Causation and Responsibility: A New Direction

In "Property, Causality, and Liability" and "Causation and Aggression," Hans-Hermann Hoppe and Stephan Kinsella & Patrick Tinsley, respectively, argue against the Rothbardian position on criminal liability, especially with regard to the issue of incitement. This essay takes a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Libertarian papers 2009-04, Vol.1 (24)
Main Author: Mortellaro, Matt
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Causality
Entrapment
Jurisprudence
Liability
Libertarianism
Natural law
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page
container_title Libertarian papers
container_volume 1
creator Mortellaro, Matt
description In "Property, Causality, and Liability" and "Causation and Aggression," Hans-Hermann Hoppe and Stephan Kinsella & Patrick Tinsley, respectively, argue against the Rothbardian position on criminal liability, especially with regard to the issue of incitement. This essay takes a critical look at the suggested approaches of both and attempts to defend the Rothbardian position on incitement from their criticisms. Further, this essay examines the views of Walter Block on incitement and attempts to correct inconsistencies in his position with regard to murder contracts and threats.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1221460705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2831150951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_12214607053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1zWzNLHkYOAqLs4yMDAzM7c04WTQdU4sLU4syczPU0jMS1EISi0uyM8rzkzKzMksqbRScFTwSy1XcMksSk0GqeFhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXhDIyNDEzMDcwNTY-JUAQBJYzER</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221460705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Causation and Responsibility: A New Direction</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Mortellaro, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Mortellaro, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>In "Property, Causality, and Liability" and "Causation and Aggression," Hans-Hermann Hoppe and Stephan Kinsella &amp; Patrick Tinsley, respectively, argue against the Rothbardian position on criminal liability, especially with regard to the issue of incitement. This essay takes a critical look at the suggested approaches of both and attempts to defend the Rothbardian position on incitement from their criticisms. Further, this essay examines the views of Walter Block on incitement and attempts to correct inconsistencies in his position with regard to murder contracts and threats.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1947-6949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auburn: Stephan Kinsella</publisher><subject>Causality ; Entrapment ; Jurisprudence ; Liability ; Libertarianism ; Natural law</subject><ispartof>Libertarian papers, 2009-04, Vol.1 (24)</ispartof><rights>Copyright Stephan Kinsella Apr 28, 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1221460705?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,21415,21422,25783,33646,34020,37047,43768,43983,44625</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mortellaro, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Causation and Responsibility: A New Direction</title><title>Libertarian papers</title><description>In "Property, Causality, and Liability" and "Causation and Aggression," Hans-Hermann Hoppe and Stephan Kinsella &amp; Patrick Tinsley, respectively, argue against the Rothbardian position on criminal liability, especially with regard to the issue of incitement. This essay takes a critical look at the suggested approaches of both and attempts to defend the Rothbardian position on incitement from their criticisms. Further, this essay examines the views of Walter Block on incitement and attempts to correct inconsistencies in his position with regard to murder contracts and threats.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Entrapment</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Libertarianism</subject><subject>Natural law</subject><issn>1947-6949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1zWzNLHkYOAqLs4yMDAzM7c04WTQdU4sLU4syczPU0jMS1EISi0uyM8rzkzKzMksqbRScFTwSy1XcMksSk0GqeFhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXhDIyNDEzMDcwNTY-JUAQBJYzER</recordid><startdate>20090428</startdate><enddate>20090428</enddate><creator>Mortellaro, Matt</creator><general>Stephan Kinsella</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090428</creationdate><title>Causation and Responsibility: A New Direction</title><author>Mortellaro, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_12214607053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Entrapment</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Libertarianism</topic><topic>Natural law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mortellaro, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Libertarian papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mortellaro, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Causation and Responsibility: A New Direction</atitle><jtitle>Libertarian papers</jtitle><date>2009-04-28</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>24</issue><eissn>1947-6949</eissn><abstract>In "Property, Causality, and Liability" and "Causation and Aggression," Hans-Hermann Hoppe and Stephan Kinsella &amp; Patrick Tinsley, respectively, argue against the Rothbardian position on criminal liability, especially with regard to the issue of incitement. This essay takes a critical look at the suggested approaches of both and attempts to defend the Rothbardian position on incitement from their criticisms. Further, this essay examines the views of Walter Block on incitement and attempts to correct inconsistencies in his position with regard to murder contracts and threats.</abstract><cop>Auburn</cop><pub>Stephan Kinsella</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1947-6949
ispartof Libertarian papers, 2009-04, Vol.1 (24)
issn 1947-6949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1221460705
source Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Causality
Entrapment
Jurisprudence
Liability
Libertarianism
Natural law
title Causation and Responsibility: A New Direction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-26T23%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Causation%20and%20Responsibility:%20A%20New%20Direction&rft.jtitle=Libertarian%20papers&rft.au=Mortellaro,%20Matt&rft.date=2009-04-28&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=24&rft.eissn=1947-6949&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2831150951%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_12214607053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221460705&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true