Richards's equation and nonlinear mixed models applied to avian growth: why use them?

Postnatal growth is an important life‐history trait that varies widely across avian species, and several equations with a sigmoidal shape have been used to model it. Classical three‐parameter models have an inflection point fixed at a percentage of the upper asymptote which could be an unrealistic a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of avian biology 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.n/a
Main Authors: Svagelj, Walter S., Laich, Agustina Gómez, Quintana, Flavio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal behavior
asymptotic size
Body mass
Data processing
Frameworks
grouped data
Growth curves
growth models
Growth rate
Length
Life history
maximum growth rate
Modelling
nonlinear mixed models
random effects
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of avian biology
container_volume 50
creator Svagelj, Walter S.
Laich, Agustina Gómez
Quintana, Flavio
description Postnatal growth is an important life‐history trait that varies widely across avian species, and several equations with a sigmoidal shape have been used to model it. Classical three‐parameter models have an inflection point fixed at a percentage of the upper asymptote which could be an unrealistic assumption generating biased fits. The Richards model emerged as an interesting alternative because it includes an extra parameter that determines the location of the inflection point which can move freely along the growth curve. Recently, nonlinear mixed models (NLMM) have been used in modeling avian growth because these models can deal with a lack of independence among data as typically occurs with multiple measurements on the same individual or on groups of related individuals. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, logistic, U4 and Richards's equations modeling chick growth in the imperial shag Phalacrocorax atriceps. We modelled growth in commonly used morphological traits, including body mass, bill length, head length and tarsus length, and compared the performance of models by using NLMM. Estimated adult size, age at maximum growth and maximum growth rates markedly differed across models. Overall, the most consistent performance in estimated adult size was obtained by the Richards model that showed deviations from mean adult size within 5%. Based on AICc values, the Richards equation was the best model for all traits analyzed. For tarsus length, both Richards and U4 models provided indistinguishable fits because the relative inflection value estimated from the Richards model was very close to that assumed by the U4 model. Our results highlight the bias incurred by three‐parameter models when the assumed inflection placement deviates from that derived from data. Thus, the application of the Richards equation using the NLMM framework represents a flexible and powerful tool for the analysis of avian growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jav.01864
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2170884709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2170884709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKcH_4OAB_HQ7UubpKkXkeFPBoI48RaSNrUZbbMl7eb-e6vz6nd5-eDhfeFB6JzAhAw3XarNBIjg9ACNCAeIgIqPQzSCDEQkBEuP0UkISwBI4oyN0OLV5pXyRbgM2Kx71VnXYtUWuHVtbVujPG7slylw4wpTB6xWq9oOb-ew2ljV4k_vtl11jbfVDvfB4K4yzc0pOipVHczZX47R4v7ubfYYzV8enma38yiPs1REsWZUK0FJIVjGeKw1JHlONZhY0SxljBteUEqoMFxkhVYacq4o12VZiETpZIwu9r0r79a9CZ1cut63w6SMSQpC0BSygbraU7l3IXhTypW3jfI7SUD-WJODNflrbWCne3Zra7P7H5TPt-8kZqlIvgHiAm5z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170884709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Richards's equation and nonlinear mixed models applied to avian growth: why use them?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Svagelj, Walter S. ; Laich, Agustina Gómez ; Quintana, Flavio</creator><creatorcontrib>Svagelj, Walter S. ; Laich, Agustina Gómez ; Quintana, Flavio</creatorcontrib><description>Postnatal growth is an important life‐history trait that varies widely across avian species, and several equations with a sigmoidal shape have been used to model it. Classical three‐parameter models have an inflection point fixed at a percentage of the upper asymptote which could be an unrealistic assumption generating biased fits. The Richards model emerged as an interesting alternative because it includes an extra parameter that determines the location of the inflection point which can move freely along the growth curve. Recently, nonlinear mixed models (NLMM) have been used in modeling avian growth because these models can deal with a lack of independence among data as typically occurs with multiple measurements on the same individual or on groups of related individuals. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, logistic, U4 and Richards's equations modeling chick growth in the imperial shag Phalacrocorax atriceps. We modelled growth in commonly used morphological traits, including body mass, bill length, head length and tarsus length, and compared the performance of models by using NLMM. Estimated adult size, age at maximum growth and maximum growth rates markedly differed across models. Overall, the most consistent performance in estimated adult size was obtained by the Richards model that showed deviations from mean adult size within 5%. Based on AICc values, the Richards equation was the best model for all traits analyzed. For tarsus length, both Richards and U4 models provided indistinguishable fits because the relative inflection value estimated from the Richards model was very close to that assumed by the U4 model. Our results highlight the bias incurred by three‐parameter models when the assumed inflection placement deviates from that derived from data. Thus, the application of the Richards equation using the NLMM framework represents a flexible and powerful tool for the analysis of avian growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0908-8857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-048X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jav.01864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; asymptotic size ; Body mass ; Data processing ; Frameworks ; grouped data ; Growth curves ; growth models ; Growth rate ; Length ; Life history ; maximum growth rate ; Modelling ; nonlinear mixed models ; random effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of avian biology, 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Journal of Avian Biology © 2019 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8263-7974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjav.01864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjav.01864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svagelj, Walter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laich, Agustina Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Flavio</creatorcontrib><title>Richards's equation and nonlinear mixed models applied to avian growth: why use them?</title><title>Journal of avian biology</title><description>Postnatal growth is an important life‐history trait that varies widely across avian species, and several equations with a sigmoidal shape have been used to model it. Classical three‐parameter models have an inflection point fixed at a percentage of the upper asymptote which could be an unrealistic assumption generating biased fits. The Richards model emerged as an interesting alternative because it includes an extra parameter that determines the location of the inflection point which can move freely along the growth curve. Recently, nonlinear mixed models (NLMM) have been used in modeling avian growth because these models can deal with a lack of independence among data as typically occurs with multiple measurements on the same individual or on groups of related individuals. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, logistic, U4 and Richards's equations modeling chick growth in the imperial shag Phalacrocorax atriceps. We modelled growth in commonly used morphological traits, including body mass, bill length, head length and tarsus length, and compared the performance of models by using NLMM. Estimated adult size, age at maximum growth and maximum growth rates markedly differed across models. Overall, the most consistent performance in estimated adult size was obtained by the Richards model that showed deviations from mean adult size within 5%. Based on AICc values, the Richards equation was the best model for all traits analyzed. For tarsus length, both Richards and U4 models provided indistinguishable fits because the relative inflection value estimated from the Richards model was very close to that assumed by the U4 model. Our results highlight the bias incurred by three‐parameter models when the assumed inflection placement deviates from that derived from data. Thus, the application of the Richards equation using the NLMM framework represents a flexible and powerful tool for the analysis of avian growth.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>asymptotic size</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>grouped data</subject><subject>Growth curves</subject><subject>growth models</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>maximum growth rate</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>nonlinear mixed models</subject><subject>random effects</subject><issn>0908-8857</issn><issn>1600-048X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKcH_4OAB_HQ7UubpKkXkeFPBoI48RaSNrUZbbMl7eb-e6vz6nd5-eDhfeFB6JzAhAw3XarNBIjg9ACNCAeIgIqPQzSCDEQkBEuP0UkISwBI4oyN0OLV5pXyRbgM2Kx71VnXYtUWuHVtbVujPG7slylw4wpTB6xWq9oOb-ew2ljV4k_vtl11jbfVDvfB4K4yzc0pOipVHczZX47R4v7ubfYYzV8enma38yiPs1REsWZUK0FJIVjGeKw1JHlONZhY0SxljBteUEqoMFxkhVYacq4o12VZiETpZIwu9r0r79a9CZ1cut63w6SMSQpC0BSygbraU7l3IXhTypW3jfI7SUD-WJODNflrbWCne3Zra7P7H5TPt-8kZqlIvgHiAm5z</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Svagelj, Walter S.</creator><creator>Laich, Agustina Gómez</creator><creator>Quintana, Flavio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-7974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Richards's equation and nonlinear mixed models applied to avian growth: why use them?</title><author>Svagelj, Walter S. ; Laich, Agustina Gómez ; Quintana, Flavio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>asymptotic size</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>grouped data</topic><topic>Growth curves</topic><topic>growth models</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>maximum growth rate</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>nonlinear mixed models</topic><topic>random effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svagelj, Walter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laich, Agustina Gómez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Flavio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of avian biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svagelj, Walter S.</au><au>Laich, Agustina Gómez</au><au>Quintana, Flavio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Richards's equation and nonlinear mixed models applied to avian growth: why use them?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of avian biology</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0908-8857</issn><eissn>1600-048X</eissn><abstract>Postnatal growth is an important life‐history trait that varies widely across avian species, and several equations with a sigmoidal shape have been used to model it. Classical three‐parameter models have an inflection point fixed at a percentage of the upper asymptote which could be an unrealistic assumption generating biased fits. The Richards model emerged as an interesting alternative because it includes an extra parameter that determines the location of the inflection point which can move freely along the growth curve. Recently, nonlinear mixed models (NLMM) have been used in modeling avian growth because these models can deal with a lack of independence among data as typically occurs with multiple measurements on the same individual or on groups of related individuals. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, logistic, U4 and Richards's equations modeling chick growth in the imperial shag Phalacrocorax atriceps. We modelled growth in commonly used morphological traits, including body mass, bill length, head length and tarsus length, and compared the performance of models by using NLMM. Estimated adult size, age at maximum growth and maximum growth rates markedly differed across models. Overall, the most consistent performance in estimated adult size was obtained by the Richards model that showed deviations from mean adult size within 5%. Based on AICc values, the Richards equation was the best model for all traits analyzed. For tarsus length, both Richards and U4 models provided indistinguishable fits because the relative inflection value estimated from the Richards model was very close to that assumed by the U4 model. Our results highlight the bias incurred by three‐parameter models when the assumed inflection placement deviates from that derived from data. Thus, the application of the Richards equation using the NLMM framework represents a flexible and powerful tool for the analysis of avian growth.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jav.01864</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-7974</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0908-8857
ispartof Journal of avian biology, 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.n/a
issn 0908-8857
1600-048X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2170884709
source Wiley
subjects Animal behavior
asymptotic size
Body mass
Data processing
Frameworks
grouped data
Growth curves
growth models
Growth rate
Length
Life history
maximum growth rate
Modelling
nonlinear mixed models
random effects
title Richards's equation and nonlinear mixed models applied to avian growth: why use them?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T06%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Richards's%20equation%20and%20nonlinear%20mixed%20models%20applied%20to%20avian%20growth:%20why%20use%20them?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20avian%20biology&rft.au=Svagelj,%20Walter%20S.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0908-8857&rft.eissn=1600-048X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jav.01864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2170884709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-2b54ba841d859562bb03cc4b0e2a497556e6d44148e689dbab0c6a46bffd83ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170884709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true