Loading…

Beginning Words: Studying Teacher Research

Students are recognized as individuals whose very selves are informed by the complexity of their multiple and diverse backgrounds and experiences; teachers are seen as contributing players in the intricate dance of the teaching/learning moment. Despite numerous publications which speak to the value...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:English education 2004-07, Vol.36 (4), p.259-262
Main Authors: Fleischer, Cathy, Fox, Dana L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 262
container_issue 4
container_start_page 259
container_title English education
container_volume 36
creator Fleischer, Cathy
Fox, Dana L.
description Students are recognized as individuals whose very selves are informed by the complexity of their multiple and diverse backgrounds and experiences; teachers are seen as contributing players in the intricate dance of the teaching/learning moment. Despite numerous publications which speak to the value of this kind of study for school reform (such as Teacher Research for Better Schools by Mohr, Rogers, Sanford, Noccrino, MacLean, and Clawson [2003]); publications which lay out methodologies for conducting systematic teacher research (such as Hubbard and Power's [1999] Living the Questions); publications which model how teacher research becomes a vehicle for new theory building (such as Gallas' [2003] Imagination and Literacy); and even publications which pose critical questions about the teacher research (such as Cochran-Smith and Lytle's [1999] "The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later") teacher research-in some people's minds-is still seen as haphazard reflection: valuable for a teacher, perhaps, but certainly not something that benefits the profession in a large-scale way. Might we not have much to learn from systematic study of the forms and forums of research in which these professional practitioners work? (p. 111) What might happen if English educators took on Stock's charge and began more systematic study of the genre of teacher research?
doi_str_mv 10.58680/ee20042814
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214372122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40173166</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40173166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c852-12a0118a536e48a33455512772bea6515c869cdbad98f0afe6f2700c3088b2953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0M1Lw0AQBfBFFKzVk2eheFSiM7Mf2XizxS8oCBrwGDabSZugSd1tD_3vjVb09HjwYwaeEKcIV9oaC9fMBKDIotoTI8yUTIjQ7IsRAKSJJVCH4ijGFgBJaxqJiykvmq5rusXkrQ9VvJm8rjfV9rvn7PySw-SFI7vgl8fioHbvkU9-cyzy-7t89pjMnx-eZrfzxFtNCZIDROu0NKysk1JprZHSlEp2RqP21mS-Kl2V2RpczaamFMBLsLakTMuxON-dXYX-c8NxXbT9JnTDx4JQyZSQaECXO-RDH2PguliF5sOFbYFQ_ExR_E8x6LOdbuO6D39UAaYSjZFfBE9XhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214372122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beginning Words: Studying Teacher Research</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Fleischer, Cathy ; Fox, Dana L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleischer, Cathy ; Fox, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><description>Students are recognized as individuals whose very selves are informed by the complexity of their multiple and diverse backgrounds and experiences; teachers are seen as contributing players in the intricate dance of the teaching/learning moment. Despite numerous publications which speak to the value of this kind of study for school reform (such as Teacher Research for Better Schools by Mohr, Rogers, Sanford, Noccrino, MacLean, and Clawson [2003]); publications which lay out methodologies for conducting systematic teacher research (such as Hubbard and Power's [1999] Living the Questions); publications which model how teacher research becomes a vehicle for new theory building (such as Gallas' [2003] Imagination and Literacy); and even publications which pose critical questions about the teacher research (such as Cochran-Smith and Lytle's [1999] "The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later") teacher research-in some people's minds-is still seen as haphazard reflection: valuable for a teacher, perhaps, but certainly not something that benefits the profession in a large-scale way. Might we not have much to learn from systematic study of the forms and forums of research in which these professional practitioners work? (p. 111) What might happen if English educators took on Stock's charge and began more systematic study of the genre of teacher research?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-8204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.58680/ee20042814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English</publisher><subject>Beginning teachers ; Classrooms ; Control Groups ; Educational Change ; Educational research ; Educators ; Language arts ; Language teachers ; Learning ; Research studies ; School publications ; Snakes ; Students ; Studies ; Teacher Researchers ; Teachers ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>English education, 2004-07, Vol.36 (4), p.259-262</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The National Council of Teachers of English</rights><rights>Copyright National Council of Teachers of English Conference on College Composition and Communication Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214372122/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214372122?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,21406,21422,27957,27958,33646,33912,43768,43915,58593,58826,63018,63019,63034,74553,74578,74754</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleischer, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><title>Beginning Words: Studying Teacher Research</title><title>English education</title><description>Students are recognized as individuals whose very selves are informed by the complexity of their multiple and diverse backgrounds and experiences; teachers are seen as contributing players in the intricate dance of the teaching/learning moment. Despite numerous publications which speak to the value of this kind of study for school reform (such as Teacher Research for Better Schools by Mohr, Rogers, Sanford, Noccrino, MacLean, and Clawson [2003]); publications which lay out methodologies for conducting systematic teacher research (such as Hubbard and Power's [1999] Living the Questions); publications which model how teacher research becomes a vehicle for new theory building (such as Gallas' [2003] Imagination and Literacy); and even publications which pose critical questions about the teacher research (such as Cochran-Smith and Lytle's [1999] "The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later") teacher research-in some people's minds-is still seen as haphazard reflection: valuable for a teacher, perhaps, but certainly not something that benefits the profession in a large-scale way. Might we not have much to learn from systematic study of the forms and forums of research in which these professional practitioners work? (p. 111) What might happen if English educators took on Stock's charge and began more systematic study of the genre of teacher research?</description><subject>Beginning teachers</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Educators</subject><subject>Language arts</subject><subject>Language teachers</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Research studies</subject><subject>School publications</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Researchers</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>0007-8204</issn><issn>1943-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0M1Lw0AQBfBFFKzVk2eheFSiM7Mf2XizxS8oCBrwGDabSZugSd1tD_3vjVb09HjwYwaeEKcIV9oaC9fMBKDIotoTI8yUTIjQ7IsRAKSJJVCH4ijGFgBJaxqJiykvmq5rusXkrQ9VvJm8rjfV9rvn7PySw-SFI7vgl8fioHbvkU9-cyzy-7t89pjMnx-eZrfzxFtNCZIDROu0NKysk1JprZHSlEp2RqP21mS-Kl2V2RpczaamFMBLsLakTMuxON-dXYX-c8NxXbT9JnTDx4JQyZSQaECXO-RDH2PguliF5sOFbYFQ_ExR_E8x6LOdbuO6D39UAaYSjZFfBE9XhA</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Fleischer, Cathy</creator><creator>Fox, Dana L.</creator><general>National Council of Teachers of English</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Beginning Words: Studying Teacher Research</title><author>Fleischer, Cathy ; Fox, Dana L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c852-12a0118a536e48a33455512772bea6515c869cdbad98f0afe6f2700c3088b2953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Beginning teachers</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Educators</topic><topic>Language arts</topic><topic>Language teachers</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Research studies</topic><topic>School publications</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Researchers</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleischer, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>English education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleischer, Cathy</au><au>Fox, Dana L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beginning Words: Studying Teacher Research</atitle><jtitle>English education</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>259-262</pages><issn>0007-8204</issn><eissn>1943-2216</eissn><abstract>Students are recognized as individuals whose very selves are informed by the complexity of their multiple and diverse backgrounds and experiences; teachers are seen as contributing players in the intricate dance of the teaching/learning moment. Despite numerous publications which speak to the value of this kind of study for school reform (such as Teacher Research for Better Schools by Mohr, Rogers, Sanford, Noccrino, MacLean, and Clawson [2003]); publications which lay out methodologies for conducting systematic teacher research (such as Hubbard and Power's [1999] Living the Questions); publications which model how teacher research becomes a vehicle for new theory building (such as Gallas' [2003] Imagination and Literacy); and even publications which pose critical questions about the teacher research (such as Cochran-Smith and Lytle's [1999] "The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later") teacher research-in some people's minds-is still seen as haphazard reflection: valuable for a teacher, perhaps, but certainly not something that benefits the profession in a large-scale way. Might we not have much to learn from systematic study of the forms and forums of research in which these professional practitioners work? (p. 111) What might happen if English educators took on Stock's charge and began more systematic study of the genre of teacher research?</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>National Council of Teachers of English</pub><doi>10.58680/ee20042814</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-8204
ispartof English education, 2004-07, Vol.36 (4), p.259-262
issn 0007-8204
1943-2216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214372122
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ProQuest One Literature; Education Collection
subjects Beginning teachers
Classrooms
Control Groups
Educational Change
Educational research
Educators
Language arts
Language teachers
Learning
Research studies
School publications
Snakes
Students
Studies
Teacher Researchers
Teachers
Teaching
title Beginning Words: Studying Teacher Research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T07%3A46%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beginning%20Words:%20Studying%20Teacher%20Research&rft.jtitle=English%20education&rft.au=Fleischer,%20Cathy&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=259-262&rft.issn=0007-8204&rft.eissn=1943-2216&rft_id=info:doi/10.58680/ee20042814&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40173166%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c852-12a0118a536e48a33455512772bea6515c869cdbad98f0afe6f2700c3088b2953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214372122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40173166&rfr_iscdi=true