A Comparison of Unidimensional and Three-Dimensional Differential Item Functioning Analysis Using Two-Dimensional Data

Oshima, Raju, and Flowers demonstrated the use of an item response theory—based technique for analyzing differential item function (DIF) and differential test function for dichotomously scored data that are intended to be multidimensional. Their study assumed that the number of intended-to-be measur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational and psychological measurement 2009-10, Vol.69 (5), p.732-747
Main Authors: Snow, Teresa K., Oshima, T.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Item Response Theory
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology
Statistics. Mathematics
Test Bias
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Oshima, Raju, and Flowers demonstrated the use of an item response theory—based technique for analyzing differential item function (DIF) and differential test function for dichotomously scored data that are intended to be multidimensional. Their study assumed that the number of intended-to-be measured dimensions was correctly identified. In practice, however, the number of dimensions may be misidentified. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effects of both underestimation and overestimation of the number of intended-to-be measured dimensions on the multidimensional DIF analysis using simulated two-dimensional data with known DIF items. Results show that overestimation of the number of y traits had a consequence of decreased power. Underestimation resulted in missing a certain type of nonuniform DIF, as well as confounding the impact with DIF. Recommendations are made on how to conduct a DIF investigation with a multidimensional within-item test.
ISSN:0013-1644
1552-3888
DOI:10.1177/0013164409332223