The probing behaviour of the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on two alternating hosts, maize and oat

Delphacodes kuscheli is the most important natural vector of Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) in Argentina, a Fijivirus (Reoviridae) that causes important economic losses on maize production. Although this planthopper does not breed successfully on maize, virus transmission occurs when adults migrate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Austral entomology 2019-08, Vol.58 (3), p.666-674
Main Authors: Brentassi, María E, Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R, Alvarez, Adriana E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural production
Corn
Delphacodes
Direct current
Economic impact
Economics
EPG technique
Extracellular
feeding
Hosts
Ingestion
Insects
Mechanics
MRCV
Penetration
Pest resistance
Phloem
Plant breeding
Plant resistance
resistance
Resistance factors
Viruses
Waveforms
Xylem
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53
container_end_page 674
container_issue 3
container_start_page 666
container_title Austral entomology
container_volume 58
creator Brentassi, María E
Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R
Alvarez, Adriana E
description Delphacodes kuscheli is the most important natural vector of Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) in Argentina, a Fijivirus (Reoviridae) that causes important economic losses on maize production. Although this planthopper does not breed successfully on maize, virus transmission occurs when adults migrate from oat, a winter host and a reservoir of the virus, to maize. Probing behaviour on both hosts was recorded and analysed using the direct current electrical penetration graph (DC‐EPG) system. Eight main waveforms were identified during probing behaviour by D. kuscheli. These waveforms were interpreted with reference to that described for delphacids and were related to putative probing activities: np (non‐penetration or non‐probe); N1, N2 and N3 (stylet pathway: penetration, salivation, stylet movement and extracellular activities near the phloem region); N4‐a (sieve element salivation); N4‐b (phloem sap ingestion); N5 (xylem activity); and N6 (derailed stylet mechanics). The EPG variables showed that on maize, D. kuscheli exhibited longer periods of non‐probe and longer time from first probe to first phloem activity, with a higher percentage of probing spent in stylet pathway and xylem phase than on oat. Furthermore, on maize, fewer insects showed phloem phase activities (N4‐a and N4‐b) and sustained phloem ingestion than on oat, and the time on phloem ingestion was shorter than on oat. The constrained behaviour of D. kuscheli on maize suggests that plant resistance factors may be involved.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aen.12383
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2281769379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2281769379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhYMoWGoP_oMFLxZMm91ku4m3UqsVil4qeAuzm4lJTbNxN7XUg7_drVFvzmUG3jdvmOd55zQYUVdjwHpEWRiHR16PBZz5VPD4-G-Onk-9gbXrIAgo41wI3vM-VwWSxmhZ1i9EYgHvpd4aonPSHoQK6rbQTYOG3GDVFKB0hpa8bq0qsCrJ5QI3ZdOigetfoMwAh0TXpN1pApXTamgP7oW2rb0iGyg_kECdEQ3tmXeSQ2Vx8NP73tPtfDVb-MvHu_vZdOkrlojQByUggJzmGQ0kijBnMZUyA5FlKookT4SQXCGilBwmcawYqDyKJ3mcMaDAw7530fm6V9-2aNt07d6s3cmUOS8xSUKROGrYUcpoaw3maWPKDZh9SoP0kHDqEk6_E3bsuGN3ZYX7_8F0On_oNr4A2At_ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281769379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The probing behaviour of the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on two alternating hosts, maize and oat</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Brentassi, María E ; Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R ; Alvarez, Adriana E</creator><creatorcontrib>Brentassi, María E ; Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R ; Alvarez, Adriana E</creatorcontrib><description>Delphacodes kuscheli is the most important natural vector of Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) in Argentina, a Fijivirus (Reoviridae) that causes important economic losses on maize production. Although this planthopper does not breed successfully on maize, virus transmission occurs when adults migrate from oat, a winter host and a reservoir of the virus, to maize. Probing behaviour on both hosts was recorded and analysed using the direct current electrical penetration graph (DC‐EPG) system. Eight main waveforms were identified during probing behaviour by D. kuscheli. These waveforms were interpreted with reference to that described for delphacids and were related to putative probing activities: np (non‐penetration or non‐probe); N1, N2 and N3 (stylet pathway: penetration, salivation, stylet movement and extracellular activities near the phloem region); N4‐a (sieve element salivation); N4‐b (phloem sap ingestion); N5 (xylem activity); and N6 (derailed stylet mechanics). The EPG variables showed that on maize, D. kuscheli exhibited longer periods of non‐probe and longer time from first probe to first phloem activity, with a higher percentage of probing spent in stylet pathway and xylem phase than on oat. Furthermore, on maize, fewer insects showed phloem phase activities (N4‐a and N4‐b) and sustained phloem ingestion than on oat, and the time on phloem ingestion was shorter than on oat. The constrained behaviour of D. kuscheli on maize suggests that plant resistance factors may be involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-174X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-1758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aen.12383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Corn ; Delphacodes ; Direct current ; Economic impact ; Economics ; EPG technique ; Extracellular ; feeding ; Hosts ; Ingestion ; Insects ; Mechanics ; MRCV ; Penetration ; Pest resistance ; Phloem ; Plant breeding ; Plant resistance ; resistance ; Resistance factors ; Viruses ; Waveforms ; Xylem</subject><ispartof>Austral entomology, 2019-08, Vol.58 (3), p.666-674</ispartof><rights>2019 Australian Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3019-9949</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faen.12383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faen.12383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brentassi, María E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Adriana E</creatorcontrib><title>The probing behaviour of the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on two alternating hosts, maize and oat</title><title>Austral entomology</title><description>Delphacodes kuscheli is the most important natural vector of Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) in Argentina, a Fijivirus (Reoviridae) that causes important economic losses on maize production. Although this planthopper does not breed successfully on maize, virus transmission occurs when adults migrate from oat, a winter host and a reservoir of the virus, to maize. Probing behaviour on both hosts was recorded and analysed using the direct current electrical penetration graph (DC‐EPG) system. Eight main waveforms were identified during probing behaviour by D. kuscheli. These waveforms were interpreted with reference to that described for delphacids and were related to putative probing activities: np (non‐penetration or non‐probe); N1, N2 and N3 (stylet pathway: penetration, salivation, stylet movement and extracellular activities near the phloem region); N4‐a (sieve element salivation); N4‐b (phloem sap ingestion); N5 (xylem activity); and N6 (derailed stylet mechanics). The EPG variables showed that on maize, D. kuscheli exhibited longer periods of non‐probe and longer time from first probe to first phloem activity, with a higher percentage of probing spent in stylet pathway and xylem phase than on oat. Furthermore, on maize, fewer insects showed phloem phase activities (N4‐a and N4‐b) and sustained phloem ingestion than on oat, and the time on phloem ingestion was shorter than on oat. The constrained behaviour of D. kuscheli on maize suggests that plant resistance factors may be involved.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Delphacodes</subject><subject>Direct current</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>EPG technique</subject><subject>Extracellular</subject><subject>feeding</subject><subject>Hosts</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>MRCV</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Phloem</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>Resistance factors</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><subject>Xylem</subject><issn>2052-174X</issn><issn>2052-1758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhYMoWGoP_oMFLxZMm91ku4m3UqsVil4qeAuzm4lJTbNxN7XUg7_drVFvzmUG3jdvmOd55zQYUVdjwHpEWRiHR16PBZz5VPD4-G-Onk-9gbXrIAgo41wI3vM-VwWSxmhZ1i9EYgHvpd4aonPSHoQK6rbQTYOG3GDVFKB0hpa8bq0qsCrJ5QI3ZdOigetfoMwAh0TXpN1pApXTamgP7oW2rb0iGyg_kECdEQ3tmXeSQ2Vx8NP73tPtfDVb-MvHu_vZdOkrlojQByUggJzmGQ0kijBnMZUyA5FlKookT4SQXCGilBwmcawYqDyKJ3mcMaDAw7530fm6V9-2aNt07d6s3cmUOS8xSUKROGrYUcpoaw3maWPKDZh9SoP0kHDqEk6_E3bsuGN3ZYX7_8F0On_oNr4A2At_ZA</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Brentassi, María E</creator><creator>Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R</creator><creator>Alvarez, Adriana E</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3019-9949</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>The probing behaviour of the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on two alternating hosts, maize and oat</title><author>Brentassi, María E ; Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R ; Alvarez, Adriana E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Delphacodes</topic><topic>Direct current</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>EPG technique</topic><topic>Extracellular</topic><topic>feeding</topic><topic>Hosts</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>MRCV</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Phloem</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>Resistance factors</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><topic>Xylem</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brentassi, María E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Adriana E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Austral entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brentassi, María E</au><au>Machado‐Assefh, Cristina R</au><au>Alvarez, Adriana E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The probing behaviour of the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on two alternating hosts, maize and oat</atitle><jtitle>Austral entomology</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>674</epage><pages>666-674</pages><issn>2052-174X</issn><eissn>2052-1758</eissn><abstract>Delphacodes kuscheli is the most important natural vector of Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) in Argentina, a Fijivirus (Reoviridae) that causes important economic losses on maize production. Although this planthopper does not breed successfully on maize, virus transmission occurs when adults migrate from oat, a winter host and a reservoir of the virus, to maize. Probing behaviour on both hosts was recorded and analysed using the direct current electrical penetration graph (DC‐EPG) system. Eight main waveforms were identified during probing behaviour by D. kuscheli. These waveforms were interpreted with reference to that described for delphacids and were related to putative probing activities: np (non‐penetration or non‐probe); N1, N2 and N3 (stylet pathway: penetration, salivation, stylet movement and extracellular activities near the phloem region); N4‐a (sieve element salivation); N4‐b (phloem sap ingestion); N5 (xylem activity); and N6 (derailed stylet mechanics). The EPG variables showed that on maize, D. kuscheli exhibited longer periods of non‐probe and longer time from first probe to first phloem activity, with a higher percentage of probing spent in stylet pathway and xylem phase than on oat. Furthermore, on maize, fewer insects showed phloem phase activities (N4‐a and N4‐b) and sustained phloem ingestion than on oat, and the time on phloem ingestion was shorter than on oat. The constrained behaviour of D. kuscheli on maize suggests that plant resistance factors may be involved.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/aen.12383</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3019-9949</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2052-174X
ispartof Austral entomology, 2019-08, Vol.58 (3), p.666-674
issn 2052-174X
2052-1758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2281769379
source Wiley
subjects Agricultural production
Corn
Delphacodes
Direct current
Economic impact
Economics
EPG technique
Extracellular
feeding
Hosts
Ingestion
Insects
Mechanics
MRCV
Penetration
Pest resistance
Phloem
Plant breeding
Plant resistance
resistance
Resistance factors
Viruses
Waveforms
Xylem
title The probing behaviour of the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on two alternating hosts, maize and oat
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T19%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20probing%20behaviour%20of%20the%20planthopper%20Delphacodes%20kuscheli%20(Hemiptera:%20Delphacidae)%20on%20two%20alternating%20hosts,%20maize%20and%20oat&rft.jtitle=Austral%20entomology&rft.au=Brentassi,%20Mar%C3%ADa%20E&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=674&rft.pages=666-674&rft.issn=2052-174X&rft.eissn=2052-1758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aen.12383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2281769379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2973-ac7a0af1fd10be73f281bbda7ddc44b5977b5ceeebb5a688c2acf486f8d2a1a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281769379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true