneous, affect-based) and a deliberative (i.e., effortful, planned, and analytic) decision mode. Even though other individual characteristics in decision making (e.g., risk attitude) seem to be domain-specific, it is commonly assumed that a person's decision style is relatively stable across decision domains. Using a domain-specific extension of the Unified Scale to Assess Individual Differences in Intuition and Deliberation (USID), we found that preference for intuition and preference for deliberation showed considerable variability across domains (e.g., choosing a dress vs. choosing a doctor). In addition, domain-specific preferences for intuition were consistently correlated with self-rated expertise in making decisions in the respective domain. Our results indicate that a person's domain-general decision style does not necessarily generalize across decision domains, and that the domain-specificity of preferences for intuition seems to be driven partly by differences in expertise.</abstract><cop>Washigton</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-4107</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2211-3681
ispartof Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2015-09, Vol.4 (3), p.303-311
issn 2211-3681
2211-369X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2624966320
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Cognitive Ability
Decision Making
Decision style
Deliberation
Domain specificity
Expertise
Female
Human
Individual Differences
Intuition
Male
Preferences
title Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T01%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domain-specific%20preferences%20for%20intuition%20and%20deliberation%20in%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20research%20in%20memory%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Pachur,%20Thorsten&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=303-311&rft.issn=2211-3681&rft.eissn=2211-369X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624966320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a485t-2f003e9cea2df7388677b338bec25dc4dc0e421238170f34cb96ff31f73bcd003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624966320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true