Loading…
Evidence of shape variation in wild Tor Mahseer (Tor tor) from Indian Rivers
It has been hypothesized that geographical isolation between river ecosystems often resulted in phenotypic variation and ultimately change in the population structure of aquatic species. To test the hypothesis, 471 individuals of Tor Mahseer, Tor tor, were collected across its distribution range fro...
Saved in:
Published in: | River research and applications 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1424-1436 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813 |
container_end_page | 1436 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1424 |
container_title | River research and applications |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar |
description | It has been hypothesized that geographical isolation between river ecosystems often resulted in phenotypic variation and ultimately change in the population structure of aquatic species. To test the hypothesis, 471 individuals of Tor Mahseer, Tor tor, were collected across its distribution range from 18 locations on 10 Indian Rivers covering the Ganges, Narmada, and Godavari River basins to assess the population‐level inter‐ and intra‐basin shape variation through landmark‐based “geometric morphometrics.” Overall, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed significant differences (F = 3.33, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rra.3866 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605514379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605514379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEQgIMoWKvgTwh4qYeteW2yOZZStVARSj2HbB40pd3UpK3035ta8SYMzAx8zOMD4B6jIUaIPKWkh7Th_AL0cE3rCjMuLv_qWl6Dm5xXCGHRyKYHZpNDsK4zDkYP81JvHTzoFPQuxA6GDn6FtYWLmOCbXmbnEhycml1Mj9CnuIHTzgbdwXk4uJRvwZXX6-zufnMffDxPFuPXavb-Mh2PZpUhkvJK0MZ6RJEg1kqPHTGOtaQtISQTrUW1sAJRJmRLpDeOoHJqwzgz3EjTYNoHD-e52xQ_9y7v1CruU1dWKsJRXWNGhSzU4EyZFHNOzqttChudjgojdXKliit1clXQ6oyWd93xX07N56Mf_htj3Wiv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605514379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence of shape variation in wild Tor Mahseer (Tor tor) from Indian Rivers</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>It has been hypothesized that geographical isolation between river ecosystems often resulted in phenotypic variation and ultimately change in the population structure of aquatic species. To test the hypothesis, 471 individuals of Tor Mahseer, Tor tor, were collected across its distribution range from 18 locations on 10 Indian Rivers covering the Ganges, Narmada, and Godavari River basins to assess the population‐level inter‐ and intra‐basin shape variation through landmark‐based “geometric morphometrics.” Overall, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed significant differences (F = 3.33, p < .001) in shape across wild populations. The Mahalanobis and Procrustes distances extracted from canonical variate analysis (CVA) were found to be significant (p < .001) between basins and nonsignificant (p > .001) within basin except Banas and Kali Sindh Rivers in the Ganges River basin. The results indicated that Tor Mahseer in Indian Rivers were represented by four heterogeneous phenotypic stocks (1: the Ganges River basin except Banas and Kali Sindh River; 2: the Banas and Kali Sindh River; 3: the Narmada River basin, and 4: the Godavari River basin) based on their shape. The wireframes depicted variation mainly in the head region, body depth, and the caudal peduncle area between four phenotypic stocks. The population‐level shape variation between the basins might be due to geographical isolation between the basins and within the Ganges basin because of river fragmentation due to habitat alteration, which restricts the movement of fishes. This study is useful for resolving the “phenotypic stock” complexity in order to develop a suitable stock management plan with the aim of conserving and restoring populations of Tor Mahseer in Indian Rivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic populations ; Basins ; Environmental management ; Geographical isolation ; Morphometry ; Multivariate analysis ; Phenotypic variation ; Phenotypic variations ; population ; Population structure ; Populations ; River basins ; River ecology ; Rivers ; Shape ; Stocks ; Tor Mahseer ; Tor tor ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1424-1436</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4407-5752</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3866$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3866$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence of shape variation in wild Tor Mahseer (Tor tor) from Indian Rivers</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>It has been hypothesized that geographical isolation between river ecosystems often resulted in phenotypic variation and ultimately change in the population structure of aquatic species. To test the hypothesis, 471 individuals of Tor Mahseer, Tor tor, were collected across its distribution range from 18 locations on 10 Indian Rivers covering the Ganges, Narmada, and Godavari River basins to assess the population‐level inter‐ and intra‐basin shape variation through landmark‐based “geometric morphometrics.” Overall, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed significant differences (F = 3.33, p < .001) in shape across wild populations. The Mahalanobis and Procrustes distances extracted from canonical variate analysis (CVA) were found to be significant (p < .001) between basins and nonsignificant (p > .001) within basin except Banas and Kali Sindh Rivers in the Ganges River basin. The results indicated that Tor Mahseer in Indian Rivers were represented by four heterogeneous phenotypic stocks (1: the Ganges River basin except Banas and Kali Sindh River; 2: the Banas and Kali Sindh River; 3: the Narmada River basin, and 4: the Godavari River basin) based on their shape. The wireframes depicted variation mainly in the head region, body depth, and the caudal peduncle area between four phenotypic stocks. The population‐level shape variation between the basins might be due to geographical isolation between the basins and within the Ganges basin because of river fragmentation due to habitat alteration, which restricts the movement of fishes. This study is useful for resolving the “phenotypic stock” complexity in order to develop a suitable stock management plan with the aim of conserving and restoring populations of Tor Mahseer in Indian Rivers.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic populations</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Geographical isolation</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Phenotypic variation</subject><subject>Phenotypic variations</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Tor Mahseer</subject><subject>Tor tor</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEQgIMoWKvgTwh4qYeteW2yOZZStVARSj2HbB40pd3UpK3035ta8SYMzAx8zOMD4B6jIUaIPKWkh7Th_AL0cE3rCjMuLv_qWl6Dm5xXCGHRyKYHZpNDsK4zDkYP81JvHTzoFPQuxA6GDn6FtYWLmOCbXmbnEhycml1Mj9CnuIHTzgbdwXk4uJRvwZXX6-zufnMffDxPFuPXavb-Mh2PZpUhkvJK0MZ6RJEg1kqPHTGOtaQtISQTrUW1sAJRJmRLpDeOoHJqwzgz3EjTYNoHD-e52xQ_9y7v1CruU1dWKsJRXWNGhSzU4EyZFHNOzqttChudjgojdXKliit1clXQ6oyWd93xX07N56Mf_htj3Wiv</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4407-5752</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Evidence of shape variation in wild Tor Mahseer (Tor tor) from Indian Rivers</title><author>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic populations</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Geographical isolation</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Phenotypic variation</topic><topic>Phenotypic variations</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Tor Mahseer</topic><topic>Tor tor</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dwivedi, Arvind Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence of shape variation in wild Tor Mahseer (Tor tor) from Indian Rivers</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1424</spage><epage>1436</epage><pages>1424-1436</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>It has been hypothesized that geographical isolation between river ecosystems often resulted in phenotypic variation and ultimately change in the population structure of aquatic species. To test the hypothesis, 471 individuals of Tor Mahseer, Tor tor, were collected across its distribution range from 18 locations on 10 Indian Rivers covering the Ganges, Narmada, and Godavari River basins to assess the population‐level inter‐ and intra‐basin shape variation through landmark‐based “geometric morphometrics.” Overall, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed significant differences (F = 3.33, p < .001) in shape across wild populations. The Mahalanobis and Procrustes distances extracted from canonical variate analysis (CVA) were found to be significant (p < .001) between basins and nonsignificant (p > .001) within basin except Banas and Kali Sindh Rivers in the Ganges River basin. The results indicated that Tor Mahseer in Indian Rivers were represented by four heterogeneous phenotypic stocks (1: the Ganges River basin except Banas and Kali Sindh River; 2: the Banas and Kali Sindh River; 3: the Narmada River basin, and 4: the Godavari River basin) based on their shape. The wireframes depicted variation mainly in the head region, body depth, and the caudal peduncle area between four phenotypic stocks. The population‐level shape variation between the basins might be due to geographical isolation between the basins and within the Ganges basin because of river fragmentation due to habitat alteration, which restricts the movement of fishes. This study is useful for resolving the “phenotypic stock” complexity in order to develop a suitable stock management plan with the aim of conserving and restoring populations of Tor Mahseer in Indian Rivers.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3866</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4407-5752</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-1459 |
ispartof | River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1424-1436 |
issn | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2605514379 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Aquatic populations Basins Environmental management Geographical isolation Morphometry Multivariate analysis Phenotypic variation Phenotypic variations population Population structure Populations River basins River ecology Rivers Shape Stocks Tor Mahseer Tor tor Variance analysis |
title | Evidence of shape variation in wild Tor Mahseer (Tor tor) from Indian Rivers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T19%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20of%20shape%20variation%20in%20wild%20Tor%20Mahseer%20(Tor%20tor)%20from%20Indian%20Rivers&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Dwivedi,%20Arvind%20Kumar&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1424&rft.epage=1436&rft.pages=1424-1436&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3866&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605514379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2936-738df03072dd9f1e2ce4b2bb2b7947bd057d703479b29fce208988464c6c9c813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605514379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |