Loading…
Fingerprinting the Late Pleistocene tephras of Ciomadul volcano, eastern–central Europe
ABSTRACT Late Pleistocene tephras derived by large explosive volcanic eruptions are widespread in the Mediterranean and surrounding areas. They are important isochronous markers in stratigraphic sections and therefore it is important to constrain their sources. We report here tephrochronology result...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of quaternary science 2020-01, Vol.35 (1-2), p.232-244 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783 |
| container_end_page | 244 |
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 232 |
| container_title | Journal of quaternary science |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Harangi, Szabolcs Molnár, Kata Schmitt, Axel K. Dunkl, István Seghedi, Ioan Novothny, Ágnes Molnár, Mihály Kiss, Balázs Ntaflos, Theodoros Mason, Paul R. D. Lukács, Réka |
| description | ABSTRACT
Late Pleistocene tephras derived by large explosive volcanic eruptions are widespread in the Mediterranean and surrounding areas. They are important isochronous markers in stratigraphic sections and therefore it is important to constrain their sources. We report here tephrochronology results using multiple criteria to characterize the volcanic products of the Late Pleistocene Ciomadul volcano in eastern–central Europe. This dacitic volcano had an explosive eruption stage between 57 and 30 ka. The specific petrological character (ash texture, occurrence of plagioclase and amphibole phenocrysts and their compositions), the high‐K calc‐alkaline major element composition and particularly the distinct trace element characteristics provide a strong fingerprint of the Ciomadul volcano. This can be used for correlating tephra and cryptotephra occurrences within this timeframe. Remarkably, during this period several volcanic eruptions produced tephras with similar glass major element composition. However, they differ from Ciomadul tephras by glass trace element abundances, ratios of strongly incompatible trace elements and their mineral cargo that serve as discrimination tools. We used (U‐Th)/He zircon dates combined with U‐Th in situ rim dates along with luminescence and radiocarbon dating to constrain the age of the explosive eruptions of Ciomadul that yielded distal tephra layers but lack of identified proximal deposits. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jqs.3177 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2347352866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2347352866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1KAzEQB_AgCtYq-AgBLx7cmmTTZPcopfWDgop68BSy2Vm7ZbvZJlmlN9_BN_RJTK1XTzMwP2aYP0KnlIwoIexyufajlEq5hwaU5HlCOZX7aECYkElGZX6IjrxfEhJnggzQ66xu38B1rm5D7HBYAJ7rAPihgdoHa6AFHKBbOO2xrfCktitd9g1-t43Rrb3AoH0A135_fkUbnG7wtHe2g2N0UOnGw8lfHaKX2fR5cpPM769vJ1fzxKRMykRwxvKiMkamnFHNK1GBgLwYAzcARHKeUj2mWgMUZZmZUjKe01JUsjSkkFk6RGe7vZ2z6x58UEvbuzaeVCzlMh2zTIioznfKOOu9g0rFl1fabRQlahucisGpbXCRJjv6UTew-depu8enX_8DOaFxVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2347352866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fingerprinting the Late Pleistocene tephras of Ciomadul volcano, eastern–central Europe</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Harangi, Szabolcs ; Molnár, Kata ; Schmitt, Axel K. ; Dunkl, István ; Seghedi, Ioan ; Novothny, Ágnes ; Molnár, Mihály ; Kiss, Balázs ; Ntaflos, Theodoros ; Mason, Paul R. D. ; Lukács, Réka</creator><creatorcontrib>Harangi, Szabolcs ; Molnár, Kata ; Schmitt, Axel K. ; Dunkl, István ; Seghedi, Ioan ; Novothny, Ágnes ; Molnár, Mihály ; Kiss, Balázs ; Ntaflos, Theodoros ; Mason, Paul R. D. ; Lukács, Réka</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Late Pleistocene tephras derived by large explosive volcanic eruptions are widespread in the Mediterranean and surrounding areas. They are important isochronous markers in stratigraphic sections and therefore it is important to constrain their sources. We report here tephrochronology results using multiple criteria to characterize the volcanic products of the Late Pleistocene Ciomadul volcano in eastern–central Europe. This dacitic volcano had an explosive eruption stage between 57 and 30 ka. The specific petrological character (ash texture, occurrence of plagioclase and amphibole phenocrysts and their compositions), the high‐K calc‐alkaline major element composition and particularly the distinct trace element characteristics provide a strong fingerprint of the Ciomadul volcano. This can be used for correlating tephra and cryptotephra occurrences within this timeframe. Remarkably, during this period several volcanic eruptions produced tephras with similar glass major element composition. However, they differ from Ciomadul tephras by glass trace element abundances, ratios of strongly incompatible trace elements and their mineral cargo that serve as discrimination tools. We used (U‐Th)/He zircon dates combined with U‐Th in situ rim dates along with luminescence and radiocarbon dating to constrain the age of the explosive eruptions of Ciomadul that yielded distal tephra layers but lack of identified proximal deposits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-8179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jqs.3177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>(U‐Th)/He zircon dating ; Ciomadul volcano ; Composition ; distal tephra ; Fingerprinting ; Glass ; Magma ; Multiple criterion ; petrochemical fingerprint ; Plagioclase ; Pleistocene ; Radiocarbon dating ; Radiometric dating ; Stratigraphy ; tephrochronology ; Trace elements ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanoes ; Zircon</subject><ispartof>Journal of quaternary science, 2020-01, Vol.35 (1-2), p.232-244</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2372-4581 ; 0000-0002-2338-4209</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjqs.3177$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjqs.3177$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harangi, Szabolcs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár, Kata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Axel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunkl, István</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seghedi, Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novothny, Ágnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár, Mihály</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiss, Balázs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntaflos, Theodoros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Paul R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukács, Réka</creatorcontrib><title>Fingerprinting the Late Pleistocene tephras of Ciomadul volcano, eastern–central Europe</title><title>Journal of quaternary science</title><description>ABSTRACT
Late Pleistocene tephras derived by large explosive volcanic eruptions are widespread in the Mediterranean and surrounding areas. They are important isochronous markers in stratigraphic sections and therefore it is important to constrain their sources. We report here tephrochronology results using multiple criteria to characterize the volcanic products of the Late Pleistocene Ciomadul volcano in eastern–central Europe. This dacitic volcano had an explosive eruption stage between 57 and 30 ka. The specific petrological character (ash texture, occurrence of plagioclase and amphibole phenocrysts and their compositions), the high‐K calc‐alkaline major element composition and particularly the distinct trace element characteristics provide a strong fingerprint of the Ciomadul volcano. This can be used for correlating tephra and cryptotephra occurrences within this timeframe. Remarkably, during this period several volcanic eruptions produced tephras with similar glass major element composition. However, they differ from Ciomadul tephras by glass trace element abundances, ratios of strongly incompatible trace elements and their mineral cargo that serve as discrimination tools. We used (U‐Th)/He zircon dates combined with U‐Th in situ rim dates along with luminescence and radiocarbon dating to constrain the age of the explosive eruptions of Ciomadul that yielded distal tephra layers but lack of identified proximal deposits.</description><subject>(U‐Th)/He zircon dating</subject><subject>Ciomadul volcano</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>distal tephra</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>petrochemical fingerprint</subject><subject>Plagioclase</subject><subject>Pleistocene</subject><subject>Radiocarbon dating</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>tephrochronology</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><subject>Zircon</subject><issn>0267-8179</issn><issn>1099-1417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1KAzEQB_AgCtYq-AgBLx7cmmTTZPcopfWDgop68BSy2Vm7ZbvZJlmlN9_BN_RJTK1XTzMwP2aYP0KnlIwoIexyufajlEq5hwaU5HlCOZX7aECYkElGZX6IjrxfEhJnggzQ66xu38B1rm5D7HBYAJ7rAPihgdoHa6AFHKBbOO2xrfCktitd9g1-t43Rrb3AoH0A135_fkUbnG7wtHe2g2N0UOnGw8lfHaKX2fR5cpPM769vJ1fzxKRMykRwxvKiMkamnFHNK1GBgLwYAzcARHKeUj2mWgMUZZmZUjKe01JUsjSkkFk6RGe7vZ2z6x58UEvbuzaeVCzlMh2zTIioznfKOOu9g0rFl1fabRQlahucisGpbXCRJjv6UTew-depu8enX_8DOaFxVg</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Harangi, Szabolcs</creator><creator>Molnár, Kata</creator><creator>Schmitt, Axel K.</creator><creator>Dunkl, István</creator><creator>Seghedi, Ioan</creator><creator>Novothny, Ágnes</creator><creator>Molnár, Mihály</creator><creator>Kiss, Balázs</creator><creator>Ntaflos, Theodoros</creator><creator>Mason, Paul R. D.</creator><creator>Lukács, Réka</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-4581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2338-4209</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Fingerprinting the Late Pleistocene tephras of Ciomadul volcano, eastern–central Europe</title><author>Harangi, Szabolcs ; Molnár, Kata ; Schmitt, Axel K. ; Dunkl, István ; Seghedi, Ioan ; Novothny, Ágnes ; Molnár, Mihály ; Kiss, Balázs ; Ntaflos, Theodoros ; Mason, Paul R. D. ; Lukács, Réka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>(U‐Th)/He zircon dating</topic><topic>Ciomadul volcano</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>distal tephra</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>petrochemical fingerprint</topic><topic>Plagioclase</topic><topic>Pleistocene</topic><topic>Radiocarbon dating</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>tephrochronology</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><topic>Zircon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harangi, Szabolcs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár, Kata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Axel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunkl, István</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seghedi, Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novothny, Ágnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár, Mihály</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiss, Balázs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntaflos, Theodoros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Paul R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukács, Réka</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of quaternary science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harangi, Szabolcs</au><au>Molnár, Kata</au><au>Schmitt, Axel K.</au><au>Dunkl, István</au><au>Seghedi, Ioan</au><au>Novothny, Ágnes</au><au>Molnár, Mihály</au><au>Kiss, Balázs</au><au>Ntaflos, Theodoros</au><au>Mason, Paul R. D.</au><au>Lukács, Réka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fingerprinting the Late Pleistocene tephras of Ciomadul volcano, eastern–central Europe</atitle><jtitle>Journal of quaternary science</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>232-244</pages><issn>0267-8179</issn><eissn>1099-1417</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Late Pleistocene tephras derived by large explosive volcanic eruptions are widespread in the Mediterranean and surrounding areas. They are important isochronous markers in stratigraphic sections and therefore it is important to constrain their sources. We report here tephrochronology results using multiple criteria to characterize the volcanic products of the Late Pleistocene Ciomadul volcano in eastern–central Europe. This dacitic volcano had an explosive eruption stage between 57 and 30 ka. The specific petrological character (ash texture, occurrence of plagioclase and amphibole phenocrysts and their compositions), the high‐K calc‐alkaline major element composition and particularly the distinct trace element characteristics provide a strong fingerprint of the Ciomadul volcano. This can be used for correlating tephra and cryptotephra occurrences within this timeframe. Remarkably, during this period several volcanic eruptions produced tephras with similar glass major element composition. However, they differ from Ciomadul tephras by glass trace element abundances, ratios of strongly incompatible trace elements and their mineral cargo that serve as discrimination tools. We used (U‐Th)/He zircon dates combined with U‐Th in situ rim dates along with luminescence and radiocarbon dating to constrain the age of the explosive eruptions of Ciomadul that yielded distal tephra layers but lack of identified proximal deposits.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jqs.3177</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-4581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2338-4209</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0267-8179 |
| ispartof | Journal of quaternary science, 2020-01, Vol.35 (1-2), p.232-244 |
| issn | 0267-8179 1099-1417 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2347352866 |
| source | Wiley |
| subjects | (U‐Th)/He zircon dating Ciomadul volcano Composition distal tephra Fingerprinting Glass Magma Multiple criterion petrochemical fingerprint Plagioclase Pleistocene Radiocarbon dating Radiometric dating Stratigraphy tephrochronology Trace elements Volcanic activity Volcanic eruptions Volcanoes Zircon |
| title | Fingerprinting the Late Pleistocene tephras of Ciomadul volcano, eastern–central Europe |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T11%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fingerprinting%20the%20Late%20Pleistocene%20tephras%20of%20Ciomadul%20volcano,%20eastern%E2%80%93central%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20quaternary%20science&rft.au=Harangi,%20Szabolcs&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=232-244&rft.issn=0267-8179&rft.eissn=1099-1417&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jqs.3177&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2347352866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-64229bfcc73421a4f6fe6e9b5e4cee074431a51aaeebdd8cd72491d6f7dc0b783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2347352866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |