Loading…

Attack and aggregation of a major squash pest: Parsing the role of plant chemistry and beetle pheromones across spatial scales

Successful management of insect crop pests requires an understanding of the cues and spatial scales at which they function to affect rates of attack of preferred and non‐preferred host plants. A long‐standing conceptual framework in insect–plant ecology posits that there is hierarchical structure sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of applied ecology 2020-08, Vol.57 (8), p.1442-1451
Main Authors: Brzozowski, Lauren J., Gardner, Jeffrey, Hoffmann, Michael P., Kessler, André, Agrawal, Anurag A., Mazourek, Michael, Kaplan, Ian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53
container_end_page 1451
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1442
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 57
creator Brzozowski, Lauren J.
Gardner, Jeffrey
Hoffmann, Michael P.
Kessler, André
Agrawal, Anurag A.
Mazourek, Michael
Kaplan, Ian
description Successful management of insect crop pests requires an understanding of the cues and spatial scales at which they function to affect rates of attack of preferred and non‐preferred host plants. A long‐standing conceptual framework in insect–plant ecology posits that there is hierarchical structure spanning host location, acceptance and attack that could be exploited for integrated pest management. We investigated how plant‐ and insect‐derived chemical cues affect successive decisions of host choice in aggregating insects, and tested predictions in the Cucurbita pepo–Acalymma vittatum system. Acalymma vittatum is an aggregating specialist beetle pest that strongly prefers zucchini (C. p. pepo) to summer squash (C. p. ovifera), two independent domesticates of C. pepo. We hypothesized that subspecies‐specific plant traits, especially volatile cues, interact with the male‐produced aggregation pheromone to amplify beetle preference for C. p. pepo. Differential beetle attack of C. pepo subspecies in the field is not determined by plant traits that affect host finding or differential aggregation due to pheromones: across two years, beetles had strong density‐dependent attraction to both subspecies when male beetles were feeding, and no interactions between plant volatiles and the male‐produced pheromone were detected. In the absence of male pheromone emission, beetles were equally unattracted to plants with or without beetle feeding. In contrast, plant traits that mediate insect acceptance appear to underlie differences in preference. At a local scale, beetles did not accept and emigrated from C. p. ovifera compared to C. p. pepo. Distinct volatile emissions were observed between subspecies, but further work is needed to identify if these volatiles promote emigration. Synthesis and applications. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolate
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.13689
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429612530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429612530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUDtPwzAQthBIlMLMaok5rR-JE7NVVXkJiQ4wW5fEeZQkTu1UqAu_HadBrNxwd7r7vnt8CN1SsqDelpSLKGBChAufJfIMzf4q52hGCKNBIgm9RFfO7QghMuJ8hr5XwwDZJ4Yux1CWVpcw1KbDpsCAW9gZi93-AK7CvXbDPd6CdXVX4qHS2JpGj8C-gW7AWaXb2g32eJqVaj34bl9pa1rTaYchs8Y57Hq_ABrsMmi0u0YXBTRO3_zGOfp42Lyvn4LXt8fn9eo1yHgkZJDKEFgeQSJiIrJChHGakzCToUg5hZRSHbMUGGc0LvynkMQ6Jql3QHgh84jP0d00t7dmf_CfqJ052M6vVCxkUlAWceJRywl1OtXqQvW2bsEeFSVqFFmNkqpRUnUS2TOiifFVN_r4H1y9bDcT7wcVB38w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429612530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attack and aggregation of a major squash pest: Parsing the role of plant chemistry and beetle pheromones across spatial scales</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Brzozowski, Lauren J. ; Gardner, Jeffrey ; Hoffmann, Michael P. ; Kessler, André ; Agrawal, Anurag A. ; Mazourek, Michael ; Kaplan, Ian</creator><contributor>Kaplan, Ian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Lauren J. ; Gardner, Jeffrey ; Hoffmann, Michael P. ; Kessler, André ; Agrawal, Anurag A. ; Mazourek, Michael ; Kaplan, Ian ; Kaplan, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>Successful management of insect crop pests requires an understanding of the cues and spatial scales at which they function to affect rates of attack of preferred and non‐preferred host plants. A long‐standing conceptual framework in insect–plant ecology posits that there is hierarchical structure spanning host location, acceptance and attack that could be exploited for integrated pest management. We investigated how plant‐ and insect‐derived chemical cues affect successive decisions of host choice in aggregating insects, and tested predictions in the Cucurbita pepo–Acalymma vittatum system. Acalymma vittatum is an aggregating specialist beetle pest that strongly prefers zucchini (C. p. pepo) to summer squash (C. p. ovifera), two independent domesticates of C. pepo. We hypothesized that subspecies‐specific plant traits, especially volatile cues, interact with the male‐produced aggregation pheromone to amplify beetle preference for C. p. pepo. Differential beetle attack of C. pepo subspecies in the field is not determined by plant traits that affect host finding or differential aggregation due to pheromones: across two years, beetles had strong density‐dependent attraction to both subspecies when male beetles were feeding, and no interactions between plant volatiles and the male‐produced pheromone were detected. In the absence of male pheromone emission, beetles were equally unattracted to plants with or without beetle feeding. In contrast, plant traits that mediate insect acceptance appear to underlie differences in preference. At a local scale, beetles did not accept and emigrated from C. p. ovifera compared to C. p. pepo. Distinct volatile emissions were observed between subspecies, but further work is needed to identify if these volatiles promote emigration. Synthesis and applications. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. Editor's Choice</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acalymma vittatum ; Aggregation pheromone ; Agricultural practices ; Allelochemicals ; Beetles ; Chemical stimuli ; Coleoptera ; Cucurbita pepo ; Cultivars ; Emigration ; Farm management ; Farms ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; host acceptance ; Host location ; Host plants ; Insect ecology ; Insects ; Integrated pest management ; Pest control ; Pests ; Pheromone emission ; Pheromones ; Plant breeding ; plant volatiles ; plant–herbivore interactions ; squash ; Volatile compounds ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2020-08, Vol.57 (8), p.1442-1451</ispartof><rights>2020 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2285-7692 ; 0000-0003-0095-1220 ; 0000-0002-1797-7518 ; 0000-0002-9936-7106</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13689$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13689$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kaplan, Ian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Lauren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Anurag A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazourek, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Attack and aggregation of a major squash pest: Parsing the role of plant chemistry and beetle pheromones across spatial scales</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Successful management of insect crop pests requires an understanding of the cues and spatial scales at which they function to affect rates of attack of preferred and non‐preferred host plants. A long‐standing conceptual framework in insect–plant ecology posits that there is hierarchical structure spanning host location, acceptance and attack that could be exploited for integrated pest management. We investigated how plant‐ and insect‐derived chemical cues affect successive decisions of host choice in aggregating insects, and tested predictions in the Cucurbita pepo–Acalymma vittatum system. Acalymma vittatum is an aggregating specialist beetle pest that strongly prefers zucchini (C. p. pepo) to summer squash (C. p. ovifera), two independent domesticates of C. pepo. We hypothesized that subspecies‐specific plant traits, especially volatile cues, interact with the male‐produced aggregation pheromone to amplify beetle preference for C. p. pepo. Differential beetle attack of C. pepo subspecies in the field is not determined by plant traits that affect host finding or differential aggregation due to pheromones: across two years, beetles had strong density‐dependent attraction to both subspecies when male beetles were feeding, and no interactions between plant volatiles and the male‐produced pheromone were detected. In the absence of male pheromone emission, beetles were equally unattracted to plants with or without beetle feeding. In contrast, plant traits that mediate insect acceptance appear to underlie differences in preference. At a local scale, beetles did not accept and emigrated from C. p. ovifera compared to C. p. pepo. Distinct volatile emissions were observed between subspecies, but further work is needed to identify if these volatiles promote emigration. Synthesis and applications. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. Editor's Choice</description><subject>Acalymma vittatum</subject><subject>Aggregation pheromone</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Allelochemicals</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Chemical stimuli</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Cucurbita pepo</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>host acceptance</subject><subject>Host location</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Pheromone emission</subject><subject>Pheromones</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>plant volatiles</subject><subject>plant–herbivore interactions</subject><subject>squash</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUDtPwzAQthBIlMLMaok5rR-JE7NVVXkJiQ4wW5fEeZQkTu1UqAu_HadBrNxwd7r7vnt8CN1SsqDelpSLKGBChAufJfIMzf4q52hGCKNBIgm9RFfO7QghMuJ8hr5XwwDZJ4Yux1CWVpcw1KbDpsCAW9gZi93-AK7CvXbDPd6CdXVX4qHS2JpGj8C-gW7AWaXb2g32eJqVaj34bl9pa1rTaYchs8Y57Hq_ABrsMmi0u0YXBTRO3_zGOfp42Lyvn4LXt8fn9eo1yHgkZJDKEFgeQSJiIrJChHGakzCToUg5hZRSHbMUGGc0LvynkMQ6Jql3QHgh84jP0d00t7dmf_CfqJ052M6vVCxkUlAWceJRywl1OtXqQvW2bsEeFSVqFFmNkqpRUnUS2TOiifFVN_r4H1y9bDcT7wcVB38w</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Brzozowski, Lauren J.</creator><creator>Gardner, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Michael P.</creator><creator>Kessler, André</creator><creator>Agrawal, Anurag A.</creator><creator>Mazourek, Michael</creator><creator>Kaplan, Ian</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-7692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-1220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-7518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-7106</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Attack and aggregation of a major squash pest: Parsing the role of plant chemistry and beetle pheromones across spatial scales</title><author>Brzozowski, Lauren J. ; Gardner, Jeffrey ; Hoffmann, Michael P. ; Kessler, André ; Agrawal, Anurag A. ; Mazourek, Michael ; Kaplan, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acalymma vittatum</topic><topic>Aggregation pheromone</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Allelochemicals</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Chemical stimuli</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Cucurbita pepo</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>host acceptance</topic><topic>Host location</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Pheromone emission</topic><topic>Pheromones</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>plant volatiles</topic><topic>plant–herbivore interactions</topic><topic>squash</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brzozowski, Lauren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Anurag A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazourek, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brzozowski, Lauren J.</au><au>Gardner, Jeffrey</au><au>Hoffmann, Michael P.</au><au>Kessler, André</au><au>Agrawal, Anurag A.</au><au>Mazourek, Michael</au><au>Kaplan, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attack and aggregation of a major squash pest: Parsing the role of plant chemistry and beetle pheromones across spatial scales</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1442</spage><epage>1451</epage><pages>1442-1451</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Successful management of insect crop pests requires an understanding of the cues and spatial scales at which they function to affect rates of attack of preferred and non‐preferred host plants. A long‐standing conceptual framework in insect–plant ecology posits that there is hierarchical structure spanning host location, acceptance and attack that could be exploited for integrated pest management. We investigated how plant‐ and insect‐derived chemical cues affect successive decisions of host choice in aggregating insects, and tested predictions in the Cucurbita pepo–Acalymma vittatum system. Acalymma vittatum is an aggregating specialist beetle pest that strongly prefers zucchini (C. p. pepo) to summer squash (C. p. ovifera), two independent domesticates of C. pepo. We hypothesized that subspecies‐specific plant traits, especially volatile cues, interact with the male‐produced aggregation pheromone to amplify beetle preference for C. p. pepo. Differential beetle attack of C. pepo subspecies in the field is not determined by plant traits that affect host finding or differential aggregation due to pheromones: across two years, beetles had strong density‐dependent attraction to both subspecies when male beetles were feeding, and no interactions between plant volatiles and the male‐produced pheromone were detected. In the absence of male pheromone emission, beetles were equally unattracted to plants with or without beetle feeding. In contrast, plant traits that mediate insect acceptance appear to underlie differences in preference. At a local scale, beetles did not accept and emigrated from C. p. ovifera compared to C. p. pepo. Distinct volatile emissions were observed between subspecies, but further work is needed to identify if these volatiles promote emigration. Synthesis and applications. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. By dissecting pest preference during successive host choice decisions, we isolated a trait with implications for pest management. Beetles on cucurbits can be managed by employing cultivars with differential susceptibility (e.g. trap cropping), and the mechanistic knowledge presented here informs best practices and limitations for on‐farm applications. More broadly, pest management in diversified cropping systems can be enhanced through understanding how plant preference gradients affect herbivore movement and behaviour, and plant breeders can target traits to reduce herbivory in such systems. Editor's Choice</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.13689</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-7692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-1220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-7518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-7106</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2020-08, Vol.57 (8), p.1442-1451
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2429612530
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Acalymma vittatum
Aggregation pheromone
Agricultural practices
Allelochemicals
Beetles
Chemical stimuli
Coleoptera
Cucurbita pepo
Cultivars
Emigration
Farm management
Farms
Herbivores
Herbivory
host acceptance
Host location
Host plants
Insect ecology
Insects
Integrated pest management
Pest control
Pests
Pheromone emission
Pheromones
Plant breeding
plant volatiles
plant–herbivore interactions
squash
Volatile compounds
Volatiles
title Attack and aggregation of a major squash pest: Parsing the role of plant chemistry and beetle pheromones across spatial scales
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T16%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attack%20and%20aggregation%20of%20a%20major%20squash%20pest:%20Parsing%20the%20role%20of%20plant%20chemistry%20and%20beetle%20pheromones%20across%20spatial%20scales&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Brzozowski,%20Lauren%20J.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1442&rft.epage=1451&rft.pages=1442-1451&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13689&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429612530%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-b94a2d5a86706cf647bd04c946b31ab11e72ba23217f002a87e70b7e7a03f9d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429612530&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true