Loading…
Phytotoxic potential of essential oils from temperate climate plants against the germination of selected weeds and crops
This work aimed to assess the phytotoxic potential of 12 essential oils (EOs) collected from plants growing in natural or cultivated stands in a temperate climate, i.e., Achillea millefolium , Acorus calamus , Carum carvi , Chamomilla recutita , Foeniculum vulgare , Lavandula angustifolia , Melissa...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of pest science 2017-02, Vol.90 (1), p.407-419 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13 |
| container_end_page | 419 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 407 |
| container_title | Journal of pest science |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Synowiec, A. Kalemba, D. Drozdek, E. Bocianowski, J. |
| description | This work aimed to assess the phytotoxic potential of 12 essential oils (EOs) collected from plants growing in natural or cultivated stands in a temperate climate, i.e.,
Achillea millefolium
,
Acorus calamus
,
Carum carvi
,
Chamomilla recutita
,
Foeniculum vulgare
,
Lavandula angustifolia
,
Melissa officinalis
,
Mentha
×
piperita
,
Salvia officinalis
,
Solidago canadensis
,
Tanacetum vulgare
and
Thymus vulgaris.
The germination of four weed species, i.e.,
Amaranthus retroflexus
,
Avena fatua
,
Bromus secalinus
and
Centaurea cyanus
, was tested against all 12 EOs, and the germination of three crops, i.e.,
Avena sativa
,
Brassica napus
and
Zea mays
, was tested in the presence of six EOs. The influence of five doses of each EO against the germination of the tested species was assessed in a petri dish experiment. The results were analyzed using dose-response non-linear analysis, the effective dose (ED50) and multivariate analysis. As a result, four groups of EOs of contrasting phytotoxicity were distinguished. The most phytotoxic group consisted of four EOs, namely
C
.
carvi
,
T
.
vulgaris
,
M.
×
piperita
and
S
.
officinalis
. These EOs were composed mainly of oxygenated monoterpenes in a range of 64.1–93.3 %. The least phytotoxic group consisted of
S. canadensis
EO, composed mainly of mono- and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (92.3 %). In addition, principal component analysis indicated that the phytotoxic effect of the EOs also depended on the sensitivity of the plant species. Crops are more tolerant than weeds to the majority of EOs. Small-seeded species, namely
A. retroflexus
and
C. cyanus
, were the most sensitive to the EOs, while the kernels of
Z. mays
and the seeds of
A. fatua
were the most tolerant. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10340-016-0759-2 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259229958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880783293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYsoOI7-AHcB19U8mjZZyuALBnSh65BJb2Y6tE1NMjjz702pihtdnRv4zgn3niy7JPiaYFzdBIJZgXNMyhxXXOb0KJuRktC8qMry-Gfm4jQ7C2GLMZWYiVm2f9kcootu3xg0uAh9bHSLnEUQwvejaQOy3nUoQjeA1xGQaZtu1KHVfQxIr3XTh4jiBtAafNf0OjauH3MCtGAi1OgDoE5kXyPj3RDOsxOr2wAXXzrP3u7vXheP-fL54Wlxu8xNQXDMC-Alo2C0FNZSUwhGQBZWp3VWtsTWcF1JY7ipK8LAWlJZXhhek5WQLAmbZ1dT7uDd-w5CVFu38336UlHKJaVScvEfRYTAlWBUskSRiUobhODBqsGnO_iDIliNNaipBpVqUGMNiiYPnTwhsX06zq_kP02f50yMcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259229958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phytotoxic potential of essential oils from temperate climate plants against the germination of selected weeds and crops</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Synowiec, A. ; Kalemba, D. ; Drozdek, E. ; Bocianowski, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Synowiec, A. ; Kalemba, D. ; Drozdek, E. ; Bocianowski, J.</creatorcontrib><description>This work aimed to assess the phytotoxic potential of 12 essential oils (EOs) collected from plants growing in natural or cultivated stands in a temperate climate, i.e.,
Achillea millefolium
,
Acorus calamus
,
Carum carvi
,
Chamomilla recutita
,
Foeniculum vulgare
,
Lavandula angustifolia
,
Melissa officinalis
,
Mentha
×
piperita
,
Salvia officinalis
,
Solidago canadensis
,
Tanacetum vulgare
and
Thymus vulgaris.
The germination of four weed species, i.e.,
Amaranthus retroflexus
,
Avena fatua
,
Bromus secalinus
and
Centaurea cyanus
, was tested against all 12 EOs, and the germination of three crops, i.e.,
Avena sativa
,
Brassica napus
and
Zea mays
, was tested in the presence of six EOs. The influence of five doses of each EO against the germination of the tested species was assessed in a petri dish experiment. The results were analyzed using dose-response non-linear analysis, the effective dose (ED50) and multivariate analysis. As a result, four groups of EOs of contrasting phytotoxicity were distinguished. The most phytotoxic group consisted of four EOs, namely
C
.
carvi
,
T
.
vulgaris
,
M.
×
piperita
and
S
.
officinalis
. These EOs were composed mainly of oxygenated monoterpenes in a range of 64.1–93.3 %. The least phytotoxic group consisted of
S. canadensis
EO, composed mainly of mono- and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (92.3 %). In addition, principal component analysis indicated that the phytotoxic effect of the EOs also depended on the sensitivity of the plant species. Crops are more tolerant than weeds to the majority of EOs. Small-seeded species, namely
A. retroflexus
and
C. cyanus
, were the most sensitive to the EOs, while the kernels of
Z. mays
and the seeds of
A. fatua
were the most tolerant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10340-016-0759-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brassica ; Carum carvi ; Centaurea cyanus ; Crops ; Ecology ; Entomology ; Essential oils ; Forestry ; Germination ; Life Sciences ; Linear analysis ; Monoterpenes ; Multivariate analysis ; Nonlinear analysis ; Nonlinear response ; Oils & fats ; Original Paper ; Pest control ; Pests ; Phytotoxicity ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Principal components analysis ; Seeds ; Species ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Journal of pest science, 2017-02, Vol.90 (1), p.407-419</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Pest Science is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Synowiec, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalemba, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdek, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocianowski, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Phytotoxic potential of essential oils from temperate climate plants against the germination of selected weeds and crops</title><title>Journal of pest science</title><addtitle>J Pest Sci</addtitle><description>This work aimed to assess the phytotoxic potential of 12 essential oils (EOs) collected from plants growing in natural or cultivated stands in a temperate climate, i.e.,
Achillea millefolium
,
Acorus calamus
,
Carum carvi
,
Chamomilla recutita
,
Foeniculum vulgare
,
Lavandula angustifolia
,
Melissa officinalis
,
Mentha
×
piperita
,
Salvia officinalis
,
Solidago canadensis
,
Tanacetum vulgare
and
Thymus vulgaris.
The germination of four weed species, i.e.,
Amaranthus retroflexus
,
Avena fatua
,
Bromus secalinus
and
Centaurea cyanus
, was tested against all 12 EOs, and the germination of three crops, i.e.,
Avena sativa
,
Brassica napus
and
Zea mays
, was tested in the presence of six EOs. The influence of five doses of each EO against the germination of the tested species was assessed in a petri dish experiment. The results were analyzed using dose-response non-linear analysis, the effective dose (ED50) and multivariate analysis. As a result, four groups of EOs of contrasting phytotoxicity were distinguished. The most phytotoxic group consisted of four EOs, namely
C
.
carvi
,
T
.
vulgaris
,
M.
×
piperita
and
S
.
officinalis
. These EOs were composed mainly of oxygenated monoterpenes in a range of 64.1–93.3 %. The least phytotoxic group consisted of
S. canadensis
EO, composed mainly of mono- and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (92.3 %). In addition, principal component analysis indicated that the phytotoxic effect of the EOs also depended on the sensitivity of the plant species. Crops are more tolerant than weeds to the majority of EOs. Small-seeded species, namely
A. retroflexus
and
C. cyanus
, were the most sensitive to the EOs, while the kernels of
Z. mays
and the seeds of
A. fatua
were the most tolerant.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Carum carvi</subject><subject>Centaurea cyanus</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Essential oils</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Linear analysis</subject><subject>Monoterpenes</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear response</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>1612-4758</issn><issn>1612-4766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYsoOI7-AHcB19U8mjZZyuALBnSh65BJb2Y6tE1NMjjz702pihtdnRv4zgn3niy7JPiaYFzdBIJZgXNMyhxXXOb0KJuRktC8qMry-Gfm4jQ7C2GLMZWYiVm2f9kcootu3xg0uAh9bHSLnEUQwvejaQOy3nUoQjeA1xGQaZtu1KHVfQxIr3XTh4jiBtAafNf0OjauH3MCtGAi1OgDoE5kXyPj3RDOsxOr2wAXXzrP3u7vXheP-fL54Wlxu8xNQXDMC-Alo2C0FNZSUwhGQBZWp3VWtsTWcF1JY7ipK8LAWlJZXhhek5WQLAmbZ1dT7uDd-w5CVFu38336UlHKJaVScvEfRYTAlWBUskSRiUobhODBqsGnO_iDIliNNaipBpVqUGMNiiYPnTwhsX06zq_kP02f50yMcQ</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Synowiec, A.</creator><creator>Kalemba, D.</creator><creator>Drozdek, E.</creator><creator>Bocianowski, J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Phytotoxic potential of essential oils from temperate climate plants against the germination of selected weeds and crops</title><author>Synowiec, A. ; Kalemba, D. ; Drozdek, E. ; Bocianowski, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Carum carvi</topic><topic>Centaurea cyanus</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Essential oils</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Linear analysis</topic><topic>Monoterpenes</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear response</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Synowiec, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalemba, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdek, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocianowski, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of pest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Synowiec, A.</au><au>Kalemba, D.</au><au>Drozdek, E.</au><au>Bocianowski, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phytotoxic potential of essential oils from temperate climate plants against the germination of selected weeds and crops</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pest science</jtitle><stitle>J Pest Sci</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>407-419</pages><issn>1612-4758</issn><eissn>1612-4766</eissn><abstract>This work aimed to assess the phytotoxic potential of 12 essential oils (EOs) collected from plants growing in natural or cultivated stands in a temperate climate, i.e.,
Achillea millefolium
,
Acorus calamus
,
Carum carvi
,
Chamomilla recutita
,
Foeniculum vulgare
,
Lavandula angustifolia
,
Melissa officinalis
,
Mentha
×
piperita
,
Salvia officinalis
,
Solidago canadensis
,
Tanacetum vulgare
and
Thymus vulgaris.
The germination of four weed species, i.e.,
Amaranthus retroflexus
,
Avena fatua
,
Bromus secalinus
and
Centaurea cyanus
, was tested against all 12 EOs, and the germination of three crops, i.e.,
Avena sativa
,
Brassica napus
and
Zea mays
, was tested in the presence of six EOs. The influence of five doses of each EO against the germination of the tested species was assessed in a petri dish experiment. The results were analyzed using dose-response non-linear analysis, the effective dose (ED50) and multivariate analysis. As a result, four groups of EOs of contrasting phytotoxicity were distinguished. The most phytotoxic group consisted of four EOs, namely
C
.
carvi
,
T
.
vulgaris
,
M.
×
piperita
and
S
.
officinalis
. These EOs were composed mainly of oxygenated monoterpenes in a range of 64.1–93.3 %. The least phytotoxic group consisted of
S. canadensis
EO, composed mainly of mono- and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (92.3 %). In addition, principal component analysis indicated that the phytotoxic effect of the EOs also depended on the sensitivity of the plant species. Crops are more tolerant than weeds to the majority of EOs. Small-seeded species, namely
A. retroflexus
and
C. cyanus
, were the most sensitive to the EOs, while the kernels of
Z. mays
and the seeds of
A. fatua
were the most tolerant.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10340-016-0759-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1612-4758 |
| ispartof | Journal of pest science, 2017-02, Vol.90 (1), p.407-419 |
| issn | 1612-4758 1612-4766 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259229958 |
| source | Springer Link |
| subjects | Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Brassica Carum carvi Centaurea cyanus Crops Ecology Entomology Essential oils Forestry Germination Life Sciences Linear analysis Monoterpenes Multivariate analysis Nonlinear analysis Nonlinear response Oils & fats Original Paper Pest control Pests Phytotoxicity Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Plant species Principal components analysis Seeds Species Weeds |
| title | Phytotoxic potential of essential oils from temperate climate plants against the germination of selected weeds and crops |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T11%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phytotoxic%20potential%20of%20essential%20oils%20from%20temperate%20climate%20plants%20against%20the%20germination%20of%20selected%20weeds%20and%20crops&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pest%20science&rft.au=Synowiec,%20A.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=407-419&rft.issn=1612-4758&rft.eissn=1612-4766&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10340-016-0759-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880783293%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4e5632eca98ff2c4831e94fa612bf60fc5a79cc5cd713eff17f54c5d1b8935d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259229958&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |