The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification

This study adopts moral reasoning strategies (moral rationalization and decoupling) to investigate why consumers support companies involved in ethical transgressions. Drawing on several cases of real multinationals publicly involved in tax avoidance practices, it aims to demonstrate that moral ratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business ethics 2021-11, Vol.174 (2), p.369-386
Main Authors: Matute, Jorge, Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis, Palau-Saumell, Ramon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Avoidance behavior
Brand identification
Brands
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Consumer behavior
Consumers
Education
Ethics
Individual differences
Management
Moral judgment
Morality
Multinational corporations
Original Paper
Philosophy
Political ideologies
Purchase intention
Quality of Life Research
Rationalization
Tax avoidance
Taxation
Transgression
Values
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493
container_end_page 386
container_issue 2
container_start_page 369
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 174
creator Matute, Jorge
Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis
Palau-Saumell, Ramon
description This study adopts moral reasoning strategies (moral rationalization and decoupling) to investigate why consumers support companies involved in ethical transgressions. Drawing on several cases of real multinationals publicly involved in tax avoidance practices, it aims to demonstrate that moral rationalization and moral decoupling depend not only on how consumers perceive the magnitude of the transgression, but also on their individual differences, such as political ideology and brand identification. A quantitative study with a sample of 3989 consumers of five different focal brands was employed to test a set of hypotheses. Findings reveal that moral decoupling directly (and indirectly through performance judgments) explains purchase intentions. However, rationalization only explains behavioral intentions if it leads to a reduction in the perceived immorality of the action. Furthermore, the study reveals significant differences across personal values. Left-leaning individuals tend to rationalize less and decouple more when they perceive that the magnitude of the transgression as egregious. Interestingly, consumers who are highly identified with the brand are less affected by the transgression and tend to be more supportive toward the brand by engaging in rationalization mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-020-04610-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2594890656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2594890656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhBThZ4tqUcWI7G27tisJKRa3a5WxNnEnqKrWLna0oJ16DN-hz9UlwdpG41Qd75Pn-fyz_jL0XcCQA6o9JgFKigBIKkFpAoV6whVB1VYBu6pdsAULXhVRSvmZvUrqBvJSQC_a4uSa-9v24JW-Jh56fxwG9-4WTCz49_f7DN_iTH98H1-FMXES0k7OUePB8lZHtLcUdd0LXeO9C_MRnz8sw7uy-hYgjvyRMwTs_8Ksp4kSDo3TIL8LoslfurzsKYxgeDjn6jp_Eec93fnJ97s9Pecte9TgmevfvPGDfTz9vVl-Ls_Mv69XxWWErVU5Fp9sGqJUabIuVkm3-ErSqFHZJJYkuF123tHUPbVVCpRsNEpXEphYWQTbVAfuw972L4ceW0mRuwjb6PNKUqpHLBrTSmSr3lI0hpUi9uYvuFuODEWDmRMw-EZPHm10iRmVRtRelDPuB4n_rZ1R_AQw-kfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2594890656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Matute, Jorge ; Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis ; Palau-Saumell, Ramon</creator><creatorcontrib>Matute, Jorge ; Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis ; Palau-Saumell, Ramon</creatorcontrib><description>This study adopts moral reasoning strategies (moral rationalization and decoupling) to investigate why consumers support companies involved in ethical transgressions. Drawing on several cases of real multinationals publicly involved in tax avoidance practices, it aims to demonstrate that moral rationalization and moral decoupling depend not only on how consumers perceive the magnitude of the transgression, but also on their individual differences, such as political ideology and brand identification. A quantitative study with a sample of 3989 consumers of five different focal brands was employed to test a set of hypotheses. Findings reveal that moral decoupling directly (and indirectly through performance judgments) explains purchase intentions. However, rationalization only explains behavioral intentions if it leads to a reduction in the perceived immorality of the action. Furthermore, the study reveals significant differences across personal values. Left-leaning individuals tend to rationalize less and decouple more when they perceive that the magnitude of the transgression as egregious. Interestingly, consumers who are highly identified with the brand are less affected by the transgression and tend to be more supportive toward the brand by engaging in rationalization mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04610-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Avoidance behavior ; Brand identification ; Brands ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Education ; Ethics ; Individual differences ; Management ; Moral judgment ; Morality ; Multinational corporations ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Political ideologies ; Purchase intention ; Quality of Life Research ; Rationalization ; Tax avoidance ; Taxation ; Transgression ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2021-11, Vol.174 (2), p.369-386</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2402-327X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2594890656/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2594890656?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,11715,11933,12874,12888,21415,21422,27899,27957,27958,33258,33646,34020,34810,36085,36095,43768,43983,44235,44396,44398,74578,74825,75085,75250,75252</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matute, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palau-Saumell, Ramon</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>This study adopts moral reasoning strategies (moral rationalization and decoupling) to investigate why consumers support companies involved in ethical transgressions. Drawing on several cases of real multinationals publicly involved in tax avoidance practices, it aims to demonstrate that moral rationalization and moral decoupling depend not only on how consumers perceive the magnitude of the transgression, but also on their individual differences, such as political ideology and brand identification. A quantitative study with a sample of 3989 consumers of five different focal brands was employed to test a set of hypotheses. Findings reveal that moral decoupling directly (and indirectly through performance judgments) explains purchase intentions. However, rationalization only explains behavioral intentions if it leads to a reduction in the perceived immorality of the action. Furthermore, the study reveals significant differences across personal values. Left-leaning individuals tend to rationalize less and decouple more when they perceive that the magnitude of the transgression as egregious. Interestingly, consumers who are highly identified with the brand are less affected by the transgression and tend to be more supportive toward the brand by engaging in rationalization mechanisms.</description><subject>Avoidance behavior</subject><subject>Brand identification</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political ideologies</subject><subject>Purchase intention</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Rationalization</subject><subject>Tax avoidance</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Transgression</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhBThZ4tqUcWI7G27tisJKRa3a5WxNnEnqKrWLna0oJ16DN-hz9UlwdpG41Qd75Pn-fyz_jL0XcCQA6o9JgFKigBIKkFpAoV6whVB1VYBu6pdsAULXhVRSvmZvUrqBvJSQC_a4uSa-9v24JW-Jh56fxwG9-4WTCz49_f7DN_iTH98H1-FMXES0k7OUePB8lZHtLcUdd0LXeO9C_MRnz8sw7uy-hYgjvyRMwTs_8Ksp4kSDo3TIL8LoslfurzsKYxgeDjn6jp_Eec93fnJ97s9Pecte9TgmevfvPGDfTz9vVl-Ls_Mv69XxWWErVU5Fp9sGqJUabIuVkm3-ErSqFHZJJYkuF123tHUPbVVCpRsNEpXEphYWQTbVAfuw972L4ceW0mRuwjb6PNKUqpHLBrTSmSr3lI0hpUi9uYvuFuODEWDmRMw-EZPHm10iRmVRtRelDPuB4n_rZ1R_AQw-kfo</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Matute, Jorge</creator><creator>Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis</creator><creator>Palau-Saumell, Ramon</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-327X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification</title><author>Matute, Jorge ; Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis ; Palau-Saumell, Ramon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Avoidance behavior</topic><topic>Brand identification</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political ideologies</topic><topic>Purchase intention</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Rationalization</topic><topic>Tax avoidance</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Transgression</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matute, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palau-Saumell, Ramon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Psychology Journals (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matute, Jorge</au><au>Sánchez-Torelló, José Luis</au><au>Palau-Saumell, Ramon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>369-386</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>This study adopts moral reasoning strategies (moral rationalization and decoupling) to investigate why consumers support companies involved in ethical transgressions. Drawing on several cases of real multinationals publicly involved in tax avoidance practices, it aims to demonstrate that moral rationalization and moral decoupling depend not only on how consumers perceive the magnitude of the transgression, but also on their individual differences, such as political ideology and brand identification. A quantitative study with a sample of 3989 consumers of five different focal brands was employed to test a set of hypotheses. Findings reveal that moral decoupling directly (and indirectly through performance judgments) explains purchase intentions. However, rationalization only explains behavioral intentions if it leads to a reduction in the perceived immorality of the action. Furthermore, the study reveals significant differences across personal values. Left-leaning individuals tend to rationalize less and decouple more when they perceive that the magnitude of the transgression as egregious. Interestingly, consumers who are highly identified with the brand are less affected by the transgression and tend to be more supportive toward the brand by engaging in rationalization mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-020-04610-5</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-327X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2021-11, Vol.174 (2), p.369-386
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2594890656
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Collection; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PAIS Index; Springer Link; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Avoidance behavior
Brand identification
Brands
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Consumer behavior
Consumers
Education
Ethics
Individual differences
Management
Moral judgment
Morality
Multinational corporations
Original Paper
Philosophy
Political ideologies
Purchase intention
Quality of Life Research
Rationalization
Tax avoidance
Taxation
Transgression
Values
title The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T15%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Organizations%E2%80%99%20Tax%20Avoidance%20Practices%20on%20Consumers%E2%80%99%20Behavior:%20The%20Role%20of%20Moral%20Reasoning%20Strategies,%20Political%20Ideology,%20and%20Brand%20Identification&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Matute,%20Jorge&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=369-386&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-020-04610-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2594890656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6b90eb460cba354b020ac521c8e2e1d21cdd8c7f0b320369604a54a971ca0493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2594890656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true