Young Children's Disambiguation of Object Name Reference

Children show a disambiguation effect-a tendency to select unfamiliar rather than familiar things as the referents of new names. In previous studies, this effect has been reversed in young 2-year-olds, but not older children, by preexposing the unfamiliar objects, suggesting that attraction to novel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Child development 1991-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1288-1301
Main Authors: Merriman, William E., Schuster, Joneen M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age Differences
Age groups
Attention
Child Behavior
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Cognition & reasoning
Disambiguation Effect
Experimentation
Familiarity
Female
Humans
Language Acquisition
Language Development
Male
Mental Recall
Names
Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Object Naming
Paired-Associate Learning
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Phonetics
Phonology
Pilot Projects
Referents
Semantics
Social research
Spoons
Toddlers
Verbal Learning
Vocabulary
Word sense disambiguation
Word Similarity
Words
Young Children
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e47cce61568b0f2ee9c6eb4d493459b2bc13031661a6f9e8320afb84d72548d73
cites
container_end_page 1301
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1288
container_title Child development
container_volume 62
creator Merriman, William E.
Schuster, Joneen M.
description Children show a disambiguation effect-a tendency to select unfamiliar rather than familiar things as the referents of new names. In previous studies, this effect has been reversed in young 2-year-olds, but not older children, by preexposing the unfamiliar objects, suggesting that attraction to novelty controls 2-year-olds' choices of referents for new names, but a mutual exclusivity and/or lexical gap-filling principle determines preschoolers' selections. Both the disambiguation effect and its reversal by preexposure were replicated in the present study; however, 24-month-olds' rate of selecting unfamiliar over familiar kinds was less when they were simply asked to choose between the items than when they were asked to identify the referents of unfamiliar names. Thus, some young children may have both an attraction to novel tokens and a tendency to honor an abstract lexical principle. Referent selections were also affected by object typicality and word similarity. Correlations between the tendency to acknowledge a new name's unfamiliarity and to treat it like a similar-sounding familiar name suggested that youngsters' phonological matching skills affect their interpretation of new names. Also, 4-year-olds who most often mapped distinctive-sounding new names to unfamiliar kinds tended to admit their unfamiliarity with these names most frequently, suggesting that children's increasing awareness of their own knowledge begins to affect their lexical processing during the preschool years.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1130807
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198682109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ439960</ericid><jstor_id>1130807</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1130807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e47cce61568b0f2ee9c6eb4d493459b2bc13031661a6f9e8320afb84d72548d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRaq3iCygEFbqKzq1zWUqtN4oF0YWrkJmc1IQmaWeShW_vlBRddXU4_B_nP3wInRN8SxmWd4QwrLA8QEPChYyVoPwQDTHGOmaa4mN04n0ZVio0G6ABkUpIIoZIfTVdvYym38Uqc1CPffRQ-LQyxbJL26KpoyaPFqYE20ZvaQXRO-QQOAun6ChPVx7OdnOEPh9nH9PneL54epnez2PLCGlj4NJaEGQilME5BdBWgOEZ14xPtKHGhscZEYKkItegGMVpbhTPJJ1wlUk2Qlf93bVrNh34NimbztWhMiFaCUUJ1gG63gtRLbZqOA7UuKesa7x3kCdrV1Sp-0kITrYWk53FQF7u7nWmguyf67WF_KLPwRX2L529cqa12Bbd9HHp28btbfkFAy583g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296308040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Young Children's Disambiguation of Object Name Reference</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Merriman, William E. ; Schuster, Joneen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Merriman, William E. ; Schuster, Joneen M.</creatorcontrib><description>Children show a disambiguation effect-a tendency to select unfamiliar rather than familiar things as the referents of new names. In previous studies, this effect has been reversed in young 2-year-olds, but not older children, by preexposing the unfamiliar objects, suggesting that attraction to novelty controls 2-year-olds' choices of referents for new names, but a mutual exclusivity and/or lexical gap-filling principle determines preschoolers' selections. Both the disambiguation effect and its reversal by preexposure were replicated in the present study; however, 24-month-olds' rate of selecting unfamiliar over familiar kinds was less when they were simply asked to choose between the items than when they were asked to identify the referents of unfamiliar names. Thus, some young children may have both an attraction to novel tokens and a tendency to honor an abstract lexical principle. Referent selections were also affected by object typicality and word similarity. Correlations between the tendency to acknowledge a new name's unfamiliarity and to treat it like a similar-sounding familiar name suggested that youngsters' phonological matching skills affect their interpretation of new names. Also, 4-year-olds who most often mapped distinctive-sounding new names to unfamiliar kinds tended to admit their unfamiliarity with these names most frequently, suggesting that children's increasing awareness of their own knowledge begins to affect their lexical processing during the preschool years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1130807</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1786716</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHDEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Age groups ; Attention ; Child Behavior ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Disambiguation Effect ; Experimentation ; Familiarity ; Female ; Humans ; Language Acquisition ; Language Development ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Names ; Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) ; Object Naming ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Pilot Projects ; Referents ; Semantics ; Social research ; Spoons ; Toddlers ; Verbal Learning ; Vocabulary ; Word sense disambiguation ; Word Similarity ; Words ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child development, 1991-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1288-1301</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Dec 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e47cce61568b0f2ee9c6eb4d493459b2bc13031661a6f9e8320afb84d72548d73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1130807$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1130807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,31034,33258,58593,58826</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ439960$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1786716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merriman, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Joneen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Young Children's Disambiguation of Object Name Reference</title><title>Child development</title><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><description>Children show a disambiguation effect-a tendency to select unfamiliar rather than familiar things as the referents of new names. In previous studies, this effect has been reversed in young 2-year-olds, but not older children, by preexposing the unfamiliar objects, suggesting that attraction to novelty controls 2-year-olds' choices of referents for new names, but a mutual exclusivity and/or lexical gap-filling principle determines preschoolers' selections. Both the disambiguation effect and its reversal by preexposure were replicated in the present study; however, 24-month-olds' rate of selecting unfamiliar over familiar kinds was less when they were simply asked to choose between the items than when they were asked to identify the referents of unfamiliar names. Thus, some young children may have both an attraction to novel tokens and a tendency to honor an abstract lexical principle. Referent selections were also affected by object typicality and word similarity. Correlations between the tendency to acknowledge a new name's unfamiliarity and to treat it like a similar-sounding familiar name suggested that youngsters' phonological matching skills affect their interpretation of new names. Also, 4-year-olds who most often mapped distinctive-sounding new names to unfamiliar kinds tended to admit their unfamiliarity with these names most frequently, suggesting that children's increasing awareness of their own knowledge begins to affect their lexical processing during the preschool years.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Disambiguation Effect</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Names</subject><subject>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</subject><subject>Object Naming</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Referents</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Spoons</subject><subject>Toddlers</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word sense disambiguation</subject><subject>Word Similarity</subject><subject>Words</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRaq3iCygEFbqKzq1zWUqtN4oF0YWrkJmc1IQmaWeShW_vlBRddXU4_B_nP3wInRN8SxmWd4QwrLA8QEPChYyVoPwQDTHGOmaa4mN04n0ZVio0G6ABkUpIIoZIfTVdvYym38Uqc1CPffRQ-LQyxbJL26KpoyaPFqYE20ZvaQXRO-QQOAun6ChPVx7OdnOEPh9nH9PneL54epnez2PLCGlj4NJaEGQilME5BdBWgOEZ14xPtKHGhscZEYKkItegGMVpbhTPJJ1wlUk2Qlf93bVrNh34NimbztWhMiFaCUUJ1gG63gtRLbZqOA7UuKesa7x3kCdrV1Sp-0kITrYWk53FQF7u7nWmguyf67WF_KLPwRX2L529cqa12Bbd9HHp28btbfkFAy583g</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Merriman, William E.</creator><creator>Schuster, Joneen M.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development, etc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>Young Children's Disambiguation of Object Name Reference</title><author>Merriman, William E. ; Schuster, Joneen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e47cce61568b0f2ee9c6eb4d493459b2bc13031661a6f9e8320afb84d72548d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Disambiguation Effect</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Names</topic><topic>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</topic><topic>Object Naming</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Referents</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Spoons</topic><topic>Toddlers</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word sense disambiguation</topic><topic>Word Similarity</topic><topic>Words</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merriman, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Joneen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merriman, William E.</au><au>Schuster, Joneen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ439960</ericid><atitle>Young Children's Disambiguation of Object Name Reference</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1288</spage><epage>1301</epage><pages>1288-1301</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><coden>CHDEAW</coden><abstract>Children show a disambiguation effect-a tendency to select unfamiliar rather than familiar things as the referents of new names. In previous studies, this effect has been reversed in young 2-year-olds, but not older children, by preexposing the unfamiliar objects, suggesting that attraction to novelty controls 2-year-olds' choices of referents for new names, but a mutual exclusivity and/or lexical gap-filling principle determines preschoolers' selections. Both the disambiguation effect and its reversal by preexposure were replicated in the present study; however, 24-month-olds' rate of selecting unfamiliar over familiar kinds was less when they were simply asked to choose between the items than when they were asked to identify the referents of unfamiliar names. Thus, some young children may have both an attraction to novel tokens and a tendency to honor an abstract lexical principle. Referent selections were also affected by object typicality and word similarity. Correlations between the tendency to acknowledge a new name's unfamiliarity and to treat it like a similar-sounding familiar name suggested that youngsters' phonological matching skills affect their interpretation of new names. Also, 4-year-olds who most often mapped distinctive-sounding new names to unfamiliar kinds tended to admit their unfamiliarity with these names most frequently, suggesting that children's increasing awareness of their own knowledge begins to affect their lexical processing during the preschool years.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>1786716</pmid><doi>10.2307/1130807</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-3920
ispartof Child development, 1991-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1288-1301
issn 0009-3920
1467-8624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198682109
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ERIC; JSTOR
subjects Age Differences
Age groups
Attention
Child Behavior
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Cognition & reasoning
Disambiguation Effect
Experimentation
Familiarity
Female
Humans
Language Acquisition
Language Development
Male
Mental Recall
Names
Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Object Naming
Paired-Associate Learning
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Phonetics
Phonology
Pilot Projects
Referents
Semantics
Social research
Spoons
Toddlers
Verbal Learning
Vocabulary
Word sense disambiguation
Word Similarity
Words
Young Children
title Young Children's Disambiguation of Object Name Reference
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T14%3A24%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Young%20Children's%20Disambiguation%20of%20Object%20Name%20Reference&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Merriman,%20William%20E.&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1288&rft.epage=1301&rft.pages=1288-1301&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft.coden=CHDEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1130807&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1130807%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e47cce61568b0f2ee9c6eb4d493459b2bc13031661a6f9e8320afb84d72548d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296308040&rft_id=info:pmid/1786716&rft_ericid=EJ439960&rft_jstor_id=1130807&rfr_iscdi=true