Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China

Dinitroaniline and amide herbicides have been continually applied in garlic in China, leading to the change of weed community and dominant weed species. Catchweed bedstraw, shepherd's-purse, and flixweed have become major troublesome weeds. Crop safety of fluorochloridone to 18 crops (at rates...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 2014-12, Vol.28 (4), p.721-728
Main Authors: Cong, Cong, Wang, Zhaozhen, Li, Rongrong, Li, Lingxu, Bu, Dongxin, Wang, Jinxin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural production
Chlorophyll
Cotton
Crop rotation
Crop science
Crops
Experiments
Garlic
Greenhouse
Herbicides
Intercropping
Plants
POST application
Potatoes
PRE application
rate-response
Seeds
Weed control
Weeds
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483
container_end_page 728
container_issue 4
container_start_page 721
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 28
creator Cong, Cong
Wang, Zhaozhen
Li, Rongrong
Li, Lingxu
Bu, Dongxin
Wang, Jinxin
description Dinitroaniline and amide herbicides have been continually applied in garlic in China, leading to the change of weed community and dominant weed species. Catchweed bedstraw, shepherd's-purse, and flixweed have become major troublesome weeds. Crop safety of fluorochloridone to 18 crops (at rates of 500 and 1,000 g ai ha−1) and weed efficacy against 35 weeds (at rates of 125 and 250 g ha−1) were determined in greenhouse studies. Visual estimate indicated that fluorochloridone was not safe to many crops, especially cruciferous crops. Among all of the trial crops, garlic was the only crop which was not injured in both PRE and POST application at rate of 500 g ha−1, even when treated with 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone showed high efficacy against most weeds tested in this experiment when applied PRE, but could not offer a satisfactory control when applied POST. Further rate-response study of fluorochloridone to garlic and six weeds was also investigated. PRE application of fluorochloridone to garlic was safer than POST, and the rates for 10% growth reductions (GR10s) were 1,959 g ha−1 for PRE and 537 g ha−1 for POST. When applied PRE, GR90s of shepherd's-purse and flixweed were 19.2 and 70.3 g ha−1, respectively. Though GR90 of catchweed bedstraw was 541 g ha−1, it could be totally controlled without injuring garlic. On the basis of these results, fluorochloridone has an excellent prospect for weed control in garlic fields. Nomenclature: Fluorochloridone; catchweed bedstraw, Galium aparine L.; flixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. Ex Prantl; shepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik; garlic, Allium sativum L. Los herbicidas dinitrioaniline y amide han sido aplicados continuamente en ajo en China, lo que ha llevado a cambios en la comunidad de malezas y las especies de malezas dominantes. Galium aparine, Capsella bursa-pastoris y Descurainia sophia se han convertido en las mayores malezas problemáticas. En estudios de invernadero, se determinó la seguridad para 18 cultivos de fluorochloridone (a dosis de 500 y 1,000 g ai ha−1) y su eficacia para el control de 35 especies de malezas (a dosis de 125 y 250 g ha−1). Estimados visuales indicaron que fluorochloridone no fue seguro en muchos cultivos, especialmente especies crucíferas. Entre todos los cultivos del estudio, el ajo fue el único cultivo que no fue dañado en aplicaciones PRE y POST con la dosis de 500 g ha−1, e inclusive cuando se trató con 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone mostró alta eficacia d
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT-D-13-00155.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1644455187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43702292</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43702292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXroQB19POO8lSYmuFgosW6m6YJ02JmTpJhP57UyNuXZ0L57vncg8A9wTPiCR8vtuiZ0QYwpgIMSMXYDIoRjTj-BJMcF5ghFn2fg1u2vYwQJJSPAGrxZeue91VsYExwJ33Di5CqKy2J6gbB8sUj3Cjg-9OZ2BZ9zFFu69jqlxsPKwaWO6rRt-Cq6Dr1t_96hRslottuULrt5fX8mmNDKNFh4yUrDCGO0s8ZoK7IJw0OLeBmMJwmjGa6cCNcDoIybXXhlrBbEEF4zmbgscx9ZjiZ-_bTh1in5rhoCKScy4EybOBmo-UTbFtkw_qmKoPnU6KYHUuS-226lkRpn7KGoYpeBg3Dm0X0x_OWYYpLejgo9E3VRy-_jfvG-HRc-k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1644455187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Cong, Cong ; Wang, Zhaozhen ; Li, Rongrong ; Li, Lingxu ; Bu, Dongxin ; Wang, Jinxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cong, Cong ; Wang, Zhaozhen ; Li, Rongrong ; Li, Lingxu ; Bu, Dongxin ; Wang, Jinxin</creatorcontrib><description>Dinitroaniline and amide herbicides have been continually applied in garlic in China, leading to the change of weed community and dominant weed species. Catchweed bedstraw, shepherd's-purse, and flixweed have become major troublesome weeds. Crop safety of fluorochloridone to 18 crops (at rates of 500 and 1,000 g ai ha−1) and weed efficacy against 35 weeds (at rates of 125 and 250 g ha−1) were determined in greenhouse studies. Visual estimate indicated that fluorochloridone was not safe to many crops, especially cruciferous crops. Among all of the trial crops, garlic was the only crop which was not injured in both PRE and POST application at rate of 500 g ha−1, even when treated with 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone showed high efficacy against most weeds tested in this experiment when applied PRE, but could not offer a satisfactory control when applied POST. Further rate-response study of fluorochloridone to garlic and six weeds was also investigated. PRE application of fluorochloridone to garlic was safer than POST, and the rates for 10% growth reductions (GR10s) were 1,959 g ha−1 for PRE and 537 g ha−1 for POST. When applied PRE, GR90s of shepherd's-purse and flixweed were 19.2 and 70.3 g ha−1, respectively. Though GR90 of catchweed bedstraw was 541 g ha−1, it could be totally controlled without injuring garlic. On the basis of these results, fluorochloridone has an excellent prospect for weed control in garlic fields. Nomenclature: Fluorochloridone; catchweed bedstraw, Galium aparine L.; flixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. Ex Prantl; shepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik; garlic, Allium sativum L. Los herbicidas dinitrioaniline y amide han sido aplicados continuamente en ajo en China, lo que ha llevado a cambios en la comunidad de malezas y las especies de malezas dominantes. Galium aparine, Capsella bursa-pastoris y Descurainia sophia se han convertido en las mayores malezas problemáticas. En estudios de invernadero, se determinó la seguridad para 18 cultivos de fluorochloridone (a dosis de 500 y 1,000 g ai ha−1) y su eficacia para el control de 35 especies de malezas (a dosis de 125 y 250 g ha−1). Estimados visuales indicaron que fluorochloridone no fue seguro en muchos cultivos, especialmente especies crucíferas. Entre todos los cultivos del estudio, el ajo fue el único cultivo que no fue dañado en aplicaciones PRE y POST con la dosis de 500 g ha−1, e inclusive cuando se trató con 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone mostró alta eficacia de control en la mayoría de las malezas evaluadas en este experimento cuando se aplicó PRE, pero no pudo ofrecer un control satisfactorio cuando se aplicó POST. También se investigó la respuesta a dosis de fluorochloridone de ajo y seis malezas. La aplicación PRE de fluorochloridone a ajo fue más segura que la POST, y las dosis que causaron reducciones del crecimiento de 10% (GR10s) fueron 1,959 g ha−1 para PRE y 537 g ha−1 para POST. Cuando se aplicó PRE, GR90s de C. bursa-pastoris y D. sophia fueron 19.2 y 70.3 g ha−1, respectivamente. Aunque GR90 para G. aparine fue 541 g ha−1, esta maleza se puedo controlar totalmente sin dañar al ajo. Con base en estos resultados, fluorochloridone tiene un excelente potencial para el control de malezas en campos de ajo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-13-00155.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Chlorophyll ; Cotton ; Crop rotation ; Crop science ; Crops ; Experiments ; Garlic ; Greenhouse ; Herbicides ; Intercropping ; Plants ; POST application ; Potatoes ; PRE application ; rate-response ; Seeds ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2014-12, Vol.28 (4), p.721-728</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Oct-Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43702292$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43702292$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,58593,58826</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cong, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhaozhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rongrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lingxu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bu, Dongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jinxin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Dinitroaniline and amide herbicides have been continually applied in garlic in China, leading to the change of weed community and dominant weed species. Catchweed bedstraw, shepherd's-purse, and flixweed have become major troublesome weeds. Crop safety of fluorochloridone to 18 crops (at rates of 500 and 1,000 g ai ha−1) and weed efficacy against 35 weeds (at rates of 125 and 250 g ha−1) were determined in greenhouse studies. Visual estimate indicated that fluorochloridone was not safe to many crops, especially cruciferous crops. Among all of the trial crops, garlic was the only crop which was not injured in both PRE and POST application at rate of 500 g ha−1, even when treated with 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone showed high efficacy against most weeds tested in this experiment when applied PRE, but could not offer a satisfactory control when applied POST. Further rate-response study of fluorochloridone to garlic and six weeds was also investigated. PRE application of fluorochloridone to garlic was safer than POST, and the rates for 10% growth reductions (GR10s) were 1,959 g ha−1 for PRE and 537 g ha−1 for POST. When applied PRE, GR90s of shepherd's-purse and flixweed were 19.2 and 70.3 g ha−1, respectively. Though GR90 of catchweed bedstraw was 541 g ha−1, it could be totally controlled without injuring garlic. On the basis of these results, fluorochloridone has an excellent prospect for weed control in garlic fields. Nomenclature: Fluorochloridone; catchweed bedstraw, Galium aparine L.; flixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. Ex Prantl; shepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik; garlic, Allium sativum L. Los herbicidas dinitrioaniline y amide han sido aplicados continuamente en ajo en China, lo que ha llevado a cambios en la comunidad de malezas y las especies de malezas dominantes. Galium aparine, Capsella bursa-pastoris y Descurainia sophia se han convertido en las mayores malezas problemáticas. En estudios de invernadero, se determinó la seguridad para 18 cultivos de fluorochloridone (a dosis de 500 y 1,000 g ai ha−1) y su eficacia para el control de 35 especies de malezas (a dosis de 125 y 250 g ha−1). Estimados visuales indicaron que fluorochloridone no fue seguro en muchos cultivos, especialmente especies crucíferas. Entre todos los cultivos del estudio, el ajo fue el único cultivo que no fue dañado en aplicaciones PRE y POST con la dosis de 500 g ha−1, e inclusive cuando se trató con 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone mostró alta eficacia de control en la mayoría de las malezas evaluadas en este experimento cuando se aplicó PRE, pero no pudo ofrecer un control satisfactorio cuando se aplicó POST. También se investigó la respuesta a dosis de fluorochloridone de ajo y seis malezas. La aplicación PRE de fluorochloridone a ajo fue más segura que la POST, y las dosis que causaron reducciones del crecimiento de 10% (GR10s) fueron 1,959 g ha−1 para PRE y 537 g ha−1 para POST. Cuando se aplicó PRE, GR90s de C. bursa-pastoris y D. sophia fueron 19.2 y 70.3 g ha−1, respectivamente. Aunque GR90 para G. aparine fue 541 g ha−1, esta maleza se puedo controlar totalmente sin dañar al ajo. Con base en estos resultados, fluorochloridone tiene un excelente potencial para el control de malezas en campos de ajo.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Garlic</subject><subject>Greenhouse</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Intercropping</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>POST application</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>PRE application</subject><subject>rate-response</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXroQB19POO8lSYmuFgosW6m6YJ02JmTpJhP57UyNuXZ0L57vncg8A9wTPiCR8vtuiZ0QYwpgIMSMXYDIoRjTj-BJMcF5ghFn2fg1u2vYwQJJSPAGrxZeue91VsYExwJ33Di5CqKy2J6gbB8sUj3Cjg-9OZ2BZ9zFFu69jqlxsPKwaWO6rRt-Cq6Dr1t_96hRslottuULrt5fX8mmNDKNFh4yUrDCGO0s8ZoK7IJw0OLeBmMJwmjGa6cCNcDoIybXXhlrBbEEF4zmbgscx9ZjiZ-_bTh1in5rhoCKScy4EybOBmo-UTbFtkw_qmKoPnU6KYHUuS-226lkRpn7KGoYpeBg3Dm0X0x_OWYYpLejgo9E3VRy-_jfvG-HRc-k</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Cong, Cong</creator><creator>Wang, Zhaozhen</creator><creator>Li, Rongrong</creator><creator>Li, Lingxu</creator><creator>Bu, Dongxin</creator><creator>Wang, Jinxin</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China</title><author>Cong, Cong ; Wang, Zhaozhen ; Li, Rongrong ; Li, Lingxu ; Bu, Dongxin ; Wang, Jinxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Garlic</topic><topic>Greenhouse</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Intercropping</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>POST application</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>PRE application</topic><topic>rate-response</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cong, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhaozhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rongrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lingxu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bu, Dongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jinxin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cong, Cong</au><au>Wang, Zhaozhen</au><au>Li, Rongrong</au><au>Li, Lingxu</au><au>Bu, Dongxin</au><au>Wang, Jinxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>728</epage><pages>721-728</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Dinitroaniline and amide herbicides have been continually applied in garlic in China, leading to the change of weed community and dominant weed species. Catchweed bedstraw, shepherd's-purse, and flixweed have become major troublesome weeds. Crop safety of fluorochloridone to 18 crops (at rates of 500 and 1,000 g ai ha−1) and weed efficacy against 35 weeds (at rates of 125 and 250 g ha−1) were determined in greenhouse studies. Visual estimate indicated that fluorochloridone was not safe to many crops, especially cruciferous crops. Among all of the trial crops, garlic was the only crop which was not injured in both PRE and POST application at rate of 500 g ha−1, even when treated with 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone showed high efficacy against most weeds tested in this experiment when applied PRE, but could not offer a satisfactory control when applied POST. Further rate-response study of fluorochloridone to garlic and six weeds was also investigated. PRE application of fluorochloridone to garlic was safer than POST, and the rates for 10% growth reductions (GR10s) were 1,959 g ha−1 for PRE and 537 g ha−1 for POST. When applied PRE, GR90s of shepherd's-purse and flixweed were 19.2 and 70.3 g ha−1, respectively. Though GR90 of catchweed bedstraw was 541 g ha−1, it could be totally controlled without injuring garlic. On the basis of these results, fluorochloridone has an excellent prospect for weed control in garlic fields. Nomenclature: Fluorochloridone; catchweed bedstraw, Galium aparine L.; flixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. Ex Prantl; shepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik; garlic, Allium sativum L. Los herbicidas dinitrioaniline y amide han sido aplicados continuamente en ajo en China, lo que ha llevado a cambios en la comunidad de malezas y las especies de malezas dominantes. Galium aparine, Capsella bursa-pastoris y Descurainia sophia se han convertido en las mayores malezas problemáticas. En estudios de invernadero, se determinó la seguridad para 18 cultivos de fluorochloridone (a dosis de 500 y 1,000 g ai ha−1) y su eficacia para el control de 35 especies de malezas (a dosis de 125 y 250 g ha−1). Estimados visuales indicaron que fluorochloridone no fue seguro en muchos cultivos, especialmente especies crucíferas. Entre todos los cultivos del estudio, el ajo fue el único cultivo que no fue dañado en aplicaciones PRE y POST con la dosis de 500 g ha−1, e inclusive cuando se trató con 1,000 g ha−1. Fluorochloridone mostró alta eficacia de control en la mayoría de las malezas evaluadas en este experimento cuando se aplicó PRE, pero no pudo ofrecer un control satisfactorio cuando se aplicó POST. También se investigó la respuesta a dosis de fluorochloridone de ajo y seis malezas. La aplicación PRE de fluorochloridone a ajo fue más segura que la POST, y las dosis que causaron reducciones del crecimiento de 10% (GR10s) fueron 1,959 g ha−1 para PRE y 537 g ha−1 para POST. Cuando se aplicó PRE, GR90s de C. bursa-pastoris y D. sophia fueron 19.2 y 70.3 g ha−1, respectivamente. Aunque GR90 para G. aparine fue 541 g ha−1, esta maleza se puedo controlar totalmente sin dañar al ajo. Con base en estos resultados, fluorochloridone tiene un excelente potencial para el control de malezas en campos de ajo.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-D-13-00155.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2014-12, Vol.28 (4), p.721-728
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1644455187
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Cambridge University Press
subjects Agricultural production
Chlorophyll
Cotton
Crop rotation
Crop science
Crops
Experiments
Garlic
Greenhouse
Herbicides
Intercropping
Plants
POST application
Potatoes
PRE application
rate-response
Seeds
Weed control
Weeds
title Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T07%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Weed%20Efficacy%20and%20Crop%20Safety%20of%20Fluorochloridone%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Cong,%20Cong&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=728&rft.pages=721-728&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-D-13-00155.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43702292%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-b6639bb4dc1e0354df5d6b08cf1b9b427327af4b5daf564aeab2c53c9253483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1644455187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43702292&rfr_iscdi=true