Advancing Psychobiography: Reply to Young and Collins (2018)

In this reply to Young and Collins (2018), the author responds to 3 primary concerns raised about integrating psychobiography into mainstream psychology: appropriate historical context and historiographic research methods, avoiding deterministic conclusions and the role of psychobiography in theory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American psychologist 2018-04, Vol.73 (3), p.288-289
Main Author: Ponterotto, Joseph G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavioral sciences
Biography
Ethics
History
Informed Consent
Morals
Psychological Theories
Psychologists
Psychology
Research Design
Research methodology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-193215cc833ae309e63f6ac7842de862c802b4f2d16f1ca4ab6afe8572434a2f3
cites
container_end_page 289
container_issue 3
container_start_page 288
container_title The American psychologist
container_volume 73
creator Ponterotto, Joseph G.
description In this reply to Young and Collins (2018), the author responds to 3 primary concerns raised about integrating psychobiography into mainstream psychology: appropriate historical context and historiographic research methods, avoiding deterministic conclusions and the role of psychobiography in theory testing, and ethical concerns related to lack of informed consent of the identified subject. The author appreciates the thoughtful comments of Young and Collins and hopes that discussion and debate about psychobiography will continue in the literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/amp0000320
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2118377290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118377290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-193215cc833ae309e63f6ac7842de862c802b4f2d16f1ca4ab6afe8572434a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AFS8MYPqvlqmog3Y_gFA0UU5lVI03Tr6JqatEL_vRmbeue5OZzk4T2HB4BjBK8QJOm1WjUwFMFwBwyRIEksBJztguH6MYaMzQbgwPtlGBMu0D4YYMEo5zQdgttx_qVqXdbz6MX3emGz0s6dahb9TfRqmqqPWht92C78qzqPJraqytpHZxgifn4I9gpVeXO07SPwfn_3NnmMp88PT5PxNFaYoTYOJ2GUaM0JUYZAYRgpmNIppzg3nGHNIc5ogXPECqQVVRlTheFJiimhChdkBE43uY2zn53xrVzaztVhpcQIcZKmWMB_KYgpEowTFKiLDaWd9d6ZQjauXCnXSwTlWqf80xngk21kl61M_ov--AvA5QZQjZJNEKhcW-rKeN05Z-p2HSZTIonEnJNvIHZ8Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024196831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advancing Psychobiography: Reply to Young and Collins (2018)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Ponterotto, Joseph G.</creator><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ponterotto, Joseph G. ; Kazak, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>In this reply to Young and Collins (2018), the author responds to 3 primary concerns raised about integrating psychobiography into mainstream psychology: appropriate historical context and historiographic research methods, avoiding deterministic conclusions and the role of psychobiography in theory testing, and ethical concerns related to lack of informed consent of the identified subject. The author appreciates the thoughtful comments of Young and Collins and hopes that discussion and debate about psychobiography will continue in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29648847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavioral sciences ; Biography ; Ethics ; History ; Informed Consent ; Morals ; Psychological Theories ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Research Design ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2018-04, Vol.73 (3), p.288-289</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-193215cc833ae309e63f6ac7842de862c802b4f2d16f1ca4ab6afe8572434a2f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,31034,33258</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29648847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ponterotto, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><title>Advancing Psychobiography: Reply to Young and Collins (2018)</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>In this reply to Young and Collins (2018), the author responds to 3 primary concerns raised about integrating psychobiography into mainstream psychology: appropriate historical context and historiographic research methods, avoiding deterministic conclusions and the role of psychobiography in theory testing, and ethical concerns related to lack of informed consent of the identified subject. The author appreciates the thoughtful comments of Young and Collins and hopes that discussion and debate about psychobiography will continue in the literature.</description><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Biography</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Psychological Theories</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AFS8MYPqvlqmog3Y_gFA0UU5lVI03Tr6JqatEL_vRmbeue5OZzk4T2HB4BjBK8QJOm1WjUwFMFwBwyRIEksBJztguH6MYaMzQbgwPtlGBMu0D4YYMEo5zQdgttx_qVqXdbz6MX3emGz0s6dahb9TfRqmqqPWht92C78qzqPJraqytpHZxgifn4I9gpVeXO07SPwfn_3NnmMp88PT5PxNFaYoTYOJ2GUaM0JUYZAYRgpmNIppzg3nGHNIc5ogXPECqQVVRlTheFJiimhChdkBE43uY2zn53xrVzaztVhpcQIcZKmWMB_KYgpEowTFKiLDaWd9d6ZQjauXCnXSwTlWqf80xngk21kl61M_ov--AvA5QZQjZJNEKhcW-rKeN05Z-p2HSZTIonEnJNvIHZ8Gg</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Ponterotto, Joseph G.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Advancing Psychobiography: Reply to Young and Collins (2018)</title><author>Ponterotto, Joseph G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-193215cc833ae309e63f6ac7842de862c802b4f2d16f1ca4ab6afe8572434a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Biography</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Psychological Theories</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ponterotto, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ponterotto, Joseph G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advancing Psychobiography: Reply to Young and Collins (2018)</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>288-289</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>In this reply to Young and Collins (2018), the author responds to 3 primary concerns raised about integrating psychobiography into mainstream psychology: appropriate historical context and historiographic research methods, avoiding deterministic conclusions and the role of psychobiography in theory testing, and ethical concerns related to lack of informed consent of the identified subject. The author appreciates the thoughtful comments of Young and Collins and hopes that discussion and debate about psychobiography will continue in the literature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>29648847</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000320</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-066X
ispartof The American psychologist, 2018-04, Vol.73 (3), p.288-289
issn 0003-066X
1935-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2118377290
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycArticles (EBSCO)
subjects Behavioral sciences
Biography
Ethics
History
Informed Consent
Morals
Psychological Theories
Psychologists
Psychology
Research Design
Research methodology
title Advancing Psychobiography: Reply to Young and Collins (2018)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T07%3A46%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advancing%20Psychobiography:%20Reply%20to%20Young%20and%20Collins%20(2018)&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Ponterotto,%20Joseph%20G.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=288-289&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118377290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-193215cc833ae309e63f6ac7842de862c802b4f2d16f1ca4ab6afe8572434a2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024196831&rft_id=info:pmid/29648847&rfr_iscdi=true